Upload
Login or register

templer

Last status update:
-
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:2/17/2011
Last Login:10/19/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 0 total,  17 ,  17
Comment Thumbs: 525 total,  625 ,  100
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 148 Comments: Faptastic → Level 149 Comments: Faptastic
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1905
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:183
FJ Points:500

  • Views: 905
    Thumbs Up 10 Thumbs Down 0 Total: +10
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 02/28/11
    Hail to the King Hail to the King
  • Views: 896
    Thumbs Up 4 Thumbs Down 3 Total: +1
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/24/12
    8-bit Trip 8-bit Trip
  • Views: 668
    Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 8 Total: -5
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/11/12
    Spy's Creed Spy's Creed

latest user's comments

#16 - I logged in to post so I would not hide as an anon. I don't kn…  [+] (19 replies) 10/10/2016 on what will happen in the... -1
User avatar
#62 - theugandanhero (10/10/2016) [-]
I'll leave it here with the rest of the garbage.
User avatar
#27 - freedomfiend (10/10/2016) [-]
The Greatest Speech Ever Made  Original
Trump is a business man who's owned hundreds of successful businesses. He and his peers are able to do one thing very well; delegate. As it is, delegating the right jobs to the right people is what makes up at least 75% of a president's job. I don't think he will do so well on the international politics scene, but then again, the US is in a pretty shit state right now. I'm sure I speak for most Americans when I say that I'd rather have the president focus on cleaning up the country before trying to improve foreign relations. George Washington wanted the USA to be isolationist, and while I don't entirely agree with him, I do think we need isolationism, at least for the time being.

Also, I don't know where you're getting that Hillary is better than Trump in any way. She is, without doubt, one of the most revolting human beings I know of. We already know what she does when she has some power ("lose" $6 billion, sell material and weapons to the highest bidder regardless of their allegiances, bully, harass, and intimidate anyone who gets in her way, etc). I genuinely fear for what this country may become if she were to become president; after all, power amplifies corruption, and she's already extremely corrupt as it is.

Not to mention, she uses the exact same scare tactics as Trump, and even takes it several steps further. She actively lies and cheats to get her way, and even openly commits crimes without indictment. Not to mention, most big news outlets are blatantly biased for her, and it wouldn't surprise me if it was because she was lining their pockets. Just two days ago, I got a phone call from a survey company that admitted that they supplied their data to news corporations. Not once during my interview did they ever ask a single question that painted Trump in a positive light, nor did they ever ask a negative question about Hillary. If I had answered as positively as possible for Trump and as negatively as possible for Hillary, it would have been registered as neutral/uncertain. If that's not bias, I don't know what is.

Sure, Trump's not great, but he's at least functional, and if he can get the right people, he may even be able to put this country on the right track. Hillary, on the other hand, is a vile monster, willing to corrupt and destroy anything that gets in the way of what she personally wants. She is exactly the kind of person that people like Charlie Chaplain in _The Dictator_ warned us about. I do not doubt that if she becomes the next president, she will surely be the next great villain of the world.
#22 - logicalreason (10/10/2016) [-]
Cowards like cowardly ideas. They don't have the stones to admit the only reason they support trump is because he wants to stop the 'brown' people from coming here.
User avatar
#54 - wootsauce (10/10/2016) [-]
"Stop the brown people"

OK lets pretend for a moment that that is true, tell me honestly, what would be wrong about that?
#74 - logicalreason (10/11/2016) [-]
Because the amount of melanin in a persons skin indicates nothing other than the amount of direct sunlight their ancestors had to endure, and is not an effective way to judge a persons traits.

I've met people of all races, there are white people I don't like, there are white people I do like. There are annoying 'hood rat' black people, and there are intelligent, diligent, hard working black people that contribute greatly to our society. There are lazy Mexican people I am sure of it, but I've never met one. There is good and bad in every population, that's just fact, but you cannot judge an entire population based on the actions of a few. If you do you are essentially doing the same thing as BLM. BLM say's that all white cops are racist, the majority of white people resent that accusation. If you say all Muslims are terrorists, the majority of Muslims are going to resent the accusation. There are racist cops, and there are terrorist Muslims, but neither represent the vast majority of their respective demographic.

