mr been

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

crixuz Rank: #5

Channel: politics

next random

Comment

mr been. .. he keeps the family name strong. I approve.

+3418

Views: 108118 Submitted: 08/23/2017

Block User's Content

Block Channel Content

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (193)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 193 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#2 - knightbean#1 on commentsRank#1

Reply+652

(08/23/2017)[-]

he keeps the family name strong.
I approve.

#55 to #2 - kingtravis#170 on contentRank#170

Reply+50

(08/24/2017)[-]

4 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#158 to #55 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+8

(09/04/2017)[-]

Whoa

#58 to #2 - thugnatzie

Reply+16

(08/24/2017)[-]

Another deep and insightfull comment from knightfart.

#110 to #2 - juncker

Reply+14

(08/24/2017)[-]

This opinion seems to be popular. I proceed to comment that I agree with said popular opinion, and create attention to this comment by posting a larger than average reaction image.

#133 to #110 - anon id: bb8c54cd

Reply+10

(08/24/2017)[-]

I agree with your opinion, so I am going to post a larger than average reaction image of a knight drinking juice to show my approval. Does that comply with your standards?

#146 to #133 - knightbean#1 on commentsRank#1

Reply+11

(08/24/2017)[-]

I approve of this

#139 to #110 - vozel

Reply+5

(08/24/2017)[-]

i don't mind knightbean himself, what i hate is his petty group of followers

they act like he's the #1 person of this website and the greatest person ever

no offense but he's really a normal guy who's easy to recognize

#157 to #139 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply0

(09/04/2017)[-]

I mean, that's how they show their affection. If he was normal, he wouldn't be gathering this much attention on a daily basis. He's got something unique about him and that attracts people. You probably do it to people you like albeit to a lesser degree.

#159 to #157 - vozel

Reply-2

(09/04/2017)[-]

dude this comment is over a week old

#160 to #159 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+2

(09/05/2017)[-]

If you're implying that it's wrong to reply to old comments, you're sadly mistaken by virtue of the reply button and you responding. What you just did was a convenient way of avoiding the points I brought up.

#161 to #160 - vozel

Reply-4

(09/05/2017)[-]

lol what

i just don't care about the thread since i forgot about it and don't feel like revisiting, nor do i want to be 100% serious at *both* the times you bumped this thread, but sure whatever you want to say bud lmao

#162 to #161 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+3

(09/05/2017)[-]

You say you don't care, but you also replied twice, whereas simply not replying would have gotten the job done. That and you're laughing it off. You're so obviously at a loss for words, calling it pathetic for lying wouldn't even do you justice. Now, you're either going to reply, explain yourself, or actually use your common sense and ignore me, but only after the fact that it's been explained to you as an option when it shouldn't have.

#163 to #162 - vozel

Reply-4

(09/05/2017)[-]

lol are you seriously getting that riled up over a knightbean argument

fine, let me do you the honor of entertaining you

give me a second to type up all those refutations you so desperately want

#164 to #163 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+3

(09/05/2017)[-]

I actually don't care about this topic anymore and was actually hoping you wouldn't reply. You said you didn't care, so you have no obligation to appease me. You're just doing it because you were called out on a mistake and now want to correct yourself.

#165 to #164 - vozel

Reply-3

(09/05/2017)[-]

lol i wasn't even typing the whole time

#166 to #165 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+3

(09/05/2017)[-]

I'm actually saddened that you needlessly lie so often, even if it's futile.

#167 to #166 - renacava

Reply+1

(09/05/2017)[-]

you kinda sound autistic right now .-.

#170 to #167 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+1

(09/05/2017)[-]

I think you've been accustomed to this website's norms for too long.

If I didn't care what anyone thought about me before my reply, what makes you think I would care after the fact? Since you didn't consider how I would respond or feel, you're assessment, which hinges off those facts, is worthless and can be ignored.

#171 to #170 - renacava

Reply0

(09/05/2017)[-]

.-.

#172 to #171 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply0

(09/05/2017)[-]

You weren't even prepared to explain yourself. You just said something off of impulse without even considering the outcome. And you did again too since you seem to be implying that your response is an indicator that your last reply was correct.

