x
Click to expand

thefirespike

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:11/07/2010
Last Login:2/27/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#21888
Highest Content Rank:#12064
Highest Comment Rank:#4748
Content Thumbs: 230 total,  344 ,  114
Comment Thumbs: 956 total,  1129 ,  173
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 23 Content: Peasant → Level 24 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 30% (3/10)
Level 189 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 190 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Subscribers:0
Content Views:13873
Times Content Favorited:6 times
Total Comments Made:505
FJ Points:1255
Favorite Tags: FJ (2) | game (2) | see (2) | the (2)

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 5394
    Thumbs Up 92 Thumbs Down 15 Total: +77
    Comments: 11
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 06/07/12
    son i am dissapoint son i am dissapoint
  • Views: 1267
    Thumbs Up 29 Thumbs Down 4 Total: +25
    Comments: 8
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 11/22/11
    bands bands
  • Views: 991
    Thumbs Up 26 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +25
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/22/11
    Look! FJ! oh wait Look! FJ! oh wait
  • Views: 844
    Thumbs Up 22 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +17
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 06/10/11
    Nes Zapper Nes Zapper
  • Views: 1413
    Thumbs Up 15 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +14
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/19/11
    Gamer girls Gamer girls
  • Views: 1393
    Thumbs Up 20 Thumbs Down 8 Total: +12
    Comments: 6
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/26/10
    lol lol
1 2 3 > [ 18 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#97 - how i consider it is thaumaturge and theurgist is just the gen… 02/17/2015 on Freshly squeezed OC +1
#30 - yeah, I'm gonna become a lich eventually. i may not have worde…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/16/2015 on D&D ALL 4E UNDEAD 0
User avatar #31 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Oh, then I have what you are looking for right... here rp g.stackexchange.c om/questions/36581/is-it-possible-to-create-undead-with-class-levels

It is more of a comprehensive answer than I could give, the TL;DR answer is that you cannot make an undead and say "By the way, I made this guy with 10 levels of Wizard.", you have to find a wizard, kill him/her, and then raise him/her as a Huecuva or a similar undead (anything that keeps their respective casting score works, the link gives some options) , a good way to get around that requirement perhaps would be to take on the Leadership feat, have a loyal cohort that is willing to die for you... and kill him/her and then raise, only to get a new cohort and do the same with the new cohort, ad infinitum.
#25 - After google-ing a bit I'm mostly interested in the bone creat… 02/16/2015 on D&D ALL 4E UNDEAD 0
#17 - so I'm preparing to play my first campaign ever with a few fri…  [+] (20 new replies) 02/16/2015 on D&D ALL 4E UNDEAD 0
User avatar #27 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
A Lich is what you are looking for, Liches retains their minds after transitioning to undead, and gain all the bonuses from being a Lich, the process is described on pages 167-168 of the Monster Manual I, but it only denotes the mechanical part of becoming a Lich, the proper ritual and fluff for the ritual is to be decided between player and DM, so go ahead and get crazy, if you need help on figuring it all out, Libris Mortis might be a very good book to look into and get some ideas.

Vampires also work, but Liches are generally better, becoming a vampire is highly situational, where becoming a Lich can be done by your own devices, plus, most special abilities gained from being a Vampire are of little use to a caster, so that's another point towards being a Lich, if you do want to be a Vampire, the mechanical details are on pages 252-253 of Monster Manual I.

Keep in mind seeking either of those is irremediably evil, but I suspect your character is already evil from being a Dread Necromancer, so that's not much of an issue.
User avatar #30 - thefirespike (02/16/2015) [-]
yeah, I'm gonna become a lich eventually. i may not have worded it right at first but basically what I'm wanting is to make minions with class levels. so i can have some skeleton wizards and the likes in my ranks.
User avatar #31 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Oh, then I have what you are looking for right... here rp g.stackexchange.c om/questions/36581/is-it-possible-to-create-undead-with-class-levels

It is more of a comprehensive answer than I could give, the TL;DR answer is that you cannot make an undead and say "By the way, I made this guy with 10 levels of Wizard.", you have to find a wizard, kill him/her, and then raise him/her as a Huecuva or a similar undead (anything that keeps their respective casting score works, the link gives some options) , a good way to get around that requirement perhaps would be to take on the Leadership feat, have a loyal cohort that is willing to die for you... and kill him/her and then raise, only to get a new cohort and do the same with the new cohort, ad infinitum.
User avatar #19 - tigtone (02/16/2015) [-]
Vampires and Liches retain their previous abilities and become stronger, so regarding the official SRD that's as close as you can get.

