x
Click to expand

usafperson

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/06/2011
Last Login:6/21/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#3449
Highest Content Rank:#16394
Highest Comment Rank:#2987
Content Thumbs: 39 total,  69 ,  30
Comment Thumbs: 2829 total,  3293 ,  464
Content Level Progress: 72.88% (43/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 58% (58/100)
Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 224 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:25661
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:364
FJ Points:2678

latest user's comments

#148 - Other than the one quote that may or may not seems a little cr… 05/27/2015 on who are you people? 0
#16 - Sometimes relationships, even between two mature and attractiv…  [+] (14 new replies) 05/26/2015 on Burns 0
#31 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
I don't know but her response doesn't exactly fit being "mature"
User avatar #33 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
The appropriateness of her response really depends on the circumstances of their break up, I think. For all we know he cheated multiple times, in which case I would probably do the same thing If I was hot, which I'm not :/, icrievertim
#34 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
Well, he does say "Big Mistake", but for all we know that refers to the break-up. Or cheating.

Being confident is the first step to hotness bby
User avatar #35 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
I have no tits, no ass, and roastbeef. Confidence is not going to help here
#36 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
Living up to your confidence is the second step. Just get dat ass with squats and i have no idea what's mean with roasbeef, butt still
It'll amaze you how much it'll help
User avatar #37 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
Thanks for trying, dude. Look up roast beef though and you'll know what I mean.
#38 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
You gotta bust out the fisherman webm

If i look up roast beef, i just get the food, so i still don't know what it is.
User avatar #41 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
Haha awesome Webm though, thanks
User avatar #39 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
Roast beef pussy* sorry
#43 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
The Webm's the best motivational thing you can get. It's perma-opened in a tab while studying.

There's probably some exercises out there for it i am no expert on the female anatomy, at all, but everything's possible if you try. That and i don't think a lot of people mind.
You'll be rolling in dicks in no time.
User avatar #44 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
I really appreciate what you're saying.

This is purely for information, but saying there are exercises for that is like saying there are exercises to make you taller. The only thing that can fix it is surgery. Now you know

And thanks again
#45 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
Sometimes, you just gotta give someone a confidence boost. Now use the boost and become confident!

