x
Click to expand

theterranigh

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Age: 113
Date Signed Up:1/08/2011
Last Login:6/25/2015
Location:New Zealand
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#27779
Highest Comment Rank:#16095
Comment Thumbs: 129 total,  180 ,  51
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 68 Comments: FJ Cultist → Level 69 Comments: FJ Cultist
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:68
FJ Points:144
PSN- imorsum
I'm to old for this site.

latest user's comments

#46 - Comment deleted  [+] (2 new replies) 06/21/2015 on Eminem on swearing in Germany +11
#58 - diemaske Comment deleted by theterranigh
#69 - luckyspirit Comment deleted by theterranigh
#45 - Comment deleted  [+] (3 new replies) 06/21/2015 on Eminem on swearing in Germany +2
#46 - theterranigh Comment deleted by theterranigh
#58 - diemaske Comment deleted by theterranigh
#69 - luckyspirit Comment deleted by theterranigh
#82 - I would assume in large portions of American society they do a… 06/17/2015 on TransTumblr +2
#224 - You really don't understand different perspectives do you. I'm…  [+] (5 new replies) 06/16/2015 on Different strokes to move... 0
User avatar #229 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
"Morally wrong" has no meaning. Whats morally wrong to you, obviously is not morally wrong to me and my friends. Dont base your arguements off of morals.
While your personal experience is sorta valid, you're useing it to generalize, which isn't an apropriate use of a personal experience.
Also, you might wanna look up what a "Strawman Arguement" actually is. I didn't use "people" as a strawman. I used to it refer to spefic people, one of which is you and others whom you dont know. If I had used names instead of "people", what would that have accomplished?

Also, calling people retarded isn't really constructive, especially when you just misused the entire "strawman" thing.
User avatar #286 - fazermint (06/16/2015) [-]
If morals have no meaning, then how would you feel if I chopped off your limbs and fed them to you? I can just claim it's not morally wrong to me and it is justified. You're about the dumbest person I've ever seen have access to the internet.
User avatar #291 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Thats not a moral question you dimwit...
If you do something like that, you're demonstrably insane and should be put in a mental hospital. If you did that, you would also be hurting somebody, me, and therefore its not justified. Again, it isn't a moral question for very obvious reasons.
A better question would have been; "If I agree to letting you chop off my legs and feed them to me, is it acceptable for you to do it?". Thats a moral question. Yours wasn't. Try to understand the concepts thats involved in the discussion, before you start blabbering. You look a fool otherwise.

Always kinda makes me smile, when people call me stupid while at the same time misuseing or misunderstanding concepts thats being discussed.
User avatar #294 - fazermint (06/17/2015) [-]
I used your logic, and you called it stupid. Cool
User avatar #299 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Please direct to the place where you deployed anything even remotely resembling logic.
I fail to anywhere where you've made much sense, much less anywhere where you'de been making sense useing my logic.
#210 - No I'm saying your immature about sexual situations, and ironi…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/16/2015 on Different strokes to move... 0
User avatar #213 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
Those are pretty much the same thing. Both come down to "You're only into wierd shit, cuz you dont get laid enough!". No matter how you choose to phrase it, it serves little other reason than to irretate peole.
I dont think everyone is out to get me. I do however, think that people who patronize me are out to annoy me. Patronizing people over their sexual preferance is probably the most retarded thing I see people consistently do, thats why it annoys me.
User avatar #224 - theterranigh (06/16/2015) [-]
You really don't understand different perspectives do you. I'm trying to explain to you that yes your argument is morally wrong. I'm providing a reason based off personal experience because you're showing your immaturity in the argument, an argument which nobody agrees with. I'm not patronizing, I'm not the one using 'people' as a straw man. Maybe you should look at what your saying and look figuratively in my comment before you go full retard.
User avatar #229 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
"Morally wrong" has no meaning. Whats morally wrong to you, obviously is not morally wrong to me and my friends. Dont base your arguements off of morals.
While your personal experience is sorta valid, you're useing it to generalize, which isn't an apropriate use of a personal experience.
Also, you might wanna look up what a "Strawman Arguement" actually is. I didn't use "people" as a strawman. I used to it refer to spefic people, one of which is you and others whom you dont know. If I had used names instead of "people", what would that have accomplished?

Also, calling people retarded isn't really constructive, especially when you just misused the entire "strawman" thing.
User avatar #286 - fazermint (06/16/2015) [-]
If morals have no meaning, then how would you feel if I chopped off your limbs and fed them to you? I can just claim it's not morally wrong to me and it is justified. You're about the dumbest person I've ever seen have access to the internet.
User avatar #291 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Thats not a moral question you dimwit...
If you do something like that, you're demonstrably insane and should be put in a mental hospital. If you did that, you would also be hurting somebody, me, and therefore its not justified. Again, it isn't a moral question for very obvious reasons.
A better question would have been; "If I agree to letting you chop off my legs and feed them to me, is it acceptable for you to do it?". Thats a moral question. Yours wasn't. Try to understand the concepts thats involved in the discussion, before you start blabbering. You look a fool otherwise.

