|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #33226 on CommentsLevel 207 Comments: Comedic Genius
OfflineSend mail to zenrath Block zenrath Invite zenrath to be your friend
latest user's comments
|#35 - Somebody has to do it||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||+1|
|#33 - OH I GEDDIT! [+] (2 new replies)||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||-1|
|#32 - Junk which is Funny [+] (3 new replies)||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||-1|
|#31 - FUNNY-JUNK [+] (4 new replies)||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||-1|
|#30 - funny-junk [+] (5 new replies)||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||-1|
|#29 - But this is funnyjunk, You're not the hero funnyjunk deserves [+] (6 new replies)||16 hours ago on I know the horse is dead...||-2|
|#61 - all have the same stats, 4 friends, 4 reviews, 1 useful, 1 fun…||11/23/2014 on why so serious||0|
|#8 - His dad's name is Tami? Probably an even bigger disap…||11/22/2014 on Oh mom!!||+2|
|#106 - Yeah, good work quoting things and assigning your own views on…||09/28/2014 on the battle has ended||0|
|#104 - Of course a global flood pre-dates the bible, thats just logic… [+] (2 new replies)||09/27/2014 on the battle has ended||0|
#105 - vladhellsing (09/27/2014) [-]
"I bet i could i could out-science you guys, from a religious believer standpoint"
"you a born believing there is a God/creator"
"Then you grow up, and you start hating God because of personal things"
Then you have the gall to say "Im not trying to say whats right or wrong(...)i wont call it"? Well way to cover your tracks, but the internet doesn't forget things so easily.
Who says I believe everything scientists have to say? I don't even understand most of quantum mechanics and think anyone who talks about the multiverse theory is doing so out of their arse. However, I understand how evolution works, seen the evidence backing the theory and seen the utilitarian application of the knowledge. Scientists have made mistakes in the past and have corrected their errors in light of new evidence. That's the good thing about science; it's a self-correcting procedure.
As for ancient drawings of dinosaurs, I've seen ancient cave paintings & depictions of all manner of creatures. And you know what's interesting to note? All drawings of 'dinosaurs' are usually nothing more than very crude silhouettes with little to no detail, whereas depictions of deer, mammoths, leopards, sabre-tooth cats and other creatures known to have existed around the time are remarkably detailed, down to the fur & detail of the eyes. Some may even be considered photorealistic. But using art as evidence from any time period is hazy at best. You know what else we have ancient depictions of? Dragons, chimeras, nagas, basilisks, angels, demons, gods and all manner of monsters. Are we going to believe they all existed as well? That's like using photos of modern people in elaborate makeup and saying "Haha, lizard people exist! Look, we even have photos of them!"
#106 - zenrath (09/28/2014) [-]
Yeah, good work quoting things and assigning your own views on what somebody else has said. I stated i wouldnt call whats right or wrong, that doesnt contradict that fact i believe i could throw down the same, if not more, knowledge on the topic.
All i hear about believing in evolution is that fact that everybody believes it and thats supposed to be the end all of all arguments. I believe it, because he believes it. Awesome.
Ancient drawings of dinosaurs being hazy? really? read over what you wrote, you provided nothing but self-created opinions. Egypt depicts dinosaurs, Babylon clearly has carvings of a lion and a dinosaur all throughout their brick structures, how about the cambodian dinosaur? Heres a link refuting it, ( www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/stegosaurus-rhinoceros-or-hoax-40387948/?no-ist ) i dont mind posting that link at all, i try to disprove something before i talk about it, the article refuting it is clearly trying to divert as much attention off it as possible, even starting the article out with evolutionary theory to install confidence to the masses, that this piece is scientifically accurate, despite it all being fluff.
I dont disagree that theres probably mythical things depicted too, but the dinosaurs are generally damn accurate to our fossils. Things get distorted, sure. Theres probably things we never new existed, dont be so arrogant to think we got it all figured out. I firmly believe dragons and dinosaurs are one and the same reference, historically, the word was coined in 1841, before that, probably referenced as dragons, all throughout different cultures, and then eventually distorted by myth and legends, hell the english flag honours st george killing a dragon/dinosaur, you'd think that would need some sort of truth. "Oh fuck, no it was just a really scary bear" yeah, lets keep shitting on the dead people and making fun of their intelligence because we're so arrogant and brainwashed.