www.google.be/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#q=Exercises+to+make+you+taller
Nothing's impossible!
User avatar #46 - cumbersome (05/26/2015) [-]
Haha nice dude. You're a good guy. Have a nice day
#48 - kinginthenorth (05/26/2015) [-]
Y-you too
Just remember the fisherman
#6 - In case any of you care, she was found. She was sexually abuse…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/21/2015 on You laugh you go to hell +5
#11 - anon (05/22/2015) [-]
hawt
#8 - anon (05/21/2015) [-]
safer but not okay really.
#91 - All good!  [+] (1 new reply) 05/16/2015 on (untitled) +1
#92 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
#89 - Exactly my point. Absence of evidence of absence is not eviden…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/16/2015 on (untitled) +1
#90 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Mine too, I misread your original post. Sorry
User avatar #91 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
All good!
#92 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
#87 - Although you shouldn't confuse this with the idea that absence…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/16/2015 on (untitled) 0
#88 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Sure, but in science we must have evidence to support claims.
User avatar #89 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Exactly my point. Absence of evidence of absence is not evidence of presence either.
Say that 5 times fast.
My point is that all claims need evidence.
#90 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Mine too, I misread your original post. Sorry
User avatar #91 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
All good!
#92 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
#85 - Who are you to tell me what I don't understand about science? … 05/16/2015 on (untitled) 0
#30 - I could say "The great thing about he Bible is, it's true…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/16/2015 on (untitled) 0
#60 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
The thing you don't understand about science is that it doesn't try to prove negatives. What it does is take observations about the universe and then tries to understand how it works. It doesn't say 'well you can't disprove unicorns so we can't say if they exist or not'.
User avatar #87 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Although you shouldn't confuse this with the idea that absence of evidence = evidence of absence, because it does not.
#88 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Sure, but in science we must have evidence to support claims.
User avatar #89 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Exactly my point. Absence of evidence of absence is not evidence of presence either.
Say that 5 times fast.
My point is that all claims need evidence.
#90 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Mine too, I misread your original post. Sorry
User avatar #91 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
All good!
#92 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
User avatar #85 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Who are you to tell me what I don't understand about science? I'm well aware of what you've just explained to me, and that doesn't contradict anything that I've said.
#29 - Thank you for saying that. I've been sick of this guy and Bill…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/16/2015 on (untitled) 0
#59 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Sounds like you're projecting pal.
User avatar #30 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
I could say "The great thing about he Bible is, it's true whether you believe it or not." That, what I say, doesn't change anything. It's right or wrong, true or untrue. Period. Building off of what you said, there is ONE ultimate truth and that truth is, was, and always will be true, whether we believe it or not, and whether it's something we consider hard science at the time or not. The truth, if we ever are able to find it through science, could be what we consider science now, it could be finding that the God in the Bible is true, or something else. I can't prove to you one way or the other.
#60 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
The thing you don't understand about science is that it doesn't try to prove negatives. What it does is take observations about the universe and then tries to understand how it works. It doesn't say 'well you can't disprove unicorns so we can't say if they exist or not'.
User avatar #87 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Although you shouldn't confuse this with the idea that absence of evidence = evidence of absence, because it does not.
#88 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Sure, but in science we must have evidence to support claims.
User avatar #89 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Exactly my point. Absence of evidence of absence is not evidence of presence either.
Say that 5 times fast.
My point is that all claims need evidence.
#90 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
Mine too, I misread your original post. Sorry
User avatar #91 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
All good!
#92 - popeflatus (05/16/2015) [-]
User avatar #85 - usafperson (05/16/2015) [-]
Who are you to tell me what I don't understand about science? I'm well aware of what you've just explained to me, and that doesn't contradict anything that I've said.
#16 - GOT EEEM!!!! 05/16/2015 on The Prize +3
#11 - Comment deleted 05/16/2015 on Thoughts 2 0
#8 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 05/15/2015 on Thoughts 2 0
#9 - undeaddog Comment deleted by usafperson
#11 - usafperson Comment deleted by usafperson
#16 - What does this have to do with entitled or self-victimizing br… 05/15/2015 on Neil's FW tumblr users... +2
#23 - What he ^ said, and probably not because this is a memorial fl… 05/15/2015 on Planes 0
#9 - Did anybody say it was?  [+] (3 new replies) 05/15/2015 on Neil's FW tumblr users... +19
User avatar #14 - doctorprofessornv (05/15/2015) [-]
Yes, all the entitled sissies who think their cushy life under mommy and daddy is the norm of existence, and if they aren't being handed life on a silver platter it's obviously because someone is oppressing them.
#31 - anon (05/15/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** Lol this is gay. Gotta find some other way to express your hatred
User avatar #16 - usafperson (05/15/2015) [-]
What does this have to do with entitled or self-victimizing brats who think they're being oppressed? The quote says the universe isn't obligated to make sense to you. That would imply that someone was saying that it is.
#11 - It has to do with the translation and how sentences and phrase… 05/14/2015 on Religion, not even once 0
#8 - If you're genuinely interested. Otherwise, go back t…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/12/2015 on Religion, not even once 0
User avatar #9 - ninjaroo (05/12/2015) [-]
Eeeh, I'd call that a stretch. Besides twisting "I now know" into "I already knew, but now it's known", which could have been accurately described if it had originally been written a different way and making some grand theological assumptions about what it means for god to know something, it doesn't explain why God needs something to be known. He makes the judgements and the opinions of man have no bearing on those, the critical acclaim of Abraham has no value.
User avatar #11 - usafperson (05/14/2015) [-]
It has to do with the translation and how sentences and phrases were formed to mean things back then vs now. I thought the same thing too at first but it makes sense to me now.
#68 - Don't start an argument against something with "your argu… 05/07/2015 on Change 0
#43 - Not everyone in all these countries are satisfied with it, and…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/07/2015 on Change 0
User avatar #44 - colossusshadow (05/07/2015) [-]
Your argument is blown away in the wind by countries that have government provided healthcare though, you literally just need to see it in action. USA's method's with dealing with health are the laughing stock of pretty much any first world country, but no you can just say "not all of them!" despite the most common thing that happens when this debate comes up - everyone collectively agrees the united states is a shitpile in denial that the system works

