Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

wallbuilder    

Rank #4512 on Comments
wallbuilder Avatar Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win
Online
Send mail to wallbuilder Block wallbuilder Invite wallbuilder to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Consoles Owned: X360
Video Games Played: LoL, Minecraft, FPS, RPG, JRPG, Visual Novels
X-box Gamertag: Decimater08
Interests: Anime, Video games, Manga
Date Signed Up:10/31/2012
Last Login:8/30/2014
Location:Australia
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#4512
Highest Comment Rank:#1339
Content Thumbs: 4 total,  14 ,  10
Comment Thumbs: 5724 total,  6168 ,  444
Content Level Progress: 13.55% (8/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 48% (48/100)
Level 255 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 256 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:957
Total Comments Made:6265
FJ Points:5714

latest user's comments

#70766 - Which parts in particular did you disagree with? 06/03/2014 on Religion Board +1
#70765 - I know, but creation seems to imply a sentient party generatin…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Religion Board +1
User avatar #70838 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
>imply
This word holds no meaning. Abiogenesis, for example, claims that the first cells were created without the need for a deity or designer
User avatar #70842 - wallbuilder (06/04/2014) [-]
I know, I was simply using it to avoid confusion. If I agreed to natural creation I'd be agreeing with the existence of a creator, unless the term means something different and I'm ignorant of it.
#70763 - But we observe a physical world with laws and constants. We li…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Religion Board +1
User avatar #70764 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I disagree heavily with what you've stated, but this is probably going to be the most reasonable answer that I'm going to obtain.

P.S. I stated natural creation as in creation through natural means , not natural existence.
User avatar #70766 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Which parts in particular did you disagree with?
User avatar #70765 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
I know, but creation seems to imply a sentient party generating something.
User avatar #70838 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
>imply
This word holds no meaning. Abiogenesis, for example, claims that the first cells were created without the need for a deity or designer
User avatar #70842 - wallbuilder (06/04/2014) [-]
I know, I was simply using it to avoid confusion. If I agreed to natural creation I'd be agreeing with the existence of a creator, unless the term means something different and I'm ignorant of it.
#70761 - Any claim without evidence is equally as valid as the claim of…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Religion Board +1
User avatar #70762 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
Any claim without evidence is equally as valid as the claim of natural creation without evidence. So I don't really see a point to arguing it in particular.
Rather than asking about God, perhaps try asking about theory of logic, truth, knowledge, reality etc. Which doesn't really matter since a small amount of the user have provided any of that, and the question of a deity is relevant in discussing the theism/atheism position.
User avatar #70763 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
But we observe a physical world with laws and constants. We live our lives under innumerous assumptions that what we perceive as the physical world is reality. The world we see today can be tracked a good distance into the past and we can observe the way things appear to work. From our understanding of this physical universe, we cannot observe anything Godly.

The belief of natural existence is simply that the universe exists as we can see it. Basically, what is, is. And we cannot see a God in this universe of rules and constants. We can't see spirits or wizards, either. So we don't see a reason to spend time thinking about it.
User avatar #70764 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I disagree heavily with what you've stated, but this is probably going to be the most reasonable answer that I'm going to obtain.

P.S. I stated natural creation as in creation through natural means , not natural existence.
User avatar #70766 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Which parts in particular did you disagree with?
User avatar #70765 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
I know, but creation seems to imply a sentient party generating something.
User avatar #70838 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
>imply
This word holds no meaning. Abiogenesis, for example, claims that the first cells were created without the need for a deity or designer
User avatar #70842 - wallbuilder (06/04/2014) [-]
I know, I was simply using it to avoid confusion. If I agreed to natural creation I'd be agreeing with the existence of a creator, unless the term means something different and I'm ignorant of it.
#271075 - Lotta' **** content the past few days... as in, …  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... +3
User avatar #271097 - lobselvith (06/03/2014) [-]
Summerfags will be summerfags.
#70759 - You call people out on things like strawman and that means you…  [+] (17 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Religion Board +1
User avatar #70768 - revengeforfreeze (06/03/2014) [-]
I don't agree, I think the assertion "I exist" is also wrong. What are you? You are the sum of current neural processes that lead up to one percieved singularity, but it's an illusion. You don't even exist. That's where ideas like souls come in. Sure, might be possible, but it doesn't look like it when we look at the way the brain works.
User avatar #70790 - Sethorein (06/03/2014) [-]
Descartes. I am a thing that is capable of thought. I do not know what state I exist within, so far as I am aware that I came capable of self reflection upon my very nature of existence. For the capacity to reflect upon myself and my experience I must exist in some state. The state is unknown to me, but the thought is known to me.

