x
Click to expand

warbob

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Interests: PC games , good books , good animes
Date Signed Up:6/23/2011
Last Login:4/02/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5095
Highest Content Rank:#8090
Highest Comment Rank:#1983
Content Thumbs: 150 total,  390 ,  240
Comment Thumbs: 5687 total,  8103 ,  2416
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 14 Content: New Here → Level 15 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 56.99% (57/100)
Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:2
Content Views:51000
Times Content Favorited:13 times
Total Comments Made:4536
FJ Points:5509
Favorite Tags: lol (2)

latest user's comments

#107 - You are very likely right. But if we presume that we …  [+] (2 new replies) 02/27/2015 on Blame genetic. 0
User avatar #180 - ninjaroo (03/01/2015) [-]
Having a healthy obese person has absolutely no bearing on whether or not being obese is unhealthy.
User avatar #110 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
We can create a healthy obese person now... With a regime of drugs that keep them that way. Then you have to deal with the side affects of the drugs. There might be better ways, but its easier to just get up and take a walk, and maybe trade that donut for an apple every once in a while.
#105 - Highly probable. But then again, it's not like humani…  [+] (14 new replies) 02/27/2015 on Blame genetic. 0
User avatar #112 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
That's not how knowledge works, especially when it comes to things like this.

Every time we make a new discovery, we're not getting it perfectly right. We're just getting a little bit less wrong, eliminating answers that are definitely wrong to get a more refined correct answer. Obesity, regardless of how much of it there is that we don't understand, has been very well determined to be bad for your health.
User avatar #114 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
but you can't know what you do not know. Well sure , you could guess a little portion of it like "we don't know this and that"

but for the most part you are not aware of what you don't know. Thus we may have extremely little knowledge of the subject which is actually not enough to be able to draw a conclusive statement.
User avatar #119 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
What we do not know is not the issue. We do know, via various causal links we have determined through rigorous study.

Also, for most decisions you will ever make it's absolutely ludicrous to act based on what you do not know. If someone goes to punch you in the face, you don't stand there and take it in the face because maybe they're going to miss intentionally or their hand will somehow defy physics and phase through your skull without doing damage, you take the social cue of someone punching you in the face and the basic understanding of how things interact with other things and decide maybe you should just move.
User avatar #121 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
as I was saying , what we know may just turn out to be very insuficient to what we need to draw a conclusion in some cases which makes the overall statement untrue.

I'm not saying we should act based on that presumption though , I'm only stating we need to have it in mind and consider it a possiblity with infinitely small odds at least.


also fun fact: as defined by physics , it is possible that if someone punches you their fist will go right through you without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision. The chance of that howver is lower than 1/ insert number that is higher than the presumed age of the universe here
User avatar #124 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
That's not how physics works, actually. The particles of their fist never touch the particles of my face, it's merely the interaction between those particles that we perceive as touch. In the same way that a magnet simply can't fall through a magnetic field without interacting with it, a fist simply can't fall through a face.

There are however some substances which lack that sort of friction entirely, meaning they just fall straight through things. I forget what they are, but they only seem to exist at temperatures close to absolute zero.
User avatar #151 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
fine , change "without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision"

with "without the particles getting close enough to obstruct each other thus avoiding collision"

you get what I mean.
User avatar #171 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
No, that's simply not possible. The areas that an atom would interact with overlap, there is no gap to go through.
User avatar #172 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
normally yes. But as you know all of the particles are moving constantly.
User avatar #175 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
They vibrate around a fixed point, relative to each other, and the fields overlap far too much for it to have any impact.
User avatar #176 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
well the chance of what I spoke happening is astronomically low for a reason
User avatar #106 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
I'm not saying we know everything about obesity. I'm saying obesity is not healthy, and we can prove it, and have proved it, with research and studies. Show me a healthy obese person, and I will show you someone who is still a toddler.
User avatar #107 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
You are very likely right.

But if we presume that we somehow acquired all the knowledge in the universe would it still be 100% impossible to create a heatly obese person? Who knows, I sure don't.

