Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

tyraxio    

Rank #28276 on Comments
no avatar Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to tyraxio Block tyraxio Invite tyraxio to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/31/2012
Last Login:11/07/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#28276
Highest Content Rank:#3892
Highest Comment Rank:#2059
Content Thumbs: 1902 total,  2299 ,  397
Comment Thumbs: 2596 total,  3940 ,  1344
Content Level Progress: 99% (99/100)
Level 118 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 119 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 31% (31/100)
Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Content Views:90968
Times Content Favorited:113 times
Total Comments Made:1502
FJ Points:4389

latest user's comments

#124 - Especially in RPGs this is a pretty big issue - in particular …  [+] (21 new replies) 02/16/2014 on FPS Games These Days +2
User avatar #139 - thekingofengland (02/16/2014) [-]
if you talking about Fallout New Vegas, it would be difficult to alter the story line after completion as the amount of final different outccomes would be too much script to stick in the game, it specifically tells you when you're about to do last mission, so just do don't do it and keep a save file. All you miss is a bit of XP, nothing much. FNV is Obsidian not Bethesda, but it's only game I could think of to fit your description. FO3 and Skyrim let you do what you want
#152 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
You can't free-roam after main quest in Fallout 3 without Broken Steel. New Vegas severely needed an expansion like that, but refused to for some odd reason.
User avatar #170 - yusay (02/16/2014) [-]
>Refused to for some odd reason

It's not like there are wildly different endings for New Vegas compared to Fallout 3's one.
#176 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
Good point, but it is still very much possible for them to have made one. I have explained this a few comments down.

But in regards to that, multiple Elder Scrolls expansions are set in huge islands or such, so really, it wouldn't be a lot of extra work. They would, for example, barely even have to work on designing new characters or places, simply modify the old slightly. Sure, they would need, what, four different of these? It could've still been done easily, I'm not asking for a lot.
User avatar #165 - thekingofengland (02/16/2014) [-]
Once I played FO3 with Broken Steel, I could never play it again without it. You can always get a GOTY copy locally for less than £10 usually. For FNV though, they would need to make it so if you sided with Legion there is no NCR and slave camps are set up everywhere, if you chose yourself, everyone would need to recognise your infamy and Legion and NCR presense reduced. I think it would be too much content even for DLC. I love the series though cannot wait for FO4. I would love it if they could get Mark Wahlberg to do a cameo as its to be set in Boston. But a man can dream...
#174 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
Fallout 3 with Broken Steel is amazing.

They could've done it. Or, at the very least put troops of whichever side you alligned with in the lairs of the other side, as though they are in the process of "cleansing" the land. Regardless, it is a lot of content, but it would've made for a good expansion in itself.

Besides, the setting in Fallout New Vegas was a bit shitty. While I loved the idea of Caesars Legion, it just didn't fit in with the Fallout universe. It was a bit too try-hard Roman imitation, to the degree that is not realistic. I know that they found books about the Roman empire, but I would've loved to see Caesars Legion with another name and them just being ordinary raiders, but still have the same values and take slaves and such. They could've even linked it to the Paradise Falls slavetrade in Fallout 3.
User avatar #183 - thekingofengland (02/16/2014) [-]
Thing is, FO3 is in Washington, and FNV is Nevada which is quite far apart. FO4 is set closer to Washington, hence they're carrying on the whole 3-Dog character. If save files would carry over he would never make it into FO4 as I shot the f*cker every time and stole his bandana. That luck & charisma's mine b*tch.

