Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:7/12/2011
Last Login:9/25/2016
Content Ranking:#1745
Comment Ranking:#17458
Highest Content Rank:#693
Highest Comment Rank:#887
Content Thumbs: 2363 total,  3062 ,  699
Comment Thumbs: 8919 total,  10785 ,  1866
Content Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 117 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 60% (60/100)
Level 273 Comments: Ninja Pirate → Level 274 Comments: Ninja Pirate
Content Views:106931
Times Content Favorited:84 times
Total Comments Made:720
FJ Points:9200
Favorite Tags: i (2) | jews (2)

Text Posts

First2[ 12 ]

HD Gifs / WebMs

First2[ 12 ]

latest user's comments

#33 - Haha yeah, even those children born into it! ******* burn all …  [+] (6 replies) 09/23/2016 on Best leader +2
#577 - anon (09/24/2016) [-]
Your absolutely correct

I'm not being sarcastic
User avatar
#46 - mordadigsjalv (09/23/2016) [-]
Yes because children ate capable of understanding religion. idiot
User avatar
#230 - scorcho (09/24/2016) [-]
child:"i'm too young to understand religion"
explosions:"oh ok, you live"
#107 - willysbilly (09/23/2016) [-]
they would still fall under muslim in putin's description
User avatar
#36 - bulwark (09/23/2016) [-]
Children still have time to be cured.
#34 - chaosmike (09/23/2016) [-]
what are you? a retard?
#2 - If you've met many great black men, would you say they deserve…  [+] (3 replies) 09/03/2016 on Not all trump supporters... -12
User avatar
#22 - surrandre (09/04/2016) [-]
I'm going to let you in on a little secret, if you see someone posting about 'Subhuman niggers", "Monkeys" or "Sand Niggers", technically not what were talking about here, but it still applies we're not talking about all black people, or just even black people.
There's a difference between a black man and a nigger, just like a square and a rectangle. You do understand what I'm saying here, yes?
Being a nigger is a mentality, shared across many races, but then you're probably a nigger or a SJW/White Knight cunt to have to complain about people making jokes.
User avatar
#11 - Sewallman (09/03/2016) [-]
Last night, I was ragging on my cambodian babysitter, asking when he was going to become a chick with a dick and move to Taiwan.

You're allowed to joke respectfully about a person's race,
User avatar
#4 - wcpapier (09/03/2016) [-]
how niggers are all monkeys who shout gibs me dat and that every city they inhabit is a shithole on post after post on this site*
#7 - I think there might be brakes on the Trump train  [+] (19 replies) 07/10/2016 on The train has no freaking... +8
#53 - moodorf (07/10/2016) [-]
User avatar
#41 - wattlegobbler (07/10/2016) [-]
C'mon, we all know that the press is on Hillarys side, they just want to bring some Trump-voters to change the sides
#11 - anon (07/10/2016) [-]
Polls mean dick, especially when they're conducted 4 friggen' months before the election even starts. The Brexit result should have tipped everyone off.
User avatar
#10 - elduroto (07/10/2016) [-]
Who cares what the media thinks? It's the people who will be voting
#31 - haxslasher (07/10/2016) [-]
people aren't voting for shit. the fucking college is what counts.
I really hate this broken system
User avatar
#15 - Ruspanic (07/10/2016) [-]
>the media
These are poll results. The people who participate in polls are members of the electorate.
#79 - anon (07/25/2016) [-]
Like in Brexit, right? Oh, wait...
#69 - anon (07/10/2016) [-]
>implying people can't lie about poll results

Libcuck damage control is always so fucking weak just like their shitty memes
User avatar
#73 - Ruspanic (07/10/2016) [-]
buzzwords and denial. I wonder which 4chan board you came from?
User avatar
#12 - ridivey (07/10/2016) [-]
Actually it's the electoral college who will be voting.

What, you didn't think the system was fair, did you?
User avatar
#35 - failtolawl (07/10/2016) [-]
Electoral college is based on the popular votes of each state, and besides one election, it has been correlated with popular vote of the nation.
User avatar
#9 - chikibriki (07/10/2016) [-]
that's because trump supporters toned down a bit since he got the nomination
User avatar
#16 - Ruspanic (07/10/2016) [-]
No, all throughout the primaries Trump was still losing to Hillary in nearly every poll.
User avatar
#23 - thegamepixel (07/10/2016) [-]
There was a period of 2-3 days where Trump was winning.
User avatar
#17 - chikibriki (07/10/2016) [-]
where are these polls anyways? i haven't seen one
User avatar
#20 - chikibriki (07/10/2016) [-]
seems to me people have to go to these sites and take part in the poll, a lot of people aren't goin got do that. while it might be a sample size, it's difficult to tell based on numers alone exactly what states are going to vote which direction
User avatar
#34 - failtolawl (07/10/2016) [-]
Usually the voluntary online polls have trump supporters winning, while the professional polls have Clinton winning. Obviously the professional ones are rigged and can't be trusted until trump starts winning because that's irrefutable logic.
User avatar
#21 - Ruspanic (07/10/2016) [-]
There's some of that, but there's also a lot of polls that work by randomly calling phone numbers. No sample is going to be perfect, but that's why it's best to look at a group of different polls like in the website I linked.
#90 - This is just further evidence that Trump will lie again and ag…  [+] (7 replies) 06/08/2016 on You'll never believe what... +12
#207 - anon (06/08/2016) [-]
>>#123 >>#85 >>#98 >>#124 >>#165

