we need a new word. . BY OTIE WEBB at new mamm win} ORGANIZED, ’ lil[ Ell an. And most of all, they did nothing wrong
x
Click to expand

Comments(185):

[ 185 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - schnizel (08/30/2014) [+] (34 replies)
stickied by danjazown
And most of all, they did nothing wrong
And most of all, they did nothing wrong
#11 - negitivzero (08/30/2014) [-]
reminded me of this
#118 to #11 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
tfyc had some nice ******* zings a week ago, now they are just bending over.
#47 to #11 - shatt (08/31/2014) [-]
ok so i laughed but i couldnt fully understand it so, jokexplain?
#75 to #47 - danilorossetto (08/31/2014) [-]
Context: The comment was made by The Fine Young Capitalists, a feminist (in the good way) group trying to actually make games (different from Zoe/Anita/other feminazis)... 4chan is the main contribuitor to their campaign because of the Zoe Quinn's drama (too much to explain here on how 4chan started helping them), 4chan created Vivian James character with them....
sooo..... TFYC are defending 4chan in a funny way from nonsense critics other feminists made about 4chan....

(I don't know if this is enough to you....ask if need more explanation)
#81 to #75 - shatt (08/31/2014) [-]
no i know about that i want to understand the poster comparing someones mom to hitler to 4chan
#85 to #81 - danilorossetto (08/31/2014) [-]
hmmmm...... anyone who do not share their (feminazi) "perfect vision" are seen as "the scum" to them..... the same way when you are a child and your mother ask you to go home, you think she is a sociopath for not letting you play a little longer.... both are absolute extreme exagerations from not sharing a point of view....

TFYC completes saying that comparation is insulting to both..... to your mother, because she is NOT like Hitler only for calling you to go home, and to Hitler because he worked REALLY hard to be that insane.... the same way the comparation of 4chan being the scum of the internet is insulting to both... 4chan make good things from time to time, therefore they are not the "scum of the internet" and it is insulting to the "real" scum of the internet (whoever it is) because it's like saying the "real" scum of the internet will make good things....

I don't know if I'm helping...
#168 to #85 - shatt (08/31/2014) [-]
no you helped, thanks
#31 - madmanransom (08/30/2014) [-]
...Femibitches?
User avatar #64 to #31 - holycrapimacupcake (08/31/2014) [-]
Bulbi has spoken!
User avatar #10 - bodyrokr (08/30/2014) [-]
Stupid? Ive been going with stupid, they keep using words they don't understand completely. like "equality"
#13 - anoyingmos (08/30/2014) [-]
Calling someone a nazi today is like giving them a complement
Calling someone a nazi today is like giving them a complement
#89 to #13 - yomamacouch (08/31/2014) [-]
Could you be any more edgy
#148 to #13 - psycofang (08/31/2014) [-]
Complement? Yea cuz noone is complete without being a nazi.
#80 to #13 - strangesir (08/31/2014) [-]
Well, yes, usually it is if you're talking to a neo-nazi or an extreme racist of sorts... Or somebody who likes negative attention.
User avatar #106 to #13 - rockamekishiko (08/31/2014) [-]
only on Fj or the internet where the basement-dwelling neo-nazis hide
User avatar #7 - roninneko (08/30/2014) [-]
Hah! No, they really weren't. Their political and military organizations all hated and distrusted one another, they insisted on running a country on an ideology rather than on a set system and so their communications were a bureaucratic nightmare, and they cost themselves a lot of technological leaps because they insisted on making evaluations of scientific discoveries based on the ethnicities of the discoverers instead of on whether the science was actually true.
#149 to #7 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
and they looked hella fine doing that,
User avatar #184 to #149 - roninneko (08/31/2014) [-]
Well, Hugo Boss is Hugo Boss.
User avatar #53 to #7 - applesdontpee (08/31/2014) [-]
that last bit sounds like sjw to me
#74 to #53 - Aftershock (08/31/2014) [-]
That'd be the valid aspects of social justice. SJW would be more like saying all scientific institutes promote the science of white men only, and that we need special tri-gendered-pyrofox-only grants and institutes.
User avatar #114 to #53 - roninneko (08/31/2014) [-]
Hell, it's all SJW-ish. I've never actually met any two SJWs who weren't functionally identical that DIDN'T hate one another for some perceived betrayal, and they insist on running off of rhetoric about what things shouldn't be like instead of coming up with ways to actually make a change.
User avatar #183 to #114 - jewishcommunazi (08/31/2014) [-]
I was a little surprised to see a few SJWs with chauvinist ideas.
User avatar #124 to #7 - theshadowed (08/31/2014) [-]
And lets concentrate on the fact that Hitler actually increased the number of unemployed people, as he fired everyone apart from the white nazi male. ALso he quadrupled Germany's debt, and spent all of Germany's income on the war, ruining their infrastructure. Hitler's policy of only using German things also meant crime organizations like the black market flourished.
He hid all of this by messing with the official data. If the war had lasted longer, Germany would've just collapsed. All the allies needed to do was wait them out
User avatar #125 to #124 - roninneko (08/31/2014) [-]
Again, a lot like SJWs: if it doesn't fit their exact idea of how things should be, even if it works just fine for everyone else, they want it replaced or banned.
User avatar #126 to #125 - theshadowed (08/31/2014) [-]
You can tell that anyone who says that Hitler's Germany had positive aspects has never actually studied the nazis
User avatar #176 to #126 - schnizel (08/31/2014) [-]
Brought to you by the Shekelberg institute of history.
User avatar #58 to #7 - skittlesinexcess (08/31/2014) [-]
Yeah, but can you kill a butt-load of Jews in only seven years?
User avatar #60 to #7 - nanako ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
nice to see some intelligent discourse here
User avatar #39 to #7 - reginleif ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
>Their political and military organizations all hated and distrusted one another,

