Upload
Login or register

theaddviser

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:3/17/2011
Last Login:6/27/2016
Location:NC Richlands
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#6014
Highest Content Rank:#8088
Highest Comment Rank:#4759
Content Thumbs: 139 total,  510 ,  371
Comment Thumbs: 2836 total,  3739 ,  903
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 13 Content: New Here → Level 14 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 18% (18/100)
Level 225 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 226 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:21783
Times Content Favorited:20 times
Total Comments Made:2027
FJ Points:2813
Favorite Tags: The Game (5) | comp (4) | shit (3) | Signs (3) | Animals (2) | tag (2) | troll (2)
BACON

latest user's comments

#181 - Never said they couldn't. And when these statistics are gather… 06/18/2016 on Ethos 0
#41 - Because anything compared to a course where you learn about; …  [+] (36 new replies) 06/18/2016 on Ethos +1
#46 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
And statistics on society don't contribute to the betterment of society?
User avatar
#181 - theaddviser (06/18/2016) [-]
Never said they couldn't. And when these statistics are gathered they have to be as accurate as possible if they to help Society in any meaningful way. So women studies is still not as essential as a science course.
Mainly because the statistics they generally refer to are the ones I referred to as "debunked myths"
Wage gap
4/5 women are raped on college campuses
The fucking patriarchy
Take your pick.
#50 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
They don't when you ignore every variable besides "money in paycheck" and "thing between legs." For fucks sake, the wage studies don't even take into account hours worked or job title. As far as the people who made it are concerned, a nuclear physicists is comparable to a housewife.
#54 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Or Brad Pitt to a nuclear physicist, right? Oh, meritocracy. We love you dearly, huh?

You are a tool.

And the main point is that an actual well-informed academia could help us wreck retarded myths and help us address the real problems more appropriately.
#68 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Naw, you're trying to play it off like a homo. You're getting notifications about my replies and posting as anon.

But I'll block you now! Dumbass.
#69 - anon (06/18/2016) [-]
>>#65

You are obviously retarded. But at any rate, have fun.

-MigueldeCervantes
#74 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
#64 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
No fucking shit Sherlock. You figure that one out all on your own? My point is that the "Science" claiming the wage gap exists is broken and useless. It is counterproductive to the betterment of society because it uses biased statistics.

You call me a tool because I tell you that the studies used to make the claim of a wage gap are broken. Fine, I'd rather be useful instead of the paint filled egg dropped from the gaping vagina of a feminist in her performance art piece that you are. Don't leave any stains on your way out paint-egg.
#67 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
I'm sure you're very fucking useful, you retarded cunt. You probably sit around all day NEETing on FJ. Even an Ethnic studies major is more useful than you, you fucking dipshit.
#80 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
What did I tell you about leaving your paint stains?
#84 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Oh. You'll just keep replying "paint stains paint stains paint stains" to everything I say at this point. I know how 12 year olds work. Don't worry.

At any rate, have a good one.
#87 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
Until you stop acting like a cuckoo bird and address the point I made, yes, I will continue dismissing you with the level of understanding that you are used to. Pull playground shit, get playground treatment.
#88 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Uh-huh. What is the main point that you made, then?
#91 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
"My point is that the "Science" claiming the wage gap exists is broken and useless. It is counterproductive to the betterment of society because it uses biased statistics."

That about sums it up well enough.
#119 - migueldecervantes (06/18/2016) [-]
Sorry, friend. We had a huge storm and my connection broke for the past few hours.

As for your point:

But that's not a "science", it's a stance on the interpretation of the statistics that have been given to them by social sciences.

I can give you any fact and you can contort it any way you like; it doesn't make the research behind it biased in any way.

The point of the sociological research is this: men make more than women across all of society. How one evaluates and analyzes this evidence and the many factors behind it will give you answers ranging from "Well, it's simply meritocracy and free market. So what?" to "PATRIARCHYYYYYYYYYYYY!"