Although dndxplain or veya will probably know more than me regarding the player templates.
#41 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Can I just say that I am incredibly flattered that you consider me knowledgeable enough to point people my direction for DnD information?
#42 - tigtone (02/16/2015) [-]
I only ever get to DM, so my understanding of the many intricate character templates is limited, although I can guarantee you I know Rogue from top to bottom from the back of my head.

Rogues be using defensive roll on my traps like fuck that.
User avatar #20 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
there aren't many player templates for liches, and vampires are considered a race.
User avatar #25 - thefirespike (02/16/2015) [-]
After google-ing a bit I'm mostly interested in the bone creature and corpse creature templates (BoVD 184-5) it says they can arise from a create undead or create greater undead spell. I'm not sure how to do that though, and I dont think those spells gives me control over them.
User avatar #21 - tigtone (02/16/2015) [-]
Even better, be a vampire lich. all g.
User avatar #22 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
technically viable, but the usual prerequisits for lichdom require you to be living first.
User avatar #23 - tigtone (02/16/2015) [-]
I wonder what happens if you do both rituals at the same time.
User avatar #24 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
that...
is a good question.
User avatar #28 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
And those are the points the DM have to step in and say "Nope, not happening.", I guess.
User avatar #29 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
I have to do some research
User avatar #32 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Well, ring me up if you find anything, I am going with "You can't do both at exact same time, and whichever is first, even if a milisecond first, is the one that sticks." or "The soul can't take it and is destroyed.", either way, it can't work, it shouldn't be allowed to work.
User avatar #33 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
the only issue I'm finding is more a whole "well how would you perform two rituals"
User avatar #36 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Perhaps you could use Simulacrum to have your clone perform one ritual, and then step in to receive the effect? it would at least remove the issue of dealing with the ritual itself, and the clone is technically you.
User avatar #38 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
honestly that might work...
User avatar #44 - veya (02/16/2015) [-]
Alright, if you figure everything out, make a post about it or something, I am interested in the end result.
User avatar #84 - dndxplain (02/16/2015) [-]
from what it looks like, there's nothing stopping you from doing both rituals.
#969 - Ill give that a shot, and ill be fine i just needed to get it …  [+] (1 new reply) 02/05/2015 on How will you spend the rest... +1
User avatar #971 - tikitaco (02/05/2015) [-]
No problem, I'm here to listen!
#966 - She wasn't mean or anything, and there aren't any hard feeling…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/05/2015 on How will you spend the rest... 0
#986 - sacredsouless (02/05/2015) [-]
I get them feels. First bitch i was in love with i friendzone cause I was bout to leave to a different country. I don't want to be douche who insists she be exclusive with a dude she can't see. I care a lot about women. I love them long time.
#947 - Damn forgot anon, oh well. 02/05/2015 on How will you spend the rest... +1
#944 - Thanks. Ive been dumped before, and have always just brushed m…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/05/2015 on How will you spend the rest... 0
User avatar #950 - tikitaco (02/05/2015) [-]
I'll be on for a bit longer if you need someone to talk too! I'm pretty exciting so talking to me won't help with that sleeping problem though I recommend just laying down and thinking about life and playing some music. If you're getting too overwhelmed by feelings, just pack it in and save them for another day as you're just wasting unnecessary energy
User avatar #969 - thefirespike (02/05/2015) [-]
Ill give that a shot, and ill be fine i just needed to get it all off my chest. Thanks for listening man.
User avatar #971 - tikitaco (02/05/2015) [-]
No problem, I'm here to listen!
User avatar #947 - thefirespike (02/05/2015) [-]
Damn forgot anon, oh well.
#205 - yeah, pretty much what that movie said, but they were only gon… 02/04/2015 on The Government 0
#190 - one thing I've read involved putting it all in special contain…  [+] (16 new replies) 02/04/2015 on The Government 0
#192 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
I don't view that as a solution at all. This to me is like sweeping dirt under the rug. It's still there and you just have to clean it up later.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Into_Eternity_ (film)
User avatar #205 - thefirespike (02/04/2015) [-]
yeah, pretty much what that movie said, but they were only gonna store it there for a set amount of time I think it was like 150 years but that may be wrong until the radiation died down to safe levels or at least saferER levels , but i cant remember what the plan was after that. my knowledge of it is pretty limited though. I did like a two page pager on it about two years ago.
User avatar #204 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
these materials will become far less dangerous over time though. They have half lives y'know. After a while they all become inert.
#218 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
Yeah, the half lives for things like Uranium and plutonium are 4 billion years and 24,000 respectively, I don't exactly see that as a good thing.
User avatar #221 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
Things with long half lives are remarkably inert anyways. Perhaps in massive quantities they're dangerous, but yeah... if it takes billions of years to decay that means it's not exactly shooting out radioactive particles all that quickly.
#223 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
So we can move back into Chernobyl soon? Best estimates I read are around 25,000 years for it to be safe again.
User avatar #228 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
Chernobyl's meltdown is very different from regular nuclear waste. Also, Chernobyl should be interesting because new species that scrub radioactivity are flourishing. We may end up having a way to clean up radioactive materials, eh?
#239 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
Which would be cool if that's the outcome but again, it's obviously proven to be dangerous even if it's not in a reactor anymore. And I think it's on a level of dangerous that we shouldn't be moving forward with it. Yes it works, absolutely, I just think the risks to the people are too high to be using it moving forward when renewable sources are getting better all the time. We should have as much diversity in it as we can so if one system fails we have others to rely on.
User avatar #243 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
>we should have diversity
>we shouldn't use nuclear