Yes, thank you people don't seem to get this. The entire situation at Dunkirk happened because of ******** like this helping the Brits escape. They could have made Britain sue for peace.

>they insisted on running a country on an ideology rather than on a set system

Eh debatable, they did form alliances with the "subhuman" italians and Japanese. They did eventually allow SS units to be formed from dark people who wanted freedom from British brutality and oppression. Were they racist bastards? Yes, but their racism had pragmatic limits and hurt them just like any other nation. They ****** up not liberating the former Soviet Union, Soviet Sat nations literally loved the Nazis in the beginning.

>they cost themselves a lot of technological leaps because they insisted on making evaluations of scientific discoveries based on the ethnicities of the discoverers instead of on whether the science was actually true.

Maybe in the archeology department, but the Germans were a formidable foe even with their Nazi racism..... they ******* pioneered some great weapons during their reign of racial terror, so much that the US and Russia raced to steal the Scientists from Germany after the war ended.

It didn't help that Hitler was a **** military strategist by any objective means.
User avatar #127 to #39 - theshadowed (08/31/2014) [-]
The only reason they allowed these black ss groups, and allied with the subhumans was out of need. They would've eventually turned on them because their ideology demanded it
User avatar #129 to #127 - reginleif ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
I agree, partly the reason I said debatable and not ,"you're ******* wrong". But then again lot's of close bonds get established by war, while it is true that their ideology was pretty ******* racist, and I disagree with the Nazi supporters trying to use them as a symbol of Nazi alrightness war can change a nation.

The Spanish American war saw the US emerge as a world power willing to take on another European nation, instead of the backwater country it was before.

A single war has made and broken relationships between US and England/France depending on who helped out the most at the time.

Still happy the Germans didn't win though. :/
User avatar #179 to #129 - schnizel (08/31/2014) [-]
>Still happy the Germans didn't win though. :/
You are either ignorant or sick in the head.
User avatar #180 to #179 - reginleif ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Oh go **** off Schnizel. Nobody's buying the **** you're selling.
User avatar #181 to #180 - schnizel (08/31/2014) [-]
Well **** you kike, you guys suck eachothers dick because you are happy being ignorant. I bet you even think the holocaust was real and Hitler only used the Germans as a scapegoat.
User avatar #182 to #181 - reginleif ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Oi vey! the neckbeareded goy is on to me. Better call in the JIDF. Do you even have an internal filter btw or does the ******** thoughts in your head make it straight to your mouth?
User avatar #115 to #39 - roninneko (08/31/2014) [-]
Well as far as the science goes, the reason they didn't get the a-bomb first is partially because they had killed, driven out, or alienated all of the great physicists of the time. They dismissed Einstein's work as inferior "Jewish science", for example. Their rocket technology was unrivalled, but then again, rockets aren't terribly complicated.
#59 to #39 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
Even if the British won at Dunkirk and wiped out the entire British army there, it wouldn't have significantly changed the outcome there. Churchill brilliantly outmaneuvered his opposition who wanted to sue for peace, and I doubt there would be enough of a difference on the British stance concerning the matter. Since the Luftwaffe never won air superiority and there is no reason it would if the British armies died at Dunkirk, then the British wouldn't have been invaded anyway. And while those troops did go on to fight in Africa and Europe 1944, a victory by the Germans in Africa would be almost impossible anyway merely due to supply difficulties, and more troops could be raised by 1944.