I just don't deny the possibility.
User avatar #180 - ninjaroo (03/01/2015) [-]
Having a healthy obese person has absolutely no bearing on whether or not being obese is unhealthy.
User avatar #110 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
We can create a healthy obese person now... With a regime of drugs that keep them that way. Then you have to deal with the side affects of the drugs. There might be better ways, but its easier to just get up and take a walk, and maybe trade that donut for an apple every once in a while.
#101 - no no , I trust them. But I also doubt them. Just ass…  [+] (16 new replies) 02/27/2015 on Blame genetic. +1
User avatar #104 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
I understand, but with obesity... There is just no way. I work in the medical field, and obesity comes with so many health problems I just don't see how you can let yourself remain that way. Its a choice. I've seen people overcome obesity. The US just makes it easy to live with it instead.
User avatar #105 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
Highly probable.

But then again, it's not like humanity knows everything. Statistically speaking we may know just 1% of all the knowledge to everything we know of. So there just might be 99% knowledge on obesity that we don't know.
User avatar #112 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
That's not how knowledge works, especially when it comes to things like this.

Every time we make a new discovery, we're not getting it perfectly right. We're just getting a little bit less wrong, eliminating answers that are definitely wrong to get a more refined correct answer. Obesity, regardless of how much of it there is that we don't understand, has been very well determined to be bad for your health.
User avatar #114 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
but you can't know what you do not know. Well sure , you could guess a little portion of it like "we don't know this and that"

but for the most part you are not aware of what you don't know. Thus we may have extremely little knowledge of the subject which is actually not enough to be able to draw a conclusive statement.
User avatar #119 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
What we do not know is not the issue. We do know, via various causal links we have determined through rigorous study.

Also, for most decisions you will ever make it's absolutely ludicrous to act based on what you do not know. If someone goes to punch you in the face, you don't stand there and take it in the face because maybe they're going to miss intentionally or their hand will somehow defy physics and phase through your skull without doing damage, you take the social cue of someone punching you in the face and the basic understanding of how things interact with other things and decide maybe you should just move.
User avatar #121 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
as I was saying , what we know may just turn out to be very insuficient to what we need to draw a conclusion in some cases which makes the overall statement untrue.

I'm not saying we should act based on that presumption though , I'm only stating we need to have it in mind and consider it a possiblity with infinitely small odds at least.


also fun fact: as defined by physics , it is possible that if someone punches you their fist will go right through you without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision. The chance of that howver is lower than 1/ insert number that is higher than the presumed age of the universe here
User avatar #124 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
That's not how physics works, actually. The particles of their fist never touch the particles of my face, it's merely the interaction between those particles that we perceive as touch. In the same way that a magnet simply can't fall through a magnetic field without interacting with it, a fist simply can't fall through a face.

There are however some substances which lack that sort of friction entirely, meaning they just fall straight through things. I forget what they are, but they only seem to exist at temperatures close to absolute zero.
User avatar #151 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
fine , change "without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision"

with "without the particles getting close enough to obstruct each other thus avoiding collision"

you get what I mean.
User avatar #171 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
No, that's simply not possible. The areas that an atom would interact with overlap, there is no gap to go through.
User avatar #172 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
normally yes. But as you know all of the particles are moving constantly.
User avatar #175 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
They vibrate around a fixed point, relative to each other, and the fields overlap far too much for it to have any impact.
User avatar #176 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
well the chance of what I spoke happening is astronomically low for a reason
User avatar #106 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
I'm not saying we know everything about obesity. I'm saying obesity is not healthy, and we can prove it, and have proved it, with research and studies. Show me a healthy obese person, and I will show you someone who is still a toddler.
User avatar #107 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
You are very likely right.

But if we presume that we somehow acquired all the knowledge in the universe would it still be 100% impossible to create a heatly obese person? Who knows, I sure don't.

I just don't deny the possibility.
User avatar #180 - ninjaroo (03/01/2015) [-]
Having a healthy obese person has absolutely no bearing on whether or not being obese is unhealthy.
User avatar #110 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
We can create a healthy obese person now... With a regime of drugs that keep them that way. Then you have to deal with the side affects of the drugs. There might be better ways, but its easier to just get up and take a walk, and maybe trade that donut for an apple every once in a while.
#97 - I generally agree. But seriously though, objectively …  [+] (18 new replies) 02/27/2015 on Blame genetic. 0
User avatar #100 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
Do you understand nuclear fission? Do you understand the many components of a cars engine? Do you understand how a clock works? Do you understand how different foods affect the body? Do you understand how plate tectonics function? Do you know why water freezes? Do you know how your phone functions?

