Upload
Login or register

wolverinebamf

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:12/14/2010
Last Login:9/12/2016
Location:arizona
Stats
Comment Ranking:#18862
Highest Content Rank:#6130
Highest Comment Rank:#676
Content Thumbs: 2106 total,  3843 ,  1737
Comment Thumbs: 8706 total,  10704 ,  1998
Content Level Progress: 3% (3/100)
Level 121 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 122 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 30% (30/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:6
Content Views:170397
Times Content Favorited:214 times
Total Comments Made:5949
FJ Points:10814
Favorite Tags: atari (2) | Fat (2) | nigger (2)

Text Posts

  • Views: 28358
    Thumbs Up 791 Thumbs Down 92 Total: +699
    Comments: 38
    Favorites: 86
    Uploaded: 09/24/12
    Beta as FUCK Beta as FUCK
  • Views: 12664
    Thumbs Up 178 Thumbs Down 39 Total: +139
    Comments: 36
    Favorites: 59
    Uploaded: 09/25/12
    contradictions and shit. contradictions and shit.
  • Views: 4708
    Thumbs Up 93 Thumbs Down 22 Total: +71
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 5
    Uploaded: 12/03/11
    Adventure! Adventure!
  • Views: 2786
    Thumbs Up 60 Thumbs Down 10 Total: +50
    Comments: 16
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 06/22/12
    disgusting! disgusting!
  • Views: 14658
    Thumbs Up 32 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +29
    Comments: 16
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/12/11
    fat guy fat guy
  • Views: 1911
    Thumbs Up 31 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +26
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 02/04/12
    Douches Douches

latest user's comments

#41 - Nice anecdotes. My sister had a pitbull that had to b…  [+] (2 replies) 09/12/2016 on #StopClickBait Dump -1
User avatar
#47 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
because dogs are not responsible for how shitty their owner/previous owner is. A dog is not born aggressive, and neither is a human.
You give any dog to a shitbag, you'll end up with a bad dog
give a carbon copy of that dog to a good owner, and you'll end up with a good dog.

Pit Bulls get a shitty reputation because shitbags pick them due to their appearance, and then raise them to be aggressive. I gave you examples of pit bulls with good owners, and I could do the same for any breed, and do the same with other breeds being aggressive as hell due to their owner.

People have the ability to control their aggression (unless they have a mental or physical disorder), they are fully responsible for their own actions.
#46 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
>nice anecdotes
"Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression."
Whats this then you retarded niggerfaggot?
#36 - Pit bulls have literally been bred for aggression for hundreds…  [+] (5 replies) 09/12/2016 on #StopClickBait Dump -1
#44 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls started being bred for fighting in the early 1800s. So saying "hundreds of years" is a bit misleading. Not to mention the europoors who participated in dog fighting actively bred out "man-biters" so that they could handle the animals.
Then when they came over to america they were used to defend homes from wild life and intruders. The pit bulls would protect the people, especially children.
It wasn't until the 80's when fucking niggers figured out they could fight them for money. This is when "people" started training and "breeding" (if you could call what niggers do to them "breeding") pit bulls for raw aggression and general niggerdom.
In short its been about 30 years and the fight against dog fighting has been happening since 2008.
If anything its a great time to get a pit bull, they're very fun dogs capable of protecting your family from niggers and mudslimes.
User avatar
#40 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
I used to hang out with a guy who had 2 pit bulls, both of whom were some of the most well mannered and gentle dogs I have ever known. When his girlfriend had a baby the dogs would spend all night by the crib, as if keeping watch.

My ex-girlfriend also had a pit bull, and he was pretty much a buff teddy bear when it came to temperament. I often used him as a pillow when I was at her house.
User avatar
#41 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Nice anecdotes.

My sister had a pitbull that had to be put down a few years ago.

My mom is a dog foster parent, she keeps dogs until she can find them good homes, she no longer takes in pit bulls, because out of all the dogs she's had, she's only had trouble with pit bulls.

It's not like I'm advocating the genocide of pitbulls, just that it's silly to ignore that pitbulls are more aggressive.

How can FJ be so ready to believe that blacks are more violent/less intelligent than whites, yet pit bulls are off limits.
User avatar
#47 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
because dogs are not responsible for how shitty their owner/previous owner is. A dog is not born aggressive, and neither is a human.
You give any dog to a shitbag, you'll end up with a bad dog
give a carbon copy of that dog to a good owner, and you'll end up with a good dog.