You idiots actually fell for this bait? Why? Did the blueness of his username blind you to how obvious the bait was?
User avatar
#208 - huntergriff (06/08/2016) [-]
#124 - tapeboy (06/08/2016) [-]
I want to see one video of his supports beating up the protestors in san jose and not the other way around. Just one fucking video please.
User avatar
#123 - mrjweezy (06/08/2016) [-]
but trump didnt even post that.
#98 - comradewinter (06/08/2016) [-]
>Someone posts an Anti-Liberal post
>Wow, that Trump sure is cynical

Good on you for using Liberal logic though, immediately calling out the wrong names just to serve your political idea. Great irony.
#95 - anon (06/08/2016) [-]
You actually watch any of the videos or are you retarded? People were getting ambushed right out of the trump rally. Also this wasn't his twitter.
#9 - A little rich when FJ "judges" black people by celeb…  [+] (2 replies) 05/22/2016 on Diversity Hire +7
#12 - lulzdealer (05/23/2016) [-]
It's because of the joke at the end, "Bilbo Stabbins".

#10 - knightbean (05/22/2016) [-]
We enjoy when people get what is coming to them.
If your acting like an asshole then it's satisfying to see them get their just deserts.
It has nothing to do with skin color or political ideology.
It has everything to do with their actions.
Please stop confusing us with pol.
#11 - Yeah, Assad the dictator and Putin the journalist murderer. Wa…  [+] (2 replies) 05/20/2016 on Aid can be different +14
#26 - cringemary (05/21/2016) [-]
Journalists are cunts that don't respect others, they got what was coming.
User avatar
#12 - jaevel (05/20/2016) [-]
The grass looks always greener on the other side.
#14 - I hate Trump because I think he's a boorish man who has flip f…  [+] (2 replies) 05/18/2016 on "Why do you hate Trump?" 0
User avatar
#16 - elvoz (05/18/2016) [-]
Let me clear up a few of the points you brought up. You got some things right so I won't comment on those, but you got some a bit wrong.

Trump flip-flopped on abortion, though this was over the course of ten years. Ten years ago he was for it and nobody asked him until recently where he isn't anymore. The Iraq War, however, he was against from the start. When questioned in 2003 he said he didn't support it and still to this day says he never supported it.

He hasn't actually filed hardly any lawsuits. He's threatened to sue, possibly jokingly, but he's very rarely gone through with it. On a side note that makes him better than like over half of the rich 1%.

His "collection of statements against women" are against very specific women that have instigated him. Rosie, Megyn, Elizabeth, they all fired shots at him and he returned fire. The implication you made is that he's somehow sexist for this when he did nothing different for those women than he does to the men that stir shit with him. He insults people that get on his nerves. He's been doing that since the 70's. No misogyny here.

He wants to improve relations with North Korea, which itself isn't a bad idea considering they've got nukes now and have a pretty intense hatred of the US. Any improvement is a good thing, short of let them off the hook for their crimes. On the subject of allies, Trump is not pro-Israel and has suggested multiple times to just ditch that region of the world and let Israel handle their own problems. He hasn't said anything about Palestine, but he has made it clear he doesn't think Israel is a great ally. And he knows that Russia is a great ally to have, being that Russia is still a global power. They aren't perfect and have a lot of problems, but making them our enemy won't solve their problems.

Trump has said that "in the old days guys like him would get a punch in the mouth... they got taken out on stretchers" about a specific obnoxious protester at one of his rallies. He didn't say he'd punch him himself nor did he say that the guy should be hurt, he just joked about how in "the old days" (I'm gonna assume the 80's) he would've been beaten for his behavior. Claiming he condones violence based on one joke is insanely misleading.

Aside from those points, the stuff you brought up is pretty much true. Donald is a dick and he plays the politician game, probably better at it than anyone else right now. But while you have some valid beefs with him I just deconstructed a lot of your problems as misinformation. I'm gonna guess you didn't research these things on your own but took them at face-value when you saw them on the news. I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that the news you get is actual news and not memes from Reddit or here or whatever.

The biggest ammunition people have against Trump are lies. Think about that for a moment. Not to say there is nothing wrong with him and that people don't have any valid issues, but when put under the microscope I consistently find that the issues are completely riddled with misinformation.
#17 - willysbilly (05/19/2016) [-]
You're refuting my interpretation of what he has done instead of refuting what he has done. It's such a silly putdown to say I don't look at the news, when you're interpreting his actions differently, I'm not incorrect on them. I do read the news, I follow his quotes and actions to form my opinions, not misinformation.

For example, you say I implicated he was sexist, when all I said was that yes, those comments against specific women are disgusting to me, I think a politician should show more restraint. Why is it fair for you to say I'm spreading misinformation when you are refuting my point based upon an argument you inferred? I never said misogyny, you did.

I never said he condoned violence, I said that those statements, which we both agree he said, are things that I don't believe a candidate should say. Again, you're saying I'm being misleading, when you are the one interpreting arguments that I didn't make.

I mean, here's a list of some of his lawsuits, some of them seem very petty. He's threatened to sue the new york times just this week.

In a speech before one of the country's largest pro-Israel lobbying groups, Trump proclaimed that, "the days of treating Israel like a second-class citizen will end on day one" of his presidency.
He told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee that "there is no moral equivalency" between Israel and the Palestinians,

You may disagree with me, but it's unfair to say I'm spreading misinformation. Its strange that you would misrepresent me when that has been Trump's complaint all along.