Upload
Login or register

thebtardist

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:11/03/2010
Last Login:5/26/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 2891 total,  3215 ,  324
Comment Thumbs: 2218 total,  3288 ,  1070
Content Level Progress: 84% (84/100)
Level 128 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 129 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 52% (52/100)
Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 220 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:16
Content Views:23371
Times Content Favorited:158 times
Total Comments Made:1201
FJ Points:4965
Favorite Tags: b (5) | Stoner (5) | btardist (4) | funny (3) | chan (2) | colours (2) | internet (2) | the (2) | thegame (2)

latest user's comments

#17 - Your implying that islam isnt the only violent religion.  [+] (2 replies) 03/22/2016 on Bruxelles attacked 0
User avatar
#18 - paradoxofnight (03/22/2016) [-]
Well sorry, that wasn't my intention. What I meant was just to mock people who inist that Islam is entirely peaceful.
User avatar
#21 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Who the fuck is saying that??
#165 - So if i post lies on the internet Its ok as long as it has a m…  [+] (2 replies) 03/22/2016 on Terrorist attack in Brussels +1
#242 - sulins (03/22/2016) [-]
There's a difference between posting a lie and posting something clever/true/whatever said by someone stupid or someone you don't like.
Just because they are unpopular I don't know who Katie Hopkins is, so just use any other suitable word doesn't make the stuff they say less true.

And I agree, that facebook and cartoon bullshit is fucking shit and it's disrespectful to the victims. Just my opinion...
User avatar
#167 - lotengo (03/22/2016) [-]
Lies?
I dont know who the hell that person is. The tweet itself could come from either come from Bruce Jenner's snipped of dick for all i care, the message is correct and its not a lie
#34 - Direct qoute from the poll "The ICM opinion poll…  [+] (1 reply) 03/22/2016 on Best wishes for Belgium 0
User avatar
#36 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
WHAT AGGRESSOR IS THERE IN INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM!?
#31 - Yes because all 25-44,000 muslims hid the terrorists. Every si…  [+] (2 replies) 03/22/2016 on Best wishes for Belgium -2
#35 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
enough did.

because it's not been covered ANYWHERE, right-wing nutjob sites are the ONLY ONES WILLING TO REPORT IT m.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160321_02194969

you know that's the very reason the UN is not allowing immigration from china to taiwan right? They'd out-number the local population, vote to join china, and it'd lose independence.
User avatar
#41 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Enough did?? what? How do you know how many did? and what is enough? 1-2? Your just making up shit now

What? willing to report? What does that even mean, maybe in the USA people hate a news company for reporting on things but in the UK we have impartial news reporters like BBC, Channel 4, ITV. So theirs no amount of "unwilling to report"

Implying that muslims could pour into UK without Uk government halting immigration.
#28 - You understand how democracy works, even if they were 30% of t…  [+] (7 replies) 03/22/2016 on Best wishes for Belgium -3
User avatar
#32 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
oh, and those 2.2 million in UK? 20% openly think the 7/7 attacks in 2005 in the uk were justified.

www.cbsnews.com/news/many-british-muslims-put-islam-first/
www.webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html

But, hey, it's only a tiny amount of them.
User avatar
#34 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Direct qoute from the poll

"The ICM opinion poll also indicates that a fifth have sympathy with the "feelings and motives" of the suicide bombers who attacked London last July 7, killing 52 people, although 99 per cent thought the bombers were wrong to carry out the atrocity"

So 20% had sympathy with the motives, so about 400,000 people, but nearly 100% thought they were wrong to do so?


Its almost like they thought their motives for violence might be based on some outside aggressor...
User avatar
#36 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
WHAT AGGRESSOR IS THERE IN INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM!?
#29 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
are the muslims in brussels extremists? Didn't they hide the man who had a hand in planning the paris attacks for four months and 200 of them riots after his arrest? Doesn't the attack yesterday there feel rushed after news agencies released information from his interrogation that there was more attacks being planned and was willing to disclose them for lighter sentence?

It doesn't matter if you agree with what some one did or not, if they did it for the same value systems you hold you're likely to help them.

Add to that, hate pulling Poe's law here, but the nazi party -wasn't- the majority party, I think it was around 30% support or such. It doesn't matter if they're majority, it matters that they have power, which they're easily gaining through mass immigration.
User avatar
#31 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Yes because all 25-44,000 muslims hid the terrorists. Every single one of them helped.

I only found one report of a riot and it was from right wing scumbag rag paper the express.

The attack was being planned while he was captured and was probably in retalition for his capture.

What? So if a christain man goes and murders 50 people in the name of god, your saying that all christains are to blame because he " did it for the same value systems you hold you're likely to help them. "

Hahaha comparing a group that used armed thugs and poltical intrigue to manipulate the parliement into fearing the communists,then the Reichstag's fire, followed by removing any oppsition in parliment (those who were leading in polls).
Your talking to someone here whos studied hitlers rise to power for 7 years of his life, muslims would need to not only need every single muslim to vote them into power (30% in our little simulation) but also have the entire of the UK like them more than they fear someone like a communist party or another party. Giving them the power.

