Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

taxation    

Rank #25862 on Comments
taxation Avatar Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to taxation Block taxation Invite taxation to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Consoles Owned: ps3, wii
Date Signed Up:2/27/2012
Last Login:8/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#25862
Highest Content Rank:#1757
Highest Comment Rank:#1063
Content Thumbs: 3466 total,  3715 ,  249
Comment Thumbs: 4742 total,  5589 ,  847
Content Level Progress: 64% (64/100)
Level 134 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 35% (35/100)
Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 248 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:0
Content Views:106109
Times Content Favorited:314 times
Total Comments Made:2069
FJ Points:8413
Favorite Tags: my (2) | Not (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#24 - No problemo. 05/15/2013 on Hnng 0
#22 - Can a ninja catch an arrow? On this episode, we'll find out! …  [+] (4 new replies) 05/15/2013 on Hnng 0
#25 - pennydragon (05/15/2013) [-]
I believe this is the proper resolution. It's from XKCD 397, titled "Unscientific" in case you want to look it up.
User avatar #26 - taxation (05/16/2013) [-]
That it is sir, what I actually did was find that res and transcribe from it. No bloody way I could read all the text in geomancer's pixelly-ass thumbnail!
#23 - arandomanon (05/15/2013) [-]
Thanks
#24 - taxation (05/15/2013) [-]
No problemo.
#139 - Mmm, sad. Even the Gatorade that looked like a dick a day… 05/15/2013 on An infinity mirror desk... +1
#128 - What if I told you, he's bloody well right. It was a dude on r…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/15/2013 on An infinity mirror desk... +2
User avatar #136 - funshine (05/15/2013) [-]
The words you speak are true! It's a rare thing to find OC on funnyjunk anymore.
User avatar #139 - taxation (05/15/2013) [-]
Mmm, sad.
Even the Gatorade that looked like a dick a day or two ago was originally reddit, which was reposted there from a year ago after being taken from epiclol.
#52 - A repost 20 hours ago from a repost 22 hours ago on reddit aft… 05/13/2013 on Gatorade exploded in the... 0
#8 - I can't read it due to thumbnail-savery, but I assume it would… 05/12/2013 on Innocence Lost +2
#24 - If there was one baby, there were thousands. Avenge-swarm time! 05/12/2013 on Batspider 0
#24 - Okay, maybe not faggot. How about triforce? That's changed mea… 05/12/2013 on sleepmode.exe +1
#20 - Sure it can, faggot.  [+] (4 new replies) 05/12/2013 on sleepmode.exe +6
User avatar #23 - inuares (05/12/2013) [-]
1: I am not gay. 2: No. it can't. 3: fuck off.
User avatar #50 - ithinkihaveaids (05/12/2013) [-]
faggot.

teehee
User avatar #28 - HarvietheDinkle (05/12/2013) [-]
yes, it can. Language is constantly evolving in different cultures and societies. And FJ is a culture of its own. Just because there are certain arbitrary rules only means that for the time being, at the very moment those rules were made, that's how the language was intended to be spoken.

