Login or register


Last status update:
Date Signed Up:4/09/2011
Last Login:5/20/2016
Content Thumbs: 3514 total,  3964 ,  450
Comment Thumbs: 1344 total,  1716 ,  372
Content Level Progress: 40% (40/100)
Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 64% (64/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:125971
Times Content Favorited:217 times
Total Comments Made:560
FJ Points:4184
Favorite Tags: adorable (2) | cat (2) | Dog (2) | funny (2) | funny as hell (2) | patrick (2) | spongebob (2) | The Game (2)

  • Views: 30123
    Thumbs Up 1030 Thumbs Down 53 Total: +977
    Comments: 126
    Favorites: 87
    Uploaded: 01/06/15
    Some tweets are genius Some tweets are genius
  • Views: 25476
    Thumbs Up 755 Thumbs Down 29 Total: +726
    Comments: 32
    Favorites: 42
    Uploaded: 01/15/15
    Cats Cats
  • Views: 11508
    Thumbs Up 264 Thumbs Down 13 Total: +251
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 9
    Uploaded: 01/09/15
    Mary Jane Mary Jane
  • Views: 2615
    Thumbs Up 109 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +101
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 12
    Uploaded: 07/09/11
    fucking adorable fucking adorable
  • Views: 5628
    Thumbs Up 61 Thumbs Down 7 Total: +54
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/06/15
    Me this morning Me this morning
  • Views: 1455
    Thumbs Up 34 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +30
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 3
    Uploaded: 07/03/11
    the truth the truth
First2[ 9 ]
  • Views: 12671
    Thumbs Up 243 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +228
    Comments: 16
    Favorites: 16
    Uploaded: 01/16/15
    Zoetrope sculptures Zoetrope sculptures
  • Views: 10136
    Thumbs Up 211 Thumbs Down 25 Total: +186
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 11
    Uploaded: 01/09/15
    Nope Nope Nope Nope Nope Nope
  • Views: 3351
    Thumbs Up 17 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +12
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/05/12
    Hot Hot
  • Views: 958
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +10
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 07/24/11
    why can't I gett anywhere? why can't I gett anywhere?
First2[ 9 ]

latest user's comments

#1678 - he had a pretty ****** up life. he used to do normal recreatio…  [+] (1 reply) 02/11/2015 on Mods will post something... 0
User avatar
#1687 - lightspeedtooslow (02/11/2015) [-]
Sadly that happens quite a lot. That's one of the big reasons while drugs are generally frowned upon. I'm very sorry for your loss
#1660 - My old friend just died of a heroin overdose last night  [+] (4 replies) 02/11/2015 on Mods will post something... 0
User avatar
#1745 - spartyon (02/11/2015) [-]
my cousin died of a heroin overdose this summer. He was only 21 and had a 4 month old kid. I feel ya. Life sucks sometimes
User avatar
#1671 - lightspeedtooslow (02/11/2015) [-]
Oh shit. Why on earth was he doing heroin?
User avatar
#1678 - tigerpaws (02/11/2015) [-]
he had a pretty fucked up life. he used to do normal recreational shit with me like pot but moved onto the bigger shit. I wish he never even tried an oxy pill
User avatar
#1687 - lightspeedtooslow (02/11/2015) [-]
Sadly that happens quite a lot. That's one of the big reasons while drugs are generally frowned upon. I'm very sorry for your loss
#114 - My personal favorite, always blows my mind  [+] (34 replies) 01/21/2015 on Universal thoughts +146
User avatar
#395 - arlaxis (01/21/2015) [-]
Energy is not created nor destroyed, but matter is. You can create matter or destroy it. The only (supposed) constant in our Universe is energy.
#252 - tehcookee (01/21/2015) [-]
have you ever heard of "e=mc^2"?
that's Einsteins equation of energy to matter conversion
#350 - psdeath (01/21/2015) [-]
Everything is energy in it's purest form. Energy can't be destroyed.

Imagine you compress a spring. The spring experiences a slight increase in mass, nothing which we can detect without high tech instruments. This increase in mass times the speed of light squared, is equal to the energy put into the spring when we compressed it.