As for FNV, there is a lot of criticism of it around in general. But I loved it so much I could forgive it just for about anything. I loved the whole Legion-NCR opposing politics, and stories of the Burned Man kept me on the edge of my seat. As part of my tattoo sleeves I have a Centurion and an NCR Veteran Ranger in a mess of other random crap. Now that I'm older I don't game as often, and get bored and move on from titles very quickly. But FNV I played for over a year, after completing it on Xbox about 5 times trying different builds and taking everyone out with a silenced pistol, my friend showed me what PC mods are capable of. Next day bought PC version, and it was like playing a new game as I modded the sh*t out of it.
#190 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
The Fallout: New Vegas mechanics and new weapons was awesome, but the setting and storyline was very crap. Sorry to break it to you. There are parts of it that was very good, and the NCR/Legion politics made it very deep, and the Legion added a sense of epicness to the story, indeed.

User avatar #196 - thekingofengland (02/16/2014) [-]
I dunno, its one of those things to me, that if you don't like it you find new things about it that annoy you more, but if you love it you find new things to like about it. I like the voice cast as well with Matthew Perry playing a character called Benny. Ron Pearlman and Danny Trejo as well.The classic line, War, war never changes.
User avatar #184 - thekingofengland (02/16/2014) [-]
I didn't realise till just now I even set my avatar as a Legionairy Centurion when I made this account
User avatar #135 - schneidend (02/16/2014) [-]
I don't see the big allure of post-main quest roaming. Just do the side quests first.
#150 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
My point was that from a role-playing perspective you wouldn't just give up your main quest to do irrelevant stuff.
User avatar #153 - schneidend (02/16/2014) [-]
Earning money to fund your really important main quest and getting good loot to ensure your success seems pretty relevant to me. Plus, depending on your character's personality, ignoring a plea for help from bystanders may simply not be acceptable.
#156 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
Oh, indeed, I don't disagree with you on that. Every side quest you meet on the road I would do - the problem with a game like New Vegas is that unless you make a save game dedicated to just exploring, you will never get to see everything - especially not, since you are not allowed to explore after you have completed your main task.

About funds, that would be true if it wasn't because all RPGs today are designed so that after every quest, you are ready for the next one.
User avatar #259 - schneidend (02/17/2014) [-]
But, if you're roleplaying, it's not a difficult leap to imagine your character needs money for things like food, gear repair, bullets, hookers, any drugs to which they might be addicted, room and board, various bureaucratic fees, etc. Even if you as a player can do a bunch of quests without sleeping, eating, or a bathroom break, doesn't mean your character doesn't.
#262 - tyraxio (02/17/2014) [-]
Take Fallout 3, for example. To find James, you don't really need a lot of things to finish that, OOC wise. So, sure, you'd need food, but you find more than enough bottle caps to eat well along the way. New Vegas is, indeed, more relaxed like that, as everything, up to the point of meeting Benny and to some degree what comes after, is not really anything which is in a rush.
User avatar #263 - schneidend (02/17/2014) [-]
I'd argue that you're not necessarily in a "rush" to find Dad, since you pretty much immediately find out he's more than capable of taking care of himself. You only really discover he could be in real trouble when you enter that creepy ass vault in which he's a virtual reality prisoner. Also, unless your Speech is decent or you reload saves until you pass all speech checks, you have to do several sidequests for people before they're willing to tell you where Dad went. You could also handwave doing any sidequests as trying to work on better equipping yourself so you can survive the post-apocalyptic hell in which you now find yourself.
User avatar #131 - doctorproctor (02/16/2014) [-]
umm SKYRIM? YOU DONT EVEN HAVE TO FINISH THE MAIN QUEST, half of it is just a tutorial
#149 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
I haven't finished Skyrim yet, but I am referring to Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
User avatar #157 - doctorproctor (02/16/2014) [-]
Oh i completely understand, sorry was just saying that not all bethesda are like that, and good luck, personally my favorite quest line in skyrim is the dark brotherhood, its just really interesting and fun to me
#159 - tyraxio (02/16/2014) [-]
Nahnah, it's cool. That was my own ignorance. Just assumed that The Elder Scrolls games ended the same way the Fallout titles did.
#128 - WOW WELL THANKS FOR one of them THAT HUGE SPOILER. 02/16/2014 on A typical game of cluedo 0
#124 - Firstly, your comment is absolutely unrelated to both content … 02/16/2014 on A typical game of cluedo 0
#126 - The Brazil book report thing is actually really *******… 02/15/2014 on WTF Fun Fun Facts Comp Vol.... +1
#113 - I believe you too are euphoric, and that it is NOT because of … 02/15/2014 on dewey on god 0
#128 - Again, why I hate the privilege of celebrities. If an ordinary… 02/14/2014 on wahahaha 0
#127 - I don't think murder is considered felony to be honest. Unless…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/14/2014 on wahahaha 0
User avatar #132 - pwndguy (02/14/2014) [-]
I know that at least in the US, a Felony is "anything that is punishable by more than a year of imprisonment, including death"... so Murder is definitely a Felony...
User avatar #133 - pwndguy (02/14/2014) [-]
*death penalty
sorry, re-read that, and I can see where there might be some confusion...
#569 - He is gender neutral, and he is four. Maybe you can even say h… 02/04/2014 on Didney princess 0
#129 - Ahh, this is where out views are conflicting. This jo… 02/03/2014 on Tumblr does it again +2
#86 - Yeah, the good ol' child ******* Greeks would act…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/03/2014 on My Fox 0
#144 - baitdoesnttalkback (02/03/2014) [-]
they can educate these nuts
#142 - ... That is why we have community service or whatever… 02/03/2014 on I still think its a good idea 0
#106 - Just jumping on with churrundo, it is indeed an attack. I am n…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/03/2014 on Tumblr does it again +2
User avatar #116 - kiratheunholy (02/03/2014) [-]
So we're back to square one then... I have to question if you even read what I wrote.