Judge people based on their personal character and personality, not their religion or the shade of their skin, and you'll find mutual respect.
User avatar
#88 - wootsauce (10/11/2016) [-]
So thats a lot of feelings... why. Logically. Would stopping "brown people" from entering the country, be detrimental to the country?
#90 - logicalreason (10/11/2016) [-]
Because every time the US has accepted large groups of immigrants we benefit greatly. You have the British Colonies as your starting point. A large group of German and Dutch immigrants come over and clear and farm the midwest. Then a plethora of immigrants from all over Europe come here and bring their own unique contributions, like the differences in (Enlgish)English and (American)English coming mostly from French immigrants and cuisine from Italians. Then came the Irish and Chinese. The Chinese have made great contributions to the western half of our nation and to this day the majority of the NYPD is of Irish decent.

There is no reason to assume that Mexicans and refugees from the middle east will not be in the same situation in a generation or two. All of the groups I mentioned were hated and reviled by a lot of Americans at the time of their immigration, but today there is no denying the unmistakable impact they have had on our nation and its continuing development.
User avatar
#93 - wootsauce (10/11/2016) [-]
While Ellis Island immigrants benefited us greatly, they went through a process of being accepted. Those that failed were turned away. We are not employing that currently.

#94 - logicalreason (10/11/2016) [-]
Immigration limits weren't put in place until 1895. No one got turned away at Ellis Island. We currently have a far more rigorous screening process than we did when Ellis was still the entry point.
User avatar
#95 - wootsauce (10/12/2016) [-]
A quick Google search disputes your claims... immigrants were turned away for illness

www.ellisisland.se/english/ellisisland_immigration3.asp
#96 - logicalreason (10/12/2016) [-]
Wow. They turned away people who might bring deadly pathogens into the country. That's so much more thorough than the current process.

www.uscitizenship.info/articles/3-ways-to-immigrate-to-usa/

Now we wont let you in unless you already have a job here, or are married to a citizen.
User avatar
#97 - wootsauce (10/12/2016) [-]
So people got turned away at Ellis Island then.
#98 - logicalreason (10/12/2016) [-]
You obviously don't understand context. There were no limits on the number of immigrants we allowed in. If they were known criminals or diseased we didn't allow them in but we didn't turn anyone away because "America is full".
User avatar
#99 - wootsauce (10/12/2016) [-]
"No one got turned away at Ellis Island"

Proven false.
#100 - logicalreason (10/12/2016) [-]
Oh for fuck sake. How childish can a person be? You get proven wrong. So you have to find a technicality to cling to so your ego doesn't get bruised too badly.
User avatar
#101 - wootsauce (10/12/2016) [-]
Thats called Projection.
#102 - logicalreason (10/12/2016) [-]
Take it easy there Freud before your brother Nietzsche comes over and you two start a hoot'nanny all over my poor fragile psyche.
#103 - wootsauce (10/12/2016) [-]
Ok then. You have a good night!
#19 - theqotsakiller (10/10/2016) [-]
either that or youre just silly
#23 - Picture 01/10/2015 on Pikachu +36
#110 - even though yes you arn't suppose to use those skins they give…  [+] (1 reply) 12/02/2014 on That one bounced. 0
User avatar
#112 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
At high tiers the penetration really is high-enough for just about everything, especially for Tier 10 MTs.
Granted, if you absolutely, positively want to pen a E-100/Maus turret from the front, cHEAT ammo is your way to go. But even then, it's the fault of the E-100/Maus driver for not angling their turret, which they should be doing anyhow, since they need to expect everything penning their frontal turret armor.

Look, I'm probably one of the best examples of non-pay2win accusations. I NEVER bought a premium account, I did not buy either of the 3 premium tanks I own (IS-6, Super Pershing & KV-220), I got them through missions and the only gold I ever bought wast a MAXIMUM of 10 times buying the lowest package (220 gold IIRC) via text messages.
I'm no Unicum, but I don't consider myself a bad player at all. Go on noobmeter.com and search on the EU server player Fedaykin89.