That's kinda what E=mc^2 is about. I'm not very good at explaining, and English isn't my mother tongue, so someone tell me if I got something wrong up there.
User avatar
#347 - didactus (01/21/2015) [-]
It's not exactly a conversion as much as it describes the fact that matter holds bound energy. To further explain it I would have to invoke Quantum physical principles.
#278 - doucheendje (01/21/2015) [-]
That's not what that means
#312 - anon (01/21/2015) [-]
After the big bang, there was only hydrogen. Those atoms fussed into heavier elements inside stars, thus creating new elements. The hydrogen in your body might be billions years old. The carbon, oxygen and other elements? Not so much. Not as those elements.
User avatar
#392 - xtwinblade (01/21/2015) [-]
nigga where you think the protons and electrons in all the heavy elements in our bodies come from?
User avatar
#373 - hanabro (01/21/2015) [-]
The new elements are the same exact matter as the hydrogen, but atomically re-arranged. The same amount of mass still exists.

Technically, it's "MASS" can never be created or destroyed, which means that there is a finite amount of stuff that can exist, meaning, in a very loose sense, matter cannot be created or destroyed. It's current form can, but all the matter that was there still exists in a different form. If you burn a log, it's converted into smoke and ash, but there's still the exact same amount of matter.
#356 - psdeath (01/21/2015) [-]
Partially correct. The big bang theory became a theory because they realized that the stars were not hot enough to create the heaviest elements. They realized they needed something with immense pressure and heat which exceeded that of the stars, and the result was the big bang theory. In other words, while most of the universe is made up of hydrogen and helium and elements created within the stars, the heaviest elements were created in the big bang and is thus sort of a finite source.

I really need to edit new reaction pics

Even if you were correct, hydrogen is what makes up those other elements, so split them all up and we're basically made up of only hydrogen, which age dates back to the big bang. The point of the picture is to say that while we as beings are not that old, the components we're made of are as old as the universe.
#412 - coolcalx (01/22/2015) [-]
none of that is true.

the Big Bang Theory is the result of the phenomenon known as redshifting.
All galaxies outside of our local group are redshifted, and therefore travelling away from us. All of them.
this implies the universe is expanding, which in turn implies that the universe originated from a singularity (the result of playing the universe's expansion in reverse).

main sequence stars like our Sun don't have enough heat to fuse atoms (the heat is in fact three orders of magnitude too low), but are able to do so through quantum tunneling.

fusion cannot create energy in elements heavier than iron (just as fission cannot create energy from elements lighter than iron). The reason stars can't produce heavy elements is due to the fact that gravitational pressure would crush them REGARDLESS of their temperature. Heavy elements are created when large stars collapse, resulting in a powerful shockwave explosion known as a supernova (side note, this is the most energetic phenomenon in the universe).

no heavy elements come from the Big Bang. the Big Bang produced hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium. main sequence fusion created everything up to iron, and everything after that is the result of stars collapsing and exploding.
User avatar
#413 - psdeath (01/22/2015) [-]
I am shocked. Mainly because this sounds scientific as shit and completely valid, but also because of all the bullshit I've been spoon fed from a source I can't remember. It wasn't some bullshit source though, I just can't put the name of the scientist in my head.

But I guess I learn something new every day. I did know about the expansion of the universe though, and the whole thing playing it in reverse.
User avatar
#414 - coolcalx (01/22/2015) [-]
sorry to be the bringer of bad news, man.

I'm graduating next year with a B.S. in physics, and an emphasis in astrophysics, so I have studied this stuff pretty intensely.

also, if you have any questions, I might be able to answer them
User avatar
#420 - psdeath (01/22/2015) [-]
Bad news? My friend, you bring me knowledge, the only known cure for ignorance! That's good news. I mean, I just seem to have overlooked this part completely. Otherwise I consider myself at least somewhat above average when it comes to knowledge about space. Personal favorite space phenomenon (or what ya call it) are quasars and/or blazars.

Also, sorry but I have 1.0 AM humor and can't get over that fact that you're graduating with a BS in physics. Bullshit physics sounds like an accurate description of quantum physics though, that shit's magic. But on a serious note, that's awesome. We need more astro physicists in this world, gotta get them humies on mars.