#173 to #172 - renacava

Reply0

(09/05/2017)[-]

.-.

#174 to #173 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+1

(09/05/2017)[-]

You're going to reply despite me saying I won't.

You're only repeating yourself because you'll take annoying me into not replying as a sign of victory for proving you wrong. It doesn't make sense to reply in the same way as before since I've already explained the flaws in your reasoning. Granted, since you're only taking my responses at face value, you'll take any response as a victory for whatever excuse you can think of that you can't prove and only serves to make you feel better about yourself.

You replied with the intent that I acknowledge what you said as true and worthy of consideration, but since you've shown you're incapable of either of those things, it doesn't even matter what you say. You're essentially talking to yourself to fill your own emotional void, not because you have anything insightful to say. Thus, there's no purpose to you even replying. I know you're full of it, and you know I'm right. You're just compensating for a lack of emotional fulfillment by relying on base victories, which is truly a sad way to live.

#175 to #174 - renacava

Reply0

(09/05/2017)[-]

are you.... trolling?

#178 to #175 - fatsigurd

Reply0

(09/06/2017)[-]

Autism is one hell of a drug.

#179 to #178 - renacava

(09/06/2017)[-]

i think he might legitimately be on the spectrum

#168 to #166 - vozel

Reply-1

(09/05/2017)[-]

you do know that you can see if someone is typing right

you do know what you sound super ridiculous right now by assuming an exagerrated sense of superiority purely because i did not pursue you in your super serious argument because you bumped a thread

you do know that you're taking something so trivial so seriously and drawing conclusions about me to look stupid and make yourself look smarter for the weirdest reasons don't you

you're literally getting riled up because i did not engage in a trivial conversation with you

you do know this is fun for me to bait out from you, right

inb4 "stop spreading lies"

#169 to #168 - ogthegreat#299 on commentsRank#299

Reply+2

(09/05/2017)[-]

I'm actually annoyed that you keep replying but I'll explain this so you don't get the wrong idea.

Your first comment functions under the assumption that I was still on the page before your last comment. I left, assuming you wouldn't care anymore because if you've got nothing to prove, you shouldn't even feel the need to respond.

I don't think of myself as superior. I'm using common sense, the prerequisite for intelligent thinking. People always say that when ever I start using big words and reasoning instead of actually addressing the points with logic. That was an assessment based on how you felt. It wasn't anything you can prove. You relied on your feelings, like you've been doing this entire time, because your reasoning abilities failed.

Taking it seriously is a stretch. Yes, I'm pointing out my observations, but you seem to be implying some sort of passion simply because I'm using reason and typing multiparagraph replies. As I've said before, I was hoping you wouldn't reply. I said that because I knew that you doing so would lead to you needlessly proving yourself to recover from being called out earlier.

I don't know what you think riled up means, but I can do this without feeling any emotion. I addressed that point twice but you still accused me of being upset even though you have nothing to prove otherwise. I'm trying hard not to look down on you, but you're not showing that you're in the most rational state of mind. Ergo, anything else you could say that would serve to justify yourself has been nullified and I can completely ignore it.

I knew it was an attempt at bait, but I also knew that you're still upset for being called out and that this is your way of getting back at me. You were pretending to not care but at the same time you were defending your decisions and making accusations. You had all the time in the world to respond to >>#164, but the your response shows that your sudden 10 minute absence in comparison to your usual 2 minute responses shows that you saw my reply, thought out it, then came back and decided to point out the obvious under the guise of trolling.

Granted, there's no reason to be proud of your ability to get somebody to react since literally anything can do that without even trying. For example, I accused you of lying because I knew you wouldn't understand what I meant. You thought I meant that you weren't typing in that 10 minute absence, which I believe, when I actually meant that you didn't have to say you were going to argue back when you weren't going to. Granted, I thought you had a little more sense but you actually went on the defensive by criticizing me based on how you feel without any evidence or reasoning to support it. You can fall back under the guise of bait, but you said you didn't care about this conversation and your tone changed to passive aggressive criticism that's so far removed from reality it can be ignored.

