Upload
Login or register

supername

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:4/24/2012
Stats
Comment Ranking:#2691
Highest Content Rank:#11432
Highest Comment Rank:#348
Content Thumbs: 16 total,  58 ,  42
Comment Thumbs: 19626 total,  22241 ,  2615
Content Level Progress: 33.89% (20/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 83.1% (831/1000)
Level 317 Comments: Wizard → Level 318 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:0
Content Views:8543
Times Content Favorited:1 times
Total Comments Made:5698
FJ Points:9517
the pie

latest user's comments

#26 - I read the entire thing I'm telling you that all your doing is…  [+] (2 replies) 09/18/2016 on Game of thrones +2
User avatar
#27 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
nah you didn't, your first line "burning retainers alive for not converting" proves it.

mance wouldn't have been burned if he accepted the fair deal.
User avatar
#30 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
if you actually watched the show you'd know he burned plenty others for not converting and that is the reason he gives davos when he questions him. This is the last I have to say since you'd rather condescend instead of discuss.
#23 - use whatever justification you want but burning retainers aliv…  [+] (4 replies) 09/18/2016 on Game of thrones +1
User avatar
#25 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't read anything i said.
User avatar
#26 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I read the entire thing I'm telling you that all your doing is justifying evil actions what do you not understand about that? He sacrificed shireen on bad advice/info and it didn't work. furthermore if he had cooperated with the wildlings he would have had their aid and asking them to burn their leader alive is not a good deal. And burning people alive is torture what do you not understand about that? What do you not understand about the fact that if he was loyal he would not burn his retainers alive for not converting and use someone clearly using black magic. All you are doing is saying "yes he did bad things but he had good intentions so that's fine am I right?".
User avatar
#27 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
nah you didn't, your first line "burning retainers alive for not converting" proves it.

mance wouldn't have been burned if he accepted the fair deal.
User avatar
#30 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
if you actually watched the show you'd know he burned plenty others for not converting and that is the reason he gives davos when he questions him. This is the last I have to say since you'd rather condescend instead of discuss.
#11 - I'm talking about Stannis dying. As for him being the best kin…  [+] (6 replies) 09/18/2016 on Game of thrones 0
#18 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
All Stannis has is loyalty, he is loyal to his duty above all else. In the show they made him out to be evil, but I see show stannis as a more Macbeth type figure. In the books he's an atheist whose using the red god to save the realm after he's seen that the magic is real, he's not a true believer.

He sacrificed shireen to save his men, defeat the boltons, and eventually save the realm from the white walkers. Robb killed all of his men for some bad pussy, I think I'll go with Stannis.

He burned his brother in law because he was going to sell Shireen to the Lannisters, it's explained in the book. Imagine Shireen being married to Jeoffery, fuck.

Stannis won multiple battles, defeated the Greyjoy Fleet, took the largest of the Iron Islands, and held Storms End for years while eating the rats. He also defeated a 100,000 man army of savages that would've destroyed the realm. The reason Davos follows him is because he's a good leader.

The Wildlings are retarded, his deal was more than fair. They'd have land, they'd be citizens of the realm, they'd be protected by the crown and the wall, as long as they just served the realm instead of being a bunch of lazy freeloading cunts. They even changed their mind later and fought for the realm, if they would've done it earlier maybe Rickon and all those men at the wall would still be alive.

He has the greatest moral compass out of any of them, he's the one who sacrificed everything to save millions he never knew.