He then went on to say that God is real because the nature of god is perfection and perfection necessitates existence so perhaps we should take his philosophy with a grain of salt... Nevertheless, I think. Therefore I am, is pretty simple of an assertion. Much less simple to disprove than the assertion that perfection necessitates existence.
User avatar #70791 - revengeforfreeze (06/03/2014) [-]
Ah, I get it! Yes, then I guess it would be correct. That is basically the only thing a human being can really know, then.

I don't even see how he makes that logical leap.
User avatar #70769 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
I don't mean to say that I, as a person, exist. I mean that a thing that thinks exists and I observe it. How could I "think" without something existing?
User avatar #70770 - revengeforfreeze (06/03/2014) [-]
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Let me think for a bit. This is where it gets hard.
User avatar #70772 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
If there is something to see, there is something.
If something thinks, something must exist to do the thinking.
"I think therefore I am."
I think it was Plato? I can't remember the names.
User avatar #70775 - revengeforfreeze (06/03/2014) [-]
Nah it was DES car TES.

I'm not sure if I believe that tho. I'll have to.. read more, lurk more
User avatar #70776 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Aye, that's the dude.

Git gud soon.
User avatar #70760 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
Do not forget that if you use ad hom you are a poopie head. :^)
Given that most of the replies I've gotten don't state a single premise other than "no evidence" and fall back to a very questionable application of the highly questionable razor, I didn't realize it was such a crime to ask for what "logic" they mean when they claim to have the "logical" position.
User avatar #70761 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Any claim without evidence is equally as valid as the claim of God without evidence. So I don't really see a point to arguing it in particular. Rather than asking about God, perhaps try asking about theory of logic, truth, knowledge, reality etc. This could go on forever and in circles if you pursue it in such a strict fashion, however.
User avatar #70762 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
Any claim without evidence is equally as valid as the claim of natural creation without evidence. So I don't really see a point to arguing it in particular.
Rather than asking about God, perhaps try asking about theory of logic, truth, knowledge, reality etc. Which doesn't really matter since a small amount of the user have provided any of that, and the question of a deity is relevant in discussing the theism/atheism position.
User avatar #70763 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
But we observe a physical world with laws and constants. We live our lives under innumerous assumptions that what we perceive as the physical world is reality. The world we see today can be tracked a good distance into the past and we can observe the way things appear to work. From our understanding of this physical universe, we cannot observe anything Godly.

The belief of natural existence is simply that the universe exists as we can see it. Basically, what is, is. And we cannot see a God in this universe of rules and constants. We can't see spirits or wizards, either. So we don't see a reason to spend time thinking about it.
User avatar #70764 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I disagree heavily with what you've stated, but this is probably going to be the most reasonable answer that I'm going to obtain.

P.S. I stated natural creation as in creation through natural means , not natural existence.
User avatar #70766 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Which parts in particular did you disagree with?
User avatar #70765 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
I know, but creation seems to imply a sentient party generating something.
User avatar #70838 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
>imply
This word holds no meaning. Abiogenesis, for example, claims that the first cells were created without the need for a deity or designer
User avatar #70842 - wallbuilder (06/04/2014) [-]
I know, I was simply using it to avoid confusion. If I agreed to natural creation I'd be agreeing with the existence of a creator, unless the term means something different and I'm ignorant of it.
#46 - False. I don't think his body wanted to maintain it's velocity at all. 06/03/2014 on When you're late for... +2
#56 - Try 68+ gigs. 06/03/2014 on anon the prankster +1
#270974 - Do you believe that the universe we observe exists as we perce… 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
#270948 - Theism is a claim. Claims require sufficient basis to hold up …  [+] (2 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270965 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
The same could be said about a majority of the different interpretations of atheism.
"The universe was created by natural means" is a claim.
"The creation of the universe was done without any supernatural forces" is a negative claim.
"A deity does not exist" is a negative claim.
"The probability of a deity existing is small" is a claim, and one that's brought into question.
User avatar #270974 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Do you believe that the universe we observe exists as we perceive it?
I do. That's an assumption that I have to make, else the doubt doesn't end. I see no evidence of God, it seems out of place in our universe with it's laws of physics and such.
#270943 - Well, why do you ask for evidence on an unfalsifiable claim? E…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270945 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I ask simply for the members of the board, be the ones who the question applies to, to back up how atheism is the more "logical" position.
User avatar #270948 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Theism is a claim. Claims require sufficient basis to hold up in reality.
Oops, I did it again.
User avatar #270965 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
The same could be said about a majority of the different interpretations of atheism.
"The universe was created by natural means" is a claim.
"The creation of the universe was done without any supernatural forces" is a negative claim.
"A deity does not exist" is a negative claim.
"The probability of a deity existing is small" is a claim, and one that's brought into question.
User avatar #270974 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Do you believe that the universe we observe exists as we perceive it?
I do. That's an assumption that I have to make, else the doubt doesn't end. I see no evidence of God, it seems out of place in our universe with it's laws of physics and such.
#270937 - I don't think there's any atheists on the board who think that…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270938 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I personally would disagree about the zero-chance group (having met one particular atheist who's name will both be withheld and irrelevant, and notice the actual sect of atheism that can be applied with this definition existing making the probability seem likely to contain at least one specimen).

