Login or register
Login or register
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter e-mailed to you
Rank #35866 on Subscribers
Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius
Send mail to thefunnykiller
Invite thefunnykiller to be your friend
Last status update:
Date Signed Up:
Content Level Progress:
Level 26 Content: Peasant → Level 27 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress:
Level 217 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius
Times Content Favorited:
Total Comments Made:
i dont do tags (15)
What people say about thefunnykiller
latest user's comments
- It's just a cultural thing. There's no universal logic to it.
- but the crust is the best part
- Britain was a confederate ally in the American Civil War...
Nope. Not an ally. Not a foe, but not an ally.
That's a common misconception and no study backs this.
for an explanation please read the reply I wrote to yodawgiheard
Bah, I don't think it's a
misconception. Most people's knowledge about the Civil War is if not limited, restricted to American battles and American politics. Most people figure the War was basically an in-house affair. Which isn't entirely wrong. The influential countries of the time (e.g France, Germany, England), and the other countries in the region (e.g Mexico, Brazil, etc) mostly just played a waiting game, seeing who would win. Then they'd presumably back the winners. which is what eventually happened.
The common misconception in the US is that the British fought against the US because they were bitter about their independence. True, that some people in Britain were bitter, but they never supported the South
Not as a whole. Some did. Some aristocrats saw (correctly I might add) the Southern aristocracy as an extension of their own, and were therefore sympathetic. Others were sympathetic for economic reasons. I guess what I'm trying to say is, if they were truly so gung-ho about ending slavery (and the links you provided are some things that I've never heard about, thank you), then why didn't they help the Union? Or not send armaments to the Confederacy (though they were hardly the only ones, the Confederacy got guns and parts from all over, including Mexico and Brazil), instead of just waiting it out and supporting the winner?
- It's not staryu... it's HYAH
- Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
FJ's fav games results
- I think this was explained a bit in the red hood animated movi…
Nothing's sacred anymore
When Alfred breaks and shoots him under the same revolt principal. It would happen eventually. Bruce would never expect it, and while Alfred loves him like a son, thats exactly why he would do it, he wouldn't be able to bear seeing Bruce finally shatter, even if it was for the greater good, and he would put an end to it. The difference is, he is sane, and will accept punishment as penance for his crime instead of continuing it. Batman wins all fights if prepared, but he would never be prepared for the one person in the world he actually trusts to put an end to him out of mercy, and its exactly what would happen.
- **thefunnykiller rolls 1,788**
- 4U2PN2 "For you to pee into"
Saw This On a Urinal
- Danny in Jon's hat? No. Just no.
What would you do?
Was wondering if anyone would call me out on that...
Show Comments (20)