The really sad thing is, you're probably smiling to yourself with misguided pride because you think I'm upset just because I'm typing what you consider a lot and taking an opposing stance. In reality, you're just so used to seeing that pattern in people who are genuinely wrong and upset that you excused yourself from having to think abstractly and considering that life isn't as black and white as you think it is. And your response is to troll the other guy until you feel good about themselves from getting them to respond, even if that's the same thing I've been doing since my initial response. You don't even see how much of a hypocrite you are, getting upset over something so trivial.

#176 to #169 - vozel

Reply-1

(09/05/2017)[-]

"you do know that you're taking something so trivial so seriously and drawing conclusions about me to look stupid"

>still unironically doing it and saying i'm upset just to prove yourself right

#140 to #2 - numbertwozeldafan

Reply+3

(08/24/2017)[-]

I have now logged in.

#145 to #140 - knightbean#1 on commentsRank#1

Reply+1

(08/24/2017)[-]

kek

#137 to #2 - anon id: 0628ce01

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

I'm on a phone right now but HI KNIGHTBEAN

#93 to #2 - granate

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

You saw the opportunity and took it. Bravo.

#89 to #2 - willgum

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

I get it!!!

#80 to #2 - iviagic

Reply-39

(08/24/2017)[-]

Le knight sipping juice XDDDDDDDD

FJ is so autistic

#112 to #80 - pawnman

Reply+7

(08/24/2017)[-]

It isn't a reaction image dude. It is his persona. That is him. That picture is of Knightbean sipping juice while browsing funnyjunk.

#156 to #112 - themaninacan

Reply+1

(09/02/2017)[-]

He's a troll, used the image himself to garner attention for his comments.

#131 to #112 - anon id: bb8c54cd

Reply-1

(08/24/2017)[-]

Personally, I don't like this internet persona thing.
Like with all themed account, I find them cringe worthy if they are trying to be something more than an ironic joke, but at the same time, I'm not claiming that it does detract from the validity of the comment itself.

#132 to #131 - anon id: ae058ebc

Reply+15

(08/24/2017)[-]

Well I find you kinda cringey

#126 to #112 - anon id: 269e4c3e

Reply-3

(08/24/2017)[-]

Different anon but it is seriously unoriginal and retarded. It has nothing to do with the content and adds nothing but monotony to the comments section

#127 to #126 - pawnman

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

I thumb him up because I like him and respect his opinions. You can block him if it bothers you so much.

#115 to #112 - juncker

Reply-6

(08/24/2017)[-]

his persona is autistic

#116 to #115 - pawnman

Reply+9

(08/24/2017)[-]

We are on Funnyjunk. Everyone is Autistic until proven otherwise.

#118 to #116 - juncker

Reply+16

(08/24/2017)[-]

I remember the reason I liked FJ was reading the funny top comments.

Now it's either knightfart with his generic "i agree while sipping juice" comments, or some other autistic anime faggot with his mention lists.

#122 to #118 - edgeworthy

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

Well, can't fully disagree.

#136 to #118 - darkjustifier#240 on commentsRank#240

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

Then make yer own mention list, with blackjack, and hoockers

#117 to #116 - pawnman

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

Autistic until proven Normie

#125 to #80 - anon id: f26e3a18

Reply+3

(08/24/2017)[-]

I seriously just hate you, every post I've seen you make just reeks of teenage edge and cringe. Do us a favor a go drink bleach faggot.

#142 to #125 - iviagic

Reply+1

(08/24/2017)[-]

They hate us cause they anus.