My problem though is the "probability" that you mentioned. Many of them aren't really providing me with anything other than the shift of proof, and a couple of them are trying to apply reasoning that is simply incorrect to the claim.
User avatar #270943 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Well, why do you ask for evidence on an unfalsifiable claim? Even if there is one, most don't absolutely discount the possibility of a God. They just work with what they can, they can't disprove it so don't completely discount it but there's nothing to necessarily prove it so they stay aware of the possibility.
User avatar #270945 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I ask simply for the members of the board, be the ones who the question applies to, to back up how atheism is the more "logical" position.
User avatar #270948 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Theism is a claim. Claims require sufficient basis to hold up in reality.
Oops, I did it again.
User avatar #270965 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
The same could be said about a majority of the different interpretations of atheism.
"The universe was created by natural means" is a claim.
"The creation of the universe was done without any supernatural forces" is a negative claim.
"A deity does not exist" is a negative claim.
"The probability of a deity existing is small" is a claim, and one that's brought into question.
User avatar #270974 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Do you believe that the universe we observe exists as we perceive it?
I do. That's an assumption that I have to make, else the doubt doesn't end. I see no evidence of God, it seems out of place in our universe with it's laws of physics and such.
#270935 - Do you believe in a God existing, follow a religion or are you…  [+] (10 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270936 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I do not follow a religion. I withhold any judgement regarding the claim of a deity because of the unfalsifiable nature of the claim.
User avatar #270940 - rokkarokkaali (06/03/2014) [-]
you also make poopie when not having intelligent conversation
#270941 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
User avatar #270937 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
I don't think there's any atheists on the board who think that there is absolute-zero chance of God. Just a considerably greater probability of there not being a God.
User avatar #270938 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I personally would disagree about the zero-chance group (having met one particular atheist who's name will both be withheld and irrelevant, and notice the actual sect of atheism that can be applied with this definition existing making the probability seem likely to contain at least one specimen).