You admit you're not offended by vegan jokes, this content IS a vegan joke essentially. Now read my first comment, particularly this part: "This content isn't attacking vegans" That's the only point I was trying to make. Do you think that my point was that: "Everybody is equally tolerant of vegans and nobody ever attacks them." No, it was not. My point was that this content is not attacking them. You admitted you weren't offended by the content itself and as such this CONTENT is not attacking them. I don't give a fuck about the comments.
#129 - tyraxio (02/03/2014) [-]
Ahh, this is where out views are conflicting.

This joke itself is completely okay, but the problem is that it is posted by a person with a negative view of vegans, in order to reinforce a negative view of vegans. The only reason I am annoyed with this content, is the media and the community it is spread within. That's pretty much the internet equivalent to the tone in which you say something in real life.
#104 - That's actually a very good point. Once you notice it, it look… 02/03/2014 on youtube comments 0
#163 - Of course there will be a lower price competition. Co… 02/02/2014 on Cocaine and unicorns 0
#154 - >obviously When raising minimum wages by a substan…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Cocaine and unicorns -1
User avatar #157 - fpsnoob (02/02/2014) [-]
Except there wouldn't be any lower price competition. You're talking about raising the federal minimum wage, meaning all the companies will suffer from its effects. And even if they were to keep the prices low, they would instead cut people's hours or just put people on unpaid vocations so that they don't have to pay unemployment.
#163 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
Of course there will be a lower price competition.

Companies will not change their prices on the exact same day, and people will choose to shop with the companies that changed their prices at a slower rate. Some companies will also find that they can attract more customers, and thereby more capital, by not raising their prices.
#37 - Though... If this is meant to be in a way so that the… 02/02/2014 on a tear and a smile +5
#146 - You are implying that raising the minimum wage causes inflatio…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Cocaine and unicorns -1
User avatar #152 - fpsnoob (02/02/2014) [-]
It obviously does. Where else do you think that extra money goes. Do you think business owners are just going to think, oh, I have to pay my employees more, so I'm just going to take it out of my own profit. No, that won't happen, they will have to get that money from either cutting people or from increasing their prices.
#154 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
>obviously

When raising minimum wages by a substantial amount over a short period of time (a small bit over three years does not apply, as indeed, prices will rise at the same time), companies will have to pay workers extra out of the entire company salary, as the enterprise which raises it's prices will almost definately have less costumers than the enterprises with the lower prices. This means their prices will be forced down.

