Upload
Login or register

tankeruber

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:1/21/2012
Last Login:9/27/2016
Stats
Content Ranking:#5762
Comment Ranking:#4449
Highest Content Rank:#4921
Highest Comment Rank:#531
Content Thumbs: 53 total,  301 ,  248
Comment Thumbs: 9640 total,  14407 ,  4767
Content Level Progress: 89.83% (53/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 24% (24/100)
Level 291 Comments: Post Master → Level 292 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:1
Content Views:18226
Times Content Favorited:3 times
Total Comments Made:6651
FJ Points:4289
Favorite Tags: are (2) | fuck (2) | Holy (2) | the (2) | You (2)

latest user's comments

#350 - Business = Politics quite often, Banks--->Lobbyists--->P…  [+] (3 replies) 08/31/2015 on get yer shit together 'murica 0
User avatar
#355 - donatelo (08/31/2015) [-]
Bernie also wants to cut out big banks aka lobbyists, and refuses to accept donations from them, so if you want to make that point about trump might as well extend it to bernie.
The problem and differenec with trump, is that since he has historically donated to politicians for favors, he cuts out the middle man and grants the favors himself. against Tax increase to whom? taxes are essential brev.

i dont care about hillary, but bernies where are you getting that bernies plans are going to have a larger bite? Trumps biggest talking point is immigration, and his immigration plan is estimated at 300 billion alone.
User avatar
#362 - tankeruber (09/01/2015) [-]
I know taxes are somewhat essential, but Trump is against increasing it for anyone, and would rather shift money from useless programms into better ones, not keep the worthless ones running and just get more funding for good ones by increasing taxes.
Bernie wants to turn America into Scandinavia, a "socialist-democratic heaven" that is right now falling apart due to 1% of the immigration you have, while having about 260 million people less. I should know it's falling apart, I'm from Estonia and within a 2h boat ride to any of the "example" countries such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden etc. and they are falling flat on their ass, when facts and things are being replaced by being progressive and helping every single person who even dreams about coming into the country. It's quite literally dying to it's own ideals.
User avatar
#368 - donatelo (09/01/2015) [-]
Bernie wont turn the united states to a socialist state...presidents simply do not hold that kind of power, the same people that continuously said Obama would rewrite the constitution and become a communist dictator are the ones saying that about bernie, and honestly have no idea how the united states government work.

What programs is he going to cut? He is talking about cutting veterans affairs office, which i dont think is useless. like i said, his biggest talking point is going to cost 300 billion, and even then it is not going to solve the immigration issue because mexican immigrant are on a decling rate, meanwhile central america, carribean, and overseas-visa overstayers are increasing (45% of illegals are visa over stayers).

The cost of his proposals need increase in taxes, its simple economics.....you cant just throw money around when there is none. Bush cut taxes meanwhile trying to keep his programs in place(he also cut "useless" programs for that extra money) and we already know how that ended. Taxes are not somewhat essential, its the reason how our government entities function so we dont end up like a shit country like greece.
#296 - Actually, Trump not so long ago was a Liberal and ran for the …  [+] (5 replies) 08/30/2015 on get yer shit together 'murica 0
User avatar
#303 - donatelo (08/30/2015) [-]
fuckkkkkk...i just wrote a long reply before my laptop reset. heres a summary of what i wrote.
-business=/= politics
-while i want corop jobs back in the usa, that plan along with his other ones (already estimated at 300+ billion) will give the US a huge economic gut punch that will either increase debt by borrowing or increasing taxes.
-its "fine" because of the de-regulated rules of the neo-liberal politics...to fix it would take regulation...which repubs is against.
-his solutions are longterm with a huge economic bite....even then its a gamble, dont know why we would gamble on the longterm withc such a huge econmic bite short term.

still sad i lost the long version lel. at the end of the day i will vote for whats best for the US, but sadly trump is not.
User avatar
#350 - tankeruber (08/31/2015) [-]
Business = Politics quite often, Banks--->Lobbyists--->Power to Politician A --> Politician A enpowers banks.
Trump cuts out the Banks and boosts his own power.
He was against increasing taxes last I checked.
Not willing to do any research on Neoliberalism right now, so I will concede that point.
Many of his solutions wouldn't take all that long to implement, and the "economic bite" isn't nearly as huge as what Bernie and Hillary are proposing.
User avatar
#355 - donatelo (08/31/2015) [-]
Bernie also wants to cut out big banks aka lobbyists, and refuses to accept donations from them, so if you want to make that point about trump might as well extend it to bernie.
The problem and differenec with trump, is that since he has historically donated to politicians for favors, he cuts out the middle man and grants the favors himself. against Tax increase to whom? taxes are essential brev.