My problem though is the "probability" that you mentioned. Many of them aren't really providing me with anything other than the shift of proof, and a couple of them are trying to apply reasoning that is simply incorrect to the claim.
User avatar #270943 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Well, why do you ask for evidence on an unfalsifiable claim? Even if there is one, most don't absolutely discount the possibility of a God. They just work with what they can, they can't disprove it so don't completely discount it but there's nothing to necessarily prove it so they stay aware of the possibility.
User avatar #270945 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
I ask simply for the members of the board, be the ones who the question applies to, to back up how atheism is the more "logical" position.
User avatar #270948 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Theism is a claim. Claims require sufficient basis to hold up in reality.
Oops, I did it again.
User avatar #270965 - rebornpooper (06/03/2014) [-]
The same could be said about a majority of the different interpretations of atheism.
"The universe was created by natural means" is a claim.
"The creation of the universe was done without any supernatural forces" is a negative claim.
"A deity does not exist" is a negative claim.
"The probability of a deity existing is small" is a claim, and one that's brought into question.
User avatar #270974 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Do you believe that the universe we observe exists as we perceive it?
I do. That's an assumption that I have to make, else the doubt doesn't end. I see no evidence of God, it seems out of place in our universe with it's laws of physics and such.
#270896 - We're talking about the invention of the measuring system here…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... -1
User avatar #270899 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Fair point. Well, I guess he had some reason to base it on brine. A stupid-ass reason, but a reason none the less.
#270890 - No, it just means the limit of how much he could cool the brin…  [+] (3 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... -1
User avatar #270892 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Because water froze at 25 F and a scale that goes from 25 to 100 would be stupid?
User avatar #270896 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
We're talking about the invention of the measuring system here, there was no "water freezes at 25F" before he invented the system.
User avatar #270899 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Fair point. Well, I guess he had some reason to base it on brine. A stupid-ass reason, but a reason none the less.
#270885 - Wikipedia says the lowest temperature that he could reliably c…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... -1
User avatar #270887 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Maybe that means anything below 0 F makes the brine freeze.
User avatar #270890 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
No, it just means the limit of how much he could cool the brine. It's just seems a really, really stupid thing to base a universal measuring system off. Like, why fucking brine?
User avatar #270892 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Because water froze at 25 F and a scale that goes from 25 to 100 would be stupid?
User avatar #270896 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
We're talking about the invention of the measuring system here, there was no "water freezes at 25F" before he invented the system.
User avatar #270899 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Fair point. Well, I guess he had some reason to base it on brine. A stupid-ass reason, but a reason none the less.
#270880 - When talking temperatures online, give both the Celsius and Fa…  [+] (10 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... -1
User avatar #270883 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Oooooooooooh, so 100 F is the human body temperature. Now all we need to figure out is what the 0 F stands for.
User avatar #271037 - fargfive (06/03/2014) [-]
no no no, human body temperature is 98.6 F
#270889 - anonymous (06/03/2014) [-]
not really... 37.5 is considered a light fever.
User avatar #270891 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Eeeeeeeeeeeh, it can vary. Anything between 36.5 and 37.5 is normal.
User avatar #270885 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
Wikipedia says the lowest temperature that he could reliably cool brine to.
What the fuck.
User avatar #270887 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Maybe that means anything below 0 F makes the brine freeze.
User avatar #270890 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
No, it just means the limit of how much he could cool the brine. It's just seems a really, really stupid thing to base a universal measuring system off. Like, why fucking brine?
User avatar #270892 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Because water froze at 25 F and a scale that goes from 25 to 100 would be stupid?
User avatar #270896 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
We're talking about the invention of the measuring system here, there was no "water freezes at 25F" before he invented the system.
User avatar #270899 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Fair point. Well, I guess he had some reason to base it on brine. A stupid-ass reason, but a reason none the less.
#270861 - There's not that much filth in the water. It's not even radioa…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270863 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Ah, OK. You're being sarcastic. Thanks for clarifying.
#270854 - No, it's okay because you can see through the water a bit and …  [+] (3 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270859 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
I'm far too tired to tell if that's sarcasm or not, but that shit is seriously disgusting.
User avatar #270861 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
There's not that much filth in the water. It's not even radioactive. And the water is slightly rainbow coloured, which can only make for a better product.
User avatar #270863 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Ah, OK. You're being sarcastic. Thanks for clarifying.
#270850 - hair* **** 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
#270849 - And hydrating produce in sewage water.  [+] (5 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270852 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
That's how you get outbreaks of E Coli.
User avatar #270854 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
No, it's okay because you can see through the water a bit and when you take it out of the water it all falls off because the water cleans it as it drips off.
User avatar #270859 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
I'm far too tired to tell if that's sarcasm or not, but that shit is seriously disgusting.
User avatar #270861 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
There's not that much filth in the water. It's not even radioactive. And the water is slightly rainbow coloured, which can only make for a better product.
User avatar #270863 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Ah, OK. You're being sarcastic. Thanks for clarifying.
#270848 - Also, making cooking oil out of human air and human feces.  [+] (8 new replies) 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270851 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
This type of shit makes me glad my country doesn't import much from China.
User avatar #270850 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
hair*
fuck
User avatar #270849 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
And hydrating produce in sewage water.
User avatar #270852 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
That's how you get outbreaks of E Coli.
User avatar #270854 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
No, it's okay because you can see through the water a bit and when you take it out of the water it all falls off because the water cleans it as it drips off.
User avatar #270859 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
I'm far too tired to tell if that's sarcasm or not, but that shit is seriously disgusting.
User avatar #270861 - wallbuilder (06/03/2014) [-]
There's not that much filth in the water. It's not even radioactive. And the water is slightly rainbow coloured, which can only make for a better product.
User avatar #270863 - thechosentroll (06/03/2014) [-]
Ah, OK. You're being sarcastic. Thanks for clarifying.
#270846 - "Are you even trying?" and "Omg, that's… 06/03/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... +3
#270566 - Ew, that chart didn't work out, but it still says you're wrong.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/02/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270569 - princessren (06/02/2014) [-]
I don't really think anyone is wrong in all seriousness
if it works for the people of that society
I am used to it going month day year, it just seems natural to me
#270563 - Question | Times asked | __…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/02/2014 on Hating - file complaints,... 0
User avatar #270566 - wallbuilder (06/02/2014) [-]
Ew, that chart didn't work out, but it still says you're wrong.
User avatar #270569 - princessren (06/02/2014) [-]
I don't really think anyone is wrong in all seriousness
if it works for the people of that society
I am used to it going month day year, it just seems natural to me

