So perfect lol

+378

(10/19/2017)[-]

This is just another way to post political content. It's not funny, it's just using the reference to project your political opinion, which would be fine, if you'd have labeled it. I have blocked those categories for a reason. I don't come here for political ****. Now I'll do what I usually do in these cases, block user's content. Label/tag your **** properly OP.

#8 to #3 - doublepzk

+67

(10/19/2017)[-]

I like you.

#136 to #3 - headhunternl

+10

(10/20/2017)[-]

#26 to #3 - schmuxy#142 on commentsRank#142

(10/20/2017)[-]

oh **** there's a block user's content? nice

#138 to #26 - cheeseboyofdoom

(10/20/2017)[-]

Yup, but still dosen't work for me

#53 to #26 - dajewishmankey

(10/20/2017)[-]

Yeah for quite a few months now, maybe even a year and a half.

#160 to #3 - garbleflab

(10/20/2017)[-]

You speak the truth.

Nice to see not everyone on this site jump on the cancer wagon that is modern politics

#152 to #3 - thugnatzie

(10/20/2017)[-]

I just started to go to reddit for actual memes instead of this sad ****. Its always the same 3 retards posting political **** and they clog up the frontpage with it. And they all blocked me which pisses me off.

#11 to #3 - cutiepyro

-14

(10/19/2017)[-]

i think the point of the original was to show how easily you could misconstrue something as true with a technicality. if you wanted to get a rough estimate of how many women are lesbians, naturally you'd want to get as many people as possible in as many areas as possible. Here's the thing though, if you wanted to push a narrative to get ad revenue from your website, you could do something like go to lesbian town and sample only 30 women. turns out that 50% of those women are lesbians. Alright, now here's a big title that says "50% of women are lesbians". he never technically lied, but he stretched the truth a lot and we all know he's wrong.

although, i highly doubt that the person who made this post thought about this. he probably "lol they're dumb"

#45 to #11 - xnotcreative

+33

has deleted their comment [-]

#54 to #45 - pigbull

(10/20/2017)[-]

It's kind of mathematical.
25% are dumb
25% are smart
50% are average
Nowadays tho it's more like a 33% split. Once you get off the internet and hang out with people in real life that don't spend 10+ hours a day on the internet you start to see how dumb people really are.
I spend about 42 hours a day on the internet myself.

#55 to #54 - pigbull

(10/20/2017)[-]

oh would you look at that. It's 45 hours, not 42.

#56 to #55 - pigbull

(10/20/2017)[-]

wrong pic. Here's the pic

#24 - skyrimdovah

+98

(10/20/2017)[-]

Keep it in politics channel, faggot.

#7 - Deavas#384 on commentsRank#384

+54

(10/19/2017)[-]

That's an interesting way of saying 75% of people don't

#9 to #7 - doublepzk

(10/19/2017)[-]

Isn't it funny that about 27% of eligible voters voted for Trump? It's a funny way of saying that almost 75% of people didn't vote for Trump. About 26% for Hillary iirc, and yes this is of total voters, not of total votes. But it's funny how a lack of context leads to phrasing being so important.

#10 to #9 - Deavas#384 on commentsRank#384

(10/19/2017)[-]

That's not the same thing. There were more than 2 options, not an either or

#12 to #10 - wheredahoodat

(10/19/2017)[-]

Do you believe Trump colluded with Russia?

"Yes" "No" "Don't know" "Prefer not to answer"

#13 to #12 - Deavas#384 on commentsRank#384

(10/20/2017)[-]

Those aren't even real answers. When you vote it's definitive

#15 to #13 - thewalruss

(10/20/2017)[-]

25% of the people in this conversation think that everything is binary

#46 to #9 - cabbagemayhem

(10/20/2017)[-]

That's a funny way of saying 42% of people didn't vote at all.

#17 to #9 - theism

(10/20/2017)[-]

If Hillary Clinton had 3 million more votes how did Trump have a higher percentage of votes?

#23 to #17 - thewalruss

(10/20/2017)[-]

Actually he didn't.

#35 to #23 - theism

-4

(10/20/2017)[-]

He demonstrably did.

#38 to #35 - thewalruss

(10/20/2017)[-]

But he didn't. Officially. He lost the popular vote, but won due to the electoral vote.

#158 to #38 - theism

(10/20/2017)[-]

Trump got about 63 million Clinton got about 66 million total. 66 - 63 = 3. Clinton got 3 million more votes.

#121 to #38 - seniorawesomesauce#332 on commentsRank#332

-1

(10/20/2017)[-]

That is literally what he said. He's asking how Trump could receive a higher percentage of the vote than Hillary when Hillary got more votes. There is no mention or reference to the electoral college at all.

#47 to #38 - cabbagemayhem

-1

(10/20/2017)[-]

Which is a good thing because dense groups of people are easier to indoctrinate. Electoral protected America from liberal groupthink.

#159 to #47 - theism

(10/20/2017)[-]

Except you would be "indoctrinating" people in cities all over the country, that have different population makeups, cultures and circumstances. Rural communities are more homogeneous and more alike by comparison.