Obviously, it's not that simple, and it needs some regulation that I am not educated enough to be able to dictate, but it is certainly possible to raise minimum wage without causing inflation.
User avatar #157 - fpsnoob (02/02/2014) [-]
Except there wouldn't be any lower price competition. You're talking about raising the federal minimum wage, meaning all the companies will suffer from its effects. And even if they were to keep the prices low, they would instead cut people's hours or just put people on unpaid vocations so that they don't have to pay unemployment.
#163 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
Of course there will be a lower price competition.

Companies will not change their prices on the exact same day, and people will choose to shop with the companies that changed their prices at a slower rate. Some companies will also find that they can attract more customers, and thereby more capital, by not raising their prices.
#36 - You're welcome. 02/02/2014 on Title 0
#34 - We're in the future now. Two robots making futuristic…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/02/2014 on Title 0
User avatar #35 - merrymarvelite (02/02/2014) [-]
Then where's my jetpack?
#36 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
jetlev.com/

You're welcome.
#43 - By the way, before you argue that I am an "abnormal kid&q… 02/02/2014 on Artist -1
#42 - I do not, but what worries me here is the way that you portray… 02/02/2014 on Artist -1
#102 - If zombies have feeling, they wouldn't be zombies. Wh… 02/01/2014 on Nailed 0
#40 - I am referring mainly to the mentality that "I don't know…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/01/2014 on Artist -1
User avatar #41 - viperish (02/01/2014) [-]
You're probably intentionally searching news articles about deaths and crying your eyes out like a fucking ten year old because some old man died of cancer last week in Uruguay.

I'd say you're the abnormal kid here. Has a book that puts death into comical light while arguing about how it's immoral to laugh at people dying, proceeds to laugh at them.

The way you're labeling us with little to no knowledge is stupid. I can do that too. It would seem you have a strong case of Bipolar disorder since you laugh at people dying and then feel guilty about it. See how fucking stupid and irrational that is?

You're a fucking prick, bully and an elitist faggot who thinks he's above everyone else.
#43 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
By the way, before you argue that I am an "abnormal kid", I think you might need to take some time to understand the concept of the tragicomical.
#42 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
I do not, but what worries me here is the way that you portray the man who died from cancer in Uruguay as something which no one ought to feel sentimental about. I don't cry when I hear about strangers dying, because crying is a very strong emotional reaction, which is not neccesary to feel basic respect for fellow human beings.

I have a book with stories about ironic and odd ways people have died. I don't laugh at the book, but I have smiled slightly of it. Example? A guy tried to kill himself 4 times, everytime he failed. A few days later he died in an accident. I feel bad for the poor guy, but obviously, I can't help but notice the irony of his situation.

So, here is another problem you have. You seem very violently defensive at your position, to the degree that you are accusing me of labelling you, yet you seem to imply that you are in no way labelling me, although you are continuing to do so afterwards. I have my argumentation, being your complete disrespect of other human beings arguing that "I don't know them, so I don't give a shit". Serial killers do not know their victims, so according to your logic, it is only sensible that he doesn't care about killing them. Also, I am in fact dealing with a slight case of bipolar disorder (slash what most people would call dramatical mood swings) and I don't quite think you know what being bipolar means. I agree, the fact that I see humour in deaths is, to start with, a bit out of the ordinary. The difference between you and me is that I still feel the guilt associated, while you have completely abandoned your concept of general respect and love for another person - your morality.