Comments(176):

[ 176 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#179 - hazenberdan (08/20/2014) [-]
Hey,dunno if you remeber me or not. But,while back I asked if you were going to get Destiny. I played the beta,and I can vouche for it,it's a decent game. Feels like a weird orgy between Mass Effect,Halo,and CoD. ..Mind you,my xbox360 is currently broke. Red Ring.
User avatar #180 to #179 - wallbuilder ONLINE (08/20/2014) [-]
Yeah, I remember. There are a few potential fixes for red ring, try some of them on youtube, unless you intend to claim warranty on it, some of them violate the terms of warranty.

My friend was gonna' get Destiny too, I'll prob get it with him, on PC though.
#181 to #180 - hazenberdan (08/20/2014) [-]
I'd have got it for PC if my PC wasn't a hunk of **** . If I want to run FNV without it trying to melt,I need to keep everything at the minimum settings. And my PC just does not ******* like TF2. I've tried the fixes before,and it's a used console anyway. (Bought it at EB games,it's like a canadian gamestop.) I'm hoping to just get a new one,as in factory new. That way,I know the damn thing won't die on me after a year or two. But,money's tight so I'll probably just have to fix it myself.
User avatar #182 to #181 - wallbuilder ONLINE (08/20/2014) [-]
Ahh, sucks. My Xbox once RRoD'd, fortunately warranty covered it and now it still works fine 7 years later or something like that. I'm in Australia and we have EB games here, too.
#183 to #182 - hazenberdan (08/20/2014) [-]
Oh,really? I thought it was a Canada only thing. Neat. But,yeah. My 360's out of commission. Kinda blows because I was gonna get Castlevania Harmony of Despair. I'm a big Castlevania fan. This 						*******					 360 has red ringed on me twice now. 						****					,atleast the first time wasn't my fault though. A friend of mine was living with us for a bit because his folks went out west and he wanted to finish school at the high school here. What REALLY pisses me off is that it stopped working when we came home from Halifax. Went there due to...						****					 I don't really remeber,but I brought my 360 and it worked fine at the hotel. This was pretty much mfw I got home and set the 360 back up and it red ringed on me again.
Oh,really? I thought it was a Canada only thing. Neat. But,yeah. My 360's out of commission. Kinda blows because I was gonna get Castlevania Harmony of Despair. I'm a big Castlevania fan. This ******* 360 has red ringed on me twice now. **** ,atleast the first time wasn't my fault though. A friend of mine was living with us for a bit because his folks went out west and he wanted to finish school at the high school here. What REALLY pisses me off is that it stopped working when we came home from Halifax. Went there due to... **** I don't really remeber,but I brought my 360 and it worked fine at the hotel. This was pretty much mfw I got home and set the 360 back up and it red ringed on me again.
User avatar #156 - kua (07/20/2014) [-]
hi you are now my best freind here so you need to love me now :3
User avatar #157 to #156 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Tacos are dumb.
#158 to #157 - kua (07/20/2014) [-]
love me
love me
User avatar #159 to #158 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Sneak into North Korea and lead a successful revolution, freeing the people from oppression.
User avatar #160 to #159 - kua (07/20/2014) [-]
we can do it together like the best freinds we are :3
User avatar #161 to #160 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/20/2014) [-]
Divide and conquer, I have appearances to keep up.
User avatar #142 - revengeforfreeze (06/13/2014) [-]
You know what sucks? Having blue pilled parents that can't accept any new ideas. My parents are really slaves to the system. It's just so frustrating, you wanna yell out. They are trading away their health and wellbeing for the jobs they have.
User avatar #143 to #142 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/14/2014) [-]
Honestly, I really don't like my parents. My mum can't be reasoned with and dad follows her word. I'm just biding my time 'till I move out. Only a month or so now.
User avatar #144 to #143 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Same for me almost. Except I don't like them on the grounds of that they never accept what I do because they have so strongly held values. They disapprove of me meditating even. Jeez man, spiritually dead. Anyway. How old are you right now?
User avatar #145 to #144 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/14/2014) [-]
22.
User avatar #146 to #145 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Do you ever feel pressured to move out?
User avatar #147 to #146 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/14/2014) [-]
I wanted to move out the moment I turned 18. But I failed at finding a job for a long time.
User avatar #148 to #147 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Good luck man.

