Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

tkfourtwoone    

Rank #2964 on Content
tkfourtwoone Avatar Level 289 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Online
Send mail to tkfourtwoone Block tkfourtwoone Invite tkfourtwoone to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:9/05/2011
Last Login:7/11/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#2964
Comment Ranking:#2986
Highest Content Rank:#372
Highest Comment Rank:#1747
Content Thumbs: 30847 total,  34964 ,  4117
Comment Thumbs: 9224 total,  17626 ,  8402
Content Level Progress: 48.6% (486/1000)
Level 230 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Content: Ambassador Of Lulz
Comment Level Progress: 76% (76/100)
Level 289 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 290 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:7
Content Views:1164701
Times Content Favorited:1888 times
Total Comments Made:6928
FJ Points:39700
Favorite Tags: diablo (4) | nostalgia (3)

latest user's comments

#142 - For all the idiots claiming that "your property, your rul… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#26 - Just because someone all cares about is sex, doesn't make them…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2014 on How to get laid +1
#27 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Are you really trying to dissect a offhanded quote? What I meant by my previous post is that women have classified men as individuals who only care about sex, which you claim to be true as well. Why is it wrong then for men to analyse and classify women? Most of the things written in redpill empirically seem to be true.
#135 - "The right to private property includes having the right …  [+] (36 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -3
User avatar #284 - freedombirdman (02/25/2014) [-]
Only in a corporation is the company considered a legal entity. In partnerships and proprietorships, the owners reserve the right to make such decisions since they are the sole legal entities of the company. Even so, in a corporation, the board of directors and CEO could choose to discriminate in the name of the interests of the shareholders. Obviously that's stupid, but the point is that whoever is legally in charge of the business (be it an owner or a group of shareholders) has the right to say how things are run.
User avatar #329 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"Only in a corporation is the company considered a legal entity"

I seriously doubt this; in almost any legislation I've heard of, a company is a different legal entity from a physical person.

In other words, almost everywhere there are legislative differences between "John" and "John's", if you know what I mean.
#247 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Are you fucking retarded? Do you have any idea how a business is run?

"You do not own the area in which you run the company, the company does"
And who the fuck owns the company? The flying spaghetti monster? Not every business is publicly traded. There are plenty of people who are the sole proprietor of their company, and are the only owner, so they are, in fact, the owners of that property. My father was one such person. If your talking about companies that lease office space to other companies, like strip malls, owning the the property, then the owner of that company will have the choice to include a stipulation in the lease to mandate serving whoever, including gays, if they want. And again, there are plenty of people who buy the land their company is on.

For the exact same reason the above company should have the right to refuse legislators service, should business owners have the right to refuse whoever they want, whenever they want. Its a private enterprise, private land, with no obligation to serve anyone.

I support gays, I support gay marriage, I also am libertarian and support property and individual liberty.
User avatar #252 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I take it you really don't make the difference between a person and a company?!

The space in which the company runs its activity is considered the companies' business area. If it is owned by you, then you turn it from "personal/residential space" to "business space". Or however the hell you call it.
From that moment on, the area in which the company conducts its business is not in effect YOURS, but it's in the company's patrimony.

YOU, as owner of the company, administrate the company and the space in which it develops its activity.

THAT is the exact reason why companies must obey certain rules & laws... such as having to have access points for people with handicap, like a ramp.
And a miriad of other rules & legislations.

Meanwhile, the company in the content made a very intelligent response to a very stupid & idiotic law. Give the retarded legislators a taste of their own medicine, see what it's like.

P.S.: Your case with your father really isn't the only one. That's why I kinda have a rather clear perspective on what you can and can't do in your own private business.
#260 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Of course I do. And just because the US government has taken it upon themselves to encroach on the liberties of business owners just to make politically popular/fashionable decisions (read: garner votes) doesn't make them any less of an encroachment, from an abstract perspective.

But that business, if it is privately owned, is still a private entity with a registered owner. Even the very broad ADA you cited has exceptions. Once such is that the business has to be a "commercial facility of public accommodation" meaning there has to be a reasonable assumption that the commercial facility will be accessible to the public at some point. I.E. a restaurant would definitely qualify because its clientele is exclusively the public. But a office-based bookkeeping business where the owner goes out and retrieves and delivers client paperwork would not.

You could flip that "taste of your own medicine" shit and say that everyone who has never owned a business, including legislators, should own one and see how much more intrusive regulatory the government is and see if they would still support all those mandates on business. No, Im not saying refusing service to someone based on their religious beliefs is a good idea, for the same reasons the original comment stated above. But this mentality that business should have extra obligations is what got all this extra legislation mandating business be treated differently in the first place and have extra obligations. Its circular logic. We should encroach on business rights because were already encroaching on business rights. And the majority don't care.
User avatar #268 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Look man, mostly I'm in favor if the minimal state myself.

HOWEVER, I am also an adept of a "you're gonna tolerate each other whether you like it or not" policy. We have seen where too much liberty can go.

As I said a few times already, I would allow you the freedom to be the most scum and the most racist & hateful being on Earth - in the confines of your own house.
In the case of a business owner, however, the situation MUST change. You can't just say "well it's still my property and I do whatever the fuck I want". Yes, it IS your property, but you're also providing PUBLIC services.


Seriously, this whole love for freedom, especially the freedom of being a prick, is given way too much importance from my point of view.
In my opinion, one should be a bit forced to recognize that a customer, regardless of sex, age (with the obvious exceptions here), ethnicity or sexuality, is still a customer. Unless provoked, you should simply have no rights to kick them out or refuse to serve them. It's all a part of a healthy business owner - customer relationship.

Which reminds me of something - more precisely, a content I've seen on FJ, from a reality show, on how a US soldier defends a Muslim when the clerk tends to refuse to serve him.
#273 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Nope, once you set foot in a business, the services provided there are not public. The services provided there are the results of private individuals and private effort. The status of a "Customer" should entitle you to nothing. A purchase is a form of contract under the law, and VOLUNTARY contracts are a cornerstone of a free market. Saying that a producer has an obligation to serve anyone is saying he has an obligation to the public, which is the cornerstone and manifesto of every socialized system in the world. How does making something for profit obligate you to sell that product to anyone? It is your product, its is your choice who you sell it to. A business owner should be able to kick someone out for any reason, even if its for a person's hat color. (And they actually do have that right amazingly, but don't have the right to refuse service based on their religious beliefs. Weird huh?)

Im all for tolerating everyone, as NO ONE should be persecuted for their beliefs. But thats it, Im for TOLERATING being a legal obligation.
tol·er·ate (verb):
"allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference."
A refusal of service does not interfere with a gay's right to exist. If they are refused service, they can go elsewhere.
User avatar #282 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Also, while my use of the terms "public service" is unfortunate, since now I realize that it can be mistaken for the actual PUBLIC service, what I meant to say was that your business is open for the general public.
User avatar #281 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"A refusal of service does not interfere with a gay's right to exist."

No, but it does interfere with his right to be served, just like everybody else.
#697 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Except they Don't have a RIGHT to service, just like everyone else, including the Arizona legislators banned from the pizzeria which was the entire point. Nobody, for any reason, should be able to invoke the law to override the wishes of a private owner in terms of who he/she allows on the property.

Also, businesses are not open to the public unless they choose to be, as most retail establishments do (and most businesses in general, since they wanna make the most money possible). A business has the right to limit customers to invitation-only or appointment only like many private high-end exclusive banks do. Country clubs are usually invitation only, clubs use bouncers to keep their clientele attractive to attract other attractive clientele, the list goes on. Every business has the right to do this, except for For-Profit hospitals, which are obligated to treat anyone with a life-threatening injury.
User avatar #706 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
We're talking about open to general public businesses here, go figure.

And yes, you DO have a right to be served, you have the right to be a customer. Denying someone that right, without solid reasons, is an abuse.