Pit Bulls get a shitty reputation because shitbags pick them due to their appearance, and then raise them to be aggressive. I gave you examples of pit bulls with good owners, and I could do the same for any breed, and do the same with other breeds being aggressive as hell due to their owner.

People have the ability to control their aggression (unless they have a mental or physical disorder), they are fully responsible for their own actions.
#46 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
>nice anecdotes
"Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression."
Whats this then you retarded niggerfaggot?
#33 - Okay, say you're right. Say it's just because pit bulls are mo…  [+] (7 replies) 09/12/2016 on #StopClickBait Dump -2
#35 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
I didn't say they were bred to kill, I said trained by niggers. As in given steroids and coaxed into attacking things like cats and small dogs until they are automatically aggressive towards everything, for the purposes of making that nigger some money for crack.
Are you fucking serious? You are really comparing hunting to dog fighting? Go fuck yourself.
You could breed a dog to be aggressive as shit, no ones done that as far as I know cause that would be retarded.
To answer your question specifically, I wouldn't feel comfortable allowing ANY dog around my kid unless I met both the dog and its owner first to determine how well trained it is. Not sure why I should have to say that because its fucking obvious but there you have it.
User avatar
#36 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls have literally been bred for aggression for hundreds of years, and artificial selection works fast.

If you are a dog fighter, and one of your dogs is naturally more aggressive, therefore he fights better, would you not breed that dog? Thats how artificial selection works, and since dog fighting is not a new phenomena this process has been going on for a loooong time.
#44 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls started being bred for fighting in the early 1800s. So saying "hundreds of years" is a bit misleading. Not to mention the europoors who participated in dog fighting actively bred out "man-biters" so that they could handle the animals.
Then when they came over to america they were used to defend homes from wild life and intruders. The pit bulls would protect the people, especially children.
It wasn't until the 80's when fucking niggers figured out they could fight them for money. This is when "people" started training and "breeding" (if you could call what niggers do to them "breeding") pit bulls for raw aggression and general niggerdom.
In short its been about 30 years and the fight against dog fighting has been happening since 2008.
If anything its a great time to get a pit bull, they're very fun dogs capable of protecting your family from niggers and mudslimes.
User avatar
#40 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
I used to hang out with a guy who had 2 pit bulls, both of whom were some of the most well mannered and gentle dogs I have ever known. When his girlfriend had a baby the dogs would spend all night by the crib, as if keeping watch.

My ex-girlfriend also had a pit bull, and he was pretty much a buff teddy bear when it came to temperament. I often used him as a pillow when I was at her house.
User avatar
#41 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Nice anecdotes.

My sister had a pitbull that had to be put down a few years ago.

My mom is a dog foster parent, she keeps dogs until she can find them good homes, she no longer takes in pit bulls, because out of all the dogs she's had, she's only had trouble with pit bulls.

It's not like I'm advocating the genocide of pitbulls, just that it's silly to ignore that pitbulls are more aggressive.

How can FJ be so ready to believe that blacks are more violent/less intelligent than whites, yet pit bulls are off limits.
User avatar
#47 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
because dogs are not responsible for how shitty their owner/previous owner is. A dog is not born aggressive, and neither is a human.
You give any dog to a shitbag, you'll end up with a bad dog
give a carbon copy of that dog to a good owner, and you'll end up with a good dog.

Pit Bulls get a shitty reputation because shitbags pick them due to their appearance, and then raise them to be aggressive. I gave you examples of pit bulls with good owners, and I could do the same for any breed, and do the same with other breeds being aggressive as hell due to their owner.

People have the ability to control their aggression (unless they have a mental or physical disorder), they are fully responsible for their own actions.
#46 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
>nice anecdotes
"Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression."
Whats this then you retarded niggerfaggot?
#31 - it is statistically more likely to kill people than other dogs…  [+] (9 replies) 09/12/2016 on #StopClickBait Dump -4
#32 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
You can't take statistics out of context like that. Yes pit bulls are more likely to kill than other dogs but that is the result of niggers training them to kill and the fact that the pit bulls are more successful at killing when they try it.
That does not mean pit bulls are more likely to attack.
You aren't more likely to get into a wreck if you ride a motorcycle.
But you are more likely to die IF you do get in a wreck.
Are you understanding? Is the information reaching your brain?
I have never met an aggressive pit bull and I used to wash dogs for a living. I would get them wet sudsy and finger them in the asshole and not once did a pitbull snap at me. In fact shibas were the most common dicks.
User avatar
#33 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Okay, say you're right. Say it's just because pit bulls are more likely to be successful that they are overwhelmingly more likely to kill. Would you feel more comfortable with a lab or a pit bull next to your baby?