Do you meditate, by the way?
User avatar #149 to #148 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/14/2014) [-]
Nah. What do you do when you meditate?
User avatar #150 to #149 - indone (06/17/2014) [-]
Sorry, I forgot to reply to this.

I can eliminate false ideas, for example. Like, rocking forward and back and telling yourself something until it becomes 'true' in your mind. There are lots of tutorials online, but I suggest you look up what Sam Harris says about it. He is very knowledgable in the art of meditating.
User avatar #151 to #150 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
indone an alt account?
User avatar #152 to #151 - indone (06/17/2014) [-]
No, my new main account
User avatar #153 to #152 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
So, why the new account?
User avatar #154 to #153 - indone (06/17/2014) [-]
Negative feeling attatched to my old account(name)
User avatar #141 - aczzoh ONLINE (06/13/2014) [-]
I feel like I wanna see you happy and safe. I really wanna hold you tight and see you smile. I wanna hang out with you in-person. For the past 3 months, I've checked to see if you were on funnyjunk, seeing that you were on always made me happy, if you were i'd usually just go to your profile, check recent comments, think about replying to them but was always too afriad to do so, a little different when I was on today. sometimes when looking through pictures to post something i see a picture of your beautiful face and it always makes me so happy also i wanna hear your sexy voice still
User avatar #135 - syrianassassin (05/31/2014) [-]
can i ask a question?
User avatar #136 to #135 - wallbuilder ONLINE (05/31/2014) [-]
Sure.
User avatar #137 to #136 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
what is your beliefs ?
User avatar #138 to #137 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/01/2014) [-]
Agnostic. Not sure of a God.
User avatar #139 to #138 - syrianassassin (06/01/2014) [-]
then if you have anything and any question you can tell me, and i am willing to answer

you saw me being harsh on the board, but i am only harsh on the bad so don't take any false idea about me, you saw those fedora wingling new atheist faggots in the religion board how they treat other onions with total ******** and nonsense

this is my first post in the religion board and see what happened
www.funnyjunk.com/religion/54159#54159
User avatar #140 to #139 - wallbuilder ONLINE (06/01/2014) [-]
Alright, thanks.
User avatar #132 - revengeforfreeze (05/26/2014) [-]
Hey.. Reason I went all out on pie is because he usually held this belief / idea that I was a creepy ************ , stalker, calling me creepy on several occasions, always ranking down on my sentence structure which I know is pretty crappy, but mostly the "creepy" accusations. Can't help it sometimes, I just lash out. At least I fixed it.

Are we still cool?
User avatar #133 to #132 - wallbuilder ONLINE (05/26/2014) [-]
Yeah, it's fine, you can hate him but don't attack him without provocation. From everything I've ever seen of him, he seems a level-headed guy with a good, consistent moral compass.
User avatar #134 to #133 - revengeforfreeze (05/26/2014) [-]
Maybe I just have a bias from my past interactions. Gonna try reconsider that.
#129 - hazenberdan (05/21/2014) [-]
Hey man,I dunno if you remeber me,but I was wondering if you're gonna get Destiny? I'm seeing how many of my friends are gonna get it. I put down a pre-order on it.
User avatar #130 to #129 - wallbuilder ONLINE (05/21/2014) [-]
I'm gonna' wait and see what it's like... I might get it, but don't count on it.
#131 to #130 - hazenberdan (05/21/2014) [-]
I'll probably be able to tell you in a few months. I still owe like 50$ on it,but game comes out in september,so that's not a problem.
User avatar #125 - ikingdabsy (04/26/2014) [-]
I went to the Journey Into Nyx prerelease, pulled ass made it into a rakdos removal/ ******** deck comprised of commons because that's all black is right now

And I dominated, came 4th after winning 4 rounds and losing 1, I pulled Ajani, Mentor of Heroes in on of my prize packs, so happy
User avatar #126 to #125 - wallbuilder ONLINE (05/03/2014) [-]
Nice, was it a big event?
Sorry on late reply, I haven't been on FJ lately because of vital tasks(Dark souls 2).
Also, a ton of cards I ordered finally came in and I bought card slips today so I'll finally have some decks soon.
User avatar #162 to #126 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
MTG is great, man.
User avatar #163 to #162 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Aye, but I haven't played much for a long time. About to move into rent with friends though, so I'll get to play heaps more.
User avatar #164 to #163 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Neat. lol I'm only getting a half megabyte per second download on this.