You simply CAN'T go "it's my business, I do whatever the fuck I want" like the ultimate redneck.
User avatar #730 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
this is as stupid as it is inaccurate
#734 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
No, this is the stupid face of the business owner kicking out people for no reason.
#798 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
It might be stupid, but its their right. Just like it might be stupid, but its my right to join Westboro baptist church and stand on public land and picket funerals. Again, its STUPID, and I hate the westboro baptist church, but they are legally exercising their rights.
User avatar #824 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
The very existence of the Westboro Baptist Church is living proof that the US has gone so far with it's "freedoms", it pushed way past the barrier of "mentally sane" fields.
#837 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
The idea that the majority or someone in power should be able to stop a group from existing was the very thing the founding fathers were trying to avoid by maximizing individual freedom. To allow a "rationality" standard to be applied to speech is to make speech subjective to the will of what those in power would consider rational, which is the first step towards facism. It shouldn't matter how "sane" a speech is, so long as it remains speech and doesn't turn physical. The whole "I may not agree with what you say but I will die for your right to say it".

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." -Ayn Rand.
User avatar #764 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
Oh so now you're being racist?
Get back on tumblr, SJB scum.
User avatar #765 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I have the distinct feeling that you have no idea what "being racist" even means.

Either that, or it's a joke I'm really not getting right now.
User avatar #785 - navywannabe (02/25/2014) [-]
You don't even know our rights.
Of course you don't get the joke.
User avatar #774 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
you implied that only rednecks (white southerns) would kick gays out of their stores. Thus racism
User avatar #777 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I didn't know that rednecks are a race apart.

You idiotic dumbfuck.
User avatar #789 - navywannabe (02/25/2014) [-]
Says the one who doesn't know our rights.
User avatar #782 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
they're white. You are sterotyping white people from a specific region. that is rascsim or atleast discrimination
#722 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Show me where the status of customer entitles you to service? Go ahead, cite the law. There are a list of protected conditions on which a business cannot throw you out for (race, sex, national origin, disability) , but NO, you sure as hell have no right to make a purchase anywhere you want. You never did, and no such law has ever existed. Thats why you see signs that say "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

If it wasnt that way, and you did have to serve everyone the pizza shop here would be violating the law. Which they ARENT. Its absolutely ridiculous that the operation of private enterprise For-profit obligates a person to sell to anyone. A business can't kick someone out for being black, but they can kick that same person out for having pants too long or short.
User avatar #726 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"but NO, you sure as hell have no right to make a purchase anywhere you want"

Actually, I do.
Otherwise you're implying that my rights are being infringed by a moronic business owner who thinks he's the alpha and the omega.

Furthermore, you first show me the law that lets business owners dictate where I do my shopping. Because in the meantime, I have the Constitution, that clearly states ALL MEN ARE EQUAL.

"You don't have the right to shop wherever you want" - excuse me, I wasn't aware I'm living in a fucking fascist dictatorship.

And if you're telling me that it's somehow OK for a business to kick me out, as a customer, for having too short or too long pants... I'd say you get your head checked. I mean it.
#733 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Except you DONT. Legally, a business can kick you out for any reason, so long as its not a protected condition. No amount of ideology will change this. Like I said, if Im wrong CITE the LAW that gives you the RIGHT to do business anywhere. Go ahead, Im waiting. Otherwise, your just wrong. What, do you think those "we can refuse service to ANYONE" signs are just for show?

Facism is oppression by the GOVERNMENT. If a private business owner discriminates against you the origin of the discrimination is private. End of story. No facism here.

I hate to tell you but dress codes are a part of many businesses, include well-known restaurants. And has been since forever. You are the one that need to get their head checked. You are the one that thinks money in your pocket gives you the right to trample all over the wishes private owners. No one has a right to service from a private individual, end of story.
User avatar #742 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
" No one has a right to service from a private individual"

What part of "I'm conducting business with the company, not with a private individual" do you not understand?
The owner is the REPRESENTATIVE of the company. Not the company itself.
In other words, I'm buying eggs from "John's", not from "John" himself. And John can take his anti-freckles extreme ideology and shove it up his ass, my freckled face cannot be infringed from buying from "John's".

Maybe now I'm making my point clear.

Furthermore, you're the one who fails to cite that law you keep mentioning.
#769 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
I dont have to cite ANY law because there as to BE a law making it illegal before there is an obligation. The ABSENCE of a law mandating service from a business is my proof. Its hard to prove something DOESNT exist.

What YOU don't get is that if a business has a single owner, the business is a representation of the owner and thus the owner can make any policies he wants, including dress code, so long as it doesn't violate any protected statuses. Thus, under the law, the owner and the business are one in the same. AGAIN, thats the reason for the "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" signs. And the same reason the pizza owners can refuse service to legislators. Literally, your argument is defeated by the fact that this pizza IS refusing service to a specific group of people. If everyone had the right to shop where they wanted, this business would be in violation.

In the instance where there are multiple owners or the business is publicly traded, the will of the company reverts to "Corporate Personhood" in which the business is viewed as a representation of the collective will of the owners/investors. The multiple owners have the right to set collective policy under this law.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
" the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized corporations as having the same rights as natural persons to contract and to enforce contracts. In Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad - 118 U.S. 394"

A purchase is a CONTRACT under law. Thus, businesses, including multiple owners, have the right to determine who they make contracts with under law.
User avatar #731 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
there is no law that allows you to shop whereever you want. at all. ever. a buisness can deny you service for anything. ANYTHING. It doesnt matter how stupid they are, you are on their property and they are offering a service, they have the right to do whatever they want. This has nothing to do with equality.
User avatar #746 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"there is no law that allows you to shop whereever you want."

Actually yes there is. The Constitution. And no fucking business or business owner is above the Constitution.

Also, there is NO law that restricts my shopping opportunities in any way.
#773 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
There is NOTHING under in the constitution that mandates a business serve anyone. Your just digging for nothing here.
User avatar #780 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
There are my RIGHTS in the Constitution that clearly say I am entitled to buying your services/goods... JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE. As a fully functioning citizen of this country.

You are seriously defending a case of rights infringement here.
User avatar #974 - rockamekishiko (02/25/2014) [-]
stop pulling shit out of your ass. Now you're claiming stuff that doesn't even exist.
#781 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
Nope, no such clause to the constitution. Doesn't exist. I'd love to be proved wrong.
#735 - terminalinfinity (02/25/2014) [-]
This guy knows what is up
#585 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Dude.... you're a fucking idiot.
#134 - "Either make it so that if you own a business you have to… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) +1
#133 - Furthermore, as I said in other comments and forgot to mention…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) +4
User avatar #736 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
logically they dont, becasue personal feelings (for instance, not serving gays) hurts buisnes by makeing the people who will pay you for service smaller.

but lawfully this makes no sense. buisness is private, plain and simple.

TL;DR, GTFO
#132 - It's not about "muh feels" you goddamn idiot. It's a…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
User avatar #170 - krobeles (02/25/2014) [-]
I dont even know why the dude assumed i was an American, when i just used the capital of Denmark as my eksample...
Sometimes, i dont understand people...
#130 - They can't, because they're all moronically fixated on the &qu… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) +1
#129 - "If I don't feel comfortable with gays, should I not (as … 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#128 - The Constitution also says that ALL MEN ARE EQUAL. Wh…  [+] (16 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
User avatar #1070 - douthit (02/27/2014) [-]
All men are equal. But to force someone into an economic exchange of goods or services against their will is called theft, or slavery.
User avatar #1072 - tkfourtwoone (02/27/2014) [-]
I'm not forcing anyone into an economic exchange.

I'm merely forcing you to respect other people and their rights.
User avatar #1081 - douthit (02/28/2014) [-]
It sounds like you just changed the wording of what I said.

I agree all men are equal. I also believe in the principle of self-ownership, which states that since we each have full ownership of our own bodies, therefore we alone control what--if any--work our bodies do, therefore alone own any property traded for the work done by our bodies. You alone own your property, and nobody else can justly take or control it, or what you decide to do with it. If someone owns a business, they bought or built it with property they gained by trading minutes and hours of their lives.
User avatar #1082 - tkfourtwoone (02/28/2014) [-]
And no body ever denied that.

It's just that there is a judicial difference between your HOUSE and your SHOP/business. Different legislation.
Furthermore, it's the principle that your business is open for EVERYBODY, refusing someone for a completely stupid reason or no reason at all is in fact discriminating against that person. That person has the right to be in your shop and buy what they desire, just like everyone else.

Once again, pretty big difference between kicking somebody out of your house and kicking somebody out of your shop. No one would ever judge you for kicking whoever you want out of your house, because people only get in your house with your permission/invitation. It's a whole other story when talking about commercial spaces.
User avatar #1083 - douthit (03/01/2014) [-]
I know what the law may say, but that's not what I'm discussing. Statutory laws is changing all the time. I'm talking about natural law.