But those rules were made by people we don't know, long ago.
User avatar #24 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Okay, maybe not faggot. How about triforce? That's changed meaning from an object in LoZ to an action that newfags can't perform hasn't it?
#33 - I don't know about that OP, this guy seems fairly hipster. 05/12/2013 on No matter how hard you try +1
#90 - SCP-5201: The Boogie monster. 05/12/2013 on Death 2 Episode 2 +14
#92 - True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture wi…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#90 - So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of be…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#87 - As long as they don't get your exact address and whatnot, that…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #88 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
True that! Luckily with the majority or IPs you aren't going to find the exact location, but still the correct quadrant of the correct city is still too close for comfort for most.
User avatar #89 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
of IPs* not or
User avatar #90 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of beer, being one person out of a possible million or more isn't too big a risk to take I think. Then again, considering most nudes being taken on cell phones, one could just check the geotagging and save a whole assload of time with whatever process they'd otherwise use.
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#85 - Believable, and to a degree comforting that he'd go to such a …  [+] (8 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #86 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, chat rooms are notorious for that, there is usually no blocking and on some it just post your general location right off the bat without your permission.
User avatar #87 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
As long as they don't get your exact address and whatnot, that way the pizzas won't come rolling in!
User avatar #88 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
True that! Luckily with the majority or IPs you aren't going to find the exact location, but still the correct quadrant of the correct city is still too close for comfort for most.
User avatar #89 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
of IPs* not or
User avatar #90 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of beer, being one person out of a possible million or more isn't too big a risk to take I think. Then again, considering most nudes being taken on cell phones, one could just check the geotagging and save a whole assload of time with whatever process they'd otherwise use.
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#83 - Yeah no, DJ 4DM1N would be more likely to just ban you and lau…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #84 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, he probably has a network of proxies set up, because they are all connected they will say similar locations, but none of them will be the same.
User avatar #85 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Believable, and to a degree comforting that he'd go to such a degree to protect users' privacy. Hell I remember joining an IRC room once and they'd figured out my IP, ISP and a rough location within 5 minutes, and that was while using a proxy.
User avatar #86 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, chat rooms are notorious for that, there is usually no blocking and on some it just post your general location right off the bat without your permission.
User avatar #87 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
As long as they don't get your exact address and whatnot, that way the pizzas won't come rolling in!
User avatar #88 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
True that! Luckily with the majority or IPs you aren't going to find the exact location, but still the correct quadrant of the correct city is still too close for comfort for most.
User avatar #89 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
of IPs* not or
User avatar #90 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of beer, being one person out of a possible million or more isn't too big a risk to take I think. Then again, considering most nudes being taken on cell phones, one could just check the geotagging and save a whole assload of time with whatever process they'd otherwise use.
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#75 - Actually I just went on your user page and pinged its specific…  [+] (28 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #78 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Oh dude you have it all wrong, you are finding Funnyjunk's IP, not mine. Funnyjunk is a secure site, all IPs are hidden except for the site itself. that's why I stated earlier that I doubted DJ 4DM1N would give me the anon's IP, as only DJ 4DM1Nistration and moderators have access to everyone's IP. Though I'm also willing to bet that DJ 4DM1N uses a proxy server that happens to base out of that area.
User avatar #94 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
You have no idea how happy I am that you mentioned me twice.

This was a nice conversation to read.
User avatar #95 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
You must receive an astronomical amount of mentions my friend. If you don't mind my asking, what percentage of those do you actually read?
User avatar #96 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
If you mention me more than once, or I find your username interesting, I'll look at it.

You mentioned me twice. :)

User avatar #97 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Cool, I'm surprised we haven't had this conversation earlier, it is such a common word.
User avatar #98 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
This would be the first time you've mentioned me twice, otherwise I'm sure we would have had this conversation already. :)
#99 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Huh, fair enough!
User avatar #100 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Mention me more often.....I get lonely.. </3
User avatar #101 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
How do you get lonely? I'd guess you'd get at least 300 mentions a day, probably more.
User avatar #102 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah but, no one is ever finding anything more than once. :(
User avatar #107 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Haha, I own some, but not this one, also, wasn't a risk, the whole movie is on youtube haha.
User avatar #108 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Oh.
Even still, a lot of my friends don't have internet.



Can I have a link?
#105 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Aww, thanks. Now I'm off to go illegally watch the movie holes thanks to my .gif above.
User avatar #106 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
I actually physically own that movie..