#153 to #80 - hpcghia

Reply+2

(08/27/2017)[-]

#97 to #80 - hmaruskeksimus

Reply+1

(08/24/2017)[-]

i felt like posting this

#191 to #80 - anon id: a04ccd4b

Reply0

(12/21/2017)[-]

says the most autistic person on the site

#154 to #80 - anon id: 781f5e93

Reply-1

(08/28/2017)[-]

You sound like someone who watches GQ

#83 to #80 - yolonator#389 on commentsRank#389

Reply-4

(08/24/2017)[-]

*le sees other highly intelligent redditor*
*xDDD dies laughing at his exceptional taste of humour*
*laughs at normies who dont meme like redditors do cause they are sheep xDDD*
lel, i know right? so autistic
*le meme arrows* trollface.jpg

just go off yourself you ******* ******

#84 to #83 - anon id: 34255fb7

Reply-8

(08/24/2017)[-]

LE IRONY

#85 to #84 - yolonator#389 on commentsRank#389

Reply-5

(08/24/2017)[-]

Click to show spoiler

#20 to #13 - lotro

Reply+35

(08/23/2017)[-]

4 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#26 to #20 - nottheguyyouneed

Reply+56

(08/23/2017)[-]

4 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#185 to #13 - anon id: 3167c5af

Reply0

(10/27/2017)[-]

That's right

#17 - numbmind#92 on commentsRank#92

Reply+209

(08/23/2017)[-]

#43 to #17 - ScottP

Reply+41

(08/24/2017)[-]

#47 to #43 - numbmind#92 on commentsRank#92

Reply+6

(08/24/2017)[-]

You tell someone they can't make fun of someone/something, however you claim making fun of them doesn't count cause some privilege ********, and expect it to lead to great things.

#21 to #17 - somecreepyguy

Reply+19

(08/23/2017)[-]

#79 to #17 - TheBigGummyBear

Reply+4

(08/24/2017)[-]

This reminds of Mike from Breaking Bad telling the story of what happened when he took a half measure, when he should've taken a full measure. Half measures almost always cause more damage than the other half that they prevent, and arises a great deal of conflict.

Kyle was right on the money here, censoring just a few things didn't work. Things like censoring bad words on a PG sitcom makes sense, I mean I hate the bleeping sound as it's irritating but I understand it. But it shouldn't go beyond that.

People need to harden the **** up and accept that maybe people just don't like you for who you are. It could be for racist reasons, it could be sexism, it could be because you dress like a cunt. So what, you just be you and don't associate with those people.

#74 to #17 - alphagex

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

I say people should have freedom to critique every thing but in work place u might get fired if you a comedian I guess no issueu there but I doubt we be in that world

#54 to #17 - anon id: 01ac316a

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

I'm offended by this obvious anti-antisemitism, time to ban you.

#181 to #17 - assassindash

Reply+1

(09/22/2017)[-]

There's no such thing as all or none of acceptance.

You have to roll with the punches, if you can't then you get knocked down.

If you refuse to ever be punched, then what will you do if they keep punching after you get knocked down?

Cry like a bitch and die, probably.

The first hits are the lightest, words don't hurt.

#3 - minimummotivation

Reply+107

(08/23/2017)[-]

Now he only needs a cunning plan

#4 to #3 - noobpeller

Reply+50

(08/23/2017)[-]

A plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel?

#51 to #4 - cerig#246 on contentRank#246

Reply+13

(08/24/2017)[-]

a plan as cunning as a fox thats just been appointed professor of cunning at Oxford University

#141 to #51 - anon id: 025a21bd

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

Well, I'm afraid it's too late. Whatever it was, I'm sure it was better than my plan

#5 - blatherskite#91 on commentsRank#91

Reply+70

(08/23/2017)[-]

Wait, what?

I was not aware of this. What is that law? Have we fallen so far?

#75 to #5 - ChewyConor#394 on commentsRank#394

Reply+14

(08/24/2017)[-]

This whole thing is 3-5 years old. Google "reform section 5".
Basically, the law defined hate speech since 1986 as abusive harassing or insulting words or actions, but this campaign successfully got the word 'insulting' removed from the law. That change happened in 2014.

The law also specifically caveats:
"Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system. Subjective descriptions of a person's actions or behaviour, however abhorrent, crass or objectionable, may not be considered an attempt to spread hate unless the motive is clearly defined as such."

So when you hear about this kind of thing in the UK know that if anything the law has been relaxed of late and is pretty flexible on the matter.
It is only incompetent police individuals, exaggerated reports, and misunderstandings that lead to arrests for such minor infractions.

