Login or register


Last status update:
Age: 115
Date Signed Up:1/13/2012
Last Login:6/02/2012
Location:New New New New New New New New New New New New New New York
Content Thumbs: 36 total,  116 ,  80
Comment Thumbs: 251 total,  4813 ,  4562
Content Level Progress: 67.79% (40/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 125 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 126 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Content Views:5651
Times Content Favorited:11 times
Total Comments Made:2412
FJ Points:124
I'm a time traveler.

latest user's comments

#1 - Posting this ruined it because people thumbed  [+] (1 reply) 04/25/2012 on FJ point win 0
#2 - baconism has deleted their comment.
#2 - >Ca'nt O_O  [+] (1 reply) 04/25/2012 on Seems about right -1
#3 - dhelixx (04/25/2012) [-]
Yep Ca'nt

A contraction for
Can not type
#1 - Nice that you actually acknowledged Evolution as a theological…  [+] (2 replies) 04/25/2012 on Religion Wars -1
#2 - anon (04/25/2012) [-]
evolution "theory" falls apart quite easily:

1. genetic limits- genetic limits are built into the basic types, ex, dog breeders always encounter genetic limits when they intelligently attempt to create new breeds of dogs. Dogs may vary, but despite the best attempts of intelligent dog breeders, dogs are still dogs. If intelligent scientists cannot break genetic barriers, why expect non intelligent natural selection to do so?

2. Cyclical change - Changes are not directional towards the development of new life forms, as macro evolutionary theory requires, they just shift back and forth within a range. Ex, Darwin's finches adapted to correlate with the weather. Larger beaks helped with harder seeds during droughts and small beaks helped when wetter weather brought smaller seeds. The proportion consistently reversed itself to match the weather,no new life forms came into existence

3. Irreducible complexity - An irreducibly complex system composed of several well-matched interactive parts that contribute to the basic function,wherein the removal of any of these parts causes the system to fail. Being that all biological molecular machines are irreducibly complex,meaning that all parts must be completely formed, in the right places, in the right sizes,in operating order, at the same time, for it to function, therefore any intermediates would be nonfunctional

4. Molecular isolation - It has often been said the close DNA relationship between humans and apes implies an ancestral relationship. This can easily be interpreted as a common ancestor OR a common creator. After all, if every living creature were distinct biochemically, a food chain would not even exist

5. Nonviablility of Transitional lifeforms - Natural selection creating NEW lifeforms is unlikely because transitional forms could not survive. Ex, if birds evolved gradually from reptiles,there would be a transition between scales and feathers, in which would not be able to survive in any habitat
#3 - whofortytwo (04/25/2012) [-]
I don't believe Evolution. I was just thanking him for not saying it was a fact.
#4 - Did you notice that Toy Story 3 is there? >_>  [+] (1 reply) 04/25/2012 on I cry evry time 0
User avatar
#7 - shinymew (04/25/2012) [-]
Yeah that the only that was good the others they have been making wasn't good
#3 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 replies) 04/25/2012 on We're too cocky -1
#4 - akmatrix Comment deleted by
#5 - whofortytwo Comment deleted by