someone cleaned that

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

crixuz Rank: #5

Channel: politics

next random

Comment

someone cleaned that. .. Petty, no matter what you believe. That's petty.

+1122

Views: 52397 Submitted: 08/19/2017

Block User's Content

Block Channel Content

Related Top Content:

Sounds like child abuse

3577

Cards Against Common Sense

lively nippy horrible Lapwing

2496

Sexual harassment

2447

Pisug Ytuctof Tochimugl

2429

Meanwhile in South Africa...

2410

Sambyoch Edinilt Umercalyod

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (207)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 207 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#2 - mrwrong

Reply+396

(08/19/2017)[-]

Petty, no matter what you believe. That's petty.

#16 to #2 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply+25

(08/19/2017)[-]

That's petty
<< This is Kyle Petty

#43 to #16 - domjthenotsodj

Reply+15

(08/20/2017)[-]

>NASCAR mentioned
>Literally swell with light beer

#138 to #16 - anon id: 27c6550f

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

That's Kyle Petty
<< This is Tom Petty

#140 to #138 - commontroll

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

No, I'm pretty sure that's the Hound.

#71 to #2 - anon id: dbe2fd27

Reply+16

(08/20/2017)[-]

I read that as "Pretty, no matter what you believe, they're pretty." and was in full agreement.

#6 to #2 - aghrwyr

Reply+10

(08/19/2017)[-]

You're absolutely right. It is very petty.

#155 to #2 - totocows

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

They are both just as petty.
They both did this just to get attention.
The first girl is no better.

#167 to #155 - casterxd

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

I mean, yeah it's vain but in this day and age it's kind of the norm. The other girl did it with the clear intention to spite the first.

#210 to #167 - mrwrong

Reply0

(08/23/2017)[-]

In having taken a picture of herself, I'm inclined to agree. It's all vanity.

Yo dawg, I put some vanity in your vanity...

#180 to #167 - totocows

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

I don't know I kind of favor that one better.
The first did it for no reason other than to antagonize and attention seek in the first place all under a false pretense of showing respect to the president.
The 2nd one was at least blatant with their pettiness, basically demonstrates the very pointlessness of her cleaning the star to begin with.

#181 to #180 - casterxd

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

**casterxd used "*roll picture*"**
**casterxd rolled image**

I agree, and she should have just done her good deed and been on her way instead of drawing attention to it.

#183 to #181 - totocows

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

No she should have literally done nothing. Surely there's someone who is payed to clean that stuff off. Cleaning it and posting about it is almost inviting people to come and do it again.
It's an inevitability that people are going to do that anyways.

#184 to #183 - casterxd

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

I know, I just said that.

#114 to #2 - thugnatzie

Reply-9

(08/20/2017)[-]

I thought it was pretty smart.

#128 to #114 - kaiserdjg

Reply+5

(08/20/2017)[-]

thumb down for the comment, thumb up for the picture

#24 to #2 - anon id: c3674e94

Reply-17

(08/20/2017)[-]

they both are, since they do it for attention

#139 to #24 - anon id: 3d152ebf

Reply-3

(08/20/2017)[-]

You're being thumbed down because you're right

#175 to #139 - anon id: c9c9f391

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

I tumbled you up, because...nevermind

#158 to #139 - anon id: cd863c2e

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

t. leftist cuckold

#5 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15

Reply+110

(08/19/2017)[-]

Though stickers can be removed, that's still and asshole thing to do. Dyke.

#8 - anon id: 769216ae

Reply0

(08/19/2017)[-]

They don't even remotely look like the same person.

#9 to #8 - anon id: 769216ae

Reply+65

(08/19/2017)[-]

I just realised how ******* dumb I am.
I completely missed the '@' at the beginning of the second one.
**** I'm blind.
Jesus.

#1 - evilhomer#3 on commentsRank#3

Reply+65

(08/19/2017)[-]

**evilhomer used "*roll picture*"**
**evilhomer rolled image** yes, because stickers will do "a lot" with your protesting him

#17 to #1 - reamonster

Reply+17

(08/19/2017)[-]

That's all they have though.
They have no legitimate arguments. They have no grounds to stand on.
All they have are insults, vandalism and screaming made up stories and arguments.
Sore losers is all they are.
I don't like trump either, but he hasn't given me anything to be mad at him in his role as the president yet.

#69 to #17 - anon id: 683197c4

Reply-3

(08/20/2017)[-]

Thanks germ worry about your own prez why don't you

#170 to #69 - mookiea

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

#168 to #1 - casterxd

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

When someone else tries to do something they don't agree with then they enter "annoy the **** out of them" mode.