Our country hasn't fallen nearly as much as the media and meme frenzies would have you believe.

#76 to #75 - iamonmyphone

Reply0

(08/24/2017)[-]

Sounds about right. Thanks for clarifying.

#6 to #5 - kuroofthechaos

Reply+9

(08/23/2017)[-]

Sadly
May is such a ****** puritan

#7 to #6 - blatherskite#91 on commentsRank#91

Reply+8

(08/23/2017)[-]

Well **** me like a dude who's just dropped a bar of soap in a prison shower

Although I feel that is not too far off.

#8 to #7 - kuroofthechaos

Reply+11

(08/23/2017)[-]

May will be gone in a couple of years and we'll never have to deal with her again
And Corbyn keeps making himself unelectable (Most recently by saying that if we get nuked he won't **** the ******* back, to make sure they don't nuke anyone else)
So theres a decent chance someone who's not ******* retarded takes the position and cleans out all this nonsense
I hear Farage is coming back into politics, so we might get lucky

#19 to #8 - stenny

Reply+6

(08/23/2017)[-]

I'm rooting for the uncloggable Rees-Mogg.

#22 to #19 - kuroofthechaos

Reply+4

(08/23/2017)[-]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Rees-Mogg
Dis guy?

#25 to #22 - stenny

Reply+1

(08/23/2017)[-]

Yeah.

#52 to #19 - cerig#246 on contentRank#246

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

**** that m8 go Lord Buckethead or go home

#9 to #8 - blatherskite#91 on commentsRank#91

Reply+3

(08/23/2017)[-]

I've not been well too informed on our own country's politics as I've been keeping an eye on the Americans instead.

Hasn't UKIP been infiltrated? It would not surprise me if it did.

#10 to #9 - kuroofthechaos

Reply+4

(08/23/2017)[-]

Farage has proven himself to be able to keep such people in line
UKIP can't even function without him, so theres very little danger of them turning on him

#129 to #8 - totallytito

Reply+1

(08/24/2017)[-]

>Farage.
>Lucky.
Have fun with that.

#32 to #8 - anon id: 3823908b

Reply0

(08/23/2017)[-]

Literally nobody gains on actually nuking people back
All you do is make the extinction of humanity that much more likely. Nuclear winter isn't the only terrible **** we'd need to deal with.

#39 to #32 - kuroofthechaos

Reply+3

(08/23/2017)[-]

Incorrect
If they nuke you and you don't take them with you, they are highly likely to nuke other countries as well
It is a moral duty to do so
And its proven to work
You know the cold war?
The only reason it didn't go hot because of this principle of M.A.D (Mutually Assured Destruction)
The threat of nuclear annihilation is more powerful than any weapon and is what keeps this world from falling apart

#24 to #5 - besle

Reply+7

(08/23/2017)[-]

it's a 2012 article, don't know what came of it.

#60 to #5 - thugnatzie

Reply-2

(08/24/2017)[-]

#193 to #60 - anon id: 639c15af

Reply0

(02/15/2018)[-]

BASED

#16 - acksl

Reply+47

(08/23/2017)[-]

Lean mean bean machine

#92 to #16 - doctorjonesmd

Reply+3

(08/24/2017)[-]

That can go two ways. I mean, if you CARE about the people you're offending, then it's good to know you're offending them. I don't know how many friends you FJ people have, but that's how it is in the real world, for the most part...

#95 to #92 - acksl

Reply+4

(08/24/2017)[-]

That's true and pissing people of just so you can make them feel bad is a ****** thing to do. What Stephen Fry and Rowan atkinson is talking about is probably aimed at the people who complain about TV Shows/movies and such because they don't like it. Which often times only means that they were never the target audience. Intent is probably the most important thing here. Do you want to make people happy and someone else gets offended or are you trying to piss people off. Acting like an entitled dick and screaming "muh free speach" is something else

#18 - daspopo#406 on commentsRank#406

Reply+36

(08/23/2017)[-]

>2012
"We should be able to insult each other."

>2017

BOB

#33 to #18 - anon id: 3823908b

Reply-1

(08/23/2017)[-]

Considering what hate crime is actually defined as in british law, this is fine.
But you people spreading this stuff won't actually do three minutes of research on your own.

