x
FJ should now work well with mobile. Try it out on your mobile/tablet browser!
Click to expand

worldofwarcraftdog

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:2/24/2011
Last Login:3/05/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#510
Highest Content Rank:#5070
Highest Comment Rank:#365
Content Thumbs: 1331 total,  1854 ,  523
Comment Thumbs: 27078 total,  30458 ,  3380
Content Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 39.5% (395/1000)
Level 323 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 324 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:9
Content Views:148400
Times Content Favorited:60 times
Total Comments Made:4309
FJ Points:13956
Favorite Tags: funny (7) | cool (2) | earth (2) | fucking awesome  (2) | Music (2) | Space (2)
I bet money that im the best shot on funnyjunk, especially with shotguns

Funny Text/Links

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 10212
    Thumbs Up 380 Thumbs Down 50 Total: +330
    Comments: 15
    Favorites: 20
    Uploaded: 07/25/12
    Awesome Awesome
  • Views: 9211
    Thumbs Up 155 Thumbs Down 18 Total: +137
    Comments: 11
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 04/10/14
    Ihaveamightyneed.gif Ihaveamightyneed.gif
  • Views: 2394
    Thumbs Up 27 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +23
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 01/28/14
    daw daw
  • Views: 3608
    Thumbs Up 28 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +20
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 03/05/14
    Admin these days Admin these days
  • Views: 885
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +18
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/02/12
    Depression Depression
  • Views: 624
    Thumbs Up 20 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +16
    Comments: 7
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/29/12
    Ancient Wisdom Ancient Wisdom
1 2 3 4 5 6 > [ 31 Funny Pictures Total ]

YouTube Videos

1 2 3 > [ 15 YouTube Videos Total ]

Funny Gifs

latest user's comments

#94 - were all thinking it 8 hours ago on Bars Around The World +2
#44 - look at that **** ************ …  [+] (3 new replies) 14 hours ago on Best Christmas ever +13
#88 - listerthepessimist (10 hours ago) [-]
I dispute best book series, but fucking epic nonetheless
User avatar #47 - whycanticaps (14 hours ago) [-]
sounds awesome
#46 - anonexplains (14 hours ago) [-]
I read one of the books and it was decent.
#23 - all you people thinking im retarded, you obviously dont realiz…  [+] (2 new replies) 15 hours ago on Smart Car +3
#64 - anonexplains (11 hours ago) [-]
The smart car was trying to take a left and go across the double solid line which you can also see was a left hand turn lane for the oncoming traffic. So he is cutting sideways across traffic and making a u turn onto the left hand turn lane across the solid lines. There is no place in the world this is allowed. It goes against all the rules, the lines are there for a reason, not to suggest traffic laws
User avatar #46 - PubLandlord (12 hours ago) [-]
He wasn't merging lanes on a motorway.

It's the equivalent pulling out at junction or roundabout and getting hit by someone travelling at a constant speed.

#7 - legally....whos at fault here?  [+] (62 new replies) 03/04/2015 on Smart Car -113
User avatar #123 - fiveblackmen (6 hours ago) [-]
In America, what the little car is doing would most likely be considered reckless driving. He or she cut off oncoming traffic and caused an accident so he or she would be at fault. Obviously this particular incident didn't happen in America so the laws may be different but I feel it is safe to assume, based on this evidence, that the driver of the small car is still at fault.
#84 - anonexplains (9 hours ago) [-]
It varies, my dad pulled out into traffic (in a medium sized work truck) and a guy speeding smacked into. The cop at the scene gave my dad the ticket.

The scenario was similar to this, traffic was backed up on one side and my dad was trying to pass to the other side.

In my opinion it was the guy driving the van whose at fault, he had a clear line of sight and probably wasn't paying attention.

Posting as anon cause all the hate, sorry mate.
#80 - quoterox (9 hours ago) [-]
Blame the retard trying to squeeze a car out of a toothpaste tube.
User avatar #74 - windson (10 hours ago) [-]
The guy who crashed into the smart car because he doesn't appear on camera.
Therefore the smart car was there first, hence the entitlement to passage.
User avatar #99 - alecmason (8 hours ago) [-]
Except that's wrong. The smart car was likely illegally driving and trying to pull out by crossing (presumably) through multiple lanes, not to mention there is obviously no lane going left to right, there for is crossing lanes illegally, and the driver of the smart car is completely at fault.
#72 - dyejordan (10 hours ago) [-]
are you serious
#62 - newdevyx (11 hours ago) [-]
#45 - thoughtspot (12 hours ago) [-]
can you really not tell?
User avatar #24 - potrsr (14 hours ago) [-]
The truck driver is the one to blame, clearly...
User avatar #23 - worldofwarcraftdog (15 hours ago) [-]
all you people thinking im retarded, you obviously dont realize how fucked up some of the road laws can be.