Kindness got Ned Stark killed. You can't be a good King without sternness and commitment. I think Jon will be ok, but he is still a child and has alot to learn. He will be easily manipulated at court by Littlefinger types who advise him, just like his adopted father.
User avatar
#23 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
use whatever justification you want but burning retainers alive for not converting, burning your child, making deals with evil people for results, listening to evil people over trusted friends all shows that he is one of the least moral people and Snow is a better candidate.
User avatar
#25 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't read anything i said.
User avatar
#26 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I read the entire thing I'm telling you that all your doing is justifying evil actions what do you not understand about that? He sacrificed shireen on bad advice/info and it didn't work. furthermore if he had cooperated with the wildlings he would have had their aid and asking them to burn their leader alive is not a good deal. And burning people alive is torture what do you not understand about that? What do you not understand about the fact that if he was loyal he would not burn his retainers alive for not converting and use someone clearly using black magic. All you are doing is saying "yes he did bad things but he had good intentions so that's fine am I right?".
User avatar
#27 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
nah you didn't, your first line "burning retainers alive for not converting" proves it.

mance wouldn't have been burned if he accepted the fair deal.
User avatar
#30 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
if you actually watched the show you'd know he burned plenty others for not converting and that is the reason he gives davos when he questions him. This is the last I have to say since you'd rather condescend instead of discuss.
#9 - and he lost his claim when he died. Besides it's about who is …  [+] (11 replies) 09/18/2016 on Game of thrones 0
#39 - EdwardNigma (09/18/2016) [-]
Oh well then I guess Aegon the Conqueror lost his claim when he died too.
We can play ping pong with this shit all fucking day, but however you spin it, the Baratheons have the claim by conquest because any argument against the Baratheon claim applies to the Targaryen claim as well, because both were earned through conquest. So if those dragon fuckers want it back, they can come and take it back.

And as an added note, Jon wouldn't be god awful. However, he isn't as experienced as Stannis, a proven military commander. Of the two, against an actual fucking apocalypse, I would take the one that really knows his shit.
User avatar
#29 - twiztidxson (09/18/2016) [-]
As much as I like Jon he clearly isn't cut out to rule. He couldn't even handle Lord Commander, let alone King.

Ideally, Danny would rule, help Jon fuck the White Walkers, then let him be Warden of the North.
User avatar
#40 - EdwardNigma (09/18/2016) [-]
Well, his failure as Lord Commander wasn't really his fault. More the fault of the Watch itself which couldn't grow up and let go of its prejudices for the sake of protecting the entire god damn world from an actual fucking apocalypse.
User avatar
#10 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
Robert or Stannis? Robert dying doesn't make his claim invalid, it just goes to the next valid baratheon, Stannis. Stannis dying is what I don't like obviously, but he was still the rightful king by all the laws of Westeros.

Stannis would've been the best king, as Mance confirmed. He wasn't greedy, or lustful. He didn't drink or gamble. He didn't care about people kissing up to him and he never got jealous. He didn't have common human emotions like pride, vanity, needless cruelty, or bloodlust. He didn't even want the throne, he simply accepts it because he has a duty to the realm and it's people.

While all the other claimants fought to tear the real apart, Stannis was the only one went to the wall to save the kingdowm. As Sam called him, the king who cared. The king who was willing to sacrifice everything he ever loved so that the realm could be saved. And when all hope was lost, when all was taken from him, he kept fighting, and died without begging.
User avatar
#11 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I'm talking about Stannis dying. As for him being the best king I don't think we watched the same show he has no loyalty, easily manipulated, and yes he doesn't have common emotions which is why he listened to a crazy witch using evil magic and sacrificed his own child. The guy is a nutter he killed his own because they refused to convert he repeatedly took the advice of a witch over davos a trusted friend because he has no capacity for leadership and is easily manipulated. He can't even do basic diplomacy with the way he treated the wildlings. He has no moral compass and any man willing to kill his own daughter and men to be the king definitely wants power.

John Snow has shown leadership, diplomacy, morality and the most rare feature in GOT kindness. The only thing I would say John Snow lacks is strategizing and that can be fixed with good advisers which he actually listens to.
#18 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
All Stannis has is loyalty, he is loyal to his duty above all else. In the show they made him out to be evil, but I see show stannis as a more Macbeth type figure. In the books he's an atheist whose using the red god to save the realm after he's seen that the magic is real, he's not a true believer.