#10 - kiljiarius

Reply-2

(08/19/2017)[-]

So who are we upset with?

#144 to #10 - toosexyforyou#290 on commentsRank#290

Reply+3

(08/20/2017)[-]

You're allowed your own opinions you ******* retard.

#173 to #10 - mookiea

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Depends on your beliefs doesn't it, and reasons? Either oe, both, or neither.
Why ask others who to be upset with.
Seems like a dangerous thing to do, if you ask others what to think frequently. Just sayin.

#12 to #10 - testaburger

Reply-16

(08/19/2017)[-]

Given current FJ trends, probably the bottom one.

#18 to #12 - anon id: 4f19edd6

Reply+39

(08/20/2017)[-]

Well there's one who cleaned public property and one who defaced it. Who the ******* **** do you think we should get mad at.
**** your "given FJ trends."

#182 to #18 - anon id: 2bcb0540

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

You guys wouldn't bat an eye if it said Hillary Clinton, or anyone on the far left who's opinion and/or actions are highly controversial here. You'd probably justify the one who defaced it especially if they agreed with the FJ majority.

Either that or NEVER mention such an action here, for the right can apparently do no wrong.

#19 to #12 - shadowclawper

Reply+10

(08/20/2017)[-]

Why would we be upset by Patrick Stewart?

#22 to #19 - elduroto

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

**elduroto used "*roll picture*"**
**elduroto rolled image**

#15 - snapdragonswitch

Reply+32

(08/19/2017)[-]

They probably pay to keep a guy out there with a bucket so he can clean it everyday from daily alt-left visits.

#29 to #15 - nicodamus

Reply+27

(08/20/2017)[-]

Sounds like Donald Trump just keeps creating jobs.

#101 to #15 - cutiepyro

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

they should have a sign near those hollywood stars saying "any amount of defacing will be met with being sprayed with water"

#130 to #101 - hexagony

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

Or give a fine for ruining the Hollywood stars

#161 to #15 - anon id: cd863c2e

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

>alt-left

you mean regular left right?

#169 to #161 - casterxd

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Alt-left is their newest trigger-word.

#176 to #169 - anon id: cd863c2e

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

no it isn't

#179 to #176 - casterxd

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Yes. It is.

#165 to #161 - snapdragonswitch

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Nah, alt-left. I know a lot of lefties who don't give a hooey about trump. It's kind of relaxing really, comparing to all the others who are constantly foaming at the mouth.

#177 to #165 - anon id: cd863c2e

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

if that's your opinion

#178 to #177 - snapdragonswitch

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Thank you for respecting it, anon. I appreciate you.

#13 - kouzan#277 on commentsRank#277

Reply+23

(08/19/2017)[-]

I've removed stickers before. Adhesive comes off with gasoline. No - its true. Gas can be a solvent

#21 to #13 - elduroto

Reply+4

(08/20/2017)[-]

Yeah but if people see someone pooring gasoline in a public area, **** ain't gonna bode well

#97 to #21 - BloodyTurds

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

lighter fluid works pretty well too (gas is still probably the best) with less smell.. also unmarked containers

#86 to #13 - rogelcopter

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Gas or 3M adhesive remover. Both are great!

#14 to #13 - arkis#51 on commentsRank#51

Reply0

(08/19/2017)[-]

the liquid "Goof off" **** obliterates adhesives of any sort, even epoxy

#49 - twoboobs

Reply+21

(08/20/2017)[-]

Its peculiar how beautiful people tend to support Trump more often and ugly people tend to hate him.

#56 to #49 - anon id: 9866f7cd

Reply+5

(08/20/2017)[-]

LOLOL.

There are quite a few uggos who sport Trump attire I assure you.

#87 to #56 - northkoreanguy#204 on commentsRank#204

Reply+5

(08/20/2017)[-]

well, duh.
out of the nearly 60 mil people who support him, there's obviously ugly peoples there.

#99 to #87 - anon id: d1315199

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

The magic wardobe of skewed perception.

#92 to #49 - wtfareu

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

You sweet summer child

#105 to #49 - fables

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

hmmm???

#122 to #105 - raisinbeuponhim

Reply+3

(08/20/2017)[-]

Half of them are old people , and the rest looks like as if they are the working class, if that is how you define being inbred then you are going to have a hard time when you leave college.

#123 to #122 - fables

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

>>#49,

#124 to #123 - raisinbeuponhim

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Even tough what he said was wrong, he isn't fully incorrect that there is a large amount of people who are, not by virtue that they are against him but by being far left ideologues, looking hideos as **** by purpose.
We all know the kind i am speaking about, the blue haired, more hairy than a turkish man in his 50s and smelling like death, decay and everything that is unholy women who keeps yelling about being anti racist and pro body positivity. So yeah, theres that.

