Rank #6014 on CommentsLevel 225 Comments: Mind Blower
OfflineSend mail to theaddviser Block theaddviser Invite theaddviser to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||3/17/2011|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Highest Content Rank:||#8088|
|Highest Comment Rank:||#4759|
|Content Thumbs:||139 total, 510 , 371|
|Comment Thumbs:||2836 total, 3739 , 903|
|Content Level Progress:|| 70% (7/10) |
Level 13 Content: New Here → Level 14 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 18% (18/100) |
Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
|Times Content Favorited:||20 times|
|Total Comments Made:||2027|
|Favorite Tags:||The Game (5) | comp (4) | shit (3) | Signs (3) | Animals (2) | tag (2) | troll (2)|
latest user's comments
|#181 - Never said they couldn't. And when these statistics are gather…||06/18/2016 on Ethos||0|
|#41 - Because anything compared to a course where you learn about; … [+] (36 new replies)||06/18/2016 on Ethos||+1|
#181 - theaddviser (06/18/2016) [-]
Never said they couldn't. And when these statistics are gathered they have to be as accurate as possible if they to help Society in any meaningful way. So women studies is still not as essential as a science course.
Mainly because the statistics they generally refer to are the ones I referred to as "debunked myths"
4/5 women are raped on college campuses
The fucking patriarchy
Take your pick.
#50 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
They don't when you ignore every variable besides "money in paycheck" and "thing between legs." For fucks sake, the wage studies don't even take into account hours worked or job title. As far as the people who made it are concerned, a nuclear physicists is comparable to a housewife.
#64 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
No fucking shit Sherlock. You figure that one out all on your own? My point is that the "Science" claiming the wage gap exists is broken and useless. It is counterproductive to the betterment of society because it uses biased statistics.
You call me a tool because I tell you that the studies used to make the claim of a wage gap are broken. Fine, I'd rather be useful instead of the paint filled egg dropped from the gaping vagina of a feminist in her performance art piece that you are. Don't leave any stains on your way out paint-egg.
#119 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Sorry, friend. We had a huge storm and my connection broke for the past few hours.
As for your point:
But that's not a "science", it's a stance on the interpretation of the statistics that have been given to them by social sciences.
I can give you any fact and you can contort it any way you like; it doesn't make the research behind it biased in any way.
The point of the sociological research is this: men make more than women across all of society. How one evaluates and analyzes this evidence and the many factors behind it will give you answers ranging from "Well, it's simply meritocracy and free market. So what?" to "PATRIARCHYYYYYYYYYYYY!"
Usually, a good debate settles everything about this "unfair" wage gap bullshit. A few statistics and good formal reasoning.
If a physicist says that the Earth revolves around the sun and a retard understands it as "Well then climate change can't be true since the Earth must act as a fan to the sun and cool it down", would you blame the whole field of physics for being "biased"?
#152 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
You have the methodology backwards. I don't say the studies are biased because they claim "patriarchy" I say they are biased because they ignore huge swaths of variables in order to make the gap as large as possible. Hours worked, job title/position, overtime pay, and time at company in question.
At some places the difference between a new hire and a person who's been working there for 4 years is as much as $10/hour. Ignoring the time with the company, you could easily claim that men make twice what women do if the starting pay was $10/hour at that company, the new hire was a woman, and you compared that person to a man who had been there for 4 years.
#195 - anon (06/19/2016) [-]
you use this pic way too often faggot
get more creative you piece of shit
#63 - anon (06/18/2016) [-]
But you did block me...
#196 - anon (06/19/2016) [-]
This faggot over here blocks anyone that cant handle
He is the master of cucks
#58 - anon (06/18/2016) [-]
You didn't understand the point I made about Brad Pitt, correct?
Brad Pitt makes 100x and more of what a nuclear physicist makes. This is because society rewards his skills and efforts more.
Do you think that's fair?
You actually blocked me for not agreeing with you. How SJW of you.
|#7 - You mean that wasn't his original goal? [+] (1 new reply)||06/17/2016 on Are you kidding me?||+45|
|#34 - I seem to have run out of money to throw at the screen.||06/16/2016 on /a/ makes a Fantasy Anime||+3|
|#1641 - **theaddviser used "*roll picture*"** **theaddviser rolled …||06/11/2016 on Roll for your college...||0|
|#100 - No that would be the new ghostbusters.||06/11/2016 on super she boon||+1|
|#40 - T_T||06/09/2016 on Nips||+1|
|#41 - Implying people live past the first one they try.||06/08/2016 on Roll it up and fuck my face...||+1|
|#166 - A Yorkshire Terrier||06/07/2016 on No safety for FJ||0|
|#307 - Of course it can once, enough terrorist sneak in with the immi…||06/06/2016 on islam comp: Tenzin Gyatso...||0|