He sacrificed shireen to save his men, defeat the boltons, and eventually save the realm from the white walkers. Robb killed all of his men for some bad pussy, I think I'll go with Stannis.

He burned his brother in law because he was going to sell Shireen to the Lannisters, it's explained in the book. Imagine Shireen being married to Jeoffery, fuck.

Stannis won multiple battles, defeated the Greyjoy Fleet, took the largest of the Iron Islands, and held Storms End for years while eating the rats. He also defeated a 100,000 man army of savages that would've destroyed the realm. The reason Davos follows him is because he's a good leader.

The Wildlings are retarded, his deal was more than fair. They'd have land, they'd be citizens of the realm, they'd be protected by the crown and the wall, as long as they just served the realm instead of being a bunch of lazy freeloading cunts. They even changed their mind later and fought for the realm, if they would've done it earlier maybe Rickon and all those men at the wall would still be alive.

He has the greatest moral compass out of any of them, he's the one who sacrificed everything to save millions he never knew.

Kindness got Ned Stark killed. You can't be a good King without sternness and commitment. I think Jon will be ok, but he is still a child and has alot to learn. He will be easily manipulated at court by Littlefinger types who advise him, just like his adopted father.
User avatar
#23 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
use whatever justification you want but burning retainers alive for not converting, burning your child, making deals with evil people for results, listening to evil people over trusted friends all shows that he is one of the least moral people and Snow is a better candidate.
User avatar
#25 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't read anything i said.
User avatar
#26 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I read the entire thing I'm telling you that all your doing is justifying evil actions what do you not understand about that? He sacrificed shireen on bad advice/info and it didn't work. furthermore if he had cooperated with the wildlings he would have had their aid and asking them to burn their leader alive is not a good deal. And burning people alive is torture what do you not understand about that? What do you not understand about the fact that if he was loyal he would not burn his retainers alive for not converting and use someone clearly using black magic. All you are doing is saying "yes he did bad things but he had good intentions so that's fine am I right?".
User avatar
#27 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
nah you didn't, your first line "burning retainers alive for not converting" proves it.

mance wouldn't have been burned if he accepted the fair deal.
User avatar
#30 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
if you actually watched the show you'd know he burned plenty others for not converting and that is the reason he gives davos when he questions him. This is the last I have to say since you'd rather condescend instead of discuss.
#7 - do you know why Bruce Willis is on there??  [+] (2 replies) 09/18/2016 on Pepes defends his honor! +1
User avatar
#12 - iceguy (09/18/2016) [-]
he was in the original movie
User avatar
#14 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
No I looked it up apparently he recently wen't onto jimmey Kmmel's show dressed imitating trump and wore a maga hat and apparently he supports trump. Each person/character in the poster has done something for Trump or the conservative movement. Asange did the dnc leaks, Pepe is pepe, Milo is publicly a Trump supporter, etc. etc.
#4 - yeah John snow is alive so rejoice.  [+] (13 replies) 09/18/2016 on Game of thrones +4
User avatar
#8 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
Robert won the crown by right of conquest, baratheon is the true bloodline now.
User avatar
#9 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
and he lost his claim when he died. Besides it's about who is best to rule and Snow is best.
#39 - EdwardNigma (09/18/2016) [-]
Oh well then I guess Aegon the Conqueror lost his claim when he died too.
We can play ping pong with this shit all fucking day, but however you spin it, the Baratheons have the claim by conquest because any argument against the Baratheon claim applies to the Targaryen claim as well, because both were earned through conquest. So if those dragon fuckers want it back, they can come and take it back.

And as an added note, Jon wouldn't be god awful. However, he isn't as experienced as Stannis, a proven military commander. Of the two, against an actual fucking apocalypse, I would take the one that really knows his shit.
User avatar
#29 - twiztidxson (09/18/2016) [-]
As much as I like Jon he clearly isn't cut out to rule. He couldn't even handle Lord Commander, let alone King.