Also, it's wrong for the collective people of the united states to HAVE to pay the INSANE military budget, and a lot of people oppose it, so why then do people still have to foot that bill they disagree with? Probably because a good military is essential to a good country, but so is basic fucking healthcare especially when people have to go into debt because of something -someone else- did to them
User avatar #68 - usafperson (05/07/2015) [-]
Don't start an argument against something with "your argument is blown away by..."
Just advice, it seems kinda silly honestly. Let your arguments speak for themselves and blow away my arguments because they do just that, not because you introduce them as such.

The thing, is addressing your actual argument, is that countries with government-provided healthcare are not perfect, and that misses the point of my argument anyway. It can work, and does work, but it doesn't make it right and it doesn't mean that it's the best way it could work.
Then you attack the USA's methods, when I just told you that I don't think the US's methods have been correct before or after the Affordable Care Act happened. Neither were a true free market and neither are good. And you can call the USA the "laughing stock" of healthcare all you want, but you should know that's mostly true on websites like this. And people making fun of something has never been a good reason to think it sucks.
"not all of them!"
Why do you gotta make me sound like a child? That the truth, a lot of countries with government run healthcare don't do very well, whether you want to admit it or not. And again, many people have come to the US specifically for healthcare and then gone back home.

You can say what's common to your own experience all you and and call the US a shitpile in denial but that doesn't really do anything for your argument either.

I'm gonna make it clear again that I don't think the US's healthcare system is or was good in recent years, but it's not as bad as you and some others like to paint it. I'm supporting something entirely separate from what the US was doing beforehand so your flash-card arguments against US healthcare are really irrelevant and you haven't really addressed my actual argument.

The second part of you comment is just completely irrelevant. What does any of this have to do with the military budget? When did I ever say I endorse the military budget we have?

"especially when people have to go into debt because of something -someone else- did to them"
You know that lawsuits do exist right?
#58 - facepalmftw (05/07/2015) [-]
An efficient healthcare system is more important than a universal one. And private health care costs in the U.S. were often so high because 1. A private company needs to make their money back from getting the best doctors and equipment the can. 2. Because so many people assume going to the hospital will mean they end up perfectly fine, so when things don't go exactly as planned they sue. The whole idea behind the United States of America was (and hopefully still is) that people can choose to live their lives as they see fit. They can work, play, travel, wherever they please, and aren't constrained by what their social class or government says they can and can't do. Is it the perfect system? No. But that's why there's other countries. If you think France's society is better, move to France.
#37 - OP you son of a bitch  [+] (4 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Interesting Facts +117
#116 - rollfourexplain (05/07/2015) [-]
**rollfourexplain used "*roll 1, 0000-9999*"**
**rollfourexplain rolls 6,527**

How the heck is there a webpage that mentions FJ?
#95 - jaevel (05/07/2015) [-]
#79 - thegamepixel (05/07/2015) [-]
#72 - lunadicaccetore (05/07/2015) [-]
HO creduto che
#13 - >Healthcare doesn't cost anything >Taxes don't count…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/06/2015 on Change +3
User avatar #42 - colossusshadow (05/07/2015) [-]
I'd consider agreeing with you except in every country where health care exists "free" by means of taxes, nobody minds that their taxes pay for health care, and everyone has a good quality of life in terms of things you can't control like getting injured in a hit and run.

but that's just crazy isn't it, having a country where people's overall happiness is better.
I mean did you consider the insurance you pay probably costs the same a month or less as taxes would that allow everyone to be covered?
User avatar #43 - usafperson (05/07/2015) [-]
Not everyone in all these countries are satisfied with it, and certainly not every country with "free" healthcare is well-off with it. Many are, don't get me wrong. But here in the US we've had many people come to the US from healthcare because they believe it's better here. I assume these people had money, and I in no way make the argument that the American healthcare system was perfect before the Affordable Care Act. Far from it.

