Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/22/2012
Last Login:5/02/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12436
Highest Content Rank:#8727
Highest Comment Rank:#14833
Content Thumbs: 36 total,  68 ,  32
Comment Thumbs: 145 total,  180 ,  35
Content Level Progress: 59.32% (35/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/1)
Level 90 Comments: Srs Business → Level 91 Comments: Srs Business
Content Views:10087
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:130
FJ Points:175

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 1626
    Thumbs Up 23 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +17
    Comments: 4
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 03/22/12
    dumb bitch dumb bitch
  • Views: 1340
    Thumbs Up 17 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +11
    Comments: 12
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 12/15/14
    lmoa lmoa
  • Views: 1479
    Thumbs Up 13 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +8
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/06/14
    nye fw nye fw
  • Views: 1268
    Thumbs Up 4 Thumbs Down 1 Total: +3
    Comments: 3
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 04/09/14
    just my opinion just my opinion

YouTube Videos

latest user's comments

#112 - >pi >1 million digits 01/29/2015 on 'Merica Part 1/2 +1
#113 - it says in both the manga and the anime that if no death and n… 01/28/2015 on Mysterious Notebook 0
#106 - i thought the new spider-man was good 01/28/2015 on Comicsss Part I 0
#92 - ^^^yeah, spider-man was the classic breaking the fourth wall c…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/27/2015 on Comicsss Part I +1
User avatar #100 - angelious (01/27/2015) [-]
except while spidey was random and sassy he didnt break fourth wall regulary...unless you count silver age shenanigans.

in that case superman and batman were also part of the "Original fourth wall breaking" characters
#256 - here is a basic explanation: matter and energy can be…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/21/2015 on Universal thoughts +2
User avatar #257 - gohex (01/21/2015) [-]
Cool, so our next bombs will be anti matter bombs then. Sweet, thanks for the explanation bro
#253 - >"matter can never be created nor destroyed" … 01/21/2015 on Universal thoughts 0
#252 - have you ever heard of "e=mc^2"? that's Einstein…  [+] (12 new replies) 01/21/2015 on Universal thoughts -1
#350 - psdeath (01/21/2015) [-]
Everything is energy in it's purest form. Energy can't be destroyed.

Imagine you compress a spring. The spring experiences a slight increase in mass, nothing which we can detect without high tech instruments. This increase in mass times the speed of light squared, is equal to the energy put into the spring when we compressed it.

That's kinda what E=mc^2 is about. I'm not very good at explaining, and English isn't my mother tongue, so someone tell me if I got something wrong up there.
User avatar #347 - didactus (01/21/2015) [-]
It's not exactly a conversion as much as it describes the fact that matter holds bound energy. To further explain it I would have to invoke Quantum physical principles.
#278 - doucheendje (01/21/2015) [-]
That's not what that means
#312 - Ken M (01/21/2015) [-]
After the big bang, there was only hydrogen. Those atoms fussed into heavier elements inside stars, thus creating new elements. The hydrogen in your body might be billions years old. The carbon, oxygen and other elements? Not so much. Not as those elements.
User avatar #392 - xtwinblade (01/21/2015) [-]
nigga where you think the protons and electrons in all the heavy elements in our bodies come from?
User avatar #373 - hanabro (01/21/2015) [-]
The new elements are the same exact matter as the hydrogen, but atomically re-arranged. The same amount of mass still exists.

Technically, it's "MASS" can never be created or destroyed, which means that there is a finite amount of stuff that can exist, meaning, in a very loose sense, matter cannot be created or destroyed. It's current form can, but all the matter that was there still exists in a different form. If you burn a log, it's converted into smoke and ash, but there's still the exact same amount of matter.
#356 - psdeath (01/21/2015) [-]
Partially correct. The big bang theory became a theory because they realized that the stars were not hot enough to create the heaviest elements. They realized they needed something with immense pressure and heat which exceeded that of the stars, and the result was the big bang theory. In other words, while most of the universe is made up of hydrogen and helium and elements created within the stars, the heaviest elements were created in the big bang and is thus sort of a finite source.

I really need to edit new reaction pics

Even if you were correct, hydrogen is what makes up those other elements, so split them all up and we're basically made up of only hydrogen, which age dates back to the big bang. The point of the picture is to say that while we as beings are not that old, the components we're made of are as old as the universe.
#412 - coolcalx (01/22/2015) [-]
none of that is true.

the Big Bang Theory is the result of the phenomenon known as redshifting.
All galaxies outside of our local group are redshifted, and therefore travelling away from us. All of them.
this implies the universe is expanding, which in turn implies that the universe originated from a singularity (the result of playing the universe's expansion in reverse).

main sequence stars like our Sun don't have enough heat to fuse atoms (the heat is in fact three orders of magnitude too low), but are able to do so through quantum tunneling.

fusion cannot create energy in elements heavier than iron (just as fission cannot create energy from elements lighter than iron). The reason stars can't produce heavy elements is due to the fact that gravitational pressure would crush them REGARDLESS of their temperature. Heavy elements are created when large stars collapse, resulting in a powerful shockwave explosion known as a supernova (side note, this is the most energetic phenomenon in the universe).

no heavy elements come from the Big Bang. the Big Bang produced hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium. main sequence fusion created everything up to iron, and everything after that is the result of stars collapsing and exploding.
User avatar #413 - psdeath (01/22/2015) [-]
I am shocked. Mainly because this sounds scientific as shit and completely valid, but also because of all the bullshit I've been spoon fed from a source I can't remember. It wasn't some bullshit source though, I just can't put the name of the scientist in my head.

But I guess I learn something new every day. I did know about the expansion of the universe though, and the whole thing playing it in reverse.
User avatar #414 - coolcalx (01/22/2015) [-]
sorry to be the bringer of bad news, man.

I'm graduating next year with a B.S. in physics, and an emphasis in astrophysics, so I have studied this stuff pretty intensely.

also, if you have any questions, I might be able to answer them
User avatar #420 - psdeath (01/22/2015) [-]
Bad news? My friend, you bring me knowledge, the only known cure for ignorance! That's good news. I mean, I just seem to have overlooked this part completely. Otherwise I consider myself at least somewhat above average when it comes to knowledge about space. Personal favorite space phenomenon (or what ya call it) are quasars and/or blazars.

Also, sorry but I have 1.0 AM humor and can't get over that fact that you're graduating with a BS in physics. Bullshit physics sounds like an accurate description of quantum physics though, that shit's magic. But on a serious note, that's awesome. We need more astro physicists in this world, gotta get them humies on mars.

And alright, I don't think I have any questions but thanks! I'll continue on a quest to cure any further ignorance.
User avatar #346 - didactus (01/21/2015) [-]
All elements heavier than Helium-4 is a result of Nucleosynthesis in stars.
#72 - i think you mean to say "hi, how are you?" 01/04/2015 on Drainage ditch kayaking 0
#350 - >17 >master race pick one  [+] (1 new reply) 12/21/2014 on Hypocrisy The Picture +2
User avatar #353 - istartedthewar (12/21/2014) [-]
Just realized that didn't make sense
#55 - *as seen on QI 11/22/2014 on A moment of science 0
[ 128 Total ]


Total unique items point value: 550 / Total items point value: 950


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)