I own two structures. Who is anyone else to say what I can and can't do with my property? In principle, it makes no difference what I choose to do with or in either of those buildings, unless of course I'm violating someone else's person or property. What does it matter what I call these buildings, whether I decide to sleep in one I call my "business" or to sell some of my property within one building I deem my "house". There is no difference. Property is property.

Businesses aren't open to everyone like you claim. Most won't even let you in without a shirt and shoes on. If I want to have a sign welcoming in only people with red hair, or only left-handed people, or only black people, or only white people, or only pregnant women, or whatever, that's between me and the people who come into my building/business--if any do.

Residential space, commercial space, it's all property. If it's not yours, you don't get a say. And the same with me when it comes to your property. Plus if business owners do things that are as bad as you believe, they probably won't be in business too long anyway. These kind of things take care of themselves. In the real world, businesses want customers. They're not gonna purposely do things to deprive themselves of income.
User avatar #1084 - tkfourtwoone (03/01/2014) [-]
"Residential space, commercial space, it's all property"

Yes it is - but as I said, they are subjected to a different set of laws. In your home, you are not legally obliged to build a ramp for people in wheelchairs - In your store, however, you are. That, along with a whole set of rules & regulations, starting with the simple fact that you need a permit of somesort from the state institutions to be allowed to run that shop in the first place.
Not exactly sure when it comes to owning houses, but I'm pretty sure you don't need the state's approval to buy one. To build one, maybe, because you have to evidently follow building & safety laws.

"Most won't even let you in without a shirt and shoes on" - except during the summertime, if you're near a beach, etc. Otherwise, it falls under the "indecent exposure" laws, so you're still not really the one telling people what they may or may not wear in your shop.

So, in effect, businesses ARE open to everyone. You may include a formal dress code, which is something else entirely - because then ALL the people who enter your business "house" need to wear the proper dressing. If you're including a "must have tuxedo" policy, then you're not exactly entitled to refuse service to someone because they wear a yellow, brown, red, etc. tuxedo. They're following your rules, so you can't kick them out because you feel like it.

And yes, talking about "these kind of things take care of themselves" - remember the 50s. When most of America was a racist douchebaggery of a country, because you had the "freedom" to be a racist douchebag idiot.
User avatar #1085 - douthit (03/01/2014) [-]
Again, I know these are the current laws. I think they're immoral; what do you think?
User avatar #1086 - tkfourtwoone (03/01/2014) [-]
Which laws are you precisely referring to?
User avatar #1087 - douthit (03/01/2014) [-]
As a libertarian, I think any law which violates the principles of self-ownership or non-aggression, and I think all those we discussed do.
User avatar #1088 - tkfourtwoone (03/01/2014) [-]
I'm also a libertarian, but I also believe that for a functioning society, some things need to be well regulated. Because, as history has shown us countless times, there will always be people who will ABUSE their rights and freedoms, because they chose to respect the letter of the law, and not the spirit of the law (don't know exactly what's the English terms for that).

If I were to agree with you, that would mean that you should be allowed to have a cocaine or meth lab inside your house, for your own use (so other parties are not involved). Guess what? You can't.

You are NOT as free as you think you are. And that is perfectly normal, because we don't live in the fucking jungle.

Reverting a bit to differences between your home and your business: no body will give you a fine for having a dirty room or a dirty kitchen in your home. If you have a diner of some sort, you WILL receive a fine for not respecting sanitary regulations.
Likewise, no body will force you to have a bathroom in your own house.
If you own a place where people can eat & drink in, you are required by the law to have a sanitary facility

Therefore, self-ownership has its limits, limits defined by laws. Most laws exist to defend people from "exaggerated freedoms". Once again, think of the 50s period - AFAIK there wasn't any law to FORBID you to discriminate black people. Now there is. Society has improved, no body in their right mind can deny that.
User avatar #1089 - douthit (03/02/2014) [-]
Then what defines you as a libertarian? What principles do you have that make you call yourself one?

Society can't be regulated, or rather it shouldn't be. Society isn't a thing to be controlled, but instead it means the current state of our culture, beliefs, and traditions. It will always exist as long as there are humans.

Yet again, I'll say that I know what the law says, but I'm saying that the vast majority of laws on the books are immoral. I understand that it's illegal to have a meth lab in your home, but it shouldn't be. In principle, I can't find anything wrong with it. If a person were to have a meth lab in their home, in a way that nobody else is affected by it or put in danger by it, then I couldn't defend using violence against them for it.

You mentioned that we're not living in the jungle. Libertarians are sometimes accused of being primitive and simple. But I think it's primitive, uncivilized, and brutish to use--or support--the use of violence, except in self-defense. And government, by its very nature, does this in all things.
User avatar #1090 - tkfourtwoone (03/02/2014) [-]
"Society can't be regulated, or rather it shouldn't be"

No, I'm sorry, that's just incredibly stupid.

What you're talking about, against the government interfering and regulating, sounds like you want to go back to the Wild West.

And no, it shouldn't be fucking legal to own a meth lab. You could start stretching that freedom to allow people to buy and use the meth you created. After all, it is their desire to do so, you're not forcing them to do it, so why the hell not? And just like that, in an instant, you found a basis to legalize meth trading. GG, such logic, so modern.

Society MUST be regulated, because we, as humans, are innate primitive. Most humans will start abusing their freedoms and their "god-given" rights.

For instance, there is a fucking good god-damn reason why the state OBLIGES you to sent your child to school, to be educated. Otherwise, all the fucking idiots who think they don't need anything more than a farm and a gun to protect it will start spawning more illiterate idiots, thinking that they're freedom to do so is so high & mighty. Yeah, that sure sounds pretty fucking constructive.

FFS, in the fucking US of A there are still quite a few states in which INBREEDING is legal, because it's not forbidden. Yeah, that sure sounds pretty smart.

What you're saying sounds like you don't have any idea or clue about general human history. Since the modern man appeared, society has developed by making a compromise between freedom & regulating said freedoms, tweaking the balance more and more as societies had individuals able to elaborate such thoughts. Simply put, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
User avatar #1092 - douthit (03/02/2014) [-]
Things like preventing dangerous substance use, or making sure kids get an education are perfectly fine. But your desire to see these things does not give you--or the state--the right to practice violence against people, even if that violence comes from the police against a man using drugs, or from the IRS in taking income to provide schools.
User avatar #1091 - douthit (03/02/2014) [-]
You called yourself libertarian. What principles define you as such?

Go back to the Wild West? That’s not even a clear argument, but instead tries to conjure up scary images from violent movies.

It should be legal to own a meth lab, because the act of owning one doesn't initiate violence against anyone or infringe on their property. Basically, it’s moral to do anything that doesn't do these things, and owning a meth lab qualifies. If I’m living my life without harming a soul, what right do you have to bring violence against me? If you use violent force against me when I’m not harming anyone, you're now the aggressor—the bad guy, and violent self-defense then becomes justified to protect myself and my property from you. Just as owning a meth lab doesn't violate self-ownership or non-aggression, buying or using meth doesn't either. I don’t encourage anyone to do anything so dangerous, but there are many dangerous things I don’t advocate that shouldn't be illegal. It’s immature and authoritative to believe that your aversion to something gives you the right to forbid it of others.

It’s tricky to start talking about “rights”, because we really have one right that covers all the others, and it’s the right to not to receive violence from others.

With education, just as with the drug example, I agree with your goal (that kids should be educated). I also would never use drugs. But what we personally like or dislike can’t rationally be a basis to inflict violence upon people. It’s not a moral principle. It’s not a universal that applies everywhere all the time, no matter the situation. Things that universal are preferences.
User avatar #1073 - economic (02/27/2014) [-]
I don't think you nor they've the right to " force someone into an economic exchange of goods or services against their will".
User avatar #1071 - economic (02/27/2014) [-]
Well put.
#127 - ^THIS! Simply thinking that people will refuse to use… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#126 - "Gay people had Gay right, Gay Marriage, Gay parades, Gay… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#125 - "IF A BUSINESS WANTED TO REFUSE SERVICE TO AFRICAN AMERIC… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) +1
#124 - "You're ******* retarded. THE GOVERNMENT IS … 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -1
#123 - "Anti-gay =/= RACISM" I NEVER said that. Bu…  [+] (12 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
User avatar #147 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
" Fine, then I take it it's perfectly OK not to serve black people at my joint either.

