Upload
Login or register

wallbuilder

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:10/31/2012
Last Login:8/29/2016
Location:Australia
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#1672
Highest Comment Rank:#1339
Content Thumbs: 4 total,  14 ,  10
Comment Thumbs: 9670 total,  10576 ,  906
Content Level Progress: 13.55% (8/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 38% (38/100)
Level 284 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:0
Content Views:957
Total Comments Made:8456
FJ Points:8378

latest user's comments

#15 - Obese Indian* 07/24/2016 on Ever get that sinking feeling? +2
#34 - It sounds like it was written by a literal 10 year-old.  [+] (1 new reply) 07/24/2016 on bronies +2
User avatar
#54 - manwithmanynames (07/24/2016) [-]
I guess that could be the case... and I guess that would be understandable for how unfunny that comment was. I feel I should clear this up, it's not because I see this comment from Tumblr and therefore its automatically bad, I normally can ignore those "I'm literally dying XD" or "OMG I CANT BREATH GUISE" on there as I ignore the Keks, Shrekts, and all those comments on here...

But this one for some reason just seemed so stupidly unfunny I felt the need to question it... and while I don't care if I get red or green on my comment, I feel I should explain that this one comment (THAT JUST SO HAPPENED TO BE ON TUMBLR) was so stupid, in my opinion.
#51 - Mumkey is ******* kickass. Favourite youtuber. 07/23/2016 on Watch Until The End 0
#14 - Most animals have poor vision that works off of movement rathe… 07/21/2016 on Mouse and drainpipe 0
#15 - Is that passive aggression or humility?  [+] (1 new reply) 07/21/2016 on RANT:Pokemon GO 0
User avatar
#16 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
i dont quite understand the question
#12 - I actually just implied that.  [+] (3 new replies) 07/21/2016 on RANT:Pokemon GO 0
User avatar
#13 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
yeah i neglected to read the last sentence because for most of it you were implying that it didnt exist. then you said it did exist. but whatever wins the argument right?
User avatar
#15 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
Is that passive aggression or humility?
User avatar
#16 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
i dont quite understand the question
#10 - "For children" is literally meaningless. It's just a…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/21/2016 on RANT:Pokemon GO -1
User avatar
#11 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
ever hear of the word demographic? phrase "target demographic" specifically.
User avatar
#12 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
I actually just implied that.
User avatar
#13 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
yeah i neglected to read the last sentence because for most of it you were implying that it didnt exist. then you said it did exist. but whatever wins the argument right?
User avatar
#15 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
Is that passive aggression or humility?
User avatar
#16 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
i dont quite understand the question
#8 - "They're" Y'know how many people there are playi…  [+] (8 new replies) 07/21/2016 on RANT:Pokemon GO 0
User avatar
#9 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
the pot is calling the kettle black right now. all im saying is mind your manners. yeah its great you can do your shit, but sometimes the people hating actually have genuine points. like the examples i show. you know why some people hate? because pokemon IS TECHNICALLY for children. no judgement there like i said i would like to play if i had a smart phone. people will pick on anything dude. im a ginger. you and everyone else knows i caught/catch shit for that my whooooole life. it doesnt matter if the perso actually has a problem with what youre doing if it will get under your skin theyll pick at it and you need to not let it get under your skin. i eve etio i the video oe guy wo took it too far tat was featured on here at one point. if youre talking about it a lot or fanboying over it all the time eventually someone will say something. trust me ik. i was that kid in high school that always talked about the same 3 bands system of a down, alice in chains, and whichever flavor of the month i found out about
#14 - anon (07/21/2016) [-]
Please spell check before you post and paragraphing wouldn't hurt. It would make your text a lot more readable and more easy to approach.
User avatar
#10 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
"For children" is literally meaningless. It's just a tag made by humans like anyone else. If the opinion shifted to say that it was for adults would that alter the inherent fabric of the reality? No. It is TARGETED at children. Or at least the show is.
User avatar
#11 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
ever hear of the word demographic? phrase "target demographic" specifically.
User avatar
#12 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
I actually just implied that.
User avatar
#13 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
yeah i neglected to read the last sentence because for most of it you were implying that it didnt exist. then you said it did exist. but whatever wins the argument right?
User avatar
#15 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
Is that passive aggression or humility?
User avatar
#16 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
i dont quite understand the question
#6 - It's "sensitive" because people constantly hang ****…  [+] (10 new replies) 07/21/2016 on RANT:Pokemon GO 0
User avatar
#7 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
yes but theyre inflating problems. ive seen a bunch of posts here and other places talking like pokemon fans dont have their civil rights. and rude people are rude people. its no longer just hanging shit on them theyre out and about now lol.
User avatar
#8 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
"They're"
Y'know how many people there are playing this game? Of course you do. So naturally, even if 0.1% of them "inflate problems" it'll seem like a lot. And there are select groups of people who do treat them like shit, regardless of whether or not they're actually doing anything wrong. Usually the kind of people who end sentences in an argument with lol and XD.

I actually agree that they shouldn't infest bars if they aren't really paying customers but to pretend there aren't a lot of dickheads pointlessly hating is, well... it's a waste of your own time to be honest. Treat each case of hating/being a pokefag individually rather than just blanket blaming one side.
User avatar
#9 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
the pot is calling the kettle black right now. all im saying is mind your manners. yeah its great you can do your shit, but sometimes the people hating actually have genuine points. like the examples i show. you know why some people hate? because pokemon IS TECHNICALLY for children. no judgement there like i said i would like to play if i had a smart phone. people will pick on anything dude. im a ginger. you and everyone else knows i caught/catch shit for that my whooooole life. it doesnt matter if the perso actually has a problem with what youre doing if it will get under your skin theyll pick at it and you need to not let it get under your skin. i eve etio i the video oe guy wo took it too far tat was featured on here at one point. if youre talking about it a lot or fanboying over it all the time eventually someone will say something. trust me ik. i was that kid in high school that always talked about the same 3 bands system of a down, alice in chains, and whichever flavor of the month i found out about
#14 - anon (07/21/2016) [-]
Please spell check before you post and paragraphing wouldn't hurt. It would make your text a lot more readable and more easy to approach.
User avatar
#10 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
"For children" is literally meaningless. It's just a tag made by humans like anyone else. If the opinion shifted to say that it was for adults would that alter the inherent fabric of the reality? No. It is TARGETED at children. Or at least the show is.
User avatar
#11 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
ever hear of the word demographic? phrase "target demographic" specifically.
User avatar
#12 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
I actually just implied that.
User avatar
#13 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
yeah i neglected to read the last sentence because for most of it you were implying that it didnt exist. then you said it did exist. but whatever wins the argument right?
User avatar
#15 - wallbuilder (07/21/2016) [-]
Is that passive aggression or humility?
User avatar
#16 - lampmountaindew (07/21/2016) [-]
i dont quite understand the question
#84 - Yes, as I said, I agree. 07/20/2016 on ... 0