I physically own a lot of movies so that my friends don't have to risk watching movies illegally.
Also so they can burn the movies and have copies for themselves.
#103 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
I see I see, also I missed a great opportunity there, I should have said: "I'm finding that hard to believe." With this picture attached.
User avatar #104 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
I love you. <3
User avatar #83 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah no, DJ 4DM1N would be more likely to just ban you and laugh. Moderately confusing though, your user page IP was 85.17.31.5 whereas mine was 95.211.158.10. They do both link to the Netherlands, but mine with I think a lesser degree of accuracy, that being just "Amsterdam" as opposed to yours, at Haringweg 25
8251 RR Dronten, The Netherlands
User avatar #84 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, he probably has a network of proxies set up, because they are all connected they will say similar locations, but none of them will be the same.
User avatar #85 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Believable, and to a degree comforting that he'd go to such a degree to protect users' privacy. Hell I remember joining an IRC room once and they'd figured out my IP, ISP and a rough location within 5 minutes, and that was while using a proxy.
User avatar #86 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, chat rooms are notorious for that, there is usually no blocking and on some it just post your general location right off the bat without your permission.
User avatar #87 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
As long as they don't get your exact address and whatnot, that way the pizzas won't come rolling in!
User avatar #88 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
True that! Luckily with the majority or IPs you aren't going to find the exact location, but still the correct quadrant of the correct city is still too close for comfort for most.
User avatar #89 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
of IPs* not or
User avatar #90 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of beer, being one person out of a possible million or more isn't too big a risk to take I think. Then again, considering most nudes being taken on cell phones, one could just check the geotagging and save a whole assload of time with whatever process they'd otherwise use.
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#47 - If anybody wants more pictures and stuff like this (and this w… 05/12/2013 on HEIL +1
#71 - Vatra, but you wouldn't happen to be from the Netherlands would you?  [+] (32 new replies) 05/12/2013 on Naturists 0
User avatar #72 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Nope, no where near there.
#73 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 1374362388
Damnit.
And I thought I'd be all clever and shit.
User avatar #74 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Clever though, the majority or people aren't going to use a username to try and narrow down the search, I give you props for that.
User avatar #75 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Actually I just went on your user page and pinged its specific URL. Trying it on mine gave the same place with a different IP, so I assume that's just where fj's servers are or something.
If I had to take a guess as to what you're like, I'd say a stoner of Czech or Croatian ancestry or residence, which doesn't seem all that likely.
User avatar #78 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Oh dude you have it all wrong, you are finding Funnyjunk's IP, not mine. Funnyjunk is a secure site, all IPs are hidden except for the site itself. that's why I stated earlier that I doubted DJ 4DM1N would give me the anon's IP, as only DJ 4DM1Nistration and moderators have access to everyone's IP. Though I'm also willing to bet that DJ 4DM1N uses a proxy server that happens to base out of that area.
User avatar #94 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
You have no idea how happy I am that you mentioned me twice.

This was a nice conversation to read.
User avatar #95 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
You must receive an astronomical amount of mentions my friend. If you don't mind my asking, what percentage of those do you actually read?
User avatar #96 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
If you mention me more than once, or I find your username interesting, I'll look at it.

You mentioned me twice. :)

User avatar #97 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Cool, I'm surprised we haven't had this conversation earlier, it is such a common word.
User avatar #98 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
This would be the first time you've mentioned me twice, otherwise I'm sure we would have had this conversation already. :)
#99 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Huh, fair enough!
User avatar #100 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Mention me more often.....I get lonely.. </3
User avatar #101 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
How do you get lonely? I'd guess you'd get at least 300 mentions a day, probably more.
User avatar #102 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah but, no one is ever finding anything more than once. :(
User avatar #107 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Haha, I own some, but not this one, also, wasn't a risk, the whole movie is on youtube haha.
User avatar #108 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
Oh.
Even still, a lot of my friends don't have internet.



Can I have a link?
#105 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Aww, thanks. Now I'm off to go illegally watch the movie holes thanks to my .gif above.
User avatar #106 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
I actually physically own that movie..