i dont care about hillary, but bernies where are you getting that bernies plans are going to have a larger bite? Trumps biggest talking point is immigration, and his immigration plan is estimated at 300 billion alone.
User avatar
#362 - tankeruber (09/01/2015) [-]
I know taxes are somewhat essential, but Trump is against increasing it for anyone, and would rather shift money from useless programms into better ones, not keep the worthless ones running and just get more funding for good ones by increasing taxes.
Bernie wants to turn America into Scandinavia, a "socialist-democratic heaven" that is right now falling apart due to 1% of the immigration you have, while having about 260 million people less. I should know it's falling apart, I'm from Estonia and within a 2h boat ride to any of the "example" countries such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden etc. and they are falling flat on their ass, when facts and things are being replaced by being progressive and helping every single person who even dreams about coming into the country. It's quite literally dying to it's own ideals.
User avatar
#368 - donatelo (09/01/2015) [-]
Bernie wont turn the united states to a socialist state...presidents simply do not hold that kind of power, the same people that continuously said Obama would rewrite the constitution and become a communist dictator are the ones saying that about bernie, and honestly have no idea how the united states government work.

What programs is he going to cut? He is talking about cutting veterans affairs office, which i dont think is useless. like i said, his biggest talking point is going to cost 300 billion, and even then it is not going to solve the immigration issue because mexican immigrant are on a decling rate, meanwhile central america, carribean, and overseas-visa overstayers are increasing (45% of illegals are visa over stayers).

The cost of his proposals need increase in taxes, its simple economics.....you cant just throw money around when there is none. Bush cut taxes meanwhile trying to keep his programs in place(he also cut "useless" programs for that extra money) and we already know how that ended. Taxes are not somewhat essential, its the reason how our government entities function so we dont end up like a shit country like greece.
#284 - He said that because he was directly conforted by somebody cla…  [+] (7 replies) 08/30/2015 on get yer shit together 'murica +1
User avatar
#286 - donatelo (08/30/2015) [-]
Here is the difference then....for example, i dont like Cruz as a candidate, but when asked a few questions in the republican debates, he asnwered with policies and bills he has pushed and advocated before...showing that he atleast has tried before the election. Trump only has said this now, its not a matter of "oh nobody has asked me before"....its if, "if you are about it then show it...dont just say it."

If there was no reason to mention it before, then it is unlikely that he cared about it before...otherwise, he was in a business mind before. if so, you cant just jump into a political mind set now. I doubt trump would hurt his own private businesses in order to do something for the people.
User avatar
#296 - tankeruber (08/30/2015) [-]
Actually, Trump not so long ago was a Liberal and ran for the democrats.

His business mindset might actually save America, he said himself he isn't a politician, so he isn't here to speak, he's here to do stuff, "Make America great again".
There was no reason to say "I want more jobs in America" with the "but I have workers in China", because with the second part comes the hard explanation of "Bad laws have made creating a competitive business with 100% American-produced goods hard, because labor laws and the like have driven all manufacturing to China, outsourcing to China would be cheaper than having them made here, so In order to both keep prices low enough that people would buy his shirts, and still turn a profit, the primary goal of a business, he was forced to outsource jobs to China. If he hadn't outsourced to China he would have either A) Made no profit from the business, thus making it redundant to even own it, thus he would have been forced to wipe the slate clean and get the funds from it to make another business, you get the funds by declaring bankrupcy, a common move when you have multiple businesses. B) If he had increased the prices, he would have made a profit, but wouldn't sell nearly as much as his competitors, thus earning marginally less, being able to expand much slower, and the business also becoming redundant."

Really, as an owner of many, many businesses, what he is doing is fine, in terms of outsourcing to China. He has promised to fix the labour laws, thus allowing him to bring production back to America, thus creating jobs in a competitive environment, thus boosting the economy. Literally best candidate 10/10.
User avatar
#303 - donatelo (08/30/2015) [-]
fuckkkkkk...i just wrote a long reply before my laptop reset. heres a summary of what i wrote.
-business=/= politics
-while i want corop jobs back in the usa, that plan along with his other ones (already estimated at 300+ billion) will give the US a huge economic gut punch that will either increase debt by borrowing or increasing taxes.
-its "fine" because of the de-regulated rules of the neo-liberal politics...to fix it would take regulation...which repubs is against.
-his solutions are longterm with a huge economic bite....even then its a gamble, dont know why we would gamble on the longterm withc such a huge econmic bite short term.

