Upload
Login or register

wertologist

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/10/2011
Last Login:12/04/2016
Stats
Content Ranking:#5231
Comment Ranking:#483
Highest Content Rank:#956
Highest Comment Rank:#397
Content Thumbs: 4903 total,  5846 ,  943
Comment Thumbs: 25620 total,  28237 ,  2617
Content Level Progress: 68% (68/100)
Level 142 Content: Faptastic → Level 143 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 32.6% (326/1000)
Level 321 Comments: Covered In Thumbs → Level 322 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:98
Content Views:361383
Times Content Favorited:574 times
Total Comments Made:6969
FJ Points:24150
Favorite Tags: sims (3) | Minecraft (2) | OC (2)
Wertologist or Wert107

latest user's comments

#162 - I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was s…  [+] (8 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#160 - I'm going to call ******** that you intended that in sarcasm. …  [+] (10 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#158 - You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole comm…  [+] (12 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#156 - "Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COM…  [+] (14 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#154 - Most don't. It's just that the comics cater to the popular vie…  [+] (16 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#155 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
I don't dislike the comic, the artstyle is good in the least. Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people. Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb.
User avatar
#156 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
"Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people"

Not to speak for everyone, but most of us dislike those groups because of the shit their doing. Ever seen any of the videos? Any news articles? A lot of them are horrible. I personally don't hate them all as some aren't causing trouble, but many are. You're ignorant if you think we blindly hate them all because of a few comics. Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You are being a hypocrite. You're hating us because of "loud-mouthed assholes with sticks" even though they are a very small minority. Do you not see the hypocrisy in your statements?
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#152 - I know it's based on reality. I'm saying its obvious the comic…  [+] (18 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts -1
User avatar
#153 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Its totally not like FJ has a habit of taking comics seriously and basing their entire poltical opinion on them.
User avatar
#154 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
Most don't. It's just that the comics cater to the popular view here. Just because you don't like the comic doesn't mean it isn't true. There are tons of people who would act just like that. You'd be ignorant if you thought otherwise.
User avatar
#155 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
I don't dislike the comic, the artstyle is good in the least. Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people. Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb.
User avatar
#156 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
"Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people"

Not to speak for everyone, but most of us dislike those groups because of the shit their doing. Ever seen any of the videos? Any news articles? A lot of them are horrible. I personally don't hate them all as some aren't causing trouble, but many are. You're ignorant if you think we blindly hate them all because of a few comics. Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You are being a hypocrite. You're hating us because of "loud-mouthed assholes with sticks" even though they are a very small minority. Do you not see the hypocrisy in your statements?
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#150 - Well, it's a comic. It's pretty obvious it never happened.  [+] (20 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts 0
User avatar
#151 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Its based on true events. Its making a strawman out of something that happened,and distorting into something that didn't happen. What happened was a gay couple wanted a cake, the bakery said no, the gay couple reported them and the bakery got a fine.
User avatar
#152 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know it's based on reality. I'm saying its obvious the comic isn't real because it's obviously satire. I have seen people who would fit in the comic so it's really not a stretch.
User avatar
#153 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Its totally not like FJ has a habit of taking comics seriously and basing their entire poltical opinion on them.
User avatar
#154 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
Most don't. It's just that the comics cater to the popular view here. Just because you don't like the comic doesn't mean it isn't true. There are tons of people who would act just like that. You'd be ignorant if you thought otherwise.
User avatar
#155 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
I don't dislike the comic, the artstyle is good in the least. Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people. Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb.
User avatar
#156 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
"Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people"