...do you honestly not realize the level of retardness you're going into?! We've already gone through this segregation shit half a century ago, ffs! "

You Were either talking about gay black people or Racism.

#Learn2Conversation
User avatar #148 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
It's DISCRIMINATION anyway you put it.
#149 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Racism = Gay Discrimination
User avatar #150 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I NEVER SAID IT WAS RACISM, YOU FUCKING FUCKTARD!

Kicking gays or blacks out of your joint is DISCRIMINATION ANY WAY YOU PUT IT, FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT IS LOGICAL!
User avatar #153 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
The problem is that you are being EXTREMELY unlogical.

READ for intellectual sake, READ: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Black people discrimination = RACISM, that's what it is called, so YES, you ARE comparing Black people discrimination (RACISM) to Gay Discrimination (BS)
User avatar #154 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
So gay discrimination is "BS"?!?

Seriously, please go and apply the "shotgun to the brain" method. It does wonders in cases such as yours
User avatar #156 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Gay Discrimination WAS a big deal in, what? 2008?

This is 2014, you have rights, you have parades, you have marriage;

Say what? you don't live in the state that has given you Gay Marriage? Boo Hoo, if you REALLY want to marry that person you would take your car and drive 8 HOURS to go in another country and get married.

SO, Yes, in 2014, Gay Discrimination IS BS, it's not even us discriminating anymore, it's you Gay folks being Whining little bit**es
User avatar #158 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
First of all, DISCRIMINATION can be against sexuality, gender OR race. So whatever you call it, it's still DISCRIMINATION.

Second of all, not all the states allow gay marriages.
Not only would the marriage only be recognized in the state that allows gay marriages (making your point completely moot and making you look even more of an idiot), but WHY am I forced, as a theoretical gay, to go into ANOTHER COUNTRY to get married with the person I want to spend the rest of my life with?!?

Why is not MY OWN COUNTRY not giving me that basic human right?!?
#159 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
So You're going against Nature, and you call "Gay Marriage" basic Human right;

GG, i'm done with this conversation
User avatar #161 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
What does "nature" have to do with basic human rights?!?

Seriously, you are so fucking retarded I wish I could just meet you IRL to beat the living crap out of you! Because I cannot fathom how a person can be so utterly MORONIC!

HOW IN THE EXACT FUCK AM I GOING AGAINST "NATURE"?!?

It's YOUR damn fault for being a chauvinistic, retarded bigot! NOT anyone else's fault!

And YES, MARRIAGE IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT, YOU DIPSHIT!
#162 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Guess I'm all those things, still the one getting butthurt is you;

#Learn2Conversate, then we can talk
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
No, apparently you're the one getting butthurt about people getting married to each other, despite the fact that it doesn't affect you IN THE SLIGHTEST.

#77 - And "if you ever get a chance to take the cock out of you…  [+] (7 new replies) 02/25/2014 on tkfourtwoone's profile 0
User avatar #78 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
you keep insisting that we are all rednecks. I dont get it. Why are we rednecks when we clearly understand US law better than you? doesn't that make us more intelligent? _
User avatar #79 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Because only a complete redneck would refuse service to someone because, I don't know, he doesn't like the customer's eye color.
User avatar #80 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
in the US a "redneck" refers to someone who is a southerner and works on a farm, (the sun burns their neck red from all the time spent farming) I dont understand the correlation between eye color prejudiced and famers.
User avatar #81 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
That is the literal sense of the word.

The figurative sense is basically the equal to "white inbred trash"
User avatar #82 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
yes but I dont know anyone who uses the word like that. Maybe "Hick" or "Hillbilly" would be better, but "redneck" implies hard working farmer
User avatar #83 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Nope. No it doesn't.
User avatar #84 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
...yes it does. Maybe you misunderstand American TV colloquialisms or something, because those words have different connotations and you're using it incorrectly.
#23 - Cut me the crap with the red pill. It's a term invented for fr…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/25/2014 on How to get laid 0
#25 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Lol, you are making wild statements that are absolutely not true. You sound like a woman.

I bet you have no problem with hearing "guys are pigs, all they care about is sex"
User avatar #26 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Just because someone all cares about is sex, doesn't make them "pigs". Whether be they men or women.

It does make them both incredibly shallow, however.

However, men are generally more inclined towards one-night stands and "fun for the moment" than women. No point in denying that.
#27 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Are you really trying to dissect a offhanded quote? What I meant by my previous post is that women have classified men as individuals who only care about sex, which you claim to be true as well. Why is it wrong then for men to analyse and classify women? Most of the things written in redpill empirically seem to be true.
#121 - No, you don't get it. YOU are not entitled to deny my…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#235 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
A business can deny service for any legal reason. The only real exception is denial of service for protected status, IE sex, race, age, etc. But even those have exceptions, IE men cant go to a women's spa.
User avatar #238 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Yes, legal reasons such as refusing to serve a drunkard, a junkie or a person that disturbs that establishment.

It's not a legal reason whatsoever to refuse serving someone for having long hair, for having a beard, for having blue eyes or just because you feel like it.
User avatar #267 - wrocky (02/25/2014) [-]
i just wonder how many internet arguments/school debates youve been in to be like this
User avatar #269 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Unfortunately school debates aren't a thing in my country, except maybe for Universities.

As for internet arguments... quite a few.
#111 - I never agreed with the parades. Many level-headed gays don't …  [+] (14 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
User avatar #115 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Seriously now;

Slavery, DEATH;

that's what black people were marching about, they were being KILLED just because they were black, not different, but BLACK, they were KILLED, women RAPED, fathers MUTILATED;

Jews have been almost totally TERMINATED as a Popolation from the Earth's FACE.

Anti-gay =/= RACISM, Gay people do NOT march for the same rights, they March because they are PROUD of being Gay and fabulous, while in the end they now have ALL the rights and ALL the marriage they want;

Shut your mouth about Black people (i'm not one) because you do not even go CLOSE to the actual racism that was going on in the states years ago;

Get Schooled, make yourself an education and get out of the 8th grade.

here's an useful link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
User avatar #123 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"Anti-gay =/= RACISM"

I NEVER said that. But it's still FULL BLOWN DISCRIMINATION, YOU COCK GOBBLING IDIOT!

And gay people ALSO march for a certain basic right, the right to be married! Or civil union, whatever the fuck your retarded notion of the concept is!
Over HERE, FIRST you get married at the City Hall, THEN you go to the fucking Church. If you want to, otherwise you're still completely legit MARRIED.

Seriously, WHERE THE FUCK have you read "anti-gay=racism" in my comment, you illiterate little shit?!
User avatar #147 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
" Fine, then I take it it's perfectly OK not to serve black people at my joint either.

...do you honestly not realize the level of retardness you're going into?! We've already gone through this segregation shit half a century ago, ffs! "

You Were either talking about gay black people or Racism.

#Learn2Conversation
User avatar #148 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
It's DISCRIMINATION anyway you put it.
#149 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Racism = Gay Discrimination
User avatar #150 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I NEVER SAID IT WAS RACISM, YOU FUCKING FUCKTARD!

Kicking gays or blacks out of your joint is DISCRIMINATION ANY WAY YOU PUT IT, FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT IS LOGICAL!
User avatar #153 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
The problem is that you are being EXTREMELY unlogical.

READ for intellectual sake, READ: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Black people discrimination = RACISM, that's what it is called, so YES, you ARE comparing Black people discrimination (RACISM) to Gay Discrimination (BS)
User avatar #154 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
So gay discrimination is "BS"?!?

Seriously, please go and apply the "shotgun to the brain" method. It does wonders in cases such as yours
User avatar #156 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Gay Discrimination WAS a big deal in, what? 2008?

This is 2014, you have rights, you have parades, you have marriage;

Say what? you don't live in the state that has given you Gay Marriage? Boo Hoo, if you REALLY want to marry that person you would take your car and drive 8 HOURS to go in another country and get married.

SO, Yes, in 2014, Gay Discrimination IS BS, it's not even us discriminating anymore, it's you Gay folks being Whining little bit**es
User avatar #158 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
First of all, DISCRIMINATION can be against sexuality, gender OR race. So whatever you call it, it's still DISCRIMINATION.

