Upload
Login or register

tsukaza

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:4/21/2013
Last Login:9/28/2016
Location:Wales
Stats
Comment Ranking:#12516
Highest Comment Rank:#3559
Comment Thumbs: 2446 total,  2958 ,  512
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 4% (4/100)
Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 221 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:2831
FJ Points:2010

latest user's comments

#15 - I'm not entirely sure what that is. Care to enlighten me?  [+] (2 replies) 09/25/2016 on Savings. +1
User avatar
#16 - satoasami (09/25/2016) [-]
You get it if you're old or have a condition
#32 - anon (09/26/2016) [-]
Damn, getting on autismbux must've been a fucking breeze for you.
#13 - What does SSI mean again?  [+] (5 replies) 09/25/2016 on Savings. 0
#50 - anon (09/26/2016) [-]
Super Soldier Imperium
User avatar
#14 - satoasami (09/25/2016) [-]
Social Security Insurance
#15 - tsukaza (09/25/2016) [-]
I'm not entirely sure what that is. Care to enlighten me?
User avatar
#16 - satoasami (09/25/2016) [-]
You get it if you're old or have a condition
#32 - anon (09/26/2016) [-]
Damn, getting on autismbux must've been a fucking breeze for you.
#300 - You don't seem to be trying to make a difference? Not that it'…  [+] (2 replies) 09/24/2016 on my parents use reddit? 0
User avatar
#301 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
Dude I don't even have to try not to have kids, my face does that for me. But no I wouldn't have kids, the worlds too messed up as of now.
#308 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
I think you're undervaluing your face.

Messed up or not. Just saying it'd be good if our species died out isn't exactly the solution. We're the species more qualified than most to fix these problems.

Also "at war with itself" isn't a good argument as there are tons of species out there at war with themselves. Nearly all war that has happened within the last 30 years to today has been civil war in countries where it's understandable for it to exist. Nowadays it's more beneficial for people of other places to be alive and to trade with them then to kill them. They're more useful to us alive than dead.

It's too early to say whether war is disappearing but if we go another 70 years or so without war then we can almost agree that there is no more war anymore.

Destructive species? There are a lot of other species which are destructive too, just on a smaller scale. Do we extinct them as well? Difference is there are humans who try to not be destructive as well. And the latter is winning actually.
#296 - And you're saying the continuation of your own species isn't i…  [+] (4 replies) 09/24/2016 on my parents use reddit? 0
User avatar
#298 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
It would be it there wasn't so much negatives that came with. Like if the world wasn't so ill divided and fucked up then it would, but as it is at the minute i don't think it is worth much.
#300 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
You don't seem to be trying to make a difference? Not that it's your job to or anything. Making the problem worse doesn't exactly fit with what you say.

I guess you're not planning or even thinking about having children and will take every preventative measure possible to stop yourself having children I take it then?
User avatar
#301 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
Dude I don't even have to try not to have kids, my face does that for me. But no I wouldn't have kids, the worlds too messed up as of now.
#308 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
I think you're undervaluing your face.

Messed up or not. Just saying it'd be good if our species died out isn't exactly the solution. We're the species more qualified than most to fix these problems.

Also "at war with itself" isn't a good argument as there are tons of species out there at war with themselves. Nearly all war that has happened within the last 30 years to today has been civil war in countries where it's understandable for it to exist. Nowadays it's more beneficial for people of other places to be alive and to trade with them then to kill them. They're more useful to us alive than dead.

It's too early to say whether war is disappearing but if we go another 70 years or so without war then we can almost agree that there is no more war anymore.

Destructive species? There are a lot of other species which are destructive too, just on a smaller scale. Do we extinct them as well? Difference is there are humans who try to not be destructive as well. And the latter is winning actually.
#289 - For the continuation of the species in question?  [+] (6 replies) 09/24/2016 on my parents use reddit? 0
User avatar
#293 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
And why is the continuation or a destructive species at war with itself so important?
#296 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
And you're saying the continuation of your own species isn't important?
User avatar
#298 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
It would be it there wasn't so much negatives that came with. Like if the world wasn't so ill divided and fucked up then it would, but as it is at the minute i don't think it is worth much.
#300 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
You don't seem to be trying to make a difference? Not that it's your job to or anything. Making the problem worse doesn't exactly fit with what you say.

I guess you're not planning or even thinking about having children and will take every preventative measure possible to stop yourself having children I take it then?
User avatar
#301 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
Dude I don't even have to try not to have kids, my face does that for me. But no I wouldn't have kids, the worlds too messed up as of now.
#308 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
I think you're undervaluing your face.

Messed up or not. Just saying it'd be good if our species died out isn't exactly the solution. We're the species more qualified than most to fix these problems.

Also "at war with itself" isn't a good argument as there are tons of species out there at war with themselves. Nearly all war that has happened within the last 30 years to today has been civil war in countries where it's understandable for it to exist. Nowadays it's more beneficial for people of other places to be alive and to trade with them then to kill them. They're more useful to us alive than dead.

It's too early to say whether war is disappearing but if we go another 70 years or so without war then we can almost agree that there is no more war anymore.

Destructive species? There are a lot of other species which are destructive too, just on a smaller scale. Do we extinct them as well? Difference is there are humans who try to not be destructive as well. And the latter is winning actually.
#282 - So everyone should stop having babies just on the off chance i…  [+] (9 replies) 09/24/2016 on my parents use reddit? 0
User avatar
#288 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
Why are children needed?
#291 - fkelly has deleted their comment.
#289 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
For the continuation of the species in question?
User avatar
#293 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
And why is the continuation or a destructive species at war with itself so important?
#296 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
And you're saying the continuation of your own species isn't important?
User avatar
#298 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
It would be it there wasn't so much negatives that came with. Like if the world wasn't so ill divided and fucked up then it would, but as it is at the minute i don't think it is worth much.
#300 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
You don't seem to be trying to make a difference? Not that it's your job to or anything. Making the problem worse doesn't exactly fit with what you say.

I guess you're not planning or even thinking about having children and will take every preventative measure possible to stop yourself having children I take it then?
User avatar
#301 - fkelly (09/24/2016) [-]
Dude I don't even have to try not to have kids, my face does that for me. But no I wouldn't have kids, the worlds too messed up as of now.
#308 - tsukaza (09/24/2016) [-]
I think you're undervaluing your face.

Messed up or not. Just saying it'd be good if our species died out isn't exactly the solution. We're the species more qualified than most to fix these problems.

Also "at war with itself" isn't a good argument as there are tons of species out there at war with themselves. Nearly all war that has happened within the last 30 years to today has been civil war in countries where it's understandable for it to exist. Nowadays it's more beneficial for people of other places to be alive and to trade with them then to kill them. They're more useful to us alive than dead.

It's too early to say whether war is disappearing but if we go another 70 years or so without war then we can almost agree that there is no more war anymore.

Destructive species? There are a lot of other species which are destructive too, just on a smaller scale. Do we extinct them as well? Difference is there are humans who try to not be destructive as well. And the latter is winning actually.