Then come back and if you still believe in "p2w"
#102 - honestly the thing that bugs me about world of tanks is ther &…  [+] (3 replies) 12/02/2014 on That one bounced. 0
User avatar
#104 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
Well hit skin mods are officially banned, so you assume your chances by running such a mod.
Furthermore, an experienced player really doesn't need those hitboxes.

Second of all, gold rounds are NOT pay to win. They don't make you a better player, while they CAN make you a worse player by making you rely too much on them.
I for one couldn't care less about gold shells - they're in the game, they're here to stay... and they're a tool to be used when required.

For instance, in one game in my T-54 (in which, no, I did NOT spam HEAT, although it was tempting) I was left against a E-50 or E-50m that was only showing his turret somewhere above me. If I hadn't loaded HEAT to make sure I penned his frontal turret armor (a dodgy shot to begin with, not to mention I could have hit his gun mantlet for 0 dmg) I would have lost then & there.

Furthermore, what exactly is "pay to win" about gold rounds? You can shoot them yourself as a non-premium player, you know.
WoT is simply a "pay2grind less" game. They removed "pay2win" elements ever since patch 8.0
User avatar
#110 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
even though yes you arn't suppose to use those skins they give you all the tools to use them and there client side mods so it's not like they look at your game flies daily. so people still use them. and the gold shell are still very pay to when at high tear the cost to buy with gold vs silver is just silly at high tier.
User avatar
#112 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
At high tiers the penetration really is high-enough for just about everything, especially for Tier 10 MTs.
Granted, if you absolutely, positively want to pen a E-100/Maus turret from the front, cHEAT ammo is your way to go. But even then, it's the fault of the E-100/Maus driver for not angling their turret, which they should be doing anyhow, since they need to expect everything penning their frontal turret armor.

Look, I'm probably one of the best examples of non-pay2win accusations. I NEVER bought a premium account, I did not buy either of the 3 premium tanks I own (IS-6, Super Pershing & KV-220), I got them through missions and the only gold I ever bought wast a MAXIMUM of 10 times buying the lowest package (220 gold IIRC) via text messages.
I'm no Unicum, but I don't consider myself a bad player at all. Go on noobmeter.com and search on the EU server player Fedaykin89.

Then come back and if you still believe in "p2w"
#98 - they did and they added a kill cam thing that shows how the sh…  [+] (5 replies) 12/02/2014 on That one bounced. 0
User avatar
#99 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
I know, dude, I played it 2-3 nights ago.

What I meant was the tank's physics against other objects or, the most comical display of armored warfare of all time, tanks bumping into other tanks.

Compared to that, WoT's ramming system & physics model is light years above WarThunder, even though WarThunder recreates the actual tank motions better.
User avatar
#102 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
honestly the thing that bugs me about world of tanks is ther "mod" intgration tht lets people paint tanks weak points. AND lets not forget pay to win shell aka gold rounds.
User avatar
#104 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
Well hit skin mods are officially banned, so you assume your chances by running such a mod.
Furthermore, an experienced player really doesn't need those hitboxes.

Second of all, gold rounds are NOT pay to win. They don't make you a better player, while they CAN make you a worse player by making you rely too much on them.
I for one couldn't care less about gold shells - they're in the game, they're here to stay... and they're a tool to be used when required.

For instance, in one game in my T-54 (in which, no, I did NOT spam HEAT, although it was tempting) I was left against a E-50 or E-50m that was only showing his turret somewhere above me. If I hadn't loaded HEAT to make sure I penned his frontal turret armor (a dodgy shot to begin with, not to mention I could have hit his gun mantlet for 0 dmg) I would have lost then & there.

