Jay z is ugly as fuk

#4 - anon id: 42b26c13

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

>nazi riots

wasnt the event peaceful until some other groups came and started trouble and violence ?

unite the right was planned , but the others werent invited.

#10 to #4 - theunclean

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(08/17/2017) [-]

yes. that and the cops were told to stand down and let the left be digressive.

#1 - ivanthesronk

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

North Korea is threatening Guam because they can't reach any other US territory. Also if NK decides to attack Guam they will face enough nukes in return to assure the destruction of the entire planet so north Korea doesn't stand much of a chance.

#2 to #1 - evilhomer

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

M.utual
A.ssured
D.estruction

If you fire a nuke, we fire a nuke, we both lose. That's why I hope NK has at least some brains left not to use their nukes, and use them more as a bargaining chip

#3 to #2 - ivanthesronk

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

It wouldn't be MAD since the policy requires both countries to be able to completely wipe off each other and North Korea can't do that to the US. We are talking about 160 000 US casualties and that is the worst case.

#5 to #1 - userfivefive

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

We wouldn't use nukes. We don't need to. Our military is more than 100x more effective and larger as well. If NK nuked Guam it would finally give the U.S. a justifiable reason to go in and save NK from their dictator.

#8 to #5 - anon id: 0f04a5ec

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(08/17/2017) [-]

Just like Vietnam?

#11 to #8 - dogscar

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(08/17/2017) [-]

Except we won't just patrol S. Korea and refuse to send ground forces north of the border. That and N. Vietnam had Soviet and Chinese assistance, and food.

#9 to #8 - userfivefive

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(08/17/2017) [-]

Damn, good point.

Even so, I believe that we are in a better position this time around considering our base in South Korea and our Tech being even further ahead now. I suppose it isn't guaranteed though.

#6 to #5 - ivanthesronk

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]

I know the US would not need nukes to obliterate North Korea, but then that might send the wrong message across if no nuclear retaliation is made. In order to preserve the idea of retaliation. It might be just one, but without nuclear retaliation it might give someone the wrong idea that the US won't use the nuclear option.

#7 - userfivefive

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(08/16/2017) [-]