it may seem obvious that its the white cars fault and i totally agree that it is.
but stupid traffic laws may actually put some of the fault on the guy who hit them.
>>#11
>>#21
#64 - anonexplains (11 hours ago) [-]
The smart car was trying to take a left and go across the double solid line which you can also see was a left hand turn lane for the oncoming traffic. So he is cutting sideways across traffic and making a u turn onto the left hand turn lane across the solid lines. There is no place in the world this is allowed. It goes against all the rules, the lines are there for a reason, not to suggest traffic laws
User avatar #46 - PubLandlord (12 hours ago) [-]
He wasn't merging lanes on a motorway.

It's the equivalent pulling out at junction or roundabout and getting hit by someone travelling at a constant speed.

User avatar #19 - undeadmaus (15 hours ago) [-]
The one illegally trying to u turn.
#12 - anonexplains (16 hours ago) [-]
Morally, the white car driver. But legally? Under UK law at least it's the minivan because it's basically a rule that the car that ran into the other is the one at fault because they should have swerved or stopped.
#38 - mattygosling (13 hours ago) [-]
nope, im going to say say same rules would apply as pulling out on someone, if you pull out on someone because they were indicating and they hit you its your fault for going before they started to turn
User avatar #22 - bennii (15 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure it would still be the white car, it was in the incorrect position in the road, emerged unexpectedly, and basically just got into the other cars way without warning or need
User avatar #21 - undeadmaus (15 hours ago) [-]
No, legally too the white car. You can't jsut do shit like that.
#10 - hotpiss (21 hours ago) [-]
the dickhead, if you don't know which one that is, you probably are one.
#9 - theruinedsage (23 hours ago) [-]
How are you even slightly in doubt about that?
User avatar #112 - dracory (7 hours ago) [-]
possible cause he's trying to turn out of a blocked driveway (to a business parking zone most likely, which is illegal to block) then this is proper exiting for making a left turn the smart car driver needs to slowly inch forward as he cant see past the cars the car that hit him was not paying attention to him and just blasted trough when he should have slowed down
User avatar #95 - lazaman (8 hours ago) [-]
Pompous prick, it was a question.
#63 - ThekidsTEN (11 hours ago) [-]
The car that hit him is going too fast
User avatar #48 - andrz (12 hours ago) [-]
I dont see why people thumb worldofwarcraftdog down though. He was just asking a serious question. Different traffic rules apply in different countries, and you can't even see the whole picture of the traffic here.
User avatar #102 - xdiabolicx (8 hours ago) [-]
You sir, need to learn the laws of right-of-way. There's a set of rules to follow to make it EXTREMELY easy to claim who's at fault.
User avatar #105 - andrz (8 hours ago) [-]
Sure there is, but there are incredibly many traffic laws, and they're made to cover a lot of situations. However, some countries have certain rules with sort of loopholes where certain situations lawfully gets determined wrongly in court. It's not like "It's 100% car A's fault and you get a $2000 fine" If this was in UK the minivan would probably have some fault in the situation, seeing there are rules saying you should always drive so carefully/slowly that you're gonna be able to stop if something happens.
User avatar #106 - andrz (8 hours ago) [-]
As ThekidsTEN said, the car hitting the smartcar may also have been driving over the speedlimit, which will give him fault in the situation aswell.
#124 - ThekidsTEN (6 hours ago) [-]
He would be completely at fault. My friend was driving with only his parking lights on around an hour past dawn (there was about 60-75% daylight) and she got cut off. The guy was turning left onto a road (lowest right of way possible) and got rear ended. She got the ticket because she didn't have her lights on (at 830 in the morning)
User avatar #50 - theruinedsage (12 hours ago) [-]
No, but you can clearly see:
There are three lanes, at the least
He is coming from the one one the right
Traffic is at a standstill
He is moving sideways through traffic