Usually, a good debate settles everything about this "unfair" wage gap bullshit. A few statistics and good formal reasoning.

If a physicist says that the Earth revolves around the sun and a retard understands it as "Well then climate change can't be true since the Earth must act as a fan to the sun and cool it down", would you blame the whole field of physics for being "biased"?
#152 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
You have the methodology backwards. I don't say the studies are biased because they claim "patriarchy" I say they are biased because they ignore huge swaths of variables in order to make the gap as large as possible. Hours worked, job title/position, overtime pay, and time at company in question.

At some places the difference between a new hire and a person who's been working there for 4 years is as much as $10/hour. Ignoring the time with the company, you could easily claim that men make twice what women do if the starting pay was $10/hour at that company, the new hire was a woman, and you compared that person to a man who had been there for 4 years.
User avatar
#66 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Whoops. Wrong dude
#75 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
Holy shit this thread is a mess.
User avatar
#76 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
It won't let me delete, either
#77 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
No worries. I think this other guy is a troll.
User avatar
#79 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
He is, he said I blocked him, I checked his profile, he's disabled viewing on it, but he wasn't blocked.

12 year old autist shit right there.

Clicked block user and block content while I was in his profile tho. I highly recommend it.
#82 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
Nah, it's kinda fun poking the depressed slot in the eye sometimes. I don't think I've ever blocked anyone come to think of it.
User avatar
#83 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Lucky you.
#70 - shadowvision (06/18/2016) [-]
If you're being honest, fair enough. And yes, I do think it fair that an entertainer be paid more than a physicist. People will pay a premium to be happy, that's just how people are.
User avatar
#72 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Totally wasn't replying to you. You just popped into the thread and wasn't paying attention B)
#65 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Naw, you're trying to play it off like a homo. You're getting notifications about my replies and posting as anon.

But I'll block you now! Dumbass.
#195 - anon (06/19/2016) [-]
you use this pic way too often faggot
get more creative you piece of shit
#198 - nachobeldavid (06/19/2016) [-]
User avatar
#62 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Nice try with "YOU BLOCKED ME!!!!!!"

You're retarded, son.
#63 - anon (06/18/2016) [-]
But you did block me...

-MiguedeCervantes
#55 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
#196 - anon (06/19/2016) [-]
This faggot over here blocks anyone that cant handle
He is the master of cucks
I swear
#197 - nachobeldavid (06/19/2016) [-]
#58 - anon (06/18/2016) [-]
You didn't understand the point I made about Brad Pitt, correct?

Brad Pitt makes 100x and more of what a nuclear physicist makes. This is because society rewards his skills and efforts more.

Do you think that's fair?

-MigueldeCervantes

...

You actually blocked me for not agreeing with you. How SJW of you.
User avatar
#60 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
Unless you're some fucking jackass I blocked for being retarded in the past, then thats on you, turd monkey
User avatar
#59 - nachobeldavid (06/18/2016) [-]
I didn't block you, fucking retard.

Not going to debate with you because SEE ABOVE

Stop trying so hard.
#7 - You mean that wasn't his original goal?  [+] (1 new reply) 06/17/2016 on Are you kidding me? +45
#34 - migueldecervantes (06/17/2016) [-]
>implying people have intentions when they do something
#34 - I seem to have run out of money to throw at the screen. 06/16/2016 on /a/ makes a Fantasy Anime +3
#1641 - **theaddviser used "*roll picture*"** **theaddviser rolled … 06/11/2016 on Roll for your college... 0
#100 - No that would be the new ghostbusters. 06/11/2016 on super she boon +1
#40 - T_T 06/09/2016 on Nips +1
#41 - Implying people live past the first one they try. 06/08/2016 on Roll it up and fuck my face... +1
#166 - A Yorkshire Terrier 06/07/2016 on No safety for FJ 0
#307 - Of course it can once, enough terrorist sneak in with the immi… 06/06/2016 on islam comp: Tenzin Gyatso... 0