Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Rank #1363 on Comments
Level 345 Comments: Sold Soul
Send mail to deescalation
Invite deescalation to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Highest Content Rank:
Highest Comment Rank:
Content Level Progress:
Level 215 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress:
Level 345 Comments: Sold Soul → Level 346 Comments: Sold Soul
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
fairy tail (12)
katawa shoujo (4)
Fate Zero (2)
its not my fault (2)
What people say about deescalation
latest user's comments
- you can undo more than one nut at a time after you untorque them
How to protect your vodka...
- thumbing down because of that image you rolled, Froppy is stil…
thumbing down cause you thumbed down
- this movie came on comedy central one day when I was home sick…
- I ******* hate censorship in video games that have you murder …
Played like a fiddle
Same with movies and their ratings.
You can shoot someone point blank in the face, but god help you if you say fuck in a sexual sense
i always say it on topics like this
video game is fictional - but people who are playing it aren't
gonna be the devil's advocate here
the game has its narrative, you can shoot people in some of them, sure, but it's still work of fiction, and part of things you do in them are just there for artistic integrity;
for instance, you won't be hearing Hitler's speech in a WW II game because the developers support Hitler, but because it's historically accurate
but people, on the other hand, are real, and are calling other just as real people faggots
this is nothing but a personal attack, and the only thing it does is spoil the atmosphere and make the gaming experience worse
some server owners set up a strict "no swearing" rule and it's their damndest right to do so - if you've ever played a multiplayer game you know very well how toxic things can get, so you also know this has a very solid justification
>le toxicity meme
you see, this is why no one takes political correctness seriously. If you get your panties in a bunch over someone's choice of words, you can always mute and/or block the offending player.
Rules are there to prevent people from disrupting or breaking the game, not to be a convenient excuse to set up an echo chamber. Though if you go out of your way to BM, you deserve what you get.
????? I just dont want 12 year olds to flame me in chat for 15 minutes after I pick out thier backwards wall into their loot room because they are fucking shit
If they get kicked when theey call me a faggot, good
Keep that chat clear of babyrage
lol get gud faggot
alright, murder and physical harm is bad, sure, but rape and verbal abuse is phsycological harm, and that stuff is far more difficult to recover from. check for facts you piece of shit, that's why verbal insults, which have a real world effect on the bullied, are banned online, even in violent games
i see what you're trying to say, but i'm pretty sure it's much harder to recover from murder than it is from psychological abuse
It's someone's server, they can ban people if they want to.
If you own something, and want to keep it friendlier for people who aren't degenerates like us, you do shit like this to keep people from being cunts.
I'm at the point that I ALMOST don't want private companys having this right anymore. That companys can't legally censor anything, anymore. Like youtube or facebook. The first amendment is the first. I don't even believe in bad language. it's air vibrations and who hundreds or thousands of years ago deemed a certain word bad. But that's me.
It's conflicting, it's a private business, but I'm also sick and tired of everything getting censored.
I guess using your logic. That's a private prison, they'll keep them locked up getting raped if they want to!
What even is this argument ? they can do whatever they want, if they want to.
Rape is illegal. Kicking somebody off a rust server is not.
Are you retarded? That analogy isn't even CLOSE to functional.
Oh it is, then why the fuck does it still happen, huh? I guess they still do it because they want to. Are you retarded? I'll assume so since that isn't even what I said. Didn't address my point, but instead fixated on a half jokingly thing I said that does happen in prison. Almost like I said rape is legal.
My analogy was using an extreme, that pissing off a private prison they'll keep you in their longer, because they want to. Rape had nothing to do with that point. I don't even understand your perception of what I wrote, it wasn't worded the way your implying. That rape was the front of my argument, that's literally all you picked up on. But I agree, it's not a functional analogy. Almost like I never said that, what's English? What are you thinking I said? Rape is legal? Rape get's you more time? Rape get's you kicked off a server? Rape makes you lose free speech? No matter what way I brake that down. I can't find a functional rebuttal to what I said. It's almost a strawman.
Rape doesn't happen nearly as much as you'd think it does, and you do still get in trouble for it if you get caught, even in a private prison.
And yes, it is the exact analogy you made. You compared doing a legal action on something private that you own to doing an illegal action on something private that you own. You wrote "I guess using your logic. That's a private prison, they'll keep them locked up getting raped if they want to!" But that's not how the logic of being allowed to kick somebody off a private server works at all.
But good job deflecting your own lack of logic by acting like you never made a simple statement that you did. Stop blaming other people for YOUR poor communication skills.
I didn't specify how much rape happens, so how can you claim it happens less than what? I simply said it happens.
Yet again, I wasn't talking about rape, like I reiterated several times now. I made an extreme point with the prison, which you're still avoiding my actual point. I threw the rape in their as a half hazard made joke, it's irrelevant to what I was saying. That I reiterated in my past comment. Like shit bruh, what don't you get about this? So once more. The rape was a shitty joke, which is irrelevant to my point. This is what I meant by you're fixating on rape, and only rape. I didn't compare rape to anything, it's not worded that way. It's worded as prison rape happens from getting locked up longer, as a byproduct.
"That's a private prison, they'll keep them locked up getting raped if they want to! "
"That's a private prison, they'll keep them locked up if they want to! "
"them getting raped"
"a legal action on something private that you own to doing an illegal action on something private that you own."
So are you saying the prison owner does the raping?
"That's a private prison, they'll keep them locked up if they want to!" my my point
"them getting raped" irrelevant joke.
Pretty obvious that's not how servers work. But since you ignored "What even is this argument ? they can do whatever they want, if they want to" #19
Which imply's I was making a point that using the argument "if they want to" is a bad argument.
I was arguing with "It's someone's server, they can ban people if they want to. " from #17
Seems your compression skills are lacking since you failed to pick up on that, it's literally the next line. You can't say my communications skills are rubbish since you're ignoring 90%of what I'm saying, then tell me I'm at fault. So don't project that on me, man.
But I see the miscommunication mishap. You misunderstood my point, since the beginning "What even is this argument ? they can do whatever they want, if they want to." #17 Obviously meant My prison argument was referring to "if they want to" argument As well as fixating on my irrelevant joke. Look at who I'm replying to, and what he said.
What am I deflecting? Give me an analytical breakdown. I'll listen. And if correct. I will concede.
I never blamed you. But I do now. I said I don't understand your perception of what I said. And asked to understand what you perceived. Since we all perceive everything an infinite different ways. Which I was willing to concede, that it was my fault. If you would have broken down what I said, and showed me, which you didn't. I'm human and fuck up communications occasionally. I strive to improve my communication skills, it's the most important skill we have. Would have happily conceded. Since being wrong is good, really is. If you're wrong, you know what needs fixing. A humble piece of advice I try to follow.
Literally all I was getting at is. "because they want to" is a shitty argument. And used an extreme analogy for that.
Slow down, calm down. Re-read what I wrote. See my point in what caused it. Re-read everything said with that different perception. Come back and let's find a middle ground.
In Marvel Heroes Omega (formerly Marvel Heroes 2016 and 2015 before that) you're not allowed to use the word "nazi" or mention Hitler by name in chat. This is in spite of Captain America and Hydra's close ties to WWII, not to mention that it's technically historical censorship.
- no. **** raisins. Cinimon is great unless you add too …
Home Baked Cookies
- As a [shitty] YouTuber, I completely agree with you
Cheese is sexist
- because he said "often" not "in rare cases"
conflict and how to deal...
- If only Zelda was a girl this wouldn't be gay
- That's what I thought too. Like make a dildo in their ass
Show Comments (73)