And alright, I don't think I have any questions but thanks! I'll continue on a quest to cure any further ignorance.
User avatar
#346 - didactus (01/21/2015) [-]
All elements heavier than Helium-4 is a result of Nucleosynthesis in stars.
User avatar
#237 - tsoper (01/21/2015) [-]
I cry evry tim
#147 - dontread (01/21/2015) [-]
I guess age doesn't matter
#131 - coolcalx (01/21/2015) [-]
weeeeelllll sorta. The universe started as a giant ball of energy. then adiabatic expansion of space allowed for the temperature to drop enough for bosons (specifically the higgs) to form and give way to photons and neutrinos from unified forces separating, and eventually fundamental particles such as electrons, positrons, quarks, etc. which then conglomerated into protons and the like and then into hydrogen, a little helium, and a small amount of lithium.

matter can totally be destroyed and created. it's energy-mass conservation that really matters.

for example, if you wanted to calculate all of the positive energy in the universe, you do a simple E=Mc^2 calculation, where M is the total mass of luminous matter in the universe. this comes out to about 9*10^69 joules (if we assume mass=10^53 kg, which is within 2 orders of magnitude of most current theories)

But this number doesn't include the energy of photons and neutrinos, which are massless (neutrinos are essentially massless), so you would do E=pc, where p is the average momentum. I have no idea what that value is, but it would would add considerably to the other energy calculation.

this means the universe has 70 magnitudes of joules worth of energy, right?

well... certain energy fields (namely, gravitational) produce negative energy. It turns out that the value of the negative energy may exactly balance out the value of positive energy, producing a zero energy universe.

crazy shit.

#155 - igotyournoze (01/21/2015) [-]
#135 - whatamidoingwithme (01/21/2015) [-]
But if the energy of universe was zero, how would the "universe" expand?
User avatar
#158 - coolcalx (01/21/2015) [-]
also, before you ask the obvious question, "why is the space-time metric expanding," I have no idea. I just know that the expansion theory is necessary to explain visible phenomena such as universal redshifting. answering that question would require some googling
User avatar
#154 - coolcalx (01/21/2015) [-]
the metric expansion of the universe is a general property of the universe which takes place only on a global scale, rather than a local one. in local space, systems are gravitationally bound. this is not the case for areas outside major centers of gravitational attraction. (you know. dark space. where the reapers are)
User avatar
#122 - severepwner (01/21/2015) [-]
That couldn't be right could it? My matter couldn't have existed that far back.
User avatar
#125 - paradoxofnight (01/21/2015) [-]
Matter cant be created or destroyed.
#134 - anon (01/21/2015) [-]
nigga matter is created and destroyed all the fucking time

look up nuclear reaction
User avatar
#391 - xtwinblade (01/21/2015) [-]
The power in nuclear reaction comes from the release of energy within the atomic bonds, the matter isnt destroyed, the energy is just simply released. If the matter was destroyed there wouldnt be any radiation from the releasing protons.
User avatar
#411 - coolcalx (01/22/2015) [-]
incorrect. the energy release is due to the mass difference between the product and the reactant. In fusion and fission reactions, mass is not conserved, and the difference in mass is explained through mass-energy equivalence: E=MC^2 and the energy is released in the form of gamma rays and neutrinos.
User avatar
#203 - metacobalion (01/21/2015) [-]
That's not the same thing nigger.
#253 - tehcookee (01/21/2015) [-]
>"matter can never be created nor destroyed"
>provides example of when matter can be created or destroyed
>"thats not the same"
User avatar
#242 - gohex (01/21/2015) [-]

I thought it was energy that cannot be destroyed?
#256 - tehcookee (01/21/2015) [-]
here is a basic explanation:

matter and energy can be converted between each other, thats what the equation "E=MC^2" is talking about (energy = mass * speed of light^2)
This most commonly occurs in Nuclear Fusion (the reaction that stars and our best bombs use) when two individual protons (hydrogen) fuse together into one nucleus (hydrogen); a very tiny amount of the mass is converted into a metric-butt-ton of energy...

Anti-matter also does this when is comes into contact with regular matter and ALL of the combined anti/matter turns into energy
User avatar
#257 - gohex (01/21/2015) [-]
Cool, so our next bombs will be anti matter bombs then. Sweet, thanks for the explanation bro
#132 - sytheris (01/21/2015) [-]
*That we know of.
User avatar
#133 - paradoxofnight (01/21/2015) [-]
Good point.
#139 - timeiskey (01/21/2015) [-]
forgot to log in, but basically the matter you are came from mostly came from our sun.

organic compounds and such