There are experts for a reason. There is too much in this world for anyone to know everything. Sometimes, you have to trust that the experts actually know what they are talking about.
User avatar #101 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
no no , I trust them. But I also doubt them.

Just assume that I'm always ready to hear an alternative explanation, although I might not believe it as much as the first one. But I'll still have it in mind instead of disregarding it completely.

Kind of like having heard of a conspiracy theory. They're most likely complete bullshit. But you still remember it and are looking if the pieces fit in the puzzle.
User avatar #104 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
I understand, but with obesity... There is just no way. I work in the medical field, and obesity comes with so many health problems I just don't see how you can let yourself remain that way. Its a choice. I've seen people overcome obesity. The US just makes it easy to live with it instead.
User avatar #105 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
Highly probable.

But then again, it's not like humanity knows everything. Statistically speaking we may know just 1% of all the knowledge to everything we know of. So there just might be 99% knowledge on obesity that we don't know.
User avatar #112 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
That's not how knowledge works, especially when it comes to things like this.

Every time we make a new discovery, we're not getting it perfectly right. We're just getting a little bit less wrong, eliminating answers that are definitely wrong to get a more refined correct answer. Obesity, regardless of how much of it there is that we don't understand, has been very well determined to be bad for your health.
User avatar #114 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
but you can't know what you do not know. Well sure , you could guess a little portion of it like "we don't know this and that"

but for the most part you are not aware of what you don't know. Thus we may have extremely little knowledge of the subject which is actually not enough to be able to draw a conclusive statement.
User avatar #119 - ninjaroo (02/27/2015) [-]
What we do not know is not the issue. We do know, via various causal links we have determined through rigorous study.

Also, for most decisions you will ever make it's absolutely ludicrous to act based on what you do not know. If someone goes to punch you in the face, you don't stand there and take it in the face because maybe they're going to miss intentionally or their hand will somehow defy physics and phase through your skull without doing damage, you take the social cue of someone punching you in the face and the basic understanding of how things interact with other things and decide maybe you should just move.
User avatar #121 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
as I was saying , what we know may just turn out to be very insuficient to what we need to draw a conclusion in some cases which makes the overall statement untrue.

I'm not saying we should act based on that presumption though , I'm only stating we need to have it in mind and consider it a possiblity with infinitely small odds at least.


also fun fact: as defined by physics , it is possible that if someone punches you their fist will go right through you without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision. The chance of that howver is lower than 1/ insert number that is higher than the presumed age of the universe here
User avatar #124 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
That's not how physics works, actually. The particles of their fist never touch the particles of my face, it's merely the interaction between those particles that we perceive as touch. In the same way that a magnet simply can't fall through a magnetic field without interacting with it, a fist simply can't fall through a face.

There are however some substances which lack that sort of friction entirely, meaning they just fall straight through things. I forget what they are, but they only seem to exist at temperatures close to absolute zero.
User avatar #151 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
fine , change "without touching any of your particles and thus avoiding collision"

with "without the particles getting close enough to obstruct each other thus avoiding collision"

you get what I mean.
User avatar #171 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
No, that's simply not possible. The areas that an atom would interact with overlap, there is no gap to go through.
User avatar #172 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
normally yes. But as you know all of the particles are moving constantly.
User avatar #175 - ninjaroo (02/28/2015) [-]
They vibrate around a fixed point, relative to each other, and the fields overlap far too much for it to have any impact.
User avatar #176 - warbob (02/28/2015) [-]
well the chance of what I spoke happening is astronomically low for a reason
User avatar #106 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
I'm not saying we know everything about obesity. I'm saying obesity is not healthy, and we can prove it, and have proved it, with research and studies. Show me a healthy obese person, and I will show you someone who is still a toddler.
User avatar #107 - warbob (02/27/2015) [-]
You are very likely right.

But if we presume that we somehow acquired all the knowledge in the universe would it still be 100% impossible to create a heatly obese person? Who knows, I sure don't.

