x
FJ should now work well with mobile. Try it out on your mobile/tablet browser!
Click to expand

tyraxio

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/31/2012
Last Login:2/20/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#25918
Highest Content Rank:#3892
Highest Comment Rank:#2059
Content Thumbs: 1902 total,  2299 ,  397
Comment Thumbs: 2601 total,  3945 ,  1344
Content Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 34% (34/100)
Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:91291
Times Content Favorited:112 times
Total Comments Made:1508
FJ Points:4392

latest user's comments

#24 - Then how did the Vikings know about Loki if he was born after …  [+] (4 new replies) 12/13/2013 on Loki Out +2
User avatar #25 - steelwoolsheep (12/13/2013) [-]
read the comment below yours #20 - anonymous poster (1 hour ago)
loki from marvel is not the same as the nordic god, is it was then sex with a horse
#124 - tyraxio (12/15/2013) [-]
You are a terribly sad being for thumbing something down without even replying to it. Shame on you.
#27 - tyraxio (12/13/2013) [-]
Think of Assassin's Creed. Minerva, for example, is not Minerva - but she is still Minerva.
#26 - tyraxio (12/13/2013) [-]
I agree and disagree. It seems fairly obvious that the Marvel universe share all if not much history with our world. Vikings surely know about the Gods, and given that the nature of their tales are very fitting with the personalities of the Marvel "gods", surely they must be, at the very least, related.
#116 - I'd say you are pretty damn good if you colonise America and w… 12/13/2013 on Native Americans +1
#42 - For future reference, religion having "no place in govern… 12/13/2013 on dissing with bible quotes +3
#39 - Pastafarianism =/= atheism Pastafarianism = anti-creationism 12/13/2013 on dissing with bible quotes +1
#362 - I agree, and I have been in similar positions, but pictures li… 12/13/2013 on A neckbeard wear a trilby,... 0
#296 - Also, if you guys are not realising that this is a troll page,… 12/13/2013 on A neckbeard wear a trilby,... +1
#295 - I have never once laughed so much at a page on Facebook.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/13/2013 on A neckbeard wear a trilby,... +2
#296 - tyraxio (12/13/2013) [-]
Also, if you guys are not realising that this is a troll page, you are fucking stupid. It's not even subtle.
#257 - Dude. Irony. He makes a valid point. 12/08/2013 on Black people facts +4
#19 - >middle eastern rebel tricks population into believing he c… 12/08/2013 on don't believe the hype 0
#172 - Just giving my 2 cents. It's not about race. Claiming…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/08/2013 on Black people facts +22
#348 - economic has deleted their comment.
User avatar #242 - plainarcane (12/08/2013) [-]
It astounds me that this doesn't seem to occur to people. I guess they just want to believe whatever justifies their racism.
#236 - thebrownydestroyer has deleted their comment.
#230 - fareastbrainseer (12/08/2013) [-]
Here it is. I found the intelligent comment that people in this thread need to read.
#192 - matoromahri (12/08/2013) [-]
Basically this.
#67 - I'm vegan. I'm not sure they sell it in your area, bu… 12/08/2013 on It was delicious. 0
#66 - Absolutely. I love the vanilla and strawberry bits, but seriou… 12/08/2013 on It was delicious. 0
#23 - Magritte?  [+] (1 new reply) 12/07/2013 on perfect timing +5
#34 - porksammich (12/08/2013) [-]
Yup!
#139 - Actually, they're crystals, not cubes.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/07/2013 on Ehh?Ehh? Get it? +7
#140 - lolchris (12/07/2013) [-]
Indeed. My bad
#787 - Terrorists are not soldiers, no. They do not share definition.… 12/07/2013 on tsk 0
#762 - Sense is not equal to awareness. They can react to stimuli, I … 12/07/2013 on tsk 0
#114 - edward is kill 12/07/2013 on Cactus 0
#658 - I am certainly against fishing too. Because plants, f…  [+] (2 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
User avatar #672 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Actually www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-83446,00.html

They do have a form of sense, and you do not need a complex nervous system OR brain to feel pain. Basic animals like worms, planaria, nemotodes, ect can feel pain, and do not have brains or complex nervous systems. In fact, picking mushrooms means you are removing their FRUITING BODY, their only way to reproduce. Didn't know they produce sexually too, did you?

The thing is that every living thing can sense pain or danger, and their still eaten. Living beings kill other living beings for food. It's always been like that, humans are just the first to question a cycle that has gone on forever.
#762 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
Sense is not equal to awareness. They can react to stimuli, I am in no way disputing this, but they are not aware of the external world, and even less so, their internal worlds (emotions, desires etc.). Also what do you mean "produce sexually"? Of course I know, every being that does not rely on cloning itself (like strawberries) reproduce sexually.