Likewise it can be said that Trumps side, which mostly consists of working class people, who are often obese to outright fat, but that is because, well they are the working class what do you except when you have a monotues physically demanding job, these people want to at least enjoy themselfs somewhat in life and a good meals sure as hell helps with that.

Btw there is still an observed trend tough, where good looking women tend to often times be more coservative while not good looking ones tend to be more mid-far left leaning.

#125 to #124 - fables

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

there is no trend, there's only cherry picking on both sides

#104 to #49 - fables

Reply-1

(08/20/2017)[-]

hmm?

#106 to #49 - fables

Reply-2

(08/20/2017)[-]

HMMM??

#107 to #49 - fables

Reply-3

(08/20/2017)[-]

of course you only notice what makes your side look good

when in reality, trump AND his supporters look pretty ******* inbred to me

#203 to #107 - twoboobs

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

I notice averages.
And in reality, Trump supporters earn more, have more stable families, and yes, are more beautiful.

#204 to #203 - fables

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

got some sources to back up that claim?

I highly HIGHLY doubt there's a statistic proving that trump supporters are more beautiful
don't be a ********
in fact, I gave you proof. the supporters at their rallies are just average people like anyone else.

#205 to #204 - twoboobs

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Yeah, your fugly and pathetic self. Good enough source for me.

#206 to #205 - anon id: b57df266

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

until you've got pictures of yourself to prove you're above average in looks
maybe you should shut your dumbass up. talking **** behind a keyboard.
HAH

and you block me!! LMAO

#207 to #206 - twoboobs

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Do my a favor and kill yourself! ty

#208 to #207 - anon id: b57df266

Reply+1

(08/20/2017)[-]

yeah I'll get right on that
********

#119 to #107 - northkoreanguy#204 on commentsRank#204

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

#120 to #119 - fables

Reply-3

(08/20/2017)[-]

what in the **** is your point?

because you sure as **** are missing mine

#116 to #107 - northkoreanguy#204 on commentsRank#204

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

Hillary's supporter are much much not-a-delight for everybody.

#58 - yogb

Reply+12

(08/20/2017)[-]

That monsters university hat truely shows you can't get into a real college

#61 to #58 - anon id: 9866f7cd

Reply-9

(08/20/2017)[-]

That's the most bizzare and irrelevant connection and really has no merit in any way shape or form.

Here in America you can wear any hat you damn well please regardless of what learning institute one attends.

#66 to #61 - creammymeme

Reply+5

(08/20/2017)[-]

Its a ******* joke

#67 to #66 - anon id: df701aa5

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

No no.

If you dress like that, college is above your pay grade.

Even if you are a stripper clearing 100k+ a year- because drugs are pricey.

#68 to #67 - anon id: df701aa5

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

On closer inspection.... she is dirty AND fat...

Which means she Is visibly too poor to pay tuition

Based on...
Clothes have a ripped / wrong size/ idgaf look
.... which is no longer trendy

So she either can't afford to maintain her appearance or doesn't care.

Judging on nails, shoes, make up... she does care about her appearance. Look at her hands. Hands of a porker. So...

She wears a loose top to hide her rolls, which also explains why she chose that pose, and tight yoga pants to slim her profile- as visible by the see through stretch on her knee. Too much effort has been spemt to go into publix to argue that her style is, " idgaf what is trendy. I will wear comfy clothes thati think look good". In actuality this woman is...

"Omg that hat is hot. And looks good with this shirt that makes me look fit, and these yoga pants make my legs look hot. And these 2 nail polish colors go with these shoes, that match my pants, and accentuate my top, which matches my hat, and looks good with my make up tones".

So she's poor. As shown by effort / time spent for her look. This kind of federal poverty line attitude, apparel, and personality would not pass 1 semester of community college.

Fat bitches get out... of everywhere

#95 to #68 - anon id: 6cdd06b7

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

You do realise that people can wear clothes because they like them right. They dont need an overall style or pretend reasons.

#75 to #68 - anon id: 0820b60b

Reply0

(08/20/2017)[-]

I just see one of the countless mismatched tourists who frequent the Boulevard.

Another face in a flood of thousands.

Your TMZ critique though was quite classy.

#73 to #66 - anon id: 0820b60b

Reply-2

(08/20/2017)[-]

Sure it was.

#78 to #73 - creammymeme

Reply+2

(08/20/2017)[-]

Im glad you agree with me then

#81 to #78 - anon id: 0820b60b

Reply-3

(08/20/2017)[-]

I don't but you're gonna think so anyhow.