"A dream"

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

prodicalson Rank: #342

next random

Comment

I dream a world where traps arent gay.

+2001

Views: 35359 Submitted: 11/20/2017

Block User's Content

More from prodicalson:

Stop looking at me!!!

How will he recover from this?

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (114)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 114 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#7 - anon id: a57a650c

Reply+435

(11/20/2017)[-]

New women's rights:

Can't enter schools or bars
Needs to be transported in a case without special permission
Any crime committed with a woman immediately becomes a felony
Not telling a cop you have a woman in the car could potentially get you shot and woman confiscated
Gang members filling off fingertips, teeth, and any other uniquely identifiable markings

#18 to #7 - mamenber#488 on commentsRank#488

Reply+204

(11/20/2017)[-]

That just sounds like middle east

#19 to #18 - renegadesquash#381 on commentsRank#381

Reply+89

(11/20/2017)[-]

AKA Intersectionalist Femininist Utopia.

#32 to #18 - adoseofcancer#248 on contentRank#248

Reply+48

(11/20/2017)[-]

#70 to #32 - zapcrouch

Reply+36

(11/20/2017)[-]

Isn't that literally an oxymoron?

#97 to #70 - treefox

Reply+30

(11/21/2017)[-]

Nope. Just a regular moron.

#96 to #70 - wallbuilder#316 on commentsRank#316

Reply+6

(11/21/2017)[-]

Yes. Yes it is.

#99 to #70 - houselyrander

Reply+1

(11/21/2017)[-]

Only in the sense that she's an idiot who doesn't get enough air to her brain

#72 to #18 - MonkeyManz

Reply+3

(11/20/2017)[-]

Thats so scary accurate

#62 to #7 - vymastenaochechula

Reply+2

(11/20/2017)[-]

i don't think those are rights

#110 to #7 - domlol

Reply0

(11/21/2017)[-]

so basically Saudi Law?

#107 to #7 - anon id: de9716a9

Reply0

(11/21/2017)[-]

Whenever one of them is involved in a crime lets impose a bunch of struck regulations on them and try to make it harder for them to get food even though over 99% of them have never been involved in felony crimes.

#64 to #7 - heavenwave#449 on commentsRank#449

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

I'm cool with all that

#86 to #64 - signedforpronlinks#406 on commentsRank#406

Reply+1

(11/20/2017)[-]

#88 to #86 - heavenwave#449 on commentsRank#449

Reply+2

(11/21/2017)[-]

do it faggot

#89 to #88 - signedforpronlinks#406 on commentsRank#406

Reply-1

(11/21/2017)[-]

My suggestion to you faggotino

#91 to #89 - heavenwave#449 on commentsRank#449

Reply0

(11/21/2017)[-]

Can't help people before you help yourself so I insist. Go for it gayboy

#12 - vladhellsing#45 on commentsRank#45

Reply+119

(11/20/2017)[-]

So it'll finally be legal to put a silencer on a woman?
I can trade my old .44 for a new .22?
I can borrow my friend's one for a couple of days?
I can keep one at home and have another for the road?
I can lube it up regularly without it sounding weird?

#16 to #12 - rawrmodez

Reply+33

(11/20/2017)[-]

Don't forget about the heavy regulation, background checks, and waiting periods to obtain one. The shops dedicated to selling, trading, and course training on how to handle one efficiently. ****, sign me up, fam.

#42 to #12 - xxleeroyjenkinsxx

Reply+9

(11/20/2017)[-]

Not even a 22! You can get a 2mm if you want. Albeit it’s a Russian caliber but it’ll do the job.

#53 to #42 - cobaltmech

Reply+21

(11/20/2017)[-]

#76 to #42 - breakalego

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

(Unrelated to context) 2mm? Unless it's a SABOT/flechette, I'm gonna need an example of a gun that uses 2mm and isn't utter ****.

#98 to #76 - xxleeroyjenkinsxx

Reply0

(11/21/2017)[-]

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2mm_Kolibri

#14 to #12 - nrorsktbruker

Reply+9

(11/20/2017)[-]

and obviously have a lot of places where you can't take it with you

#47 to #12 - faffernoose

Reply+5

(11/20/2017)[-]

Whew lad, Im getting a hard on thinking of the possibilities.

Good thing Men are so nice and dont actually implement what women say they want.

#20 - happyapper#277 on commentsRank#277

Reply+37

(11/20/2017)[-]

#1 - evilkingganon#43 on commentsRank#43

Reply+30

(11/20/2017)[-]

**evilkingganon used "*roll picture*"**
**evilkingganon rolled image** I dream of a world without stupid people

#2 to #1 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+10

(11/20/2017)[-]

**raggg used "*roll picture*"**
**raggg rolled image**
Unfortunately stupidity is like the flu, it will never be wiped out as long as there are people.

#6 to #1 - qhuinn

Reply+3

(11/20/2017)[-]

The other thing here too is the fact that stupid people have always been here, they just have a platform to shout their stupidity from now.

#22 to #6 - permanonymous

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

And because we stopped locked people up in mental health facilities. We just let the crazies run around screaming crazy **** and do crazy **** now.

We're letting the loons run the loony-bin.

As far as I can tell there are only two solutions.

1) unadulterated murder
2) reopen state mental facilities and start chucking people in them

I prefer the 2nd option, but I fear that will never happen. So we really are leaving the sane people little choice in how to deal with these people. And like all things, eventually someone will be pushed too far too often and they will snap.

