Upload
Login or register

thekeeperofthumbs

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:7/27/2013
Last Login:9/28/2016
Stats
Comment Ranking:#267
Highest Content Rank:#484
Highest Comment Rank:#40
Content Thumbs: 4137 total,  4517 ,  380
Comment Thumbs: 68290 total,  70500 ,  2210
Content Level Progress: 61% (61/100)
Level 131 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 132 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 38.6% (386/1000)
Level 352 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 353 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:4
Content Views:200116
Times Content Favorited:404 times
Total Comments Made:5655
FJ Points:100817
Favorite Tags: 4Chan (9) | get (3) | sjw (3) | FML (2) | glow (2) | meme (2) | r9k (2) | Robot (2) | star wars (2) | trump (2)

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#63 - Oh so that's who that character is As ever, I see porn of …  [+] (4 replies) 13 hours ago on T H I C C +2
User avatar
#73 - cackledemon (11 hours ago) [-]
you tell me brah, most animation/comics I discover by searching source from the porn I find...hell, it often happens with music too, ever heard of Rameses b?
User avatar
#69 - loljkisback (11 hours ago) [-]
The same thing happened to me the day it was released I was like oh thats who all that porn was about.
#68 - distortedflare (11 hours ago) [-]
sauce for porn?
#21 - I think that's Tycho Brahe and Kepler tho  [+] (1 reply) 17 hours ago on Zyedrugadu Icluruicra +2
User avatar
#23 - batmanuel (16 hours ago) [-]
Entirely possible. I'd just assumed that it was Galileo based on how much the sketch looks like a portrait of him I saw in a high-school textbook I had.
#1 - dun get it  [+] (2 replies) 09/27/2016 on Seviryslys Wimp Hexc +5
#2 - megazu (09/27/2016) [-]
I think it's supposed to be God.
And he's moving house and he moves the exercise machine which he's never used because he's already omnipotent read; can't lift and finds Earth in the corner all forgotten-like and he's like "Dude shit, I forgot about the fucking humans."
User avatar
#3 - thekeeperofthumbs (17 hours ago) [-]
Oh yeah, thanks
#105 - 35.63% of people polled voted for Clinton or 35.63% of…  [+] (6 replies) 09/27/2016 on WHO WON THE DEBATE POLLS +1
User avatar
#209 - vinskinator (09/28/2016) [-]
the latter.. its an web poll, literally people need to go to the site themselves and click the button before the time is up.
User avatar
#223 - walcorn (09/28/2016) [-]
Are you stupid?
How can you be certain that exactly 35.63% of the people supporting Hillary voted in polls?
It's a fucking poll, it says nothing about the people who chose not to participate.
User avatar
#224 - vinskinator (18 hours ago) [-]
woah, sorry misread buddy
but it was not "people polled" either. these polls just put a question online, that is not the same as a scientific poll.

the 'got off their ass and voted in every available poll because their internet troll community provided them all links and they had nothing better to do with their lives' is what I meant to use to explain a skewed data sample.

My mistake, but chill out buddy
#112 - anon (09/27/2016) [-]
...what?

It's a pretty basic concept...it's a fcking poll.

X% of those polled said one thing, Y% said the other, etc.
User avatar
#134 - cdm (09/27/2016) [-]
He's not asking what the data is, he's asking how it should be interpreted. The fact that there was a site like FJ telling people to go vote in these polls is... y'know, suggestive that the polls are probably, definitely skewed away from what people actually believe. It's called "Voluntary Response Bias." Put another way, he's asking whether the majority of people actually think Trump won, or if Trump supporters were just more likely to vote.
User avatar
#106 - walcorn (09/27/2016) [-]
35.63% of people polled voted for Clinton obviously
There is no way of telling the grand total amount of clinton supporters unless they ALL get off their asses and vote
#95 - Wait, does this mean x% of ppl voted for y, or x% of y-support…  [+] (8 replies) 09/27/2016 on WHO WON THE DEBATE POLLS 0
User avatar
#97 - walcorn (09/27/2016) [-]
what
User avatar
#105 - thekeeperofthumbs (09/27/2016) [-]
35.63% of people polled voted for Clinton
or
35.63% of Clinton supporters got off their asses and voted
User avatar
#209 - vinskinator (09/28/2016) [-]
the latter.. its an web poll, literally people need to go to the site themselves and click the button before the time is up.
User avatar
#223 - walcorn (09/28/2016) [-]
Are you stupid?
How can you be certain that exactly 35.63% of the people supporting Hillary voted in polls?
It's a fucking poll, it says nothing about the people who chose not to participate.
User avatar
#224 - vinskinator (18 hours ago) [-]
woah, sorry misread buddy
but it was not "people polled" either. these polls just put a question online, that is not the same as a scientific poll.

the 'got off their ass and voted in every available poll because their internet troll community provided them all links and they had nothing better to do with their lives' is what I meant to use to explain a skewed data sample.

My mistake, but chill out buddy
#112 - anon (09/27/2016) [-]
...what?

It's a pretty basic concept...it's a fcking poll.

X% of those polled said one thing, Y% said the other, etc.
User avatar
#134 - cdm (09/27/2016) [-]
He's not asking what the data is, he's asking how it should be interpreted. The fact that there was a site like FJ telling people to go vote in these polls is... y'know, suggestive that the polls are probably, definitely skewed away from what people actually believe. It's called "Voluntary Response Bias." Put another way, he's asking whether the majority of people actually think Trump won, or if Trump supporters were just more likely to vote.
User avatar
#106 - walcorn (09/27/2016) [-]
35.63% of people polled voted for Clinton obviously
There is no way of telling the grand total amount of clinton supporters unless they ALL get off their asses and vote