I just don't deny the possibility.
User avatar #180 - ninjaroo (03/01/2015) [-]
Having a healthy obese person has absolutely no bearing on whether or not being obese is unhealthy.
User avatar #110 - joberja (02/27/2015) [-]
We can create a healthy obese person now... With a regime of drugs that keep them that way. Then you have to deal with the side affects of the drugs. There might be better ways, but its easier to just get up and take a walk, and maybe trade that donut for an apple every once in a while.
#29 - well you could live in a boat. why do I not hav… 02/27/2015 on I need a boat 0
#76 - well isn't that a part of the thrill? no pain no gain 02/27/2015 on Looks Fun 0
#24 - that's what the government wants you to think. 02/27/2015 on Tumblr est absoluta nucis... 0
#1122129 - pokemon and yu-gi-oh , the first time I watched anime and I wa… 02/26/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#1122127 - did the anime actually finish?  [+] (1 new reply) 02/26/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
User avatar #1122128 - yeorgh (02/26/2015) [-]
Naruto's? apparently not, shit even has fillers even though the manga is over, but pokemon doesn't even follow the manga, it has no end.
#10651 - ***** why didn't you post results yet? Or did you not l…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/26/2015 on /tabletop/ 0
#10652 - applescryatnight (02/26/2015) [-]
havent tested them yet, but i added in a few of your ideas.
im still in the writing phase of my campaign. my players take weeks to make their characters cause i have to go over every single detail with them.
ill make sure to post updates as soon as i get the game going though.
#10650 - the story is always at first place , I can endure the torture … 02/26/2015 on /tabletop/ 0
#10627 - well basicly if someone accuses you (in character) you have to…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2015 on /tabletop/ +1
User avatar #10629 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Thanks for the tip. I kinda wondered why my DM didn't have Hieroneous pop up and be like "bruh, nah". Now I know how to sort of hint to him that if my bullshit is hindering plot progress he can pull out that card.
#10624 - all dem faggots need to understand that a paladin is a walking…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/25/2015 on /tabletop/ +1
User avatar #10625 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
See, that's kinda what I was thinking, but apparently that makes me: stupid, immoral, autistic, trying too hard, a wine connoisseur, a little girl, in need of dick fondling, and there absolutely must be something fucking wrong with me... oh and a faggot.
User avatar #10627 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well basicly if someone accuses you (in character) you have to make a lil' speech (while shouting or speaking in a loud voice) about all the duties of a paladin that are in the name of your God and if you have done wrong , than may your God smite you or show you a sign that you have wronged.

That way they can't complain unless the DM decides the God personally intervenes to give you a message (as obscur as it might be) and you might just not understand it's a message from your god OR if it is pretty blantant you can always question whether that is really your God.

warning: doubting it is the appearence of your God may result in bad things if he's a more violent type.
User avatar #10629 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Thanks for the tip. I kinda wondered why my DM didn't have Hieroneous pop up and be like "bruh, nah". Now I know how to sort of hint to him that if my bullshit is hindering plot progress he can pull out that card.
#10621 - well that's their problem.  [+] (5 new replies) 02/25/2015 on /tabletop/ +1
User avatar #10622 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Fair enough. I probably wouldn't have killed him anyway, but I definitely would have left the party.

It's hilarious seeing you reply in my favour while the shitstorm below is just getting worse.
User avatar #10624 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
all dem faggots need to understand that a paladin is a walking truck of fuck you to all unmoral deeds and it does not compromise with mortals.

They are hated by both evil and normal people for they are the zealots that have abandoned their lives for the sake of undoing the wrongs in the world. Rather they should be thankful they don't personally oversee all their actions for they might just call for a crusade to purge the land from all the corrupted mortals.
User avatar #10625 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
See, that's kinda what I was thinking, but apparently that makes me: stupid, immoral, autistic, trying too hard, a wine connoisseur, a little girl, in need of dick fondling, and there absolutely must be something fucking wrong with me... oh and a faggot.
User avatar #10627 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well basicly if someone accuses you (in character) you have to make a lil' speech (while shouting or speaking in a loud voice) about all the duties of a paladin that are in the name of your God and if you have done wrong , than may your God smite you or show you a sign that you have wronged.