He is either doing it to do a U-turn, changing lane, or crossing the street entirely
All of which would make him the one entirely responsible, without a doubt, in any country that has even slightly sane traffic rules.
#125 - ThekidsTEN (6 hours ago) [-]
Not if the other driver is breaking the law, then anything he hits is his fault. MI here, idk about other laws
#114 - ronjeremysweiner (7 hours ago) [-]
ehh a good lawyer could get you out of all that
#110 - anonexplains (7 hours ago) [-]
if you look closely it looks like the car that hit the smart car was coming in at an angle so i think he tried to pull a left turn and into that last lane and if both cars were merging the case could be made that it was the other one at fault for making the left turn. there's a small gap in the cars to allow a left turn through and the car later crashes into the truck, either way the minivan was over the dividing line.
User avatar #51 - andrz (12 hours ago) [-]
That's true. Im just saying at first glance, i didnt notice this was on a road consisting of several lanes. You're completely right, dont get me wrong, im just saying he dosent deserve to be thumbed -40 for asking a question.

Just like gothiczombie said, "In the UK if someone rear ends you 99% of the time they are to blame"
User avatar #53 - theruinedsage (12 hours ago) [-]
It's a stupid question that shows he doesn't have a drivers license Neither does gothiczombie, if he thinks the person at fault is the guy keeping his lane And if they do, they don't deserve it.
User avatar #56 - gothiczombie (12 hours ago) [-]
Does that look like he got rear ended? I didn't say the person pulling out isn't in the wrong, he obviously is, however with due attention the crash could have been avoided.
Laws are made to be generic and cover a lot of things and some can apply to situations that they shouldn't, I don't know the legal aspects of this situation because I don't need to, it's a fucking stupid thing to do, I would never do it. This makes it in my opinion a fair question.
User avatar #66 - andrz (10 hours ago) [-]
Yeah thats what i think too. Im Norwegian so i dont really know what being "rear ended" means, i just assumed it was any kind of crash in the rear of a car.
User avatar #55 - andrz (12 hours ago) [-]
I disagree with you there. Asking a question because you don't know something is the opposite of being stupid. It shows interest and he wants to learn about it. I doubt you know what country this footage is from, and i also doubt you know the laws of traffic in every country. Some countries have pretty fucked up rules. Anyone can see that the smartcar-driver is a dick, but seeing he didnt have knowledge about the laws of traffic that applied to this situation, he simply asked. Bashing on someone for wanting to learn, is pretty much the dumbest thing you can do, in my opinion.
User avatar #52 - andrz (12 hours ago) [-]
-30*
User avatar #8 - carefree (03/04/2015) [-]
The person making illegal turns.
AKA the person in the smartcar.
User avatar #11 - kbvskoolaid (16 hours ago) [-]
Not true, In most places if you hit someone with your car then your at fault.
example: your driving on the road and someone is tailgating you, you slam on the brakes because fuck that dude. Guess what, they are at fault for hitting you.
#93 - anonexplains (9 hours ago) [-]
Your example is a REAR END collision, and the car behind is always at fault in a REAR END collision only. If I were at a 4-way stop and started to go, a car ignoring the stop sign and flooring it would be struck by my car in their driver side door. It would also be their fault for ignoring the stop sign.
#96 - twentyten (8 hours ago) [-]
The car behind is not always at fault when in a rear end collision. I would know, because some bitch cut in front me and got hit.
User avatar #40 - gothiczombie (13 hours ago) [-]
In the UK if someone rear ends you 99% of the time they are to blame, this is because you should always drive with a large enough distance between you and the car in front to break. If a car breaks and you crash into them you are tailgating or not showing due attention.
User avatar #44 - kbvskoolaid (12 hours ago) [-]
^^ this
User avatar #35 - psykobear (13 hours ago) [-]
I'm driving along normally.
Dude decides to cross the line into my lane and stop.
I hit him.
My fault.
Wut?
i don't think you understand the driving laws, m8.
User avatar #37 - kbvskoolaid (13 hours ago) [-]
thats exactly how it works, hate to break it to you. the law would say you should have been cautious when he swapped into your lane and been prepared to stop.
#117 - anonexplains (6 hours ago) [-]
Uh, no. That implies if they're changing lanes while you're both driving in the same direction, not if they're cutting a perpendicular line through traffic.

It was ALSO illegal for him to try to go that way in the first place--he appears to want to turn left, which would mean he intends to use the shared turn lane as a merge lane (which is also illegal.)