#28 to #17 - fiercebannana

(10/20/2017)[-]

Because they were aggregated by votes per land area not per person, it means a rural wyoming vote counts 4 times as much as, say, a big city vote

#34 to #28 - theism

(10/20/2017)[-]

That's extremely misleading.

#49 to #34 - fiercebannana

-1

(10/20/2017)[-]

How is that misleading? It's what happened.

Trump didn't have a higher percentage of votes. He won the electoral college and won the election.

Neither got more than 30 percent of eligible voter base. The actual winner would be no vote.

Trump got about 3million votes fewer than Clinton.

#157 to #49 - theism

(10/20/2017)[-]

Saying "trump got 27% of elligible voters" because you control for population density is misleading. I'm not talking about the electoral college.

#120 to #28 - seniorawesomesauce#332 on commentsRank#332

-1

(10/20/2017)[-]

this doesnt make any sense at all.

#122 to #120 - fiercebannana

(10/20/2017)[-]

I described the electoral college. He asked how trump won with a smaller percentage of voting age adults than clinton.

#123 to #122 - seniorawesomesauce#332 on commentsRank#332

-1

(10/20/2017)[-]

yes but >>#9 describes the popular vote. Trump didnt get 27% of electoral votes, so it doesnt make sense to say he did. He was asking how Trump got a higher percentage of the popular vote than Hillary when she got more votes. Everyone up until you was talking about the popular vote.

#125 to #7 - doyoufagsevenlift

(10/20/2017)[-]

Reminds me of that "1 in 4 homeless people is a WOMAN1" statistic.

#1 - averagecodplayer

+33

(10/19/2017)[-]

now I've had a wank now i don't know what to do, so I'm just browsing this ****. i like south park so could just watch a few episodes but no, i will look at an antiquated gif with subtitles and feel more ashamed than i previously did.

#29 - codyxvasco

+24

(10/20/2017)[-]

I blocked politics tho

#33 to #29 - baronvonhuckle#172 on commentsRank#172

+11

(10/20/2017)[-]

THERE IS NO ESCAPE

#61 to #33 - darthblam#343 on commentsRank#343

(10/20/2017)[-]

Why did I make this?

#67 to #61 - truemecid

(10/20/2017)[-]

Because we need it.

#32 - emperorehryn

+23

(10/20/2017)[-]

New Poll. 4 in 1 Americans believe these polls are all pulled out the ass for agenda pushing.

#2 - stupidgandulf

+15

(10/19/2017)[-]

"everyone I don't like is a retard" Come on guys, you're better (At least I hope) than this.

#6 to #2 - freshestprince

(10/19/2017)[-]

I happen to like a lot of people who also happen to think 9/11 was a crazy conspiracy, and they are retarded coincidentally. They are also on the gamergate bandwagon of misogyny, they think vaccines cause autism. Only thing they aren't spouting (now at least) is flat earth.

#4 to #2 - gibroner#480 on commentsRank#480

(10/19/2017)[-]

if you still believe a narrative thats debunked 5 times over than yeah you are a retard there's plenty of things you can legitimately criticize the man for but "muh russia" is not one

#14 to #2 - asugar#354 on commentsRank#354

-3

(10/20/2017)[-]

**asugar used "*roll picture*"**
**asugar rolled image**Or maybe we just don't like retards.

#126 - warwren

(10/20/2017)[-]

In the USA do you guys not say "a quarter" for 1/4? Or do people think you mean monies.

#127 to #126 - thelastamerican

+11

(10/20/2017)[-]

Nah, you can pretty much say whatever and it'll get the other person there. A quarter, a fourth, twenty five percent. Doesn't really matter about seventy five cents of the time.

#128 to #127 - warwren

(10/20/2017)[-]

Cheers mate, you cleared that up 100 $

#16 - optimussum

(10/20/2017)[-]

do people really say "a forth" as opposed to "a quarter"?

idk sounds weird to me

#18 to #16 - wishfulthinking

(10/20/2017)[-]

Third
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Seventh
Eighth

Nnnnoooo.

#20 to #18 - optimussum

+11

(10/20/2017)[-]

cant believe i spelled fourth wrong

i am the 25%

#36 - thatguyontheright#497 on commentsRank#497

(10/20/2017)[-]

I think it's more than 1/4. The average American is stupid, and half of them are dumber than that.

Proof. We have to have laws to keep people from wanting to text while driving instead of common sense kicking in and saying "I am just going to drive. I'll call the person back when I get to my destination."

And people still do it, and get pissed at the cops when they get caught. I know several people who think traffic laws are "illegal" laws and cops are enforcing them for revenue generation. A couple even think that a standing police force is illegal as stated in the constitution. They can never tell me where, they just tell me to read it and I'd know.

And then there are the stupid people who say they heard Trump say that he will end the US dollar and we'll all use Gold Bullion as currency.

Stupid people make up the majority of the world sadly because stupid people breed more. Doesn't matter what your politics are, what color you are, or anything. Stupid is stupid.

#133 to #36 - Crisfall

(10/20/2017)[-]

It's even worse when coffee shops need to warn you that the cup might be hot. like no **** captain.