Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

wertologist

Rank #713 on Comments
wertologist Avatar Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to wertologist Block wertologist Invite wertologist to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/10/2011
Last Login:12/18/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#8376
Comment Ranking:#713
Highest Content Rank:#3380
Highest Comment Rank:#512
Content Thumbs: 2632 total,  3374 ,  742
Comment Thumbs: 10341 total,  11406 ,  1065
Content Level Progress: 49% (49/100)
Level 125 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 126 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 31% (31/100)
Level 287 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 288 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:39
Content Views:251043
Times Content Favorited:455 times
Total Comments Made:2187
FJ Points:11333
Favorite Tags: sims (3) | OC (2)
Wertologist or Wert107

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

1 2 3 > [ 16 Funny Pictures Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#219 - I like the one that shoots bullets. 4 hours ago on Facebook (1) 0
#205 - I'm pretty sure I remember them saying the blasts were at the … 4 hours ago on Fighting my older brother... +1
#195 - In the original Dragonball they state the blasts go at light s…  [+] (3 new replies) 4 hours ago on Fighting my older brother... 0
#237 - anonymous (3 hours ago) [-]
Now we encounter the regular issue of a writer trumping up shit to a point it doesn't make sense. This happens a lot, and it can really hurt a VS debate.

Expect "lightspeed attacks" happening very slow in a lot of works. It's up to you to figure out if it was actually supposed to be literal.
User avatar #198 - emiyashirou (4 hours ago) [-]
I'm not quite sure if that's true, considering they can actually see the ki blasts. But even if it is, you can dodge things that can move faster than you by beginning to dodge before the attack is launched.
User avatar #205 - wertologist (4 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure I remember them saying the blasts were at the speed of light. Even if they weren't Goku can still move faster than light with Instant Transmission. They actually fight faster than humans can perceive in the Cell Games. When we watch it looks normal, but we're seeing it how they saw it. When they tried to film it no one could see what they were doing because they were moving so fast. They explain that in early DBZ. Gohan can't see Yamcha and the Saibamen fighting until Piccolo tells him to feel for the energy. After the Cell Saga they obviously have all gotten faster.
#164 - Considering Goku in early DBZ could move faster than light and…  [+] (8 new replies) 7 hours ago on Fighting my older brother... 0
#233 - anonymous (3 hours ago) [-]
Goddamn, I hear that 'fact' all the time
what-if.xkcd.com/1/

Read that and learn what would happen to the surrounding area if they were moving beyond lightspeed
#238 - anonymous (3 hours ago) [-]
Their skin would fuse with the air molecules, and every connected strike would create a nuclear explosion and a gamma ray burst.

Maybe that's why Krillin is bald...because of the radiation
User avatar #194 - emiyashirou (4 hours ago) [-]
They never moved faster than light except with instant transmission, why does everyone use this 'fact' all the time?
#319 - anonymous (13 minutes ago) [-]
I remember somebody saying that people can't see things that go like 40x faster than what they can perceive, which is when goku and cell were fighting, vegeta was shocked cuz he couldn't see them fighting at all, and since he could see things several times faster than the speed of light, he was shocked.
User avatar #195 - wertologist (4 hours ago) [-]
In the original Dragonball they state the blasts go at light speed. Since they can easily dodge most of them, logic states they can move faster than light.
#237 - anonymous (3 hours ago) [-]
Now we encounter the regular issue of a writer trumping up shit to a point it doesn't make sense. This happens a lot, and it can really hurt a VS debate.

Expect "lightspeed attacks" happening very slow in a lot of works. It's up to you to figure out if it was actually supposed to be literal.
User avatar #198 - emiyashirou (4 hours ago) [-]
I'm not quite sure if that's true, considering they can actually see the ki blasts. But even if it is, you can dodge things that can move faster than you by beginning to dodge before the attack is launched.
User avatar #205 - wertologist (4 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure I remember them saying the blasts were at the speed of light. Even if they weren't Goku can still move faster than light with Instant Transmission. They actually fight faster than humans can perceive in the Cell Games. When we watch it looks normal, but we're seeing it how they saw it. When they tried to film it no one could see what they were doing because they were moving so fast. They explain that in early DBZ. Gohan can't see Yamcha and the Saibamen fighting until Piccolo tells him to feel for the energy. After the Cell Saga they obviously have all gotten faster.
#452 - "I HAVE said that the father have to have a say, but when…  [+] (1 new reply) 7 hours ago on Mens Rights Activist 0
User avatar #453 - peachrock (17 minutes ago) [-]
Women give birth to children. I can't change that.
#435 - I'm not trying to decide for people. I don't know where you ar…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Mens Rights Activist 0
User avatar #450 - peachrock (9 hours ago) [-]
"I'm not trying to decide for people. I don't know where you are getting that from. I am for equality. If you think changing a law is bad just think back to when women could not vote in America. "

You're not adding rights like in your example, you're taking rights away from women.