Plants can react to stimuli which is harmful to their continued existence; they do not feel pain. By saying you feel pain, you are inferring a sense of feeling, which is not present in plants, as they do not have a brain or complex central nervous system. Why is this needed, you might ask. It's simple; without a CNS or a brain, the organism has no centralised understanding of anything. This means that a single vine can move towards sunlight, but there is no decisionmaking taking place; there is only that which the plant is coded to do as a reaction to certain stimuli. You might argue that this is actually what happens with insects as well, but that is a much more complicated argument, which might not have a clear-cut answer.

Indeed, we are the first to question the cycle. Why is this? Because we have a civilised sense of morals, and we have an explicit possibility of making decisions. Animals do not, animals do not evolve technologically. They have to rely on their natural instinct to survive, we do not. The lion needs to kill the gazelle to survive, but we do not need to kill the cow to survive.
#644 - We sell meat because meat tastes good, and we have a lot of cu…  [+] (4 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
User avatar #647 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Ok then why kill plants? Or fungi? Those are living things, why should we be eating them? If you say that animals do so, they also eat other animals to survive. Why not just let ourselves starve, because no matter what we do, something living ALWAYS dies. You must be against fishing too.
#658 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
I am certainly against fishing too.

Because plants, fungi, algae, bacteria, vira et cetera does not have brains or complex central nervous systems. They do not have a sense of awareness, which animals do. All animals does to some extent have wishes and desires like you and me (yes, even jellyfish and insects, although of course to a lesser extent than mammals), while plants, fungi, algae... do not.

Also, let me make an important note, I am not saying that if you were on an uninhabited island, where only you and a sheep lived, that you were not allowed to eat the sheep. I don't think I personally could get myself to do it, but that would be self-defense and highly understandable. I would not judge you in any way based on that.
User avatar #672 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Actually www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-83446,00.html

They do have a form of sense, and you do not need a complex nervous system OR brain to feel pain. Basic animals like worms, planaria, nemotodes, ect can feel pain, and do not have brains or complex nervous systems. In fact, picking mushrooms means you are removing their FRUITING BODY, their only way to reproduce. Didn't know they produce sexually too, did you?

The thing is that every living thing can sense pain or danger, and their still eaten. Living beings kill other living beings for food. It's always been like that, humans are just the first to question a cycle that has gone on forever.
#762 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
Sense is not equal to awareness. They can react to stimuli, I am in no way disputing this, but they are not aware of the external world, and even less so, their internal worlds (emotions, desires etc.). Also what do you mean "produce sexually"? Of course I know, every being that does not rely on cloning itself (like strawberries) reproduce sexually.

Plants can react to stimuli which is harmful to their continued existence; they do not feel pain. By saying you feel pain, you are inferring a sense of feeling, which is not present in plants, as they do not have a brain or complex central nervous system. Why is this needed, you might ask. It's simple; without a CNS or a brain, the organism has no centralised understanding of anything. This means that a single vine can move towards sunlight, but there is no decisionmaking taking place; there is only that which the plant is coded to do as a reaction to certain stimuli. You might argue that this is actually what happens with insects as well, but that is a much more complicated argument, which might not have a clear-cut answer.

Indeed, we are the first to question the cycle. Why is this? Because we have a civilised sense of morals, and we have an explicit possibility of making decisions. Animals do not, animals do not evolve technologically. They have to rely on their natural instinct to survive, we do not. The lion needs to kill the gazelle to survive, but we do not need to kill the cow to survive.
#569 - I thumbed down all your stupid points too. That being… 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
#568 - You don't have to eat meat to survive at all, so that argument…  [+] (6 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
User avatar #571 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
So why do we still sell meat? A LOT of foods aren't necessary but we eat them, plus meat is a great source of protein prepared naturally without all the fatty crap put into it. I

If you listened, I don't agree with sport hunting, I agree with hunting for food. I just listed why THEY call it sport. I don't "justify killing" I say there is no issue getting your own food through other means. Do they torture the animal? No. Do they force feed the animal? NO.
#644 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
We sell meat because meat tastes good, and we have a lot of cultural ties to meat. Also, two things, meat is absolutely full of saturated fat, and while indeed a source of protein, definately not the best source of protein we have access to (broccoli, for example, contains higher amounts of protein pr. gram, with an index of almost no fat at all). Meat has high amounts of cholesterol as well.

I'm certainly more in favour of hunting for food than I am for factory farming, obviously, but I don't think there are many excuses for killing an animal, just as I do not think there are many excuses for killing a human being. Self-defense being one of the only I can think of.
User avatar #647 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Ok then why kill plants? Or fungi? Those are living things, why should we be eating them? If you say that animals do so, they also eat other animals to survive. Why not just let ourselves starve, because no matter what we do, something living ALWAYS dies. You must be against fishing too.
#658 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
I am certainly against fishing too.