That way they can't complain unless the DM decides the God personally intervenes to give you a message (as obscur as it might be) and you might just not understand it's a message from your god OR if it is pretty blantant you can always question whether that is really your God.

warning: doubting it is the appearence of your God may result in bad things if he's a more violent type.
User avatar #10629 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Thanks for the tip. I kinda wondered why my DM didn't have Hieroneous pop up and be like "bruh, nah". Now I know how to sort of hint to him that if my bullshit is hindering plot progress he can pull out that card.
#10599 - if they're roleplaying properly , their characters should be p…  [+] (7 new replies) 02/25/2015 on /tabletop/ +1
User avatar #10600 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
But at the moment I can probably kill half the party before I die. Low level casters haven't gotten any hard hitting spells yet while I can power attack for around 17 - 20 damage and sunder their spell pouches
User avatar #10621 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well that's their problem.
User avatar #10622 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Fair enough. I probably wouldn't have killed him anyway, but I definitely would have left the party.

It's hilarious seeing you reply in my favour while the shitstorm below is just getting worse.
User avatar #10624 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
all dem faggots need to understand that a paladin is a walking truck of fuck you to all unmoral deeds and it does not compromise with mortals.

They are hated by both evil and normal people for they are the zealots that have abandoned their lives for the sake of undoing the wrongs in the world. Rather they should be thankful they don't personally oversee all their actions for they might just call for a crusade to purge the land from all the corrupted mortals.
User avatar #10625 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
See, that's kinda what I was thinking, but apparently that makes me: stupid, immoral, autistic, trying too hard, a wine connoisseur, a little girl, in need of dick fondling, and there absolutely must be something fucking wrong with me... oh and a faggot.
User avatar #10627 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well basicly if someone accuses you (in character) you have to make a lil' speech (while shouting or speaking in a loud voice) about all the duties of a paladin that are in the name of your God and if you have done wrong , than may your God smite you or show you a sign that you have wronged.

That way they can't complain unless the DM decides the God personally intervenes to give you a message (as obscur as it might be) and you might just not understand it's a message from your god OR if it is pretty blantant you can always question whether that is really your God.

warning: doubting it is the appearence of your God may result in bad things if he's a more violent type.
User avatar #10629 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Thanks for the tip. I kinda wondered why my DM didn't have Hieroneous pop up and be like "bruh, nah". Now I know how to sort of hint to him that if my bullshit is hindering plot progress he can pull out that card.
#10592 - **** what other people think , just BE that character a…  [+] (9 new replies) 02/25/2015 on /tabletop/ +3
User avatar #10594 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
I intend to, though in the coming campaigns I plan on disturbing his hardline self a bit if I can. No sense pissing off all my friends.
User avatar #10599 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
if they're roleplaying properly , their characters should be pissed off by your paladin and kill him for example.
User avatar #10600 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
But at the moment I can probably kill half the party before I die. Low level casters haven't gotten any hard hitting spells yet while I can power attack for around 17 - 20 damage and sunder their spell pouches
User avatar #10621 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well that's their problem.
User avatar #10622 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Fair enough. I probably wouldn't have killed him anyway, but I definitely would have left the party.

It's hilarious seeing you reply in my favour while the shitstorm below is just getting worse.
User avatar #10624 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
all dem faggots need to understand that a paladin is a walking truck of fuck you to all unmoral deeds and it does not compromise with mortals.

They are hated by both evil and normal people for they are the zealots that have abandoned their lives for the sake of undoing the wrongs in the world. Rather they should be thankful they don't personally oversee all their actions for they might just call for a crusade to purge the land from all the corrupted mortals.
User avatar #10625 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
See, that's kinda what I was thinking, but apparently that makes me: stupid, immoral, autistic, trying too hard, a wine connoisseur, a little girl, in need of dick fondling, and there absolutely must be something fucking wrong with me... oh and a faggot.
User avatar #10627 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
well basicly if someone accuses you (in character) you have to make a lil' speech (while shouting or speaking in a loud voice) about all the duties of a paladin that are in the name of your God and if you have done wrong , than may your God smite you or show you a sign that you have wronged.