I physically own a lot of movies so that my friends don't have to risk watching movies illegally.
Also so they can burn the movies and have copies for themselves.
#103 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
I see I see, also I missed a great opportunity there, I should have said: "I'm finding that hard to believe." With this picture attached.
User avatar #104 - finding (05/12/2013) [-]
I love you. <3
User avatar #83 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah no, DJ 4DM1N would be more likely to just ban you and laugh. Moderately confusing though, your user page IP was 85.17.31.5 whereas mine was 95.211.158.10. They do both link to the Netherlands, but mine with I think a lesser degree of accuracy, that being just "Amsterdam" as opposed to yours, at Haringweg 25
8251 RR Dronten, The Netherlands
User avatar #84 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, he probably has a network of proxies set up, because they are all connected they will say similar locations, but none of them will be the same.
User avatar #85 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
Believable, and to a degree comforting that he'd go to such a degree to protect users' privacy. Hell I remember joining an IRC room once and they'd figured out my IP, ISP and a rough location within 5 minutes, and that was while using a proxy.
User avatar #86 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, chat rooms are notorious for that, there is usually no blocking and on some it just post your general location right off the bat without your permission.
User avatar #87 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
As long as they don't get your exact address and whatnot, that way the pizzas won't come rolling in!
User avatar #88 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
True that! Luckily with the majority or IPs you aren't going to find the exact location, but still the correct quadrant of the correct city is still too close for comfort for most.
User avatar #89 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
of IPs* not or
User avatar #90 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
So long as nobody goes posting nudes with specific types of beer, being one person out of a possible million or more isn't too big a risk to take I think. Then again, considering most nudes being taken on cell phones, one could just check the geotagging and save a whole assload of time with whatever process they'd otherwise use.
User avatar #91 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Exactly, cellphone tracking, all three ways to do so, are more accurate than IP address tracking, though, when they turn location off, you still have the picture itself that usually maintains some tractable information. And if everything else fails you can do a reverse image search which will work great on popular places.
User avatar #92 - taxation (05/12/2013) [-]
True, though let's have an example. If I gave you a picture with which to try and find me, all you'd have is my face and a wall with a Vancouver Canucks 2011 playoffs towel and a Real Madrid scarf hanging on it. Remove tagging, you've got no IP. Best assumption, I'm in or around Vancouver due to my good English. Assuming this isn't an apartment, that rules out most of the actual city center, leaving an area from Horseshoe Bay to Hope and as far north as Whistler open for me to live in. Looking at my comment history, I've talked about Metrotown and the transit system, so I'm somewhere near Surrey. That's about as far as you can get, within 316 square kilometers and 468000 people. I'd say home free eh mate?
User avatar #93 - vatra (05/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, for purely going off of the picture, there really has to be something distinctive.
#9 - Try pulling that and he'll dip his sword in your mud. 05/09/2013 on Wise Words From A Real Man 0
#101 - Ooh, touchy.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2013 on You must specify a title. +1
#105 - douthit (05/09/2013) [-]
#95 - A .gif of a Sim putting its Sim baby into a barbecue while ano…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/08/2013 on Hitman +2
#99 - anonymous (05/08/2013) [-]
The person inside is crying.
User avatar #106 - XxNearliekbaconxX (05/08/2013) [-]
She didn't want to eat BBQ that night.
#63 - ***************** .jpeg 05/06/2013 on Don't hide behind a mask +3
#158 - What's worse if if it's letterbox, so there's strips of black … 05/06/2013 on MFW I find the perfect porn. +2
#65 - No problem mate, always glad to help! 05/06/2013 on mfw religion +1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2300

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#16 - josieabby has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #17 to #16 - taxation (04/13/2013) [-]
Awesome dude, and thanks! Glad you enjoyed it, but can I ask did our lyrics match up to those in the actual song?
#19 to #17 - josieabby has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #17 - josieabby has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #14 - finalkai (08/10/2012) [-]
can i just sit hear and watch your profile picture? its entertaining me so much.
User avatar #15 to #14 - taxation (08/10/2012) [-]
Oh for sure. The spinny-flippy-changey-shapeyness of it is so enticing, isn't it?
#3 - jasonvgrace (03/22/2012) [-]
Herro, we love you   
   
twilight agrees
Herro, we love you

twilight agrees
User avatar #7 to #3 - taxation (04/29/2012) [-]
just thought i'd come back to this for a minute... at the time u left this comment, i was not a brony and refused to watch the show. but guess what? im just gonna say that rainbow dash is the best pony.
#8 to #8 - jasonvgrace (04/29/2012) [-]
I'm pretty sure that only the best pony knows who best pony is, because who are we to judge best pony when we're not the best pony whom knows who best pony is and best pony will know because best pony is best pony...you see?
I'm pretty sure that only the best pony knows who best pony is, because who are we to judge best pony when we're not the best pony whom knows who best pony is and best pony will know because best pony is best pony...you see?
User avatar #9 to #9 - taxation (04/29/2012) [-]
sure, why not. but i have a counterargument... pony pony something pony something something pony something pony pony... you see?
User avatar #10 to #10 - jasonvgrace (04/29/2012) [-]
You make a valid point but have you considered the fact that pony in dragon doesn't pony aliens and rarity is a pony who pony pony dragon unicorn pegasus born because of pony genetics pony.
User avatar #11 to #11 - taxation (04/29/2012) [-]
seems legit, you win this round. but i shall be back as soon as the relation between a porpoise and the horn of a unicorn's foal has been clarified. then and THEN ONLY will my master argument be complete...
User avatar #12 to #12 - jasonvgrace (04/29/2012) [-]
We shall see.
User avatar #13 to #13 - taxation (05/26/2012) [-]
Right man, it's been what about 20 days... i got nothing. You win, and all my internets to you as a prize.
User avatar #4 to #3 - taxation (03/22/2012) [-]
sorry, what does this "twilight" agree with?
User avatar #5 to #4 - jasonvgrace (03/23/2012) [-]
with me.
User avatar #6 to #5 - taxation (03/25/2012) [-]
*us, if we hasn't all died. timelord much, or mpd?
 Friends (0)