Second of all, not all the states allow gay marriages.
Not only would the marriage only be recognized in the state that allows gay marriages (making your point completely moot and making you look even more of an idiot), but WHY am I forced, as a theoretical gay, to go into ANOTHER COUNTRY to get married with the person I want to spend the rest of my life with?!?

Why is not MY OWN COUNTRY not giving me that basic human right?!?
#159 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
So You're going against Nature, and you call "Gay Marriage" basic Human right;

GG, i'm done with this conversation
User avatar #161 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
What does "nature" have to do with basic human rights?!?

Seriously, you are so fucking retarded I wish I could just meet you IRL to beat the living crap out of you! Because I cannot fathom how a person can be so utterly MORONIC!

HOW IN THE EXACT FUCK AM I GOING AGAINST "NATURE"?!?

It's YOUR damn fault for being a chauvinistic, retarded bigot! NOT anyone else's fault!

And YES, MARRIAGE IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT, YOU DIPSHIT!
#162 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Guess I'm all those things, still the one getting butthurt is you;

#Learn2Conversate, then we can talk
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
No, apparently you're the one getting butthurt about people getting married to each other, despite the fact that it doesn't affect you IN THE SLIGHTEST.

#110 - "You should be able to (and are able to, thanks to the co…  [+] (13 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -1
#112 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
You're fucking retarded. THE GOVERNMENT IS FORCED TO RECOGNIZE ALL MEN AS EQUALS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT PRIVATELY OWNED ESTABLISHMENTS MUST FOLLOW THE SAME RESTRICTIONS. IF A BUSINESS WANTED TO REFUSE SERVICE TO AFRICAN AMERICANS THEY WOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO, SO LONG AS THEY HAD NO GOVERNMENTAL AFFILIATION.

Arguing with liberals is like trying to tear down a brick wall by smashing your head up against it repeatedly, you are stupid beyond belief.
User avatar #1036 - guymandude (02/26/2014) [-]
actually, that's incorrect. I don't know where this whole "only government affiliated establishments" idea came from, but it's not true. A lot of people in this thread need to study up on the Federal Laws.

although I do understand your frustration - the guy you are arguing with is pretty bad at it. It never should have gone on this long. The fact of the matter is, no, a business absolutely cannot decide suddenly that it wants to exclude an entire population of people specifically because those people are part of said population, privately owned or otherwise.
User avatar #125 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"IF A BUSINESS WANTED TO REFUSE SERVICE TO AFRICAN AMERICANS THEY WOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO"

And the state would have every right to throw your racist ass in prison for doing that.
And I would also completely have the right to beat the living shit out of you, if I was black!

GOD JESUS TITTY FUCKING DAMMIT!
HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU BE SO FUCKING RETARDED TO CLAIM THAT?!?

NO ONE HAS ANY RIGHT TO REFUSE BLACKS! THIS RETARDED SHIT ENDED OVER 60 YEARS AGO, YOU DUMB FUCK!

"Arguing with retarded inbred rednecks is like trying to tear down a brick wall by smashing your head up against it repeatedly, you are stupid beyond belief"
User avatar #124 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"You're fucking retarded. THE GOVERNMENT IS FORCED TO RECOGNIZE ALL MEN AS EQUALS. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT PRIVATELY OWNED ESTABLISHMENTS MUST FOLLOW THE SAME RESTRICTIONS"

Yes they fucking DO!

Your fucking joint is NOT ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION, YOU FUCKING REDNECK INBRED IDIOT!
#114 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
What's that, no response? Yeah, I figured, you fâggots clam up quickly when confronted with logic. Take your emotional appeals back to tumblr you raging quèèr.
User avatar #164 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
WHAT logic?!?

Redneck logic?!?

Fine! I hope one day you will be thrown out from a locale for being straight! By a gay owner!
Let's see how fast you'll jump with the "I'll sue you!" act!

You fucking redneck shithead!
#243 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Please just shut up, right or wrong you are making people who fight for gay right look like drooling, loud mouthed retards... Please just stop.
User avatar #246 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Yes.

Because apparently it is ME who is the retard.

Not the goddamn idiots who fight for their right to discriminate.

Nice fucking logic right there
#357 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Well, personally I think you should have the right to refuse a person for any reason.
User avatar #366 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
No you fucking shouldn't.

And you really are a sad case if you actually believe that.

Just imagine this: you, dressed up in fancy city clothes, in your fancy SUV, end up driving (in a road trip) in a remote, backwater, redneck-filled country town.

Where every business owner there will refuse to serve you (possibly even threaten you with a gun to get out) because "you look like a queer"

...am I putting things into perspective here?!? Do you really think those theoretical fucking rednecks should have the right to manifest their frustrations on customers?!?
#379 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Well, sure, but see they're running a business. And, believe it or not, but those stereotypes are very rarely perfected like that. If the owner threatened someone with a gun, then of course that is already illegal.

The right way to do it is to politely ask them to leave.

This is the real world, while people like that do exist, they will not make it very far at all in the business world. For every business that refuses service to a group, there are a hundred others in just a couple miles radius that won't. Businesses will overtake theirs, and they will die out.

And, if you are asked to leave, why bother wasting your time there? Go somewhere where people won't sit there and flash hateful glances at you, bridling with their own stupidity and pointless hate to you.
User avatar #386 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
For every person that is sympathetic to the gay or black who got refused service, there is at least one redneck idiot who will stand up for the other business-owning redneck.

Btw, Nazi Germans were also polite with the Jews in Berlin/Germany, at start.

#402 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
No, I do not believe those statistics are really accurate.

For every 100 people who is sympathetic, there might be one or two bigots. A while back, when I was a child, my family were all eating at a Waffle House in the back country, as that was where we lived...East Texas, I can still hear the banjos in my memories

Now there was a single black family there, and the waitress asked them to leave and told them they will not be serviced. They left. But along with them went the entire restaurant but two old men, who were asleep.

Times will always change, and homosexuality is rapidly becoming more acceptable. If a business refuses service to homosexuals, then they'd better damn well hope that their town has enough people who will put up with that. People like you described are far less in number than you think, but they sure are loud. It's a stereotype for a reason, but they're an endangered species, even here.
#108 - "Tons of people don't by **** from apple for… 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -2
#102 - "It's MY damn Business, i don't want to serve Gay people …  [+] (16 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
User avatar #105 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
First of all, I'm not even in America right now, so yeah, Learn2Talk.

Second, If your Sexuality was all this "Private" we wouldn't have these "Gay rights marriage parades things" going on in all of the States, wouldn't we?

You wanted this to be public, take the responsability for it

and "being schooled" it's so off topic with your comment i just got cancer.
User avatar #111 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I never agreed with the parades. Many level-headed gays don't either. From many people's point of view, it's just attention whoring.

BUT it is also awareness raising, like it or not. Yes, gay people have been and are discriminated, whether you like to admit it or not.
Those parades are their way of saying "I am a real person, too. I exist". I'm not saying I agree with them, but I see their point.

Just as black people had their marches for their rights in the 50s.
User avatar #115 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Seriously now;

Slavery, DEATH;

that's what black people were marching about, they were being KILLED just because they were black, not different, but BLACK, they were KILLED, women RAPED, fathers MUTILATED;

Jews have been almost totally TERMINATED as a Popolation from the Earth's FACE.

Anti-gay =/= RACISM, Gay people do NOT march for the same rights, they March because they are PROUD of being Gay and fabulous, while in the end they now have ALL the rights and ALL the marriage they want;

Shut your mouth about Black people (i'm not one) because you do not even go CLOSE to the actual racism that was going on in the states years ago;

Get Schooled, make yourself an education and get out of the 8th grade.

here's an useful link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
User avatar #123 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"Anti-gay =/= RACISM"

I NEVER said that. But it's still FULL BLOWN DISCRIMINATION, YOU COCK GOBBLING IDIOT!

And gay people ALSO march for a certain basic right, the right to be married! Or civil union, whatever the fuck your retarded notion of the concept is!
Over HERE, FIRST you get married at the City Hall, THEN you go to the fucking Church. If you want to, otherwise you're still completely legit MARRIED.

Seriously, WHERE THE FUCK have you read "anti-gay=racism" in my comment, you illiterate little shit?!
User avatar #147 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
" Fine, then I take it it's perfectly OK not to serve black people at my joint either.

...do you honestly not realize the level of retardness you're going into?! We've already gone through this segregation shit half a century ago, ffs! "

You Were either talking about gay black people or Racism.