#83 to #22 - anon id: 6c337dbb

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

The funny part is that the folks who decide what is and isn't crazy are often people like you who are currently the ones running America into the ground while pointing fingers literally any other direction, but especially across political divides, and like you need to have people to feel superior to in order to function.

Honestly that sounds fairly crazy to me.

#49 to #22 - qhuinn

Reply-1

(11/20/2017)[-]

Unfortunately for America, mental health doesn't seem to be a budget priority. There's a crisis for it but your country is full of so many crisis' and not enough money nor people dedicated to make a change.

Mental health seems to be nominally better here only because we have "free" health care. You can go to a doctor and get a diagnosis (usually the right one) and get meds, but getting set up with therapy is a bit harder, especially if you don't make a lot of money (or too much money because they can use that to justify high costs). Plus you're paying out the ass for prescriptions unless you have health coverage.

#58 to #49 - permanonymous

Reply-1

(11/20/2017)[-]

Most of those meds only make the issue worse. Pills don't fix people, they are just chemical band-aids.

#60 to #58 - qhuinn

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

I know plenty of people who take the proper medication for their body and it works wonderful for them just as much as I know plenty of people that medication didn't work for, myself included. They're never going to be a "be all, end all" solution but if they help people, they should be used. On that same note there are plenty of dangerous and violent people who should be on medication to treat mental health and are not. That's part of the problem.

#61 to #60 - permanonymous

Reply-1

(11/20/2017)[-]

Those people should not just be on meds, they should be institutionalized in a mental facility. On meds working... they are chemical band-aids at best that don't FIX the underlying issue, and most of the time they create side-effects you'll need another pill for, and another, and another, etc.

My great grandmother is 95 years old, never took meds in her life. Still alive, still active. My mother is 60, takes a buffet bar worth of pills and is slowly dying and hardly does anything. My sister is 25, and in the same boat, most of the same pills. I'm 35, take no pills and I'm even more healthy now than I was in my 20s.

I have first hand experience watching pills turn a healthy person into a bedridden zombie. Those "meds" are pure toxic garbage. Putting your faith in them is a huge mistake.

#75 to #61 - qhuinn

Reply+1

(11/20/2017)[-]

You're completely writing off my point. There's thousands of different pills for different conditions, with different side effects and beneficial effects. A person can go through hundreds of different medications until they find one that works for them. Some people never find one that works. Therapy isn't a solution on it's own either and sometimes needs the medication to provide an effect that would give a person "back their life". If their medication is cause for them to deteriorate, then they may need to switch to a different medication or perhaps there is a separate underlying cause. Or maybe drugs just don't work with their system and they should find alternatives.

Trust me, I know what medication does to people. My mother, 48, has stage four metastasized breast cancer. She takes a multitude of medications to try to combat it, including a chemotherapy pill, and it's causing her to deteriorate while keeping the cancer from spreading. On the days she has to take the highest dose of Ibrance, her energy is at an all time low, she's sick and just isn't herself. Her bones are fragile, her skin is paler than usual, she can't do as many things as she used to be able to. But without the medication, the cancer would have consumed her six months ago.

I'm certainly not saying that drugs are a magical cure that's there to help all people get better, but I'd be a fool to write off the good things it's done for people.

#8 to #6 - evilkingganon#43 on commentsRank#43

Reply0

(11/20/2017)[-]

And its caused problems. Problems no one wants to deal with because they dont want anyone to feel opressed or whatever

#33 - kmichel

Reply+29

(11/20/2017)[-]

#5 - moldybreadcrumb

Reply+26

(11/20/2017)[-]

>Is born
>mother get a background check, has a felony
>gets taken away and put on the adoption shelf

#15 - qwerasdfghjklzxc

Reply+21

(11/20/2017)[-]

"Sorry babe but you cant come in, its a women free zone"

#21 - theacm#254 on commentsRank#254

Reply+18

(11/20/2017)[-]

You want men to require a licence to even have access to a woman?
You want men to require a permit to have the woman accompany him outside the home?
You want women stored in a secure locked box, which can only be opened by the man, when not in use?
You want women to be classified according to function?
You want women to be restricted to those specific functions without the ability to change?
You want women to be almost exclusively glamourised by the entertainment industry as mere instruments, to display and carry out the man's will and power?

Or how about this:
You want women to be relatively easily accessible to men who have demonstrated an inability to be responsible with a woman?

#34 to #21 - jallelthalas

Reply+2

(11/20/2017)[-]

So basically how things were back in the early 1900s?

#35 to #34 - theacm#254 on commentsRank#254

Reply+1

(11/20/2017)[-]

Pretty much, yeah.

Certainly some of the things I mention reflect the way women were treated or were portrayed, but I suspect some other things are regressive even by 1900s-standards. A woman might have been expected to stay at home and be "domestic" but even then, her husband didn't need a permit to let her leave the house.

So what the **** the woman in the pic is on about, I have no idea.

#27 - crazycommando#444 on commentsRank#444

Reply+11

(11/20/2017)[-]

>Wants to be treated like an object
>Can't go on certain flights
>Illegal in most other countries
>Take sin the US about regulating guns/banning guns

Wow, damn she sure has a clear mind on the matter

#43 - amuzen#291 on commentsRank#291

Reply+9

(11/20/2017)[-]

pieces of property
not allowed to cross borders unless their owner has the right permits
required to have a registration that keeps track of them at all times
only allowed to be seen outside if their owners have a permit for it
Banned from schools

Is this just a really round about way for her to ask for sharia law?

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 114 comments ]

Add Comment