My argument is that private industry and the free market tend to offer much better services more efficiently (meaning lower prices for better services) than a government. Also, it's wrong to make everyone pay for healthcare that isn't going to them. If you need certain expenses, it's your responsibility to pay for them and it's wrong to force someone else to just because they're richer (I also believe it's wrong for that rich person not to donate if they are able). And I'm not a fan of making insurance mandatory.

Healthcare is expensive, and believe me, I want everyone to have access to healthcare as much as the next guy. I just think that this isn't the right approach.
User avatar #44 - colossusshadow (05/07/2015) [-]
Your argument is blown away in the wind by countries that have government provided healthcare though, you literally just need to see it in action. USA's method's with dealing with health are the laughing stock of pretty much any first world country, but no you can just say "not all of them!" despite the most common thing that happens when this debate comes up - everyone collectively agrees the united states is a shitpile in denial that the system works

Also, it's wrong for the collective people of the united states to HAVE to pay the INSANE military budget, and a lot of people oppose it, so why then do people still have to foot that bill they disagree with? Probably because a good military is essential to a good country, but so is basic fucking healthcare especially when people have to go into debt because of something -someone else- did to them
User avatar #68 - usafperson (05/07/2015) [-]
Don't start an argument against something with "your argument is blown away by..."
Just advice, it seems kinda silly honestly. Let your arguments speak for themselves and blow away my arguments because they do just that, not because you introduce them as such.

The thing, is addressing your actual argument, is that countries with government-provided healthcare are not perfect, and that misses the point of my argument anyway. It can work, and does work, but it doesn't make it right and it doesn't mean that it's the best way it could work.
Then you attack the USA's methods, when I just told you that I don't think the US's methods have been correct before or after the Affordable Care Act happened. Neither were a true free market and neither are good. And you can call the USA the "laughing stock" of healthcare all you want, but you should know that's mostly true on websites like this. And people making fun of something has never been a good reason to think it sucks.
"not all of them!"
Why do you gotta make me sound like a child? That the truth, a lot of countries with government run healthcare don't do very well, whether you want to admit it or not. And again, many people have come to the US specifically for healthcare and then gone back home.

You can say what's common to your own experience all you and and call the US a shitpile in denial but that doesn't really do anything for your argument either.

I'm gonna make it clear again that I don't think the US's healthcare system is or was good in recent years, but it's not as bad as you and some others like to paint it. I'm supporting something entirely separate from what the US was doing beforehand so your flash-card arguments against US healthcare are really irrelevant and you haven't really addressed my actual argument.

The second part of you comment is just completely irrelevant. What does any of this have to do with the military budget? When did I ever say I endorse the military budget we have?

"especially when people have to go into debt because of something -someone else- did to them"
You know that lawsuits do exist right?
#58 - facepalmftw (05/07/2015) [-]
An efficient healthcare system is more important than a universal one. And private health care costs in the U.S. were often so high because 1. A private company needs to make their money back from getting the best doctors and equipment the can. 2. Because so many people assume going to the hospital will mean they end up perfectly fine, so when things don't go exactly as planned they sue. The whole idea behind the United States of America was (and hopefully still is) that people can choose to live their lives as they see fit. They can work, play, travel, wherever they please, and aren't constrained by what their social class or government says they can and can't do. Is it the perfect system? No. But that's why there's other countries. If you think France's society is better, move to France.
#28 - noonelikesdan (05/07/2015) [-]
You're also paying towards it, it's communism that works.
#25 - I feel like it would be better not to do that and let the poor… 05/06/2015 on pets 0
#109 - >Educator and activist >Tells people being left hand… 04/29/2015 on sin +27
#19 - No, sorry. Why? 04/28/2015 on usafperson's profile 0
#17 - Glad to hear it man. Yeah, Lockheed Martin is a priva… 04/20/2015 on usafperson's profile 0