pick one.
#246 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
It shouldn't just be Nuclear. Yes we have it now but we should be working towards other means to not only strengthen our system but get us off of nuclear energy. And before you say it, YES I know we have other sources now and not just Nuclear. I'm saying moving forward, we should understand that we are going to run out of coal and oil eventually and should be focusing on replacing those as well.
User avatar #248 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
You've really made a monster out of nuclear. All things considered, nuclear is far better for the environment than coal and oil...
#250 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
Not saying it's a monster, just too dangerous for me and I think we can do better. I know coal and oil suck for environmental concerns which is why I'm saying we should be getting off those as well. If they were cleaner it may not be an issue since they're safer than nuclear. It's a trade off between them, some are safe and dirty, others are clean and unsafe. I'd prefer clean and safe.
User avatar #253 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

I don't think your understanding of the legitimate threat of nuclear power is well founded. Your only reference is to a meltdown that was allowed to go unchecked for weeks and was plugged up by the fucking soviets. If that's your barometer for safety then you're OBVIOUSLY going to think the power is dangerous.

Look at the Fukushima disaster. That's what a modern meltdown looks like. A scare with minimal to no noticeable aftereffect.
#261 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
Not just Chernobyl has had issues recently. But again it's also the waste as well. Again, just giving my opinion that I don't view them as safe or a good alternative. Issues still develop when they fail which leads to harm going to the public. About 156,000 people were displaced from the disaster because they were too close to the power plant. (fukushima) Now, if it's fine, why did they have to leave? That's the issue to me. If you have to run from it, it's not safe. Just like fracking how it makes water ignite. That to me says we should not be doing it if we make our drinking water flammable.
User avatar #263 - Sethorein (02/04/2015) [-]
they had to leave incase the multiple failsafes failed and the situation did become dangerous. A tsunami paired with an earthquake was not enough to overwhelm this plant. I think that's safe enough for me, eh?

Fracking is bad because it removed water from the water basin and contributes to more tectonic activity. Flaming water is the least of our concern. Especially since companies refuse to disclose how they're manipulating fracking water.
#273 - pyrusd (02/04/2015) [-]
"Incase" but it can happen. Trust me get where you're coming from. To me it's like saying drive this car. It's fast, it's stylish, it pollutes a bit but we can manage it. Oh yeah? Any issues? Well if you go 300 mph and hit something it'll explode and kill everyone within 300 feet of you. Uhhh....why does it explode like that? Oh don't worry about it, the car can't go 300 mph so you don't have anything to worry about. No serious why the fuck does my car explode?

That's what I'm getting at. It may be unlikely but it's still a large failure if it does fail. If it were to fail and the building collapsed and that was it then I don't really care. Just make sure the workers know.

user's channels

Join Subscribe doctor-who

user's friends

items

Total unique items point value: 1268 / Total items point value: 3881
[ 29 items Total ]

Comments(0):

 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)