Upload
Login or register

voxxyn

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:10/10/2012
Stats
Content Ranking:#4113
Comment Ranking:#2077
Highest Content Rank:#4105
Highest Comment Rank:#2106
Content Thumbs: 27 total,  36 ,  9
Comment Thumbs: 1074 total,  1121 ,  47
Content Level Progress: 50.84% (30/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 207 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 208 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Content Views:4105
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:219
FJ Points:841

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#18 - This was the gist of his reaction, but he worded it pretty bad…  [+] (1 reply) 10 hours ago on My takeaway from the first... +1
User avatar
#20 - squidamon (7 hours ago) [-]
VENT INCOMING (sorry)

well so long as we're being transparent here, I feel like inability to talk is less harmful than inability to actually do anything. For better or worse, Hillary's strength is her ability to talk and spin everything in a positive and tactful way, whereas her actions and decisions have to me been less than satisfactory. Trump's strength is business, the guy knows how to make money. Were we not 20 Tril in debt, I'd probably vote for hill, but at this point I think the country needs money more than tact or anything else, and a businessman provides a bigger chance for money than a politician.

The BIG reason I highly prefer trump to Hillary though, is that Hillary could do whatever she darn well pleases and get away with it relatively easy.The media is in her pocket, and will be more than willing to mitigate anything bad she does and overemphasize anything good. Trump is the exact opposite, he could sneeze and the media would try to spin it as some abhorrent racist remark. I don't see him being able to get away with anything without people knowing about it in detail, if for no other reason than they will try their damnedest to besmirch him.

TLDR IMO actions > wording, we really really really need money, hill is more dangerous cuz she can essentially act with impunity
#15 - its not, its a scene from a movie.  [+] (1 reply) 09/27/2016 on cringe +4
User avatar
#19 - midgettitwank (20 hours ago) [-]
which movie friend
#4 - His entire performance consisted of him backpedaling, repeatin…  [+] (9 replies) 09/27/2016 on My takeaway from the first... +12
#17 - squidamon (10 hours ago) [-]
To be fair about the mean point actually, As I recall Hillary said something to the point of "Trump shouldn't be president because he is mean and abrasive", to which trump responded with "Youre making TV commercials designed to shit on me, how are you any less mean than me?"

Correct me if im wrong, thats just how I remember it
User avatar
#18 - voxxyn (10 hours ago) [-]
This was the gist of his reaction, but he worded it pretty badly. His tone was very petulant, and he just didn't articulate well... at all. His exact words were:

"And I will tell you this, Lester: It's not nice. And I don't deserve that. It's certainly not a nice thing that she's done."

Sauce: www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/26/the-first-trump-clinton-presidential-debate-transcript-annotated/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

Now, that's not to say that I like Clinton. I think shes a crooked, dishonest bitch who will abuse her power as president for personal gain and leave the country even worse off than when she started.

But, I think that Trump is (amazingly) even worse. As a businessman, he's every bit as crooked as Hilary, and has demonstrated repeatedly throughout the election cycle that he lacks patience, tact, and decent public speaking skills. He just doesn't have the personality or skill set to lead a nation.

Where Clinton would do the minimum to keep things running while fattening her purse, Trump wouldn't even know how to keep things running, and he'd be to proud to ever admit it. As such... I'm forced to choose Clinton as the lesser of two evils here. And that's fucking pathetic.

/rant
User avatar
#20 - squidamon (7 hours ago) [-]
VENT INCOMING (sorry)

well so long as we're being transparent here, I feel like inability to talk is less harmful than inability to actually do anything. For better or worse, Hillary's strength is her ability to talk and spin everything in a positive and tactful way, whereas her actions and decisions have to me been less than satisfactory. Trump's strength is business, the guy knows how to make money. Were we not 20 Tril in debt, I'd probably vote for hill, but at this point I think the country needs money more than tact or anything else, and a businessman provides a bigger chance for money than a politician.

The BIG reason I highly prefer trump to Hillary though, is that Hillary could do whatever she darn well pleases and get away with it relatively easy.The media is in her pocket, and will be more than willing to mitigate anything bad she does and overemphasize anything good. Trump is the exact opposite, he could sneeze and the media would try to spin it as some abhorrent racist remark. I don't see him being able to get away with anything without people knowing about it in detail, if for no other reason than they will try their damnedest to besmirch him.

TLDR IMO actions > wording, we really really really need money, hill is more dangerous cuz she can essentially act with impunity
#12 - lostabyss (16 hours ago) [-]
im sure it had nothing to do with the fair and unbiased questions
User avatar
#24 - daniboyi (3 hours ago) [-]
>Using Ben Garrison and talking about bias.

This guy has shown in the past to be so far up Trump's ass with his tongue, that he is capable of tongue-kissing him.

Basically: don't talk about bias, when you are using a picture from one of the most biased people.
User avatar
#19 - heysupman (8 hours ago) [-]
Nah just his shitty answers
User avatar
#14 - lostminder (15 hours ago) [-]
you're right, if he was a good candidate he would have risen above anyways.
#15 - lostabyss (14 hours ago) [-]
but hillary is a good candidate for hiring companies to spread online propaganda?

hillary is good because she conspired with the dnc to rig the primary?

hillary is the good candidate because soros funds her and controls the media outlets so the debates always favor her?


how can someone rise above this kind of manipulation when it is so prolific? when every news organization is on a figurative witch hunt after him? what exactly could he have done to rise above it?
User avatar
#16 - lostminder (11 hours ago) [-]
he never cares about the media. he should have done what he always does and not care about them again, but also talk about all his plans even the secret ones that are far better than hillary's lmao
#9 - Sure. 09/27/2016 on sexy Jeff Goldblum 0
[ 214 Total ]