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2250
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#18 - minibeep (04/23/2015) [-]
u a weeaboo ?
User avatar #19 to #18 - usafperson (04/28/2015) [-]
No, sorry. Why?
#11 - waffies (04/20/2015) [-]
Hiya! You answered my Oedipus question, and I saw your username and felt compelled to ask my fellow FJer what his involvement with the USAF is! Are you actively enlisted, veteran, retired, or just a big fan?
Hiya! You answered my Oedipus question, and I saw your username and felt compelled to ask my fellow FJer what his involvement with the USAF is! Are you actively enlisted, veteran, retired, or just a big fan?
User avatar #13 to #11 - usafperson (04/20/2015) [-]
Also my grandfather was in the air force which is what originally got me interested.
#12 to #11 - usafperson (04/20/2015) [-]
I made this account a while ago while I was planning on going to the Air Force Academy. I wanted to be a pilot, and had been obsessed with military aircraft for a long time. I worked pretty hard for it, and even applied to the summer seminar there and was accepted and attended, which I'm very proud of. Unfortunately I won't ever know if I would have actually gotten in because I eventually decided that I, personally, could do more for my country in the private sector than as an air force pilot. I figure anyone skilled enough for the Air Force to let them into an F-22 will get the job done exceedingly well. So I'm currently at uni studying engineering. Still a huge fan though!
What about yourself?
#14 to #12 - waffies (04/20/2015) [-]
I enlisted just this month, basic training in August. Been a long time dream to get airborne, so Loadmaster on an aircrew is a heck of a way to kick things off!    
   
Mind if i ask what you mean by the private sector? Like what you hope to do as a career?  I'm afraid I don't really have a concept of anything that means!
I enlisted just this month, basic training in August. Been a long time dream to get airborne, so Loadmaster on an aircrew is a heck of a way to kick things off!

Mind if i ask what you mean by the private sector? Like what you hope to do as a career? I'm afraid I don't really have a concept of anything that means!
#15 to #14 - usafperson (04/20/2015) [-]
Congratulations! Good luck to you, I'm sure you'll do great things.

Private sector as in anything in private business, not government-run, etc. And specifically mechanical engineering. So for example, if I'm lucky I might end up working at Boeing or Northrop Grumman developing the aircraft that the Air Force would put to use. Or even in non-military related industries, if I'm successful I would be driving the American economy and technology forward.
#16 to #15 - waffies (04/20/2015) [-]
Thanks man, finally living up to some dreams, and I'm excited beyond reason. Your support means a lot too!   
   
Aaah, so Lockheed Martin developing the F-35 counts as private sector up until they start selling them to military forces? You wanna be where the real braniacs are at! Good on ya man, you have my utmost respect, and will likely have skills that I'd never dream of.   
   
Invent some jetpacks while you're at it eh?
Thanks man, finally living up to some dreams, and I'm excited beyond reason. Your support means a lot too!

Aaah, so Lockheed Martin developing the F-35 counts as private sector up until they start selling them to military forces? You wanna be where the real braniacs are at! Good on ya man, you have my utmost respect, and will likely have skills that I'd never dream of.

Invent some jetpacks while you're at it eh?
#17 to #16 - usafperson (04/20/2015) [-]
Glad to hear it man.

Yeah, Lockheed Martin is a private company that's contracted by the government to design and build the F-35 and other things. The F-35s are sold to the government for use.

Haha, we'll see what happens. Good luck, again. And thanks for your service.
#10 - datgrass (06/25/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #8 - physicsamurai (09/28/2012) [-]
Thank you.
User avatar #9 to #8 - usafperson (10/01/2012) [-]
You're welcome bro. I feel for you. Let me know how it works out.
#6 - anon (05/18/2012) [-]
retard
User avatar #1 - jmezfm (04/07/2012) [-]
Why the add?
User avatar #2 to #1 - usafperson (04/07/2012) [-]
no reason, just thought i would add a a random person as a friend, clicked your username, saw you said you accept requests, added, you accepted, we are here. How do you do?

User avatar #3 to #2 - jmezfm (04/07/2012) [-]
Haha awesome. And I do fine, and yourself?
User avatar #4 to #3 - usafperson (04/07/2012) [-]
quite fine myself, thank you
#5 to #4 - jmezfm (04/07/2012) [-]
This image has expired
You're very welcome, fine sir.
 Friends (0)