Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:6/23/2012
Last Login:7/29/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3457
Comment Ranking:#3324
Highest Content Rank:#3306
Highest Comment Rank:#3133
Content Thumbs: 685 total,  883 ,  198
Comment Thumbs: 2084 total,  2743 ,  659
Content Level Progress: 60% (6/10)
Level 63 Content: FJ Cultist → Level 64 Content: FJ Cultist
Comment Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:63740
Times Content Favorited:103 times
Total Comments Made:986
FJ Points:2298

latest user's comments

#135 - This is technically correct, since you can cut something in ha…  [+] (18 new replies) 06/30/2016 on Pizza +3
User avatar
#255 - witislimited (06/30/2016) [-]
Not at all, by integral calculus:

www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Integrate[1%2F (2^(x)),+{x,+0,+Infinity}]

Too mathy, didn't read; Even if you add up an infinite series of slices half the size of the previous, you still get a finite amount of pizza.
User avatar
#256 - witislimited (06/30/2016) [-]
To elaborate: If you can't get an infinite amount of pizza even if you add up infinite slices, from nowhere, half the size of the last, there's no way you can get an infinite amount from halving the same slices start to end.
#248 - anon (06/30/2016) [-]
Only theoretically. In the physical world it would quickly be impossible.

...now I am hungry for pizza.
#168 - drewjitsu (06/30/2016) [-]
It'd have to be practical to be correct. Aside from that, there is a finite amount of pizza.
#172 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
The amount of pizza doesnt actually matter if you think about it for a sec. Youre cutting in half each time, so there will always be some until you cant cut anymore. Which is longer amount of time than you'll live.
#177 - drewjitsu (06/30/2016) [-]
No i mean you wouldn't be able to cut it in half that many times and pizza doesn't keep forever so it's impractical. Have to consider your physical capabilities as well.
#179 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
Yeah i agree that of course its not practical. I was addressing the finite pizza bit
#157 - traitorking (06/30/2016) [-]
Not technically. Anything shorter than a Planck Length is unfeasible for measurements, and that would be where it ends.
#160 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
It would take a practically infinite amount of time, so youre right. It's just pizza forever
User avatar
#275 - imakejewburgers (06/30/2016) [-]
No, it wouldn't. Assuming you had a knife that accurate, you'd get down to that size fairly quickly. It's exponential growth (shrinkage?). If you did it with a straight, one meter line for instance, you'd get to the planck length in something like 117 slices. So you'd either reach that limit of your cutting ability or the planck length fairly quickly.
#280 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
User avatar
#286 - imakejewburgers (06/30/2016) [-]
I'm not watching a 22 minute video. Tell me your counterargument.
#288 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
Just watch until 4 minutes. 7 if you want to get into planck length
#162 - traitorking (06/30/2016) [-]
I'd say it's pizza until the knife can no longer make a distinctive cut into two seperate pieces. So probably 2, maybe 3 weeks, depending on how often you eat from it.
#163 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
Maybe he has one of those knives that are one atom thick.
#164 - traitorking (06/30/2016) [-]
But then you could (if such a knife were feasible) only cut until you had pizza that was one atom thick, and one atom is much longer than a planck length.

I'm no longer sure if you're joshin' my tots here.
#167 - zandersave (06/30/2016) [-]
Nah its true, such knives exist. No trolling

Honestly i dont know how long it would take, but Vsauce said it would be longer than the life of the universe to cut to planck length if you had such a knife.
#271 - itskookoo (06/30/2016) [-]
At one point, it stops being pizza, and you're just eating bread, and that's not a life worth living.
#39 - I rather they just make up a new word rather than have a race … 06/29/2016 on he shits half digested rats +5
#44 - Its because its about them 06/29/2016 on Bonjour +8
#163 - Uh, who the **** drew this 06/29/2016 on OC-Frankie Fo/ss/ter 0
#162 - You have a way with drawing eyes man 06/29/2016 on OC-Frankie Fo/ss/ter 0
#163 - You got my thumb at Ludacris 06/27/2016 on Dank and Music Webm 79 0
#56 - Thank you. I will only use this information for good 06/27/2016 on Smack the bitch up 0
#49 - Im pretty sure its impossible to knock someone out by hitting …  [+] (5 new replies) 06/27/2016 on Smack the bitch up -2
#87 - anon (06/28/2016) [-]
To knock someone out and dislocate their jaw, hit them with a right or left, and about 2 inches from the jaw point/chin whatever you wanna call it.
If you wanna shatter their jaw you hit them as hard as you can right on the tip of the chin, it will shatter both the ball joint and do damage to the upper jaw as well.
#88 - anon (06/28/2016) [-]
With an overhanded right or left not a high swing, but if you can bring the jaw down as you hit it instead of pushing it back up into their skull, you can tear most of the muscles and ligaments if you hit hard enough.
Only time you wanna do that is in life or death, because once you do that you want to pull their jaw down more and shatter it with another punch. They won't be dead but they won't ever eat normally again.
User avatar
#55 - jalauren (06/27/2016) [-]
I think he meant that she hit her head on the ground when he punched her
#53 - bwiedieter (06/27/2016) [-]
The length of the jaw acts as a lever, and is extremely effective at knocking someone out.
The side of the jaw is the point you aim for if you want to knock someone out, the temple where you are cool with a good chance of killing them.
#56 - zandersave (06/27/2016) [-]
Thank you. I will only use this information for good
#81 - did you like it? 06/27/2016 on treasure planet 0
#9 - vbs? And did they do it? 06/27/2016 on It was more important than... 0