You would need 12 million muslims to immigrate into the UK to gain anything throug mass immigration and theyd all need to be radical.

Your just talking comeplete and utter bullshit, this is the problem with you right wing tards. You dont even do any research

I could say that the chinese of America are going to take over by voting in their own people in to power and also immigrating 100 million chinese to America and that would be as true as your statement.
#35 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
enough did.

because it's not been covered ANYWHERE, right-wing nutjob sites are the ONLY ONES WILLING TO REPORT IT m.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160321_02194969

you know that's the very reason the UN is not allowing immigration from china to taiwan right? They'd out-number the local population, vote to join china, and it'd lose independence.
User avatar
#41 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Enough did?? what? How do you know how many did? and what is enough? 1-2? Your just making up shit now

What? willing to report? What does that even mean, maybe in the USA people hate a news company for reporting on things but in the UK we have impartial news reporters like BBC, Channel 4, ITV. So theirs no amount of "unwilling to report"

Implying that muslims could pour into UK without Uk government halting immigration.
#26 - And how does more violent = more power in a democracy.  [+] (9 replies) 03/22/2016 on Best wishes for Belgium -2
User avatar
#27 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
more numbers, more ability. More ability, more attempts.

more numbers, more votes. More votes, higher chances.

The old saying of "Strength in numbers" rings very true since democracy is basically mob control.
User avatar
#28 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
You understand how democracy works, even if they were 30% of the population,theyd still not be a majority

more ability to what though, ability to kill people? You think all 2.2 million muslims in the uk are extremists?
User avatar
#32 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
oh, and those 2.2 million in UK? 20% openly think the 7/7 attacks in 2005 in the uk were justified.

www.cbsnews.com/news/many-british-muslims-put-islam-first/
www.webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html

But, hey, it's only a tiny amount of them.
User avatar
#34 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Direct qoute from the poll

"The ICM opinion poll also indicates that a fifth have sympathy with the "feelings and motives" of the suicide bombers who attacked London last July 7, killing 52 people, although 99 per cent thought the bombers were wrong to carry out the atrocity"

So 20% had sympathy with the motives, so about 400,000 people, but nearly 100% thought they were wrong to do so?


Its almost like they thought their motives for violence might be based on some outside aggressor...
User avatar
#36 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
WHAT AGGRESSOR IS THERE IN INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM!?
#29 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
are the muslims in brussels extremists? Didn't they hide the man who had a hand in planning the paris attacks for four months and 200 of them riots after his arrest? Doesn't the attack yesterday there feel rushed after news agencies released information from his interrogation that there was more attacks being planned and was willing to disclose them for lighter sentence?

It doesn't matter if you agree with what some one did or not, if they did it for the same value systems you hold you're likely to help them.

Add to that, hate pulling Poe's law here, but the nazi party -wasn't- the majority party, I think it was around 30% support or such. It doesn't matter if they're majority, it matters that they have power, which they're easily gaining through mass immigration.
User avatar
#31 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Yes because all 25-44,000 muslims hid the terrorists. Every single one of them helped.

I only found one report of a riot and it was from right wing scumbag rag paper the express.

The attack was being planned while he was captured and was probably in retalition for his capture.

What? So if a christain man goes and murders 50 people in the name of god, your saying that all christains are to blame because he " did it for the same value systems you hold you're likely to help them. "

Hahaha comparing a group that used armed thugs and poltical intrigue to manipulate the parliement into fearing the communists,then the Reichstag's fire, followed by removing any oppsition in parliment (those who were leading in polls).
Your talking to someone here whos studied hitlers rise to power for 7 years of his life, muslims would need to not only need every single muslim to vote them into power (30% in our little simulation) but also have the entire of the UK like them more than they fear someone like a communist party or another party. Giving them the power.

You would need 12 million muslims to immigrate into the UK to gain anything throug mass immigration and theyd all need to be radical.

Your just talking comeplete and utter bullshit, this is the problem with you right wing tards. You dont even do any research

I could say that the chinese of America are going to take over by voting in their own people in to power and also immigrating 100 million chinese to America and that would be as true as your statement.
#35 - sircool (03/22/2016) [-]
enough did.

because it's not been covered ANYWHERE, right-wing nutjob sites are the ONLY ONES WILLING TO REPORT IT m.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160321_02194969

you know that's the very reason the UN is not allowing immigration from china to taiwan right? They'd out-number the local population, vote to join china, and it'd lose independence.
User avatar
#41 - thebtardist (03/22/2016) [-]
Enough did?? what? How do you know how many did? and what is enough? 1-2? Your just making up shit now

What? willing to report? What does that even mean, maybe in the USA people hate a news company for reporting on things but in the UK we have impartial news reporters like BBC, Channel 4, ITV. So theirs no amount of "unwilling to report"

Implying that muslims could pour into UK without Uk government halting immigration.