And what is more, the order to stop at Dunkirk was given by the army itself, which was concerned over counterattacks from the South.

People always say that if the Nazis had been just a bit more lucky they might have won, but they already used up all that luck in the French 1940 miracle.
User avatar #8 to #7 - roninneko (08/30/2014) [-]
... So, basically, the same as feminazis.
#32 to #8 - Rascal (08/30/2014) [-]
BUT NAZI COOL AND HITLER GOOD DUDE CAUSE I THINK SO, SOCIETY SSAYS HITLER IS BADS BUT THEY DUMB, AND IT LE FUNNAY TO SAY HITLER GOOD DOOD
User avatar #70 to #32 - captainrattrap (08/31/2014) [-]
Yea, that.
User avatar #178 to #32 - schnizel (08/31/2014) [-]
>strawman
#57 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Might I suggest ''misandrists'' it's accurate and to the point. Furthermore, more people need to acknowledge that ''misandry'' is a real word and a real phenomenon.
Might I suggest ''misandrists'' it's accurate and to the point. Furthermore, more people need to acknowledge that ''misandry'' is a real word and a real phenomenon.
#158 to #57 - rollfourexplain (08/31/2014) [-]
**rollfourexplain rolls 2,453**
I dunno. It doesn't sound like a real word. I also get it confused with the female counterpart, misogyny.

"Damn misandrists!"

I found something really interesting though. When I look up the words I get different stuff.

dictionary.reference.com/browse/misogyny
= "hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women."

dictionary.reference.com/browse/misandry
= "hatred of males."

www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/misogyny
but no results for
www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/misandry#word=Mosander

I THINK THIS HAS A BIGGER MEANING...
#157 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
At least people took the Nazis seriously.
User avatar #1 - itskennyandjosh (08/30/2014) [-]
You have a good point there.
#78 - illuminazi (08/31/2014) [-]
im sorry
some of my kin are more proficient than others
User avatar #19 - delphine (08/30/2014) [-]
Aside from the whole holocaust they were much less brutal than either the Russians or the Japanese or Chinese. Hitler committed suicide because he wasn't stupid and knew the Russians were coming for him and he knew Russians did not play patty-cake with their prisoners. Stalin was responsible for WAY more deaths than Hitler. And Mao Zedong easily quadrupled Hitler's high score.

Hitler was painted as notorious because he was on the wrong side of WW II and made enemies in both the capitalist and communist societies. Compared to the atrocities and murders of Stalin and Chairman Mao, Hitler was a lightweight.
#28 to #19 - Rascal (08/30/2014) [-]
Hitler also had much less time and much less people to rule over.
User avatar #116 to #19 - radiserne (08/31/2014) [-]
"if you ignore the evil things he did, he was actually good"
#65 - nimithecat (08/31/2014) [-]
I used to draw swastikas as a kid because I thought they were the goodguys in the war documentaries my dad used to watch on History Channel. I didn't pay attention, i just thought they looked cool and had black ninja stars on their flags.

Come on, guys. I didn't know back then. I just saw cool uniforms and a ninja flag, and I was all over it. I got suspended multiple times for the same offense, and kept getting told it was a bad thing and I never really knew why so I dismissed their nonsense.

Then I finally choose to pay attention to a documentary at the age of 14.
The nazis were the badguys all along. I felt like an asshole at that moment.