But I swear to god, if I get v&
User avatar #165 to #164 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
>"Only half megabyte per second"
Half megabyte would be the fastest I've ever downloaded.

If you do, say some evil internet person mislead you. And also, you'd have to be amazingly unlucky for the FBI or whoever to not have anything better to do.
User avatar #166 to #165 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
**** it, it's taking to long anyway/
User avatar #167 to #166 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Just do something else while waiting. They damn good ***** , don't stop now!
User avatar #168 to #167 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
**** . Your motivational speech was a second too late.

cries

Meh, I don't really like all this download this ******** to get this ******** anyway
I'll stick to free ones.
Got a link to any free ones, that don't require torrent ******** ?
User avatar #169 to #168 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Not really. I use torrents for everything, as do most people. And torrents are free, too. It's only going 500kb/s because there aren't many seeders. Currently airing shows or recent releases are much, much faster to download via torrent.
User avatar #170 to #169 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
>not many seeders
>31 seeders online before I disconnected

Do not want v&
FBI no want
User avatar #171 to #170 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Many seeders is like 1k+
And it's fine, I torrent constantly, they don't waste their time on torrenters because they'd need to arrest 80% of the population.
User avatar #172 to #171 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
A have already uninstalled everything doe.

In hindsight, did that thing even cost money originally, anyway?
User avatar #174 to #172 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
And no, it doesn't.
User avatar #173 to #172 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Casul.
User avatar #175 to #173 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Holy **** they're selling it for $75.
I was thinking about getting it if it was just like 5 or something but fuq that shiet.
User avatar #176 to #175 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Selling what? uTorrent or the game?
User avatar #177 to #176 - anonshenanigans ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
the game
User avatar #178 to #177 - wallbuilder ONLINE (07/31/2014) [-]
Yeah, it's probably not translated too.
User avatar #127 to #126 - ikingdabsy (05/03/2014) [-]
There was about 35-40 participants so it was kinda big

Awesome! I really want to make the deathtouch deal 1 damage deck you were talking about, sounds so troll. Almost as bad as my mono black 30 removal spells and 4 creatures.
User avatar #128 to #127 - wallbuilder ONLINE (05/03/2014) [-]
It is. Unless your opponents have well constructed decks that can deal with threats like that consistently, they basically can't use creatures. Try Goblin sharpshooter and virulent touch. Virulent touch is good because it catches your opponent off guard and costs only 1 mana in 1 turn as opposed to basilisk collar costing 3 mana over 2 turns. and if you have Goblin sharpshooter they lose X creatures where X is what you want them to lose. Olivia Voldaren is pretty good too, she can actually do damage.
User avatar #123 - wallbuilder ONLINE (04/18/2014) [-]
hazenberdan