"You keep trying to put focus on the unborn child. Life is important, but it is not right to put the power to drastically change the child's/children's and father's life into the hands of just the mother. It should be a shared choice all the way. That is what I'm arguing for. The way you want it is that it's 100% up to the mother and the father will have no say."

I HAVE said that the father have to have a say, but when it comes down to it, it's the mother's choice. I don't think I have anything new to add to this discussion, and neither have you. Just think of what's best for the baby in the end.
User avatar #452 - wertologist (7 hours ago) [-]
"I HAVE said that the father have to have a say, but when it comes down to it, it's the mother's choice"

"it's the mother's choice"

No matter what it's still up to the mother which is unfair. It should be 50/50 or give the father the right to opt out. The way it is now is no matter what the guy says the mother can still keep the kid(s).

I'm not trying to take away women's rights. I'm just want equal rights. If you think it's fair for the woman to have 100% say in the matter that is just messed up. You say to think about the kid, but you should try to think about the whole family in general.
User avatar #453 - peachrock (17 minutes ago) [-]
Women give birth to children. I can't change that.
#3 - I imagined/hoped it'd be Boba and the troopers washing the car. 12/16/2014 on hope tHope this comes back... +141
#3 - Interesting yes, but I prefer to sleep next to my cat. Pets ca…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/16/2014 on I like +8
#4 - jiltist (12/17/2014) [-]
I imprison my cat under the blankets for around 15 minutes every night before I go to sleep in order to warm my naked body.
User avatar #25 - snakephallus (12/17/2014) [-]
I might do that, if my cat wasn't an asshole.
#7 - applesdontpee (12/17/2014) [-]
i was expecting a cute cuddle story
#11 - youxbarstard (12/17/2014) [-]
My old neighbor had this cat she Named it Gollywog,I don't know why , it would come to me almost every single day, and it would make so much noise if I didn't let it in to sleep with me.
It pretty much only went home either to get food or when I wasn't home.
Then the lady moved to a different country and couldn't take the cat with her but AI could take care of it either...I miss her. the cat that is.
#6 - Alchemyst (12/17/2014) [-]
#6 - >Last post Actually, isn't it most predators have eyes …  [+] (3 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Facebook comp +1
User avatar #7 - heartlessrobot (12/16/2014) [-]
Which is kinda shitty for humans, since we're far from predators. No claws, dull teeth, slow movement, weak skin, weak in general. Were it not for tools we'd still be hiding in bushes and scrounging for berries.
User avatar #8 - fightforfate (12/17/2014) [-]
we can run for longer than any species on the planet.
look up endurance hunting
User avatar #11 - heartlessrobot (12/17/2014) [-]
Yeah, that doesn't help when everything that wants to kill you runs you down before you take three steps, and everything you want to kill can get so far away you can't see it anymore.
Which is why we grabbed sharp sticks and sharp rocks, and headed for the biggest living thing we could find so there would be no way we'd lose it.
#427 - You can't hide from having to make decisions in life. Whether …  [+] (5 new replies) 12/16/2014 on Mens Rights Activist 0
User avatar #430 - peachrock (12/16/2014) [-]
You are trying to decide for people, if you're trying to change the law. Not one of the things I said was untrue.

You're not "dragging" random people into the situation, you're making the man take responsibility for what he already knew was a risk. You're talking about choices, if you don't want children, or if you can't afford or don't want to pay for a baby, then the man has a CHOICE not to have sex. Sex is not a basic human right. Think of the baby, what's the best thing for the baby, the only innocent part here?

"She shouldn't have had sex if she knew she wasn't able to raise a child and was against abortion. "
The EXACT same thing goes for the man (equality), just like I said.

"but it is not right to force an unwanted participant into it. "
They're BOTH unwanted participants in the situation. I get it, women are the only ones who has the final choice, but that doesn't make them any less of an unwanted participant.