Furthermore, what exactly is "pay to win" about gold rounds? You can shoot them yourself as a non-premium player, you know.
WoT is simply a "pay2grind less" game. They removed "pay2win" elements ever since patch 8.0
User avatar
#110 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
even though yes you arn't suppose to use those skins they give you all the tools to use them and there client side mods so it's not like they look at your game flies daily. so people still use them. and the gold shell are still very pay to when at high tear the cost to buy with gold vs silver is just silly at high tier.
User avatar
#112 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
At high tiers the penetration really is high-enough for just about everything, especially for Tier 10 MTs.
Granted, if you absolutely, positively want to pen a E-100/Maus turret from the front, cHEAT ammo is your way to go. But even then, it's the fault of the E-100/Maus driver for not angling their turret, which they should be doing anyhow, since they need to expect everything penning their frontal turret armor.

Look, I'm probably one of the best examples of non-pay2win accusations. I NEVER bought a premium account, I did not buy either of the 3 premium tanks I own (IS-6, Super Pershing & KV-220), I got them through missions and the only gold I ever bought wast a MAXIMUM of 10 times buying the lowest package (220 gold IIRC) via text messages.
I'm no Unicum, but I don't consider myself a bad player at all. Go on noobmeter.com and search on the EU server player Fedaykin89.

Then come back and if you still believe in "p2w"
#60 - Hey just a heads up for all the world of tanks people out ther…  [+] (7 replies) 12/02/2014 on That one bounced. +8
User avatar
#97 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
Nigga, that's old news by now

And tbh, WoT is the better tank game. At least until they'll fix the damn physics on the WT tanks.
User avatar
#98 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
they did and they added a kill cam thing that shows how the shell killed your target or yourself.
User avatar
#99 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
I know, dude, I played it 2-3 nights ago.

What I meant was the tank's physics against other objects or, the most comical display of armored warfare of all time, tanks bumping into other tanks.

Compared to that, WoT's ramming system & physics model is light years above WarThunder, even though WarThunder recreates the actual tank motions better.
User avatar
#102 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
honestly the thing that bugs me about world of tanks is ther "mod" intgration tht lets people paint tanks weak points. AND lets not forget pay to win shell aka gold rounds.
User avatar
#104 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
Well hit skin mods are officially banned, so you assume your chances by running such a mod.
Furthermore, an experienced player really doesn't need those hitboxes.

Second of all, gold rounds are NOT pay to win. They don't make you a better player, while they CAN make you a worse player by making you rely too much on them.
I for one couldn't care less about gold shells - they're in the game, they're here to stay... and they're a tool to be used when required.

For instance, in one game in my T-54 (in which, no, I did NOT spam HEAT, although it was tempting) I was left against a E-50 or E-50m that was only showing his turret somewhere above me. If I hadn't loaded HEAT to make sure I penned his frontal turret armor (a dodgy shot to begin with, not to mention I could have hit his gun mantlet for 0 dmg) I would have lost then & there.

Furthermore, what exactly is "pay to win" about gold rounds? You can shoot them yourself as a non-premium player, you know.
WoT is simply a "pay2grind less" game. They removed "pay2win" elements ever since patch 8.0
User avatar
#110 - templer (12/02/2014) [-]
even though yes you arn't suppose to use those skins they give you all the tools to use them and there client side mods so it's not like they look at your game flies daily. so people still use them. and the gold shell are still very pay to when at high tear the cost to buy with gold vs silver is just silly at high tier.
User avatar
#112 - tkfourtwoone (12/02/2014) [-]
At high tiers the penetration really is high-enough for just about everything, especially for Tier 10 MTs.
Granted, if you absolutely, positively want to pen a E-100/Maus turret from the front, cHEAT ammo is your way to go. But even then, it's the fault of the E-100/Maus driver for not angling their turret, which they should be doing anyhow, since they need to expect everything penning their frontal turret armor.

Look, I'm probably one of the best examples of non-pay2win accusations. I NEVER bought a premium account, I did not buy either of the 3 premium tanks I own (IS-6, Super Pershing & KV-220), I got them through missions and the only gold I ever bought wast a MAXIMUM of 10 times buying the lowest package (220 gold IIRC) via text messages.
I'm no Unicum, but I don't consider myself a bad player at all. Go on noobmeter.com and search on the EU server player Fedaykin89.

Then come back and if you still believe in "p2w"
[ 183 Total ]

user's friends