Because plants, fungi, algae, bacteria, vira et cetera does not have brains or complex central nervous systems. They do not have a sense of awareness, which animals do. All animals does to some extent have wishes and desires like you and me (yes, even jellyfish and insects, although of course to a lesser extent than mammals), while plants, fungi, algae... do not.

Also, let me make an important note, I am not saying that if you were on an uninhabited island, where only you and a sheep lived, that you were not allowed to eat the sheep. I don't think I personally could get myself to do it, but that would be self-defense and highly understandable. I would not judge you in any way based on that.
User avatar #672 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Actually www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-83446,00.html

They do have a form of sense, and you do not need a complex nervous system OR brain to feel pain. Basic animals like worms, planaria, nemotodes, ect can feel pain, and do not have brains or complex nervous systems. In fact, picking mushrooms means you are removing their FRUITING BODY, their only way to reproduce. Didn't know they produce sexually too, did you?

The thing is that every living thing can sense pain or danger, and their still eaten. Living beings kill other living beings for food. It's always been like that, humans are just the first to question a cycle that has gone on forever.
#762 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
Sense is not equal to awareness. They can react to stimuli, I am in no way disputing this, but they are not aware of the external world, and even less so, their internal worlds (emotions, desires etc.). Also what do you mean "produce sexually"? Of course I know, every being that does not rely on cloning itself (like strawberries) reproduce sexually.

Plants can react to stimuli which is harmful to their continued existence; they do not feel pain. By saying you feel pain, you are inferring a sense of feeling, which is not present in plants, as they do not have a brain or complex central nervous system. Why is this needed, you might ask. It's simple; without a CNS or a brain, the organism has no centralised understanding of anything. This means that a single vine can move towards sunlight, but there is no decisionmaking taking place; there is only that which the plant is coded to do as a reaction to certain stimuli. You might argue that this is actually what happens with insects as well, but that is a much more complicated argument, which might not have a clear-cut answer.

Indeed, we are the first to question the cycle. Why is this? Because we have a civilised sense of morals, and we have an explicit possibility of making decisions. Animals do not, animals do not evolve technologically. They have to rely on their natural instinct to survive, we do not. The lion needs to kill the gazelle to survive, but we do not need to kill the cow to survive.
#564 - I don't quite catch you, buddy. You started thumbing me down, …  [+] (2 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
User avatar #567 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
I thumbed down any stupid points you made, you thumbed down anything I said, even when it wasn't to you
#569 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
I thumbed down all your stupid points too.

That being everything you've said <3
#561 - They are hunters though. Also, it feels good to see such anger in you.  [+] (2 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk -1
User avatar #565 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Those are game hunters, not real hunters. Ok using your logic, we can call terrorsits soldiers right? Because they're a type of soldiers? Then we can say all soldiers are evil and kill innocents?
#787 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
Terrorists are not soldiers, no. They do not share definition. A hunter refers simply to a human being who kills wild animals, regardless of method, weapon and reason. Instead of your soldier example, I can give you one that would've been controversial less than a hundred years ago, that all black people are human beings, and therefore human rights apply to them.

In a way, what you are saying is that only white people are real humans (only food hunters (one specific kind of hunter) are real hunters. I know my example is a bit far fetched, so don't take it too literally.
#547 - Let me just point this out, because apparently people are too …  [+] (4 new replies) 12/07/2013 on tsk 0
User avatar #557 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
No we don't, you just make shitty assumptions to try and cover your ass. Lions aren't hunted because their not a steady source of food, especially if you live anywhere else in the world. Most any animal looks "majestic" and that's why hunters respect them and use the body respectfully. You just bank on those idiotic "game hunters" that play with the carcass and act like idiots. Those aren't hunters.
#561 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
They are hunters though. Also, it feels good to see such anger in you.
User avatar #565 - kinginyellow (12/07/2013) [-]
Those are game hunters, not real hunters. Ok using your logic, we can call terrorsits soldiers right? Because they're a type of soldiers? Then we can say all soldiers are evil and kill innocents?
#787 - tyraxio (12/07/2013) [-]
Terrorists are not soldiers, no. They do not share definition. A hunter refers simply to a human being who kills wild animals, regardless of method, weapon and reason. Instead of your soldier example, I can give you one that would've been controversial less than a hundred years ago, that all black people are human beings, and therefore human rights apply to them.

In a way, what you are saying is that only white people are real humans (only food hunters (one specific kind of hunter) are real hunters. I know my example is a bit far fetched, so don't take it too literally.
#542 - No problem. 12/07/2013 on tsk 0

items

Total unique items point value: 3985 / Total items point value: 5760

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)