When it comes to this topic, I couldn't care less about what's sexist or not. My concern is primarily for the baby, then the woman (because of pregnancy, hormones and birth), then the father. That's the natural order, that's why the law support my views. By the way, you are limiting women's rights by saying they shouldn't have the right to get financially support from the fathers. That's a right today, and you want to limit it. Or have I misinterpreted this whole discussion, and you actually agree with me?
User avatar #435 - wertologist (12/16/2014) [-]
I'm not trying to decide for people. I don't know where you are getting that from. I am for equality. If you think changing a law is bad just think back to when women could not vote in America.

You keep trying to put focus on the unborn child. Life is important, but it is not right to put the power to drastically change the child's/children's and father's life into the hands of just the mother. It should be a shared choice all the way. That is what I'm arguing for. The way you want it is that it's 100% up to the mother and the father will have no say.

If two people who don't want a kid have sex, she gets prego, she changes her mind and wants to keep it, he doesn't, he has no say. That is unfair no matter how you twist it.

""She shouldn't have had sex if she knew she wasn't able to raise a child and was against abortion. "
The EXACT same thing goes for the man (equality), just like I said.
"
Both are responsible, but only one gets a say in the matter? That is not equality. I'm in no way saying that doesn't apply to men.

All I'm saying is that it is horrible unfair for a woman to have 100% say in the matter.

As I have said before I am 100% for equal rights. I'm not trying to "limit" women's rights. That is a horribly unfair right to begin with and should seriously be reworked. You could argue that I'm "limiting" women's rights if you put it that way, but just because it is a "right" it does not mean it is right. Years ago it was a right to own slaves. Years ago women had no right to vote. Are you saying that because something is a right that automatically makes it just and fair? I'm against any right that gives people control over others.
User avatar #450 - peachrock (9 hours ago) [-]
"I'm not trying to decide for people. I don't know where you are getting that from. I am for equality. If you think changing a law is bad just think back to when women could not vote in America. "

You're not adding rights like in your example, you're taking rights away from women.

"You keep trying to put focus on the unborn child. Life is important, but it is not right to put the power to drastically change the child's/children's and father's life into the hands of just the mother. It should be a shared choice all the way. That is what I'm arguing for. The way you want it is that it's 100% up to the mother and the father will have no say."

I HAVE said that the father have to have a say, but when it comes down to it, it's the mother's choice. I don't think I have anything new to add to this discussion, and neither have you. Just think of what's best for the baby in the end.
User avatar #452 - wertologist (7 hours ago) [-]
"I HAVE said that the father have to have a say, but when it comes down to it, it's the mother's choice"

"it's the mother's choice"

No matter what it's still up to the mother which is unfair. It should be 50/50 or give the father the right to opt out. The way it is now is no matter what the guy says the mother can still keep the kid(s).

I'm not trying to take away women's rights. I'm just want equal rights. If you think it's fair for the woman to have 100% say in the matter that is just messed up. You say to think about the kid, but you should try to think about the whole family in general.
User avatar #453 - peachrock (17 minutes ago) [-]
Women give birth to children. I can't change that.

user's channels

Join Subscribe bendingtime
Join Subscribe dragonball
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 900

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #18 - wholesomeburn (09/15/2014) [-]
GREETINGS MORTAL... I REQUIRE YOUR AID... Some random guy said you knew a bunch of good mods for fallout NV, mind sharing?
User avatar #12 - sirbrentcoe (08/26/2014) [-]
thanks for the add mate, can't wait to see the next castle post!
User avatar #13 to #12 - wertologist (08/26/2014) [-]
No problem. I loved your McDisiasters as well. May be a while til the next one though. I have to be in the mood to play Sims. It takes roughly 30 minutes just to get in the game to kill people.
User avatar #15 to #13 - sirbrentcoe (08/26/2014) [-]
oh, and thanks for liking my content!
User avatar #14 to #13 - sirbrentcoe (08/26/2014) [-]
i know man, i got the sims 2 free on origin, all dlc and everything, still not interesting enough for me. i play minecraft instead, haha
User avatar #16 to #14 - wertologist (08/26/2014) [-]
I play Minecraft and Battlefront 2 (mods galore)mostly. I got a good server to play on for minecraft. If you'd like, I can PM you the IP.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sirbrentcoe (08/26/2014) [-]
sure, also a list of mods and forge version. I tried to play on Phanact's server, but i would rather eat a bullet.
User avatar #11 - thewitchking (07/10/2014) [-]
ur a faggot
User avatar #10 - iamatroll (03/06/2012) [-]
dumbass
User avatar #9 - TheFixer (03/06/2012) [-]
dumbass
User avatar #8 - dennisc (03/06/2012) [-]
Why are you such a dumbass?
#7 - anonymous (03/06/2012) [-]
hey dumbass
 Friends (0)