#Learn2Conversation
User avatar #148 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
It's DISCRIMINATION anyway you put it.
#149 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Racism = Gay Discrimination
User avatar #150 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
I NEVER SAID IT WAS RACISM, YOU FUCKING FUCKTARD!

Kicking gays or blacks out of your joint is DISCRIMINATION ANY WAY YOU PUT IT, FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT IS LOGICAL!
User avatar #153 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
The problem is that you are being EXTREMELY unlogical.

READ for intellectual sake, READ: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Black people discrimination = RACISM, that's what it is called, so YES, you ARE comparing Black people discrimination (RACISM) to Gay Discrimination (BS)
User avatar #154 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
So gay discrimination is "BS"?!?

Seriously, please go and apply the "shotgun to the brain" method. It does wonders in cases such as yours
User avatar #156 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Gay Discrimination WAS a big deal in, what? 2008?

This is 2014, you have rights, you have parades, you have marriage;

Say what? you don't live in the state that has given you Gay Marriage? Boo Hoo, if you REALLY want to marry that person you would take your car and drive 8 HOURS to go in another country and get married.

SO, Yes, in 2014, Gay Discrimination IS BS, it's not even us discriminating anymore, it's you Gay folks being Whining little bit**es
User avatar #158 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
First of all, DISCRIMINATION can be against sexuality, gender OR race. So whatever you call it, it's still DISCRIMINATION.

Second of all, not all the states allow gay marriages.
Not only would the marriage only be recognized in the state that allows gay marriages (making your point completely moot and making you look even more of an idiot), but WHY am I forced, as a theoretical gay, to go into ANOTHER COUNTRY to get married with the person I want to spend the rest of my life with?!?

Why is not MY OWN COUNTRY not giving me that basic human right?!?
#159 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
So You're going against Nature, and you call "Gay Marriage" basic Human right;

GG, i'm done with this conversation
User avatar #161 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
What does "nature" have to do with basic human rights?!?

Seriously, you are so fucking retarded I wish I could just meet you IRL to beat the living crap out of you! Because I cannot fathom how a person can be so utterly MORONIC!

HOW IN THE EXACT FUCK AM I GOING AGAINST "NATURE"?!?

It's YOUR damn fault for being a chauvinistic, retarded bigot! NOT anyone else's fault!

And YES, MARRIAGE IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT, YOU DIPSHIT!
#162 - Ropyx (02/25/2014) [-]
Guess I'm all those things, still the one getting butthurt is you;

#Learn2Conversate, then we can talk
User avatar #163 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
No, apparently you're the one getting butthurt about people getting married to each other, despite the fact that it doesn't affect you IN THE SLIGHTEST.

#99 - Fortunately, this was the case. But it's not hard to …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#104 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
53% of people in the US support same sex marriage. You're literally losing half your money, now tell me, how many businesses in this economy could handle that? And the businesses that could handle it wouldn't because they know how to make money and aren't going to just shun a market group away.
#97 - "How many people do you know who would buy a product from…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) 0
#103 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Tons of people don't by shit from apple for that reason, they make up for that loss by selling their phones for much cheaper than if they would have made them in the US. They recoup that loss, by sheer manufacturing efficiency.

And you will lose customers period when you deny service because you're FUCKING REFUSING TO SELL SHIT.
User avatar #108 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
"Tons of people don't by shit from apple for that reason"

You mean "an extremely small and isolated bunch". The rest don't give a rat's ass about where their iShit came from.

And I honestly don't think you realize just how easily you can encourage right-winged idiots to support these kind of decisions. FFS, Hitler rose exactly on this kind of speech.
This ain't the 20th century anymore. Sex, skin color, religion and sexuality have no saying whenever BUSINESS is involved.

As I said, you can be the most racist and bigoted idiot you want - in the comfort of your own home. When you set up a business, you let your PERSONAL convictions aside, on the hanger at the entry to the joint.
#94 - Problem with that idea is that most people are stupid, therefo…  [+] (3 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -1
#96 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Except that's clearly not the case considering the bakery that caused this shit to start up went out of business. And considering again this place is in fucking Arizona, one of the most conservative states in the US i'd say that's a good indicator that the rest of the states would be similar if not more harsh against such businesses.
User avatar #99 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Fortunately, this was the case.

But it's not hard to imagine the opposite.
#104 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
53% of people in the US support same sex marriage. You're literally losing half your money, now tell me, how many businesses in this economy could handle that? And the businesses that could handle it wouldn't because they know how to make money and aren't going to just shun a market group away.
#88 - Well then why not push the envelope? Why not deny ser…  [+] (5 new replies) 02/25/2014 on Fuck America (Parts of it) -1
#91 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
If you want to go ahead, no skin off my white straight dick. Considering 70% of the US is white and probably a good 29% of the rest of the country wouldn't be cool with the idea of discriminating against people based on color that business would be doomed.
If you're refusing service the only person you're hurting is yourself. And if someone is stupid enough to do that there's no reason not to let them fail.
User avatar #94 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Problem with that idea is that most people are stupid, therefore racist or homophobic.

So most likely, instead of going out of business, you'll be cheered and promoted as the queer hater.

So you might wanna think again about that aspect...
#96 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
Except that's clearly not the case considering the bakery that caused this shit to start up went out of business. And considering again this place is in fucking Arizona, one of the most conservative states in the US i'd say that's a good indicator that the rest of the states would be similar if not more harsh against such businesses.
User avatar #99 - tkfourtwoone (02/25/2014) [-]
Fortunately, this was the case.

But it's not hard to imagine the opposite.
#104 - anonymous (02/25/2014) [-]
53% of people in the US support same sex marriage. You're literally losing half your money, now tell me, how many businesses in this economy could handle that? And the businesses that could handle it wouldn't because they know how to make money and aren't going to just shun a market group away.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #89 - ubisoft (06/13/2014) [-]
When the hell people start figuring out we're zionist?
User avatar #90 to #89 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (06/13/2014) [-]
omfg, you just made my day, dude =))
User avatar #87 - nebuchadnezzaurus (06/07/2014) [-]
Hey, looks like we both like old school CRPGs. That's good
User avatar #88 to #87 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (06/07/2014) [-]
Kind of a ugly shame that they have been seriously dumbed down for the masses...
User avatar #86 - Mr Fist (03/11/2014) [-]
All bashing aside, I am curious regarding something that pertains to Romania.

I dated this Romanian girl for a few years who was adopted at the age of 7. Is it true that some Romanian babies have a attachment disorder? Just children who were raised in the orphanages during the time when Birth Control was banned.
User avatar #85 - teoberry (02/26/2014) [-]
Thank you for biting my bait
#76 - oddzar (02/25/2014) [-]
You are such a tremendous ****** it blows my mind. I haven't logged into this site for literally years, but for you I'm making an exception since I already blew you the **** out of the water on the "are businesses obligated to serve everyone" debate.

If you ever get a chance to take the cock out of your mouth and read a book you should read up on constitutional law and what businesses are and are not legally required to do. I mean, that's assuming you can stop being a raging homo for even a minute, which I highly doubt.
User avatar #77 to #76 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/25/2014) [-]
And "if you ever get a chance to take the cock out of your mouth and read a book you should read up on constitutional law and what businesses are and are not legally required to do", you would realize that you are OBLIGED to serve patrons, unless they are disturbing the place. Simple as that.

Meanwhile, I also suggest you look up basic notions of LIMITATIONS of rights. You are NOT entitled to kick whoever you want out of your joint, because from that moment YOU are breaking THEIR rights to benefit from your services, causing a prejudice.

Until then, get the **** out of my profile, you idiot nazi-wannabe redneck.
User avatar #78 to #77 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
you keep insisting that we are all rednecks. I dont get it. Why are we rednecks when we clearly understand US law better than you? doesn't that make us more intelligent? _
User avatar #79 to #78 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/25/2014) [-]
Because only a complete redneck would refuse service to someone because, I don't know, he doesn't like the customer's eye color.
User avatar #80 to #79 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
in the US a "redneck" refers to someone who is a southerner and works on a farm, (the sun burns their neck red from all the time spent farming) I dont understand the correlation between eye color prejudiced and famers.
User avatar #81 to #80 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/25/2014) [-]
That is the literal sense of the word.