Not to speak for everyone, but most of us dislike those groups because of the shit their doing. Ever seen any of the videos? Any news articles? A lot of them are horrible. I personally don't hate them all as some aren't causing trouble, but many are. You're ignorant if you think we blindly hate them all because of a few comics. Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You are being a hypocrite. You're hating us because of "loud-mouthed assholes with sticks" even though they are a very small minority. Do you not see the hypocrisy in your statements?
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.
#113 - Well, it's a comic so I can't imagine anyone would take your bet.  [+] (22 replies) 11/25/2016 on Allahu Aktarts +2
User avatar
#149 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
It's not a bet it's a gameshow reference
User avatar
#150 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
Well, it's a comic. It's pretty obvious it never happened.
User avatar
#151 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Its based on true events. Its making a strawman out of something that happened,and distorting into something that didn't happen. What happened was a gay couple wanted a cake, the bakery said no, the gay couple reported them and the bakery got a fine.
User avatar
#152 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know it's based on reality. I'm saying its obvious the comic isn't real because it's obviously satire. I have seen people who would fit in the comic so it's really not a stretch.
User avatar
#153 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Its totally not like FJ has a habit of taking comics seriously and basing their entire poltical opinion on them.
User avatar
#154 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
Most don't. It's just that the comics cater to the popular view here. Just because you don't like the comic doesn't mean it isn't true. There are tons of people who would act just like that. You'd be ignorant if you thought otherwise.
User avatar
#155 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
I don't dislike the comic, the artstyle is good in the least. Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people. Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb.
User avatar
#156 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
"Its just that people (yourself, currently) are using COMICS as justification for disliking huge groups of people"

Not to speak for everyone, but most of us dislike those groups because of the shit their doing. Ever seen any of the videos? Any news articles? A lot of them are horrible. I personally don't hate them all as some aren't causing trouble, but many are. You're ignorant if you think we blindly hate them all because of a few comics. Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You are being a hypocrite. You're hating us because of "loud-mouthed assholes with sticks" even though they are a very small minority. Do you not see the hypocrisy in your statements?
User avatar
#157 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
If I hated the entire community, I wouldn't be here, would I? See I don't hate entire communities based on the loud minority. I make a point of it, actually.
User avatar
#158 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
You misread what I said. I didn't say you hated the whole community here. I pointed out how you were being a hypocrite when you bashed the anti-immigrant group here for something you just did.
User avatar
#159 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.
User avatar
#160 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I'm going to call bullshit that you intended that in sarcasm. You even accused me directly. I have never actually seen anyone here base their entire opinions on satirical comics. I'm sure there's probably at least one, but I've not seen a single one yet. Your "sarcastic" rebuttal has very little to no ground here.
User avatar
#161 - thirdjess (11/25/2016) [-]
Sarcasm doesn't mean lying with a vocal intonation, sarcasm means saying something ironic or hypocritical in order to convey a dislike for the subject at hand.
User avatar
#162 - wertologist (11/25/2016) [-]
I know what sarcasm means. I'm saying I don't believe it was sarcastic. It was pretty clear you were being serious with it.
User avatar
#163 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yea man because people are known for quoting Jeopardy and being deadly serious
User avatar
#164 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
That's not the quote we were talking about and you know it.

"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

How does that reference the jeopardy thing? The jeopardy joke wasn't in any way mocking people to take satirical comics seriously. If that's how you intended it, then you should seriously work on your delivery and phrasing.
#165 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
I was talking about the quote you originally came at me for. If you're talking about something else then you're on another page to the rest of the class and need to work on your delivery and phrasing.
User avatar
#169 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
>168

Except your reasoning doesn't match to what you said. I guess I'm insane though, right? You totally made sense.
User avatar
#172 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
Yes it does, you read too far into things and made associations that weren't there
User avatar
#167 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"Some do, but they don't represent us all. Isn't that what you were saying here?"

I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you.


Was as response about this particular quote:

"Every kind of person has at least one loud-mouthed asshole with a stick. Even Buddhist Monks. Making them worse then they appear and hating them because of that is fucking dumb."

You claimed it was in sarcasm then defended it. Then you suddenly switched which comment you were talking about to your initial comment.

By switching and saying it wasn't sarcastic, are you now admitting you are a hypocrite?
User avatar
#168 - thirdjess (11/26/2016) [-]
You're insane, I'm telling you that I was talking about my original comment - the one that is QUITE OBVIOUSLY A SARCASTIC COMMENT - and you're trying to convince me I in fact wasn't talking about what I was talking about. You misinterpreted what I had written, don't try to dodge the blame on that.
User avatar
#166 - wertologist (11/26/2016) [-]
"I made a sarcastic comment in regards to people who take political comics as gospel. If that does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you."

Except you clearly stated that is why you posted your "sarcastic" comment. Your reason which I directly quoted doesn't even make sense in context of the jeopardy comment.