Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Rank #24558 on Comments
Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Send mail to jarhedz
Invite jarhedz to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Content Level Progress:
Level 131 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress:
Level 277 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 278 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
What people say about jarhedz
they found them all
and it sold 6 million copies in...
gandalf is a troll
The elder wand
RANDOM GIF DUMP
how to avoid cops
when I look through my facebook...
Man this webm...
Okuyasu has an idea
DnD loading screens
why is this a thing?
Fix your damn shoes
latest user's comments
- triple parentheses=Jews
3h ago on
don't give in, have children
- how the **** do I use this
i think ive seen it all
it's chinese, and seems to require an account for some actions. you could just search her name (or i guess 孟衍竹 is her name at least) and hope that the images are of her, since i can't really tell, as they all look alike to me. also, if you're searching for porn purposes, i'd suggest yandex or duckduckgo, as google images filter explicit results unless some explicit-related term is added (but that's assuming she has nudes, and you can identify her in particular). if you honestly just want to know how to use that site? it appears you can make an account here: weibo.com/signup/signup.php but beyond that, i don't know since i'm not going to do so myself
yep thats her name, but i doubt she has nudes
Ears, Eyebrows, Nose -> Eyebrows look very similar, I'd say it's her
i meant if you image search her name. you know, how sometimes image search results aren't of the thing you searched for. i did a decent amount of checking to be confident i was linking the profile of the right girl.
True, I didn't really read because frazzled but nice work my dude, I feel like she's posted around FJ a lot but I've not seen anything more than modelling stuff to my memory.
孟衍竹 being her I mean
- The **** you talkin about? 4 your eyes only was super dull, so…
Kilsunt Beprenis Bonaksi
I liked 2014 Forest Hill Drive and Revenge of the Dreamers II a lot, and before that Born Sinner was one of my favorite albums of the last ten years. I agree with you that 4 your eyes only was disappointing but it wasn't so bad that it tainted my opinion of his body of work.
Those other guys you listed are good artists, but outside of Kendrick and Tribe, they don't do it for me. This isn't to say they're bums, they're good artists, but I'm just not big on their music. This entire conversation is subjective, but if all these albums sold in numbers and received accolades, I'm kinda wrong about my assessment - or at least in the minority opinion.
he's faker than splenda in instant tea
- No one ******* said it would be stronger than a .50 cal, don't…
nature is magical
5.56 NATO will punch through 1/4" steel plate at 100 yards, and it is on the light side of rifle calibers. Show me the eagle that does that.
The thing is the entire mass of the eagle isn't transferred as it strikes. Wings flare, it sheds speed rapidly and extends its talons to grasp prey. PSI values might put it close to a .22lr
And let's just argue semantics for a bit, just because we can.
The claim says "...
be 2x more powerful than a rifle round."
This has the direct implication that it is more powerful than certain rifles, purely because it uses the word "can".
Yea, and a .22 is a third of an eagle. Really it's just a ridiculous thing to say at all rifles are so varied in terms of power. I'm not familiar enough with rifle ammo to deduct what the proper rounds would be to compare to an eagle
A .22LR (longrifle) is about as small as they come, 5.56x45 is the standard NATO rifle round found in the M16 for example, and a .50bmg is about as big as they come (before anti-tank rifle rounds)
The most powerful .22 long rifle bullet is well under a tenth of the supposed eagle's power at 259 J. It's an absolutely true and impressive claim to make, as long as no one knows the statistics behind it.
Hell, most humans could punch with more power than a .22. Why do we have .22?
Because a .22LR can still penetrate things and is still very good for rabbits squirrels and just target shooting. And with good shot placement, it can be lethal for humans.
Its not about the impact energy, its about the velocity.
Really, it's about impact energy and surface area, aka "Pressure"
Impact energy is mostly dependant on velocity so they should both be fine for estimating damage. Pressure is also something that should be taken in account
I used a fucked up estimation from 40mins ago and got them confused, yea you're right.
- As far as I can gather from Facebook Beyonce recently dropped …
- Eh, its pretty well written, and not inconsistent with anythin…
SJW Comp: this is my...
- If I had to take a wild guess, it was probably Batman
Suicide Squad Trailer 2
- How the **** you gonna get those all in the same deck? Portal …
Get in Here
- Comment deleted
Me vs Feminism (What do?)
- I just assumed it was Vader's from Return of the Jedi wi…
They've Done it Again
No, it's the one Anikin had in Revenge of the Sith. Basically, Anikin's blue lightsaber, which Obi Wan gave to Luke in A New Hope.
Show Comments (31)