Now, I don't think I am better than anyone else per se, I just value morality and love very highly. I am only disrespecting you guys due to your disrespect of someone else. Although, I guess I could add that I do not know you lads, so according to your logic, I shouldn't feel sorry for you. Contradictions flow in your comments.
#22 - "Twisting" Define twisting. I only showed h…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/31/2014 on Artist -1
User avatar #28 - viperish (01/31/2014) [-]
The thing is though, you can't pigeonhole I don't know if this is the correct word, had to check the dictionary. people into sociopaths and not sociopaths. Simply because a person finds hilarity from someones death doesn't make him a sociopath.

So how contradictory are your statements then? By your logic, what you replied to this other guy makes you a sociopath as well yet you claim to absolutely respect, and expect everyone else to do the same, every person who has died a terrible death.

"Sure, I own a book called "Strange Deaths" that I have chuckled over slightly myself."

As you already mentioned, anything else is the mentality of a military general, to whom a life is just a number.
#40 - tyraxio (02/01/2014) [-]
I am referring mainly to the mentality that "I don't know said person, so why ought I to have any emotion towards their death?"

If you actually read my comment, I explained in detail why the "enjoyment" I find in the deaths are different. Also, I do feel guilty for doing it; you are loudly expressing that you are not only not feeling guilty, you are defending your emotions towards it.

I'm not a psychologist, so no, I can't "pigeonhole" anyone as a sociopath. I can only pinpoint your statements and label you based on the statements you express online, and the thought that "someone died in a way that seems funny, I will laugh at them, but feel no sympathy" is pretty much a pretty major indicator of sociopathic behaviour.
User avatar #41 - viperish (02/01/2014) [-]
You're probably intentionally searching news articles about deaths and crying your eyes out like a fucking ten year old because some old man died of cancer last week in Uruguay.

I'd say you're the abnormal kid here. Has a book that puts death into comical light while arguing about how it's immoral to laugh at people dying, proceeds to laugh at them.

The way you're labeling us with little to no knowledge is stupid. I can do that too. It would seem you have a strong case of Bipolar disorder since you laugh at people dying and then feel guilty about it. See how fucking stupid and irrational that is?

You're a fucking prick, bully and an elitist faggot who thinks he's above everyone else.
#43 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
By the way, before you argue that I am an "abnormal kid", I think you might need to take some time to understand the concept of the tragicomical.
#42 - tyraxio (02/02/2014) [-]
I do not, but what worries me here is the way that you portray the man who died from cancer in Uruguay as something which no one ought to feel sentimental about. I don't cry when I hear about strangers dying, because crying is a very strong emotional reaction, which is not neccesary to feel basic respect for fellow human beings.

I have a book with stories about ironic and odd ways people have died. I don't laugh at the book, but I have smiled slightly of it. Example? A guy tried to kill himself 4 times, everytime he failed. A few days later he died in an accident. I feel bad for the poor guy, but obviously, I can't help but notice the irony of his situation.

So, here is another problem you have. You seem very violently defensive at your position, to the degree that you are accusing me of labelling you, yet you seem to imply that you are in no way labelling me, although you are continuing to do so afterwards. I have my argumentation, being your complete disrespect of other human beings arguing that "I don't know them, so I don't give a shit". Serial killers do not know their victims, so according to your logic, it is only sensible that he doesn't care about killing them. Also, I am in fact dealing with a slight case of bipolar disorder (slash what most people would call dramatical mood swings) and I don't quite think you know what being bipolar means. I agree, the fact that I see humour in deaths is, to start with, a bit out of the ordinary. The difference between you and me is that I still feel the guilt associated, while you have completely abandoned your concept of general respect and love for another person - your morality.

Now, I don't think I am better than anyone else per se, I just value morality and love very highly. I am only disrespecting you guys due to your disrespect of someone else. Although, I guess I could add that I do not know you lads, so according to your logic, I shouldn't feel sorry for you. Contradictions flow in your comments.
#21 - Why is tragedy dependent on a relationship to the person? Is a… 01/31/2014 on Artist -1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 3985 / Total items point value: 5760

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)