The figurative sense is basically the equal to "white inbred trash"
User avatar #82 to #81 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
yes but I dont know anyone who uses the word like that. Maybe "Hick" or "Hillbilly" would be better, but "redneck" implies hard working farmer
User avatar #83 to #82 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/25/2014) [-]
Nope. No it doesn't.
User avatar #84 to #83 - ianchrist (02/25/2014) [-]
...yes it does. Maybe you misunderstand American TV colloquialisms or something, because those words have different connotations and you're using it incorrectly.
#68 - kez (02/19/2014) [-]
Improved your low confidence yet?
User avatar #69 to #68 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/19/2014) [-]
yes, I have low confidence because I'm confident enough to criticize somebody's looks. Pure retard logic.
#70 to #69 - kez (02/19/2014) [-]
You have low confidence because you were acting so unconfident I thought you were a teenage girl.

Thats pretty unconfident
User avatar #71 to #70 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/19/2014) [-]
I'm unconfident because you're stupid enough to draw moronic conclusions. Indeed.

Tell me, Einstein. If I'm insecure because I "attack" a stupid plump like Jennifer Lawrence, is this entire site uber-unconfident because it attacks Justin Bieber? Yes, I bet you all attack him because you're extremely unconfident and jealous of his success.

...maybe NOW you're beginning to unerstand just how stupid you are.
#72 to #71 - kez (02/19/2014) [-]
How have you not understood what I have been saying?

Maybe you were too nervous form your lack of confidence whilst in your hissy fit.

Its not the hate. Its the passion and emotion behind the hate.
User avatar #73 to #72 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/19/2014) [-]
The "passion and emotion" (as you call it) behind my hate (towards village idiots that blindly follow absolutely every trend) stems from my extreme low tolerance towards stupid. Given I have enough stupid going on in my country with incredibly stupid politicians taking incredibly stupid decisions, coming to this site and seeing this level of stupid ******** is literally like the last drop that filled it.
#74 to #73 - kez (02/19/2014) [-]
And it all stems from your low confidence.
User avatar #75 to #74 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/19/2014) [-]
And your braindead replies stem from your single-digit IQ. Please, I have already given you too much of my time as it is. Right now you're just annoying, like every autist on this site who thinks he's "trolling" by repeating the same track like a broken record.
#67 - silverlance (12/22/2013) [-]
Posts content entitled "You guys have way too much spare time"
Individually replies to almost all the comments on said content
User avatar #15 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
I think I have you pegged.

You're a black male who comes from a highly socialized country which sucks total dick to live in... yet despite the utter failure of your local governments policies you would like to see the rest of the world follow you example and be pathetic, pleading nancies who are always politically correct and fair to everyone and wants the world to just get along and play nice, right?
User avatar #16 to #15 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
- black male who comes from a highly socialized country
- Romania

ROFLMAO

gtfo, you're beginning to bore me
User avatar #17 to #16 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
No idea what Romania is, other than being absolutely ******* riddled with drugs.
User avatar #18 to #17 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Haha, joke's on you! We're too poor to have drugs!




Oh, wait...


No, seriously now, you've only proved so far to be the stereotypical ignorant, self-bloating Ameritard. Please, shut your pie hole. Or stuff it with deep-fried Snickers. Or something.
User avatar #21 to #18 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Hell, what the **** is the police response time over there like? Over an hour? Never? Jesus.
User avatar #20 to #18 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
And deep-fried snickers (especially the ice cream bar kind) are the **** . Don't knock them till you've tried them.
User avatar #19 to #18 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
I don't think you realize how nice it is in america.... Yea, if you go to the wrong neighborhood you might get in trouble... but compared to other contries our streets are ******* safe as all hell.... and I still want a gun. How the hell do you, living out in the ******* middle of nowhere surrounded by hell, not want to be able to defend your life from the lawless?
#22 to #19 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
IDK, most of us still know how to use our ******* fists and legs.

Also:
- middle of ******* nowhere
- Our capital <- well, center of it, anyway (P.S.: 2nd biggest my filthy item daddyistrative building in the world, next to your Pentagon)

Now how about a nice hot cup of STFU
User avatar #64 to #22 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Neat building. What's up with the walled streets though?
User avatar #65 to #64 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Ummm... they're flat blocks?

Communist design, what can I say
User avatar #66 to #65 - PgFalcon (07/29/2013) [-]
Communism ftw.

I don't know what I'd do if I had been born in a country where I wasn't allowed to do whatever I wanted whenever I wanted. I'd feel suffocated. I need to have power over my own life in order to live... and I need to have the power to live whatever life I please.

I don't know how it is in other countries... but when I think of living in places like Russia and China and how everyone is afraid of their government... I can't help but think that it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if either of those 'super-powers' were to fall.
User avatar #23 to #22 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Yea.... you've obviously never fought somebody hand to hand. When you're outnumbered you're pretty much **** out of luck unless you outclass them ******* heavily, or have had training in hand-to-hand combat.

I'll bet you live in a ******* rich-ass neighborhood, and have been coddled since birth and never set foot near any of those forbidden down-town streets. Hell, I guarentee that's true, cause you live in ******* Romania and yet here you are on ******* funnyjunk with a computer and internet connection. That's gotta be worth a ******* fortune over in a country like that.
User avatar #24 to #23 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Right now I live in a decent, nice neighborhood, but I grew up in a not-so-pleasant one.

" cause you live in ******* Romania and yet here you are on ******* funnyjunk with a computer and internet connection"

Ah, American ignorance strikes again!

You know, Romania isn't a third world country. It's not exactly "first world", but it's easily 2nd world.
Also, Romania is in top 5 countries regarding Internet speed. Not to mention it's cheap as **** .
U jelly?

Worth a fortune... lol. It's somewhere near 10-15 dollars. Average wage is around 500 dollars or more.
We may not have your wages, but we most certainly don't have your prices.
User avatar #25 to #24 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
You get what you pay for, rofl. Cheap rent means that nobody wants to live there, ya know.

I was born on a farm. Mom divorced my dad (who is a felon who robbed over 13 banks, rofl) and she married a guy who could bring home the bacon. Taught me everything I know about being a man. Hell of a lucky draw for a step-dad.

And as far as Romania goes, they do have an attractive tourism page. Says "Welcome American Tourists" at the bottom, rofl.
User avatar #26 to #25 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
At first I didn't know why mentioned "cheap rents". Then I remembered how your real estate market goes.

Sorry to disappoint you, son, but only students from other towns that come to Bucharest for college stay in rents. Well, mostly students.

Most of the people living in their natal-towns OWN the house they live in. Yeah, I know, it's a difficult concept to grasp, but I am pushing my patience limits right now

And speaking of "attractive tourism", most West-European tourists take great joy strolling through the Historical Center of our capital, one of the reasons being the very cheap (a bit over 1 Euro) but very good beer (which is a lot more than I can say about the horse-piss American beers).
And all this beer talk has made me thirsty!
User avatar #29 to #26 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Damn, you weren't kidding. ***** cheap as ******* dirt over there. I'm guessing buying anything overseas is a shocker for you guys when you try to buy american, lmao
User avatar #31 to #29 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Well, it would be rather stupid to buy something from the US since the shipping costs a lot more than buying stuff from other countries from the EU.

Also, low prices and wages are (OK, I'll be honest, WERE) one of our main points of interests for foreign antrepreneurs.
User avatar #34 to #31 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
China kinda beat you guys to the punch at that game dude. Everyone goes to them for their slave labor.
User avatar #36 to #34 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
No body said anything about slave labor.

Also, countries like Romania and Turkey are still much more appealing than China. Well, ok, not lately, due to higher and higher taxes, but in general.
User avatar #41 to #36 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
That's my point though. You guys probably aren't willing to pay your workers 10 cents an hour to work in sweat-shops. China is... therefore they really have no competition in that field. If it can't be made by robots, doesn't require skilled labor, and if it isn't a foodstuff, then you can bet your ass we ship the work out to china.

Still, I think I've seen a few random products "Made in Romania" before. Maybe a t-shirt. No idea.
User avatar #27 to #26 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
I'm military. We don't stay in one place. Owning a house is retarded, and generally reserved for people with families so they can pay it off with their BAH and sell it when they're done.

Renting is, otherwise, reserved for poor people. I assumed that everyone over in Romania lived in closets with dirt floors, especially these 'gyspies' you mentioned. Don't got those here, but read about them in books and from what I hear they're generally hated by just about everyone. Nobody cries about how hitler killed all the gypsies, for instance. Only the jews get special treatment there.