That way they can't complain unless the DM decides the God personally intervenes to give you a message (as obscur as it might be) and you might just not understand it's a message from your god OR if it is pretty blantant you can always question whether that is really your God.

warning: doubting it is the appearence of your God may result in bad things if he's a more violent type.
User avatar #10629 - Sethorein (02/25/2015) [-]
Thanks for the tip. I kinda wondered why my DM didn't have Hieroneous pop up and be like "bruh, nah". Now I know how to sort of hint to him that if my bullshit is hindering plot progress he can pull out that card.
#95 - this would've been better if this comment was the 13th  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2015 on Poop all over the new FJ... +5
#119 - immatakeaduty (02/25/2015) [-]
#7 - literally the best character in all of Naruto. 02/25/2015 on a tale of a ninja and numbers +3
#1121474 - technically you would be right, but don't tell anyone I told you that. 02/25/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#210 - The legend never dies! … 02/24/2015 on FJ Writes A Story 0
#1121310 - i'm ok with it as long as you have seen the truth with your own eyes. 02/24/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#1121307 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 02/24/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... +1
#1121309 - fatbenpoops (02/24/2015) [-]
Friend, as anime fan I watch very anime over years, i know what anime.
Thx for commentery i giv apreciation thumb up for effort but you are clerly wrong friend.
As this is anime board i post cute anime girl wolf picture getting pat on head.
Once again i am sorry that u think that way friend.
User avatar #1121310 - warbob (02/24/2015) [-]
i'm ok with it as long as you have seen the truth with your own eyes.
#1121303 - anime is the term used for animations of japanese origin. …  [+] (10 new replies) 02/24/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... 0
#1121358 - perzona (02/25/2015) [-]
The Webster's Dictionary describes it as "a style of animation that was created in Japan", doesn't that mean that as long as something has the same style as anime, it technically is?
#1121479 - yibdiy (02/25/2015) [-]
Ah yes, the good old "anime style."
imgur.com/a/C9CCU
User avatar #1121615 - perzona (02/25/2015) [-]
Well yeah, by this definition, Shin chan and things like it are not anime.
User avatar #1121474 - warbob (02/25/2015) [-]
technically you would be right, but don't tell anyone I told you that.
User avatar #1121368 - bababadsheep (02/25/2015) [-]
Japanime lad.
User avatar #1121362 - killerliquid (02/25/2015) [-]
>using merriam-webster definition
lol
User avatar #1121306 - fatbenpoops (02/24/2015) [-]
You clearly have the wrong definition of anime
#1121309 - fatbenpoops (02/24/2015) [-]
Friend, as anime fan I watch very anime over years, i know what anime.
Thx for commentery i giv apreciation thumb up for effort but you are clerly wrong friend.
As this is anime board i post cute anime girl wolf picture getting pat on head.
Once again i am sorry that u think that way friend.
User avatar #1121310 - warbob (02/24/2015) [-]
i'm ok with it as long as you have seen the truth with your own eyes.
#1121300 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/24/2015 on Anime & Manga - anime... +1
#1121302 - gaybusta (02/24/2015) [-]
#90 - well I guess you have to grasp it firmly then. You co… 02/24/2015 on Badass Spear Fight 0

items

Total unique items point value: 5508 / Total items point value: 9756
[ 38 items Total ]

Comments(46):

[ 46 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#40 - warbob (12/28/2014) [-]
dumping some webm sheit
dumping some webm sheit
User avatar #25 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
well you kind of started a massive fight by calling me out on thumbing down the game :/
User avatar #26 to #25 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
wasn't my intention , I asked because someone already said it on chat and...
sorry
User avatar #27 to #26 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
I'm not mad at you. I'd been meaning to say some stuff about encomp for a while now, but the fact of the matter is that I've never called someone out for thumbing unless I sincerely wanted their critique in order to make it better.
User avatar #28 to #27 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
just wanted to speak with you , I pretty much said what I wanted already. I'm not supporting him , I honestly don't care much. You guys can have your civil war on the board, time will pass and it will be long forgotten.
User avatar #29 to #28 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
I don't want a civil war. the only thing you could call me angry or passionate about in this whole ordeal is that the reason the board was essentially dead in the first place is because he killed it. look back and you'll see what I'm talking about.