#44 to #33 - ronaldkun

Reply+4

(08/24/2017)[-]

Hate crime shouldn't be a crime in the first place

#77 to #44 - ChewyConor#394 on commentsRank#394

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

It's an extension of harrassment, that's all.

The law specifically caveats the following:
"Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system. Subjective descriptions of a person's actions or behaviour, however abhorrent, crass or objectionable, may not be considered an attempt to spread hate unless the motive is clearly defined as such."

#111 - amuter

Reply+35

(08/24/2017)[-]

>legally arrested for badmouthing scientology

Welp, a country is appearantly commiting sudoku.

#180 to #111 - queensolange

Reply+7

(09/10/2017)[-]

Facing punishment for insulting Islam gets me mad. But ******* Scientology? It's literally the most indefensible sack of **** "religion" with no real history or credentials. The most blatantly sociopathic, hypocritical, self-serving leadership and propaganda system. And criticism against it is deemed criminal? I wish the Federal government here could raid their headquarters and permanently shut them down like Mainland China stomps out Falun Gong

#186 to #180 - anon id: 81b31dae

Reply+3

(11/03/2017)[-]

Don't forget Operation Snow White. It's VERY likely that law is there because Scientology deemed it so. They're worse than muzzies, individually, as if they're 24/7 taqiyyaing, yet also white, so able to infiltrate our governments undetected.
UK has shown it's grown pretty **** at all this espionage and rooting out subversive ****. Very very likely you have an alliance between the Westminster paedo ring and scienos not to expose each other.
So both groups vote yea on a bunch of defamation laws and suddenly your legal system is ****** from both sides.

Remember that Scienos believe themselves to be in some sort of 'jihad' against normies and 'psychiatry' as well. How strange that a sci-fi author built the west's most successful cult. Anon battered them in US and Germany but UK is like quack cult central. So, based on their attempt to infiltrate the IRS and Germany's federal enforcement agencies, they very likely got in in England since I don't recall a mass culling there.

#187 to #186 - queensolange

Reply+2

(11/04/2017)[-]

Just a nod to let you know I've read this. Pretty ****** up stuff. A government colluding with or protecting scientology calls for a coup or revolution. The UK better get its **** together somehow... and soon. Doesn't look very likely though.

#113 to #111 - nawdir

Reply+3

(08/24/2017)[-]

you mean seppuku?

#123 to #113 - jtfroh#77 on commentsRank#77

Reply+22

(08/24/2017)[-]

It's a meme, man.

#114 to #113 - powerpootis

Reply+11

(08/24/2017)[-]

Nah mate that's a number puzzle

#152 to #113 - shadowpieman

Reply+3

(08/25/2017)[-]

Twas a joke.

#143 to #113 - jewishcommunazi

Reply+1

(08/24/2017)[-]

Is that the guy from Dragon Ball?

#119 to #113 - whatarethese

has deleted their comment [-]

#150 - abullen

Reply+28

(08/25/2017)[-]

Jesus Christ it's 5 years old...

#130 - evictedone

Reply+23

(08/24/2017)[-]

If Mr. Bean is the hero we need, then by gum, he's my goddamn hero!

#38 - anon id: a1e257be

Reply+18

(08/23/2017)[-]

Wait, the british banned their bants?

Isn't that their primary export?

#45 to #38 - porksoda

Reply+7

(08/24/2017)[-]

It was til the pakis took over, hence why my parents came here and made me into a ******* leaf

#48 to #38 - ningyoaijin#300 on commentsRank#300

Reply+4

(08/24/2017)[-]

Well it was until May. Her public approval rating's been plummeting basically ever since she got into office. But as usual when Labour gets into power again they'll do their best to fix the problems the Tories are causing.

#68 to #48 - niblic

Reply+2

(08/24/2017)[-]

lol yeah that Labour and its beautifully costed mandate.. Free tuition that he promised would never happen, it is impossible. Look I hate both Conservative and Labour... But our vote is our own so have at it pal.

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 193 comments ]

Add Comment