Property over here is generally large and cheap. Is the houses we built that cost a lot, cause they're ******* good houses and worth every penny. An average wage-earners house over here is considered a mansion over in most other countries.
User avatar #28 to #27 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
". Is the houses we built that cost a lot, cause they're ******* good houses and worth every penny."

Serious doubt. I've seen a bit of TV programs that show how houses are built in America, one of the reasons they're so quick to build them is due to light materials.

You know, there IS a reason why people in Tornado Alley, for instance, don't make their houses too sturdy - its pointless anyhow.
User avatar #32 to #28 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
But for the most part that sort of thing is so rare you might as well start buying lottery tickets. Natural disasters are not a reason to fear living in a country.
User avatar #30 to #28 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Brick houses are fine in tornadoes. You're probably talking about trailer parks... which is just a cheap way to own property cause the houses are built so insanely cheaply. I could go out a buy a plot of land and a trailer for less than 25 grand right now if I really wanted to live in a ********* .

Generally speaking though, its the hurricanes that do by far the most damage over hear, not tornadoes. Even considering that most people in those areas have insurance against such damage, and end up profiting from the destruction of their homes.
#33 to #30 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
I'm not talking about trailer parks, dumbass. I was referring to the typical American house, like this one.

Judging by the looks of it, it does not look very durable.
User avatar #40 to #33 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Loved my grandma's pantry. She also had a wood-furnace in the basement that heated the main house, the water was heated by solar panels, big ass pool in the backyard, and lots of cool toys. Haven't spoken to her or anyone from that side of my family in ******* years. Don't even know if they're still alive.
User avatar #39 to #33 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Grand-parents live in a ******* mansion in the country though. Were big farmers, but sold all their land and machinery and retired rich. Owned a garage that you could park airplanes in, had crazy cars, multiple buildings all connected by walk-ways and **** .

Don't get along with them now due to my mom marrying my step-dad though, which my grandma disapproved of for whatever reason.
User avatar #37 to #33 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
I was, personally, raised in a partially brick and partially wooden house. We lived in a tornado hot-spot as it so happens, and while they touch down every year and destroy a couple homes every so often... our house never suffered much from the wind damage.

We also happened to live next to a fault line, and have the occasional mild earthquake. House has been fine.
User avatar #38 to #37 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Oh well, to each their own, I guess
User avatar #46 to #38 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Oh god, how did I not realize that you guy's are the home of ******* dracula....

That alone is just cause to drop by and have a cheap vacation someday, rofl. Try your guys foods and sleep with a few of your women. ;D
User avatar #49 to #46 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Well... about Dracula. Yes, it's one of our main "brands", even though Bram Stoker's book is pure fiction, bar some historical details.

Please, for your cultural sake, read this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_the_Impaler

It gives you a better understanding from where the name "Dracula" originated. However, the "vampire" part of the story is entirely Stoker's doing; we DO have some balcan/slavic folklore mythology called "strigoi", but it's not really the same thing.
User avatar #51 to #49 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
yar, yar, what's his nuts the impailer. As much as popular belief on the internet would lead you to believe we actually have a pretty thorough world history teaching regimine in most of our schools, and we did a pretty extensive history over Romania and it's quirks. It's only just now slowly coming back to me cause it's been so damn long, rofl.
User avatar #57 to #51 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
"And also that one guy who was stabbed, poisoned, shot, and drowned by his wife and somehow still survived. I think he was a king or something. "

I really believe you're thinking of Rasputin, who was a Russian. And he wasn't killed by his wife (didn't had any), but by Russian nobles that wanted him gone.
User avatar #61 to #57 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Yup. That's the guy. Did an entire week on him alone, and not just the weird stuff that surrounded him. Compared to places like turkey and hungary we actually covered a ********* of stuff over Romania, as it turns out. Watched a couple documentaries over Vlad the impaler too.
User avatar #53 to #51 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Well... I guess our military campaigns against the Turks/Ottomans ARE a subject of historical interest... even though they haven't been very successful, considering we were vastly outnumbered, I'd say we did pretty well in conserving our independence.
User avatar #59 to #53 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Wait.... **** Rasputin happened only a hundred years ago! That was ******* recent!
User avatar #58 to #53 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Rasputin! That was the guy. You people had one hell of a violent history... but then again everyone did back then didnt' they?
User avatar #55 to #53 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
I think our history classes were more focused upon the weird stuff that happened within your government and the various risings of power.

And also that one guy who was stabbed, poisoned, shot, and drowned by his wife and somehow still survived. I think he was a king or something.
User avatar #44 to #38 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Ooo... and crafts fairs. Neat.
#48 to #44 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
You might want to search the Top Gear episode when they went to our Transfagarasan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transf%C4%83g%C4%83r%C4%83%C8%99an

Really impressive scenery, in many parts of the country, I'll give you that (check pic in the left)
User avatar #63 to #48 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
And yes, I remember that road ******* . Good episode.
User avatar #62 to #48 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Top Gear is like in the top five list of things that England has done good by the world, rofl.
User avatar #43 to #38 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Seems like a surprisingly safe country for tourism. Cheap too, so you can spend a month or so there and not break the budget. Only problem is that there doesn't appear to be anything at all to do once you're there but look at castles and mountains.
User avatar #45 to #43 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
The capital is literally full of places to see. I'm not talking about bars & clubs, but many historical buildings, starting from the Parliament (that big ass building from the picture above) to many interbellic houses.

Also, 1 month to visit the entire country? Lol, no way.
User avatar #50 to #45 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Research done. Your country just bumped my trip to Africa and Austrailia down a notch, but stays behind going to Paris. (never going to south america ******* ever. Did a fun little jaunt to honduras once rousting out drug-lords and training with the local military... but even when you're all carrying rifles you gotta be careful where you go, rofl).

You're probably the best place to visit within a thousand miles of your area.

#56 to #50 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
From where the hell do you get the idea that Romanians are black?!

OK, the gipsies are dark-skinned, since they originate from India, but slavic/balkans people are caucasian as **** . Pic related!
User avatar #60 to #56 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Ah, so no blacks in Romania? Gud. Guuuud. *cackles like dracula*

Rofl. So you probably hate Indian's more than I do. I'm just faintly annoyed by the way they smell like curry and worship cows.
User avatar #52 to #50 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (07/28/2013) [-]
Well, there's Greece, Turkey, Italy, Germany, Austria... although the latter 2 are rather expensive.
User avatar #54 to #52 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Meh, might just end up seeing it all as a big road-trip through Asia. Spend a couple days in a city and move on.

Apparently you guys have a bit of a problem with human trafficing though... so glad I'm not a woman or child.

Just curious though, but are you black? I get the feeling you are.
User avatar #47 to #45 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
For some reason I was thinking of Romania as being one of those ******* ukranian drug-routes into russia. I totally forgot that it's actually pretty ******* awesome.
User avatar #42 to #38 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Rofl, yup. House was sturdy as **** . Then again, the soil there was very good for making strong foundations. Some places I guess that isn't always the case, and the houses shift and float down-river or become lop-sided.
User avatar #35 to #33 - PgFalcon (07/28/2013) [-]
Our building codes are, generally, among the toughest in the world. New buildings built today are as sturdy as anything you've ever seen.

That is not to say, of course, that this has always been the case. Over half of our homes are several decades old, and not all of them are built very well.
User avatar #14 - jonswan (06/26/2012) [-]
I'm sorry for being a bloody idiot. I'm going to delete it, just thought you should know i didn't do it out of angst.
User avatar #13 - mycatthenazi (05/31/2012) [-]
**mycatthenazi rolled user dwarfman ** i'll sell you 6 nickelbags of meth and a slightly used pipe for 95$ deal?
User avatar #12 - acidjoker (05/07/2012) [-]
just saying .............. ******
#11 - fjmastermind (05/07/2012) [-]
Niggggggggggggeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
#7 - anonymous (05/07/2012) [-]
User avatar #5 - RaciallyDiverse (05/07/2012) [-]
dude you're a ****** , remember?
User avatar #4 - rainbowdashieone (05/07/2012) [-]
****** !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LEAVE MY KFC ALONE
User avatar #3 - Schiffy (05/07/2012) [-]
I must inform you that you are now known to be a ****** !
#9 to #3 - thuntking **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)