About the game, though, it's off topic. I may not necessarily like the idea about it but that's beside the point. what you guys as players should do is what languagexplain, myself, and a few others wound up doing. petition to get a forum gaming board or something for games like that.
User avatar #30 to #29 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
yeah , at some point I realised it's not exacly /tabletop/ gaming either. Trying to get in contact with addy or smt to propose the board to be renamed to /tabletop & roleplaying/ if the users agree and stuff.
User avatar #31 to #30 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
I honestly know of games similar to this that wouldn't fit that bill either. I've wanted to post them before, but to be entirely honest, I don't want to pollute the board (unlike someone.) I sincerely think games should deserve their own board.

in case you're wondering, one game I had wanted to start is called king of the hill. the goal is essentially to take the hill (it gets increasingly more absurd as it goes on)
User avatar #32 to #31 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
sounds good. Perhaps we'll make roleplaying a part of the board at some point so all that stuff is actually ontopic.

However it'd be quite hard to make the people stop playing the nation builder and from what I've seen the mods aren't seeing it as an infringement of the rules either.
User avatar #33 to #32 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
never said you guys should stop, I just think it should be moved. one mod did recommend that he move it to his profile.
User avatar #34 to #33 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
I suppose it's a possibility.
But we still have the problem with the lack of people on the board. The cause for them being so low atm aside, we need active people on the board now.
User avatar #35 to #34 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
I've been trying to get more people using it. I haven't got many ideas for what to do as of yet. maybe having rikter post a painting guide and doing some "newbie friendly" character creation guides
User avatar #36 to #35 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
guides on creating characters sounds good , but tabletop gaming itself doesn't provide that many topics for conversation imo.
User avatar #37 to #36 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
believe it or not it's more than rpgs. cardgame deckbuilding threads, wargame army threads, character design threads, campaign detail threads, LFG (looking for group) threads, game-design threads, et cetera.
User avatar #38 to #37 - warbob (08/28/2014) [-]
well nation building and etc. is roleplaying imo , so I can figure out a lot of stuff that can happen within a roleplaying board.
User avatar #39 to #38 - dndxplain ONLINE (08/28/2014) [-]
I sincerely still think a games board would be better suited for your needs, because you can argue that roleplays are games, but you can't argue that checkers or go fish are roleplays
User avatar #23 - killerliquid (08/21/2014) [-]
Actually they have a lot of **** like this wtf
#22 - killerliquid (08/21/2014) [-]
www.reddit.com/r/OneTrueTatsuya   
They have a 			*******		 subreddit for Tatsuya fukken christ
www.reddit.com/r/OneTrueTatsuya
They have a ******* subreddit for Tatsuya fukken christ
User avatar #21 - Byte (06/25/2014) [-]
Why do we all try?
In the end we'll all die
The same outcome for all
The tall and the small
For the people who think they are worthless
And for the rich people who have no sense
To see their lives will end too
And there's nothing they can do
You can't buy your way out of death
One of life’s hardest test
Some people's lives end fast
Like in a shooting or a crash
Their lives are over in a flash
Their friends all mourn
Their family is torn
User avatar #20 - warbob (09/23/2013) [-]
**warbob rolls 952,980,146**
#19 - helpmeplz has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #18 - warbob (03/10/2013) [-]
**warbob rolls 441,869,888**
User avatar #14 - warbob (12/15/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 675,275,462**
User avatar #13 - warbob (12/07/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 376,388,765**
User avatar #12 - warbob (11/17/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 972,071,844**
User avatar #11 - warbob (10/08/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 873,936,703**
User avatar #10 - warbob (10/04/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 214,208,281**
User avatar #9 - warbob (10/03/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 870,800,274**
User avatar #8 - warbob (09/26/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 956,752,226**
User avatar #7 - warbob (09/25/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 659,636,910**
User avatar #6 - warbob (09/19/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 705,693,954**
User avatar #5 - warbob (09/12/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 135,224,902**
User avatar #4 - warbob (09/10/2012) [-]
**warbob rolls 215,362,217**
User avatar #3 - warbob (08/10/2012) [-]
Wtf are items and why would people be fighting over them?

5 minutes late

I've got 8 items , need moar
[ 46 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)