#92 to #65 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
What do you mean the nazis where the bad guys?!
#156 to #65 - rejak (08/31/2014) [-]
At 14 ??? seriously ??
User avatar #109 to #65 - brodofaggins (08/31/2014) [-]
The nazis were bad because they lost. What if they won? Not a single person would say that the nazis are bad.
#100 to #65 - timetravelzero ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Bad guys? Since when? Misguided and misinformed, sure. All they really wanted to do was cleanse the world and make a better future. They were, in their eyes, a "necessary evil". Sure, some of them were probably sociopaths that just wanted to kill. But every culture has a hint of that kind of people.   
   
Tell me, in your mind, is being misguided in your attempt to better the world truly evil?   
 Devil's advocate here, but YES they were 			*******		 awful as a whole. Their ideals got twisted and ended up becoming nothing more than mass-genocide.
Bad guys? Since when? Misguided and misinformed, sure. All they really wanted to do was cleanse the world and make a better future. They were, in their eyes, a "necessary evil". Sure, some of them were probably sociopaths that just wanted to kill. But every culture has a hint of that kind of people.

Tell me, in your mind, is being misguided in your attempt to better the world truly evil?
Devil's advocate here, but YES they were ******* awful as a whole. Their ideals got twisted and ended up becoming nothing more than mass-genocide.
#105 to #100 - nimithecat (08/31/2014) [-]
That was surprisingly a well thought out and deep response.
Thank you for the data.
#135 to #105 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
France and brittain started ww2
#108 to #105 - timetravelzero ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Just some sympathy for the devil, my friend.
#62 - krobeles ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
And you gotta admit, those uniforms were bitchin.
#68 to #62 - Rascal (08/31/2014) [-]
One day, I'm gonna look at a picture of a nazi and mistaken it for a cop.
User avatar #69 to #62 - alecmason (08/31/2014) [-]
their Panzer uniforms were ******* awsome
#123 to #62 - szatan (08/31/2014) [-]
>posting cheap as **** historically inaccurate replica
User avatar #51 - tommythecatt ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
And well dressed
User avatar #46 - sugoi (08/31/2014) [-]
We'll call the legbeards.
How's that?
User avatar #9 - guylongname (08/30/2014) [-]
Read post, thumbed up
Looked at meme, thumbed down (incorrect use)
Rethought life choices, left neutral
#133 - angelusprimus ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
Actually, less then you'd think, really.
A lot of reputation Nazis have comes from propaganda and a lot of remainder comes from the fact that they inherited Prussian state that Bismark built.
If you go past the internet myths of Nazi efficiency and start to do some actual research you will see that they actually lowered the efficiency of much superior Weimar Republic. Why? Quite simply because Nazis were more interested in how pure someone's blood is, and what are his connections to Nazi Party then how good people are at their jobs.
And Nazis weren't as united as you'd think. There were periodical party mini wars at the end of which entire factions would get wiped out. Just look at what happened to Ernst Röhm, Nazi Party's number two.

Nazi is a good call for feminazi. They took over an old and respected organization of feminism that fought for equality. Turned it to something disgusting, messing it up in the process. Any dissent is attacked and brutally quashed and if you don't agree with them 100% or if you are part of a group they dissaprove, you are a subhuman who should be destroyed.
#88 - hurblurb (08/31/2014) [-]
Feminagger
#36 - crazyolitis (08/30/2014) [-]
They are called that because of xenophobia Tumblr: anybody not a deviant. Nazis: anybody not their own race , Their extremist views Tumblr is left wing extremist ******** , nazis are right wing extremist ******** , their tendency to disregard knowledge that doesn't conform to what they want Tumblr cries 'trigger' for everything, nazis burned books. Pic related. , their tendency to never make compromises, huge generalisations, along witj a few other things I'm too tired for to name.

Sometimes I feel like I'm the only person in this place that's somewhat moderate when it comes to politics.
User avatar #86 to #36 - thatoneiranianguy (08/31/2014) [-]
Hitler was actually a left winger, but w/e.

National Socialism was incredibly leftist. It was a Socialist paradise built for Germans on the grounds of liberation from the evils that are Capitalism and Communism.
User avatar #50 to #36 - crazyolitis (08/31/2014) [-]
Also, both sides almost completely model their lives behind their ideologies, as if they're brainwashed into only caring for their ideologies.
User avatar #61 to #36 - nanako ONLINE (08/31/2014) [-]
many people who post here with a political ideaology deliberately misrepresent themselves for lulz. That aside, a lot of the views aren't nearly as extreme as they sound.
[ 185 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)