Dear god I hope you don't have a driver's license.
#115 - ohemgeezus (7 hours ago) [-]
Look at wrong-way driving, retard
#41 - licestr (12 hours ago) [-]
You're not just wrong, you're stupid.
User avatar #39 - psykobear (13 hours ago) [-]
That's not true at all.
Wait, country? Because it's not true in the US.
User avatar #69 - toosexyforyou (10 hours ago) [-]
It is true in the US and any European country as well, the smart car would always be at fault. You are wrong and stupid.
User avatar #70 - psykobear (10 hours ago) [-]
... I said the smart car is at fault, nigga. koolaid was saying the van was at fault.
User avatar #71 - toosexyforyou (10 hours ago) [-]
I apologize. It looked like you were replying to the other guy. kbvskoolaid, read my other comment.
User avatar #43 - davidteninch (12 hours ago) [-]
In Minnesota, most insurance can't blame just one party.

For example, I was hit on my bicycle by a driver that had just started to move but hadn't seen me. If I hadn't been there, there would have been no accident. If he hadn't been there, there also would have been no accident. Meaning we were both to blame even though I was technically the victim.
#42 - davidteninch has deleted their comment.
User avatar #30 - Mintberrycrunsh (14 hours ago) [-]
No its not true (your example is but pls look at hamplanet and his comments)

If you take someones right of way and slamm inot his care, YOU are the one to blame and are fully liable.

But if someone rear-ends you and you hit the brakes, you are semi-liable and are treated likewise in court.

its allmost in every country that way.
User avatar #28 - SteyrAUG (14 hours ago) [-]
But that's because the car behind is required by law to maintain a safe following distance. In the case shown above the person inching out into traffic and expecting everyone in the world to get out of their way is at fault because they failed to yield the right of way to the cars currently in the road.
User avatar #27 - angelious (14 hours ago) [-]
that would be the case if you were following the rules of nature traffic. this guy made an illegal turn. its his fault that the crash happened.
#13 - hamplanet (16 hours ago) [-]
No. In most countries, you would also be at fault because you have to check the rear mirror before slamming ylour breaks. If you break too sudden and someone crashes into you, you are to blame as much as them.
And here, it's the same. He just drove into the street without being able to see if it's free, so he is to blame for the crash. Don't make up shit.
#25 - anonexplains (14 hours ago) [-]
So wrong, it's legally the person who hits you in the back who's at fault in all countries.
User avatar #33 - meganinja (14 hours ago) [-]
In all countries?

Wow you sure are smart to know the traffic laws of every single country on the planet.
#18 - drahkreher (15 hours ago) [-]
almost all the time LEGALLY the person who rear-ends someone is at fault, even if they did nothing wrong
User avatar #17 - kbvskoolaid (15 hours ago) [-]
you dont have to check rear mirrors before you break incase of unexpected scenarios. such as a deer jumping infront of your car or a tree falling. You make up what ever reason you want for breaking.
#10 - god damnit making myself tear up  [+] (1 new reply) 03/03/2015 on Daaww 0
#12 - coffinsalesman (03/03/2015) [-]
I'm just *sniff* cutting onions over here....
#9 - those video of soldiers coming home to their animals (especial…  [+] (7 new replies) 03/03/2015 on Daaww +25
User avatar #152 - abcz (14 hours ago) [-]
DAYUM THAT DOG AT 1:20, that dog is like a bear (with less hair)
#112 - croneos (16 hours ago) [-]
My dog greets me like this every time i get home from work
User avatar #71 - donatelo (22 hours ago) [-]
1:33 got me good in the feels department...but a good feel
User avatar #45 - icedpyro (03/04/2015) [-]
User avatar #57 - thumbingthumbing (03/04/2015) [-]
So sweet and lovely are dogs
#10 - worldofwarcraftdog (03/03/2015) [-]
god damnit

making myself tear up
#12 - coffinsalesman (03/03/2015) [-]
I'm just *sniff* cutting onions over here....
#8 - Picture  [+] (3 new replies) 03/03/2015 on Daaww +20
#67 - anonexplains (23 hours ago) [-]
yes, get a retarded dog, that will love you, your neighbors and cars and the postman.