Why are hunting dogs not on the list? They are trained to kill. Bulldogs have been bred to be aggresive, both for dog fighting AND for home protection.

If we can breed greyhounds to run fast, and we can breed bloodhounds to sniff things out, why is it so hard to believe breeding pit bulls to be aggressive would not create a more aggressive breed of dog?
#35 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
I didn't say they were bred to kill, I said trained by niggers. As in given steroids and coaxed into attacking things like cats and small dogs until they are automatically aggressive towards everything, for the purposes of making that nigger some money for crack.
Are you fucking serious? You are really comparing hunting to dog fighting? Go fuck yourself.
You could breed a dog to be aggressive as shit, no ones done that as far as I know cause that would be retarded.
To answer your question specifically, I wouldn't feel comfortable allowing ANY dog around my kid unless I met both the dog and its owner first to determine how well trained it is. Not sure why I should have to say that because its fucking obvious but there you have it.
User avatar
#36 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls have literally been bred for aggression for hundreds of years, and artificial selection works fast.

If you are a dog fighter, and one of your dogs is naturally more aggressive, therefore he fights better, would you not breed that dog? Thats how artificial selection works, and since dog fighting is not a new phenomena this process has been going on for a loooong time.
#44 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls started being bred for fighting in the early 1800s. So saying "hundreds of years" is a bit misleading. Not to mention the europoors who participated in dog fighting actively bred out "man-biters" so that they could handle the animals.
Then when they came over to america they were used to defend homes from wild life and intruders. The pit bulls would protect the people, especially children.
It wasn't until the 80's when fucking niggers figured out they could fight them for money. This is when "people" started training and "breeding" (if you could call what niggers do to them "breeding") pit bulls for raw aggression and general niggerdom.
In short its been about 30 years and the fight against dog fighting has been happening since 2008.
If anything its a great time to get a pit bull, they're very fun dogs capable of protecting your family from niggers and mudslimes.
User avatar
#40 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
I used to hang out with a guy who had 2 pit bulls, both of whom were some of the most well mannered and gentle dogs I have ever known. When his girlfriend had a baby the dogs would spend all night by the crib, as if keeping watch.

My ex-girlfriend also had a pit bull, and he was pretty much a buff teddy bear when it came to temperament. I often used him as a pillow when I was at her house.
User avatar
#41 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Nice anecdotes.

My sister had a pitbull that had to be put down a few years ago.

My mom is a dog foster parent, she keeps dogs until she can find them good homes, she no longer takes in pit bulls, because out of all the dogs she's had, she's only had trouble with pit bulls.

It's not like I'm advocating the genocide of pitbulls, just that it's silly to ignore that pitbulls are more aggressive.

How can FJ be so ready to believe that blacks are more violent/less intelligent than whites, yet pit bulls are off limits.
User avatar
#47 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
because dogs are not responsible for how shitty their owner/previous owner is. A dog is not born aggressive, and neither is a human.
You give any dog to a shitbag, you'll end up with a bad dog
give a carbon copy of that dog to a good owner, and you'll end up with a good dog.

Pit Bulls get a shitty reputation because shitbags pick them due to their appearance, and then raise them to be aggressive. I gave you examples of pit bulls with good owners, and I could do the same for any breed, and do the same with other breeds being aggressive as hell due to their owner.

People have the ability to control their aggression (unless they have a mental or physical disorder), they are fully responsible for their own actions.
#46 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
>nice anecdotes
"Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression."
Whats this then you retarded niggerfaggot?
#28 - Pitbulls should not be that close to babies. I don't care how …  [+] (13 replies) 09/12/2016 on #StopClickBait Dump -5
User avatar
#45 - ottophilatsio (09/12/2016) [-]
We had a family friend whos infant was torn apart by their pitbull. I will never trust those dogs. Go ahead and redthumb me to oblivion, but I fucking hate pitbulls.
#30 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
Large powerful dogs have the capacity to kill people? who knew?
The point is that those dogs aren't more aggressive than normal. When they are aggressive its more often fatal as a result of the physical power of the dog but if they met the dog and it was nice I see no reason not to let the dog hang out with the baby.
Furthermore pit bulls are used for dog fighting on a large scale, specifically training a dog to be ferocious skews those statistics massively.
Finally, it has nothing to do with morals, just common sense.
Don't be such a fuckin puss
User avatar
#31 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
it is statistically more likely to kill people than other dogs. That should be enough to not let a pit bull around your fragile baby.

Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression.
#32 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
You can't take statistics out of context like that. Yes pit bulls are more likely to kill than other dogs but that is the result of niggers training them to kill and the fact that the pit bulls are more successful at killing when they try it.
That does not mean pit bulls are more likely to attack.
You aren't more likely to get into a wreck if you ride a motorcycle.
But you are more likely to die IF you do get in a wreck.
Are you understanding? Is the information reaching your brain?
I have never met an aggressive pit bull and I used to wash dogs for a living. I would get them wet sudsy and finger them in the asshole and not once did a pitbull snap at me. In fact shibas were the most common dicks.
User avatar
#33 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Okay, say you're right. Say it's just because pit bulls are more likely to be successful that they are overwhelmingly more likely to kill. Would you feel more comfortable with a lab or a pit bull next to your baby?

Why are hunting dogs not on the list? They are trained to kill. Bulldogs have been bred to be aggresive, both for dog fighting AND for home protection.

If we can breed greyhounds to run fast, and we can breed bloodhounds to sniff things out, why is it so hard to believe breeding pit bulls to be aggressive would not create a more aggressive breed of dog?
#35 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
I didn't say they were bred to kill, I said trained by niggers. As in given steroids and coaxed into attacking things like cats and small dogs until they are automatically aggressive towards everything, for the purposes of making that nigger some money for crack.
Are you fucking serious? You are really comparing hunting to dog fighting? Go fuck yourself.
You could breed a dog to be aggressive as shit, no ones done that as far as I know cause that would be retarded.
To answer your question specifically, I wouldn't feel comfortable allowing ANY dog around my kid unless I met both the dog and its owner first to determine how well trained it is. Not sure why I should have to say that because its fucking obvious but there you have it.
User avatar
#36 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls have literally been bred for aggression for hundreds of years, and artificial selection works fast.

If you are a dog fighter, and one of your dogs is naturally more aggressive, therefore he fights better, would you not breed that dog? Thats how artificial selection works, and since dog fighting is not a new phenomena this process has been going on for a loooong time.
#44 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
Pit bulls started being bred for fighting in the early 1800s. So saying "hundreds of years" is a bit misleading. Not to mention the europoors who participated in dog fighting actively bred out "man-biters" so that they could handle the animals.
Then when they came over to america they were used to defend homes from wild life and intruders. The pit bulls would protect the people, especially children.
It wasn't until the 80's when fucking niggers figured out they could fight them for money. This is when "people" started training and "breeding" (if you could call what niggers do to them "breeding") pit bulls for raw aggression and general niggerdom.
In short its been about 30 years and the fight against dog fighting has been happening since 2008.
If anything its a great time to get a pit bull, they're very fun dogs capable of protecting your family from niggers and mudslimes.
User avatar
#40 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
I used to hang out with a guy who had 2 pit bulls, both of whom were some of the most well mannered and gentle dogs I have ever known. When his girlfriend had a baby the dogs would spend all night by the crib, as if keeping watch.

My ex-girlfriend also had a pit bull, and he was pretty much a buff teddy bear when it came to temperament. I often used him as a pillow when I was at her house.
User avatar
#41 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Nice anecdotes.

My sister had a pitbull that had to be put down a few years ago.

My mom is a dog foster parent, she keeps dogs until she can find them good homes, she no longer takes in pit bulls, because out of all the dogs she's had, she's only had trouble with pit bulls.

It's not like I'm advocating the genocide of pitbulls, just that it's silly to ignore that pitbulls are more aggressive.

How can FJ be so ready to believe that blacks are more violent/less intelligent than whites, yet pit bulls are off limits.
User avatar
#47 - ragingspacepanda (09/12/2016) [-]
because dogs are not responsible for how shitty their owner/previous owner is. A dog is not born aggressive, and neither is a human.
You give any dog to a shitbag, you'll end up with a bad dog
give a carbon copy of that dog to a good owner, and you'll end up with a good dog.

Pit Bulls get a shitty reputation because shitbags pick them due to their appearance, and then raise them to be aggressive. I gave you examples of pit bulls with good owners, and I could do the same for any breed, and do the same with other breeds being aggressive as hell due to their owner.