Always kinda makes me smile, when people call me stupid while at the same time misuseing or misunderstanding concepts thats being discussed.
User avatar #294 - fazermint (06/17/2015) [-]
I used your logic, and you called it stupid. Cool
User avatar #299 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Please direct to the place where you deployed anything even remotely resembling logic.
I fail to anywhere where you've made much sense, much less anywhere where you'de been making sense useing my logic.
#104 - I was told by a wise man one day that "When your a teenag…  [+] (9 new replies) 06/16/2015 on Different strokes to move... -1
User avatar #143 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
Dont patronize me.
Dont try to say "You're only into wierd shit cuz you're a virgin!". Thats bloody immature.

And just to entirely clear about this; I'm not a fucking virgin...
User avatar #210 - theterranigh (06/16/2015) [-]
No I'm saying your immature about sexual situations, and ironically by you paraphrasing me wrongly and thinking that I'm trying to look down on you, your kind of proving my point.

Not everybody's out to get you man....
User avatar #213 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
Those are pretty much the same thing. Both come down to "You're only into wierd shit, cuz you dont get laid enough!". No matter how you choose to phrase it, it serves little other reason than to irretate peole.
I dont think everyone is out to get me. I do however, think that people who patronize me are out to annoy me. Patronizing people over their sexual preferance is probably the most retarded thing I see people consistently do, thats why it annoys me.
User avatar #224 - theterranigh (06/16/2015) [-]
You really don't understand different perspectives do you. I'm trying to explain to you that yes your argument is morally wrong. I'm providing a reason based off personal experience because you're showing your immaturity in the argument, an argument which nobody agrees with. I'm not patronizing, I'm not the one using 'people' as a straw man. Maybe you should look at what your saying and look figuratively in my comment before you go full retard.
User avatar #229 - krobeles (06/16/2015) [-]
"Morally wrong" has no meaning. Whats morally wrong to you, obviously is not morally wrong to me and my friends. Dont base your arguements off of morals.
While your personal experience is sorta valid, you're useing it to generalize, which isn't an apropriate use of a personal experience.
Also, you might wanna look up what a "Strawman Arguement" actually is. I didn't use "people" as a strawman. I used to it refer to spefic people, one of which is you and others whom you dont know. If I had used names instead of "people", what would that have accomplished?

Also, calling people retarded isn't really constructive, especially when you just misused the entire "strawman" thing.
User avatar #286 - fazermint (06/16/2015) [-]
If morals have no meaning, then how would you feel if I chopped off your limbs and fed them to you? I can just claim it's not morally wrong to me and it is justified. You're about the dumbest person I've ever seen have access to the internet.
User avatar #291 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Thats not a moral question you dimwit...
If you do something like that, you're demonstrably insane and should be put in a mental hospital. If you did that, you would also be hurting somebody, me, and therefore its not justified. Again, it isn't a moral question for very obvious reasons.
A better question would have been; "If I agree to letting you chop off my legs and feed them to me, is it acceptable for you to do it?". Thats a moral question. Yours wasn't. Try to understand the concepts thats involved in the discussion, before you start blabbering. You look a fool otherwise.

Always kinda makes me smile, when people call me stupid while at the same time misuseing or misunderstanding concepts thats being discussed.
User avatar #294 - fazermint (06/17/2015) [-]
I used your logic, and you called it stupid. Cool
User avatar #299 - krobeles (06/17/2015) [-]
Please direct to the place where you deployed anything even remotely resembling logic.
I fail to anywhere where you've made much sense, much less anywhere where you'de been making sense useing my logic.
#6 - What a STAR player. I'm so sorry. 06/09/2015 on Childhood Nostalgia +1
#3 - How do you even make money off this site... 03/21/2015 on theterranigh's profile 0
#133 - Yep you're exactly right, the center point is the 'Center mass…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/19/2015 on Not the moon +1
User avatar #134 - zaxzwim (03/20/2015) [-]
space is fucking awesome, and i remember seeing something about this on TV at one point, might have been on cosmos
#55 - What is a binary system. That can work, they would just orbit …  [+] (4 new replies) 03/19/2015 on Not the moon +3
User avatar #74 - zaxzwim (03/19/2015) [-]
the center of the orbit would be between the two earths right? like if there are two suns they orbit each other?
User avatar #133 - theterranigh (03/19/2015) [-]
Yep you're exactly right, the center point is the 'Center mass'. Because the mass in the solar system isn't entirely balanced, the center mass of the solar system is off center to the sun a little, and so the sun also rotates around this point slightly. Cool huh.
User avatar #134 - zaxzwim (03/20/2015) [-]
space is fucking awesome, and i remember seeing something about this on TV at one point, might have been on cosmos
User avatar #126 - reretzu (03/19/2015) [-]
I'm not really educated enough to give you a definite answer, but I'm around 92.314% certain that you're correct.
[ 62 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 954 / Total items point value: 4909

Comments(1):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)