still sad i lost the long version lel. at the end of the day i will vote for whats best for the US, but sadly trump is not.
User avatar
#350 - tankeruber (08/31/2015) [-]
Business = Politics quite often, Banks--->Lobbyists--->Power to Politician A --> Politician A enpowers banks.
Trump cuts out the Banks and boosts his own power.
He was against increasing taxes last I checked.
Not willing to do any research on Neoliberalism right now, so I will concede that point.
Many of his solutions wouldn't take all that long to implement, and the "economic bite" isn't nearly as huge as what Bernie and Hillary are proposing.
User avatar
#355 - donatelo (08/31/2015) [-]
Bernie also wants to cut out big banks aka lobbyists, and refuses to accept donations from them, so if you want to make that point about trump might as well extend it to bernie.
The problem and differenec with trump, is that since he has historically donated to politicians for favors, he cuts out the middle man and grants the favors himself. against Tax increase to whom? taxes are essential brev.

i dont care about hillary, but bernies where are you getting that bernies plans are going to have a larger bite? Trumps biggest talking point is immigration, and his immigration plan is estimated at 300 billion alone.
User avatar
#362 - tankeruber (09/01/2015) [-]
I know taxes are somewhat essential, but Trump is against increasing it for anyone, and would rather shift money from useless programms into better ones, not keep the worthless ones running and just get more funding for good ones by increasing taxes.
Bernie wants to turn America into Scandinavia, a "socialist-democratic heaven" that is right now falling apart due to 1% of the immigration you have, while having about 260 million people less. I should know it's falling apart, I'm from Estonia and within a 2h boat ride to any of the "example" countries such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden etc. and they are falling flat on their ass, when facts and things are being replaced by being progressive and helping every single person who even dreams about coming into the country. It's quite literally dying to it's own ideals.
User avatar
#368 - donatelo (09/01/2015) [-]
Bernie wont turn the united states to a socialist state...presidents simply do not hold that kind of power, the same people that continuously said Obama would rewrite the constitution and become a communist dictator are the ones saying that about bernie, and honestly have no idea how the united states government work.

What programs is he going to cut? He is talking about cutting veterans affairs office, which i dont think is useless. like i said, his biggest talking point is going to cost 300 billion, and even then it is not going to solve the immigration issue because mexican immigrant are on a decling rate, meanwhile central america, carribean, and overseas-visa overstayers are increasing (45% of illegals are visa over stayers).

The cost of his proposals need increase in taxes, its simple economics.....you cant just throw money around when there is none. Bush cut taxes meanwhile trying to keep his programs in place(he also cut "useless" programs for that extra money) and we already know how that ended. Taxes are not somewhat essential, its the reason how our government entities function so we dont end up like a shit country like greece.
#283 - He also said he supports creationism, never said he's perfect,…  [+] (2 replies) 08/30/2015 on get yer shit together 'murica 0
User avatar
#288 - rockamekishiko (08/30/2015) [-]
dominos? he's not the best candidate, he's not even the least bad candidate. He is stupidly confident and for some reason you retards love that
User avatar
#292 - tankeruber (08/30/2015) [-]
Dominos are the Oreos of europe, made in china, real cheap, slightly softer cookies than oreos. We have both here.

Historically anytime the republicans proposed a non-extremist right-winger as their potential president, the democrats won, so the other republicans are out of the picture, last I checked Trump has only promised things that the president can change, compared to utopian bullshit Bernie and Hillary spew, any other candidate proboably won't make it to the final 1v1, I wager it's going to be Bernie vs Trump, and Trump is going to win. The only policies I don't agree with are his support of creationism and the continued teaching of it in some states, but other than that, Bernie will whittle America into a communist state, I've seen the signs all before in 1934 Estonia, with the second constitution, and Hillary is really a joke candidate, focusing on emotion instead of facts. The fact that he is extremely confident and strong-minded is good, because bitchboy Obama can't say "No" to Putin, while Trump might have the backbone to actually do it. He promises simple things to the simple american, and that's why he is a great candidate, and since I'm an EU fag and your military keeps us safe, if Trump wants to improve your military I'm all for that, while Bernie wants to leave us in the cold by reducing spending, making further budget cuts to the military and reducing your military a neccessary move, witch fucking sucks for any 1st world country, as Russia and China pour as much money into Military as they can without having to worry about bitchy baby-boomers being mad about it, and America will have to either face backlash from half it's community and leave EU in the cold, losing potential business partners, or suffer backlash anyway because any money that isn't spent directly benefiting baby boomers is money ill spent, apparently.
#488 - They allready are if you pay enough money.  [+] (2 replies) 08/30/2015 on Gun Control activists 0
User avatar
#526 - cormy (08/30/2015) [-]
Pay who? Legal for who?
User avatar
#616 - tankeruber (08/30/2015) [-]
With enough money you could technically own a nuke, maybe not a whole megaton one but with 5 billion dollars to spare you might get a smaller, couple kiloton nuke and be able to keep it without a bomb squad rolling up with a pre-emtive drone strike.
It's expensive, yeah, but possible.