People have the ability to control their aggression (unless they have a mental or physical disorder), they are fully responsible for their own actions.
#46 - coolpeoplearecool (09/12/2016) [-]
>nice anecdotes
"Pit bulls are known to snap, even ones raised by a loving family. I've had pitbulls myself that have snapped and bit children without ever showing prior signs of aggression."
Whats this then you retarded niggerfaggot?
#29 - anon (09/12/2016) [-]
it's a fucking dog, just as dangerous as any other dog the same size. shut the fuck up
#73 - Neat. I'll check it out. I'm wary about putting time into priv…  [+] (1 reply) 09/12/2016 on I'm still pissed about this. 0
User avatar
#74 - jimmytwoshoes (09/12/2016) [-]
sunwell-wow.com/
link for you to the main page
#55 - Like I said, I played on a vanilla server for a few months. Go…  [+] (2 replies) 09/12/2016 on I'm still pissed about this. 0
User avatar
#56 - manofparody (09/12/2016) [-]
I'm liking Legion so far. Particularly Rogue. I leveled my mage first to 110, then started hating it because I lost my class trinket and it felt underpowered after that.
My rogue is just insanely fun. The class quests, the artifact quests, just everything about it is the best. The rogue class hall is easily the best class hall. I honestly thought it would be retarded when I heard about it, but holy shit is it such a cool idea implemented so well.
I'm enjoying Legion so far. Although I've already done each zone about 4-5 times so far, I do enjoy the fact that they allow you to choose which zone you want to go to, instead of doing the whole "This is where you're going to go and this is what you're going to do. You have no choice."
User avatar
#57 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Agreed. My only 110 is a rogue but I'm liking it. The zones are actually fun.
#52 - ****, forgot to log in, if you want to talk about WoW, reply t…  [+] (7 replies) 09/12/2016 on I'm still pissed about this. 0
User avatar
#72 - jimmytwoshoes (09/12/2016) [-]
i play on Sunwell, its a Wrath server
User avatar
#73 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Neat. I'll check it out. I'm wary about putting time into private servers now though, after months of work into my nostalrius account went down the drain when actiblizz threatened to sue.
User avatar
#74 - jimmytwoshoes (09/12/2016) [-]
sunwell-wow.com/
link for you to the main page
User avatar
#54 - manofparody (09/12/2016) [-]
I think people are too hyped on that nostalgia factor to realize how complete and utter shit vanilla and BC wow was.
>only 1-2 viable dps classes
>Warrior was only class that could actively tank. Paladin would just oom
>AV Was 6+ hours long (Sounds cool. It's not)
>1 hour hearthstones
>No mounts
>Weapon skills (Lemme bash this dummy for an hour straight)
>Vanilla wasn't more difficult. It just took significantly longer. Tired of hearing "wow has gotten too easy." Bitch, no it hasn't. It's just gotten faster.
>Hybird classes were healers. They were absolutely not viable as dps. Even then, they only had 2~ abilities you'd use
>Farming was incredibly insane
>40 man raids sound cool, until you have to wait 2+ hours to get one formed.
>Druid was just a cluster fuck of bad ideas implemented by the devs

The game wasn't anything worth noting until WotLK. Too many people ride the nostalgia dick, and either didn't play or just decides to ignore all the annoyingly bad shit, like a girl who keeps going back to an abusive boyfriend.
User avatar
#55 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Like I said, I played on a vanilla server for a few months. Got to level 40 before they closed it.

I don't think vanilla was the best, but I think Cata-WoD could have been a lot better. I've got a lot of optimism going into legion too. I am really excited to see where we're going in this expansion.
User avatar
#56 - manofparody (09/12/2016) [-]
I'm liking Legion so far. Particularly Rogue. I leveled my mage first to 110, then started hating it because I lost my class trinket and it felt underpowered after that.
My rogue is just insanely fun. The class quests, the artifact quests, just everything about it is the best. The rogue class hall is easily the best class hall. I honestly thought it would be retarded when I heard about it, but holy shit is it such a cool idea implemented so well.
I'm enjoying Legion so far. Although I've already done each zone about 4-5 times so far, I do enjoy the fact that they allow you to choose which zone you want to go to, instead of doing the whole "This is where you're going to go and this is what you're going to do. You have no choice."
User avatar
#57 - wolverinebamf (09/12/2016) [-]
Agreed. My only 110 is a rogue but I'm liking it. The zones are actually fun.

channels owned

Subscribe anti-funny
Subscribe funnyjunk