Perhaps you could just buy a software that tells you it loves you. Same shit.
User avatar #133 - autonomous (15 hours ago) [-]
Just cause you weren't loved doesn't mean you gotta shit on other people, come on.
#115 - ineedthistothumb (16 hours ago) [-]
you must be great at parties.
#6 - >falls  [+] (10 new replies) 03/03/2015 on (untitled) +301
User avatar #27 - reichmaster (03/04/2015) [-]
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
#38 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#39 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#40 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#41 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#42 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#31 - camzore (03/04/2015) [-]
pls stop
User avatar #65 - flappyhippobutt (15 hours ago) [-]
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
User avatar #34 - reichmaster (03/04/2015) [-]
no
#35 - camzore (03/04/2015) [-]
ok
#5 - *gasp* what an adorable gravity defying puppy  [+] (11 new replies) 03/03/2015 on (untitled) +227
#6 - worldofwarcraftdog (03/03/2015) [-]
>falls
User avatar #27 - reichmaster (03/04/2015) [-]
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
#38 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#39 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#40 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#41 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#42 - meek (23 hours ago) [-]
#31 - camzore (03/04/2015) [-]
pls stop
User avatar #65 - flappyhippobutt (15 hours ago) [-]
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
User avatar #34 - reichmaster (03/04/2015) [-]
no
#35 - camzore (03/04/2015) [-]
ok
#8 - goofy's war face holy **** my sides 03/03/2015 on Full Metal Disney +7

user's channels

Join Subscribe 4chan
Join Subscribe deadpool
Join Subscribe fucking-science

items

Total unique items point value: 2041 / Total items point value: 7035
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #45 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (12/06/2014) [-]
Россия сосет шары
#44 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#41 - sdcanonymoose (02/23/2014) [-]
Anniversary of your sign-up tomorrow
Anniversary of your sign-up tomorrow
User avatar #40 - skatedawg (05/06/2013) [-]
Hello fellow Arkansan.
User avatar #39 - amissingmouse (01/19/2013) [-]
Hi :)
BE MAH FRIEND. :) K?
Thanks.
#13 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Dat face.
User avatar #14 to #13 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
lololol
User avatar #16 to #15 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
hey do you want to see something really ******* cool?
User avatar #18 to #17 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
do you have your phone near you?
do you have rhys's number indexed on your caller id?
is it on silent?
#21 to #18 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Faggot. I know what you did.
User avatar #24 to #21 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
lol but it worked right?
haha what exactly did i do?
#25 to #24 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Showed Rhys's name and number. I said hello, then sat on the line for 20 seconds, knowing you were there.
#30 to #25 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Have a funny one. I'm looking for my personal favorite "cute" applejack.
#33 to #30 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Obligatory...
Obligatory...
#35 to #33 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
daww
daww
#34 to #33 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
...and my favorite pic. LET ME LOVE YOU.
User avatar #37 to #34 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
okay bro i gotta sleep, ill see you tomorrow mabey
#38 to #37 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
You can think about this while you sleep. Night
User avatar #28 to #25 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
dont tell anyone i have this ability, i know its nothing to special but id like to keep it on the DL with people i dont tell
#27 to #25 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
and that picture is adorable
User avatar #26 to #25 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
lol no, as soon as you said hello i hung up, cause i get the feeling rhys might flip out if i woke him up, he really likes getting sleep
#29 to #26 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
YFW when Rhys rage activated.
#32 to #29 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
mfw i say something he doesnt like.......its like spilling milk , holy 						****
mfw i say something he doesnt like.......its like spilling milk , holy ****
#36 to #32 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Print out a couple of these and keep 'em handy.
#19 to #18 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes.
User avatar #20 to #19 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
i cant talk cause rhys would get [pissed , but who did your caller id say that was?
#23 to #20 - leveledbutton (11/15/2012) [-]
Rhys.
Rhys.
User avatar #22 to #20 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (11/15/2012) [-]
hed get pissed cause hes sleeping
fyi
#12 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE Comment deleted by worldofwarcraftdog [-]
User avatar #9 - djponee (09/13/2011) [-]
**djponee rolled user trollmanone**
#7 - anonexplains (07/26/2011) [-]
nice you play wow
User avatar #6 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (05/26/2011) [-]
rolls
User avatar #5 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (05/26/2011) [-]
"worldofwarcraftdog rolls"
#1 - JohnE (03/19/2011) [-]
**JohnE rolls 46** Dubs and you are good at WoW.

Well, looks like you aren't good at WoW.
User avatar #2 to #1 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (03/19/2011) [-]
lols how do you figure?
User avatar #3 to #2 - ROFL (03/20/2011) [-]
**ROFL rolls 918** singles and you're a faggot
User avatar #4 to #3 - worldofwarcraftdog ONLINE (03/20/2011) [-]
LMAO
 Friends (0)