If ya' want, I've just thought about zombies a bunch is all.
#124 to #123 - hazenberdan (04/18/2014) [-]
Alright cool,it's kind of fun to do stuff like that.
User avatar #109 to #108 - wallbuilder ONLINE (03/31/2014) [-]
An inverted Japanese flag I get but what's the logo in the middle represent?
#110 to #109 - minibeep (03/31/2014) [-]
thats a secret that only our people know
User avatar #111 to #110 - wallbuilder ONLINE (03/31/2014) [-]
Cool, can I become one of those people?
#112 to #111 - minibeep (03/31/2014) [-]
im shocked and offended
here take this bcause you hate when this happens
User avatar #113 to #112 - wallbuilder ONLINE (03/31/2014) [-]
I'm not sure what to make of this. Is this a piece of art? Thank you for the gift, if so. And please can I know? I love secrets.
#114 to #113 - minibeep (03/31/2014) [-]
u cannot
User avatar #115 to #114 - wallbuilder ONLINE (03/31/2014) [-]
Oh, such cruelty, proffering grand secrets only to snatch them away. Away with you, cruel mistress.
User avatar #107 - wallbuilder ONLINE (01/29/2014) [-]
Note: Should I make a certain comment involving vomit, it is intended as a joke.
User avatar #103 - Rei ONLINE (01/17/2014) [-]
Fire warnings Issued for Victoria
www.bom.gov.au/vic/warnings/fire.shtml
User avatar #105 to #103 - wallbuilder ONLINE (01/17/2014) [-]
Aye, there's ********* of smoke blowing in but our area is fortunately fire-free. Cheers for the heads-up.
User avatar #97 - theflamingfire ONLINE (12/21/2013) [-]
I'm glad you thumbed me
User avatar #98 to #97 - wallbuilder ONLINE (12/21/2013) [-]
Which one was it again? I usually thumb up comments that get raped without undue thought so there's a fair amount on FJ.
User avatar #99 to #98 - theflamingfire ONLINE (12/21/2013) [-]
Most of my comments never get thumbed up which makes me sad
User avatar #100 to #99 - wallbuilder ONLINE (12/21/2013) [-]
Np. Link to the comment?
User avatar #102 to #101 - wallbuilder ONLINE (12/21/2013) [-]
Ah, yes. Well, I got the joke, or style of joke. FJ can often be dumb or hypocritical.
User avatar #96 - wallbuilder ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
**wallbuilder rolls 57**
User avatar #95 - megpoidgumibear (11/06/2013) [-]
hi sexy girl
User avatar #116 to #95 - wallbuilder ONLINE (04/02/2014) [-]
Somehow, I never noticed this comment 'till now.
User avatar #117 to #116 - megpoidgumibear (04/02/2014) [-]
YOU SUCK
User avatar #118 to #117 - wallbuilder ONLINE (04/02/2014) [-]
But hey, at least I replied!
#120 to #119 - wallbuilder ONLINE (04/02/2014) [-]
Am I no longer a sexy girl?
User avatar #121 to #120 - megpoidgumibear (04/02/2014) [-]
no, you' re a bad girl.
User avatar #94 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/27/2013) [-]
the one and only
#90 - ikingdabsy (10/18/2013) [-]
If someone plays this does summoning creatures give them health?
User avatar #91 to #90 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/18/2013) [-]
If the creature is green/has green mana symbols in it's casting cost, yes.
User avatar #92 to #91 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/18/2013) [-]
Creatures count as spells when they are cast.
User avatar #93 to #92 - ikingdabsy (10/18/2013) [-]
Ok, just wanted to check.
User avatar #77 - kibi (10/14/2013) [-]
You mentioned me in a comment on someone's wall, but that person requires me to be their friend to view it.

Mind filling me in, friend?
User avatar #78 to #77 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/14/2013) [-]
How long ago was this? I don't remember, I rarely talk on peoples walls.
User avatar #79 to #78 - kibi (10/14/2013) [-]
It was on lordsaten's wall, yesterday abouts?
#80 to #79 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/15/2013) [-]
You sure it was me who mentioned and on lords@ten? Can't find anything.
#81 to #80 - kibi (10/15/2013) [-]
I don't even care what you might've said anymore I just want to solve this mystery.
User avatar #82 to #81 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/15/2013) [-]
I'm not trying to be evasive, I legitimately couldn't find it. You sure it was lordsatens?
#83 to #82 - kibi (10/15/2013) [-]
When I click the link, it gives me this.

I'm actually a little frightened.
User avatar #84 to #83 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/16/2013) [-]
I haven't even commented on the wall in ages apparently. No idea what happened. There's a person called kibitzer I think but I've never spoken to them. Best guess is it was a delayed mention and I did it accidentally.
User avatar #89 to #84 - kibi (10/16/2013) [-]
Mystery solved! \o/
User avatar #85 to #84 - kibitzer (10/16/2013) [-]
I'll clear this up for you. You were agreeing with a comment I made, but instead of mentioning my name, you decide to go for ki-bi instead.
User avatar #86 to #85 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/16/2013) [-]
<3
User avatar #88 to #87 - kibi (10/16/2013) [-]
You're both heroes.
#74 - ikingdabsy (10/09/2013) [-]
Soooooooooooooooo, more magic help pretty pls   
   
I'd decided to use a black deck because I like and understand it. Soon after I was being told the power of blue-black, and I thought &quot;I want in on that&quot;.   
So I'm choosing a intro pack and found 2 I like   
Dark Ascention - Relentless Dead   
and New Phyrexia - Devouring Skies   
   
Opinion?
Soooooooooooooooo, more magic help pretty pls

I'd decided to use a black deck because I like and understand it. Soon after I was being told the power of blue-black, and I thought "I want in on that".
So I'm choosing a intro pack and found 2 I like
Dark Ascention - Relentless Dead
and New Phyrexia - Devouring Skies

Opinion?
User avatar #75 to #74 - wallbuilder ONLINE (10/10/2013) [-]
Aye, Blue/black are my main colours.

The relentless dead one looks really **** . But the Devouring skies seems okay. Go with that.
[ 176 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)