Ideally, Danny would rule, help Jon fuck the White Walkers, then let him be Warden of the North.
User avatar
#40 - EdwardNigma (09/18/2016) [-]
Well, his failure as Lord Commander wasn't really his fault. More the fault of the Watch itself which couldn't grow up and let go of its prejudices for the sake of protecting the entire god damn world from an actual fucking apocalypse.
User avatar
#10 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
Robert or Stannis? Robert dying doesn't make his claim invalid, it just goes to the next valid baratheon, Stannis. Stannis dying is what I don't like obviously, but he was still the rightful king by all the laws of Westeros.

Stannis would've been the best king, as Mance confirmed. He wasn't greedy, or lustful. He didn't drink or gamble. He didn't care about people kissing up to him and he never got jealous. He didn't have common human emotions like pride, vanity, needless cruelty, or bloodlust. He didn't even want the throne, he simply accepts it because he has a duty to the realm and it's people.

While all the other claimants fought to tear the real apart, Stannis was the only one went to the wall to save the kingdowm. As Sam called him, the king who cared. The king who was willing to sacrifice everything he ever loved so that the realm could be saved. And when all hope was lost, when all was taken from him, he kept fighting, and died without begging.
User avatar
#11 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I'm talking about Stannis dying. As for him being the best king I don't think we watched the same show he has no loyalty, easily manipulated, and yes he doesn't have common emotions which is why he listened to a crazy witch using evil magic and sacrificed his own child. The guy is a nutter he killed his own because they refused to convert he repeatedly took the advice of a witch over davos a trusted friend because he has no capacity for leadership and is easily manipulated. He can't even do basic diplomacy with the way he treated the wildlings. He has no moral compass and any man willing to kill his own daughter and men to be the king definitely wants power.

John Snow has shown leadership, diplomacy, morality and the most rare feature in GOT kindness. The only thing I would say John Snow lacks is strategizing and that can be fixed with good advisers which he actually listens to.
#18 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
All Stannis has is loyalty, he is loyal to his duty above all else. In the show they made him out to be evil, but I see show stannis as a more Macbeth type figure. In the books he's an atheist whose using the red god to save the realm after he's seen that the magic is real, he's not a true believer.

He sacrificed shireen to save his men, defeat the boltons, and eventually save the realm from the white walkers. Robb killed all of his men for some bad pussy, I think I'll go with Stannis.

He burned his brother in law because he was going to sell Shireen to the Lannisters, it's explained in the book. Imagine Shireen being married to Jeoffery, fuck.

Stannis won multiple battles, defeated the Greyjoy Fleet, took the largest of the Iron Islands, and held Storms End for years while eating the rats. He also defeated a 100,000 man army of savages that would've destroyed the realm. The reason Davos follows him is because he's a good leader.

The Wildlings are retarded, his deal was more than fair. They'd have land, they'd be citizens of the realm, they'd be protected by the crown and the wall, as long as they just served the realm instead of being a bunch of lazy freeloading cunts. They even changed their mind later and fought for the realm, if they would've done it earlier maybe Rickon and all those men at the wall would still be alive.

He has the greatest moral compass out of any of them, he's the one who sacrificed everything to save millions he never knew.

Kindness got Ned Stark killed. You can't be a good King without sternness and commitment. I think Jon will be ok, but he is still a child and has alot to learn. He will be easily manipulated at court by Littlefinger types who advise him, just like his adopted father.
User avatar
#23 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
use whatever justification you want but burning retainers alive for not converting, burning your child, making deals with evil people for results, listening to evil people over trusted friends all shows that he is one of the least moral people and Snow is a better candidate.
User avatar
#25 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
You obviously didn't read anything i said.
User avatar
#26 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
I read the entire thing I'm telling you that all your doing is justifying evil actions what do you not understand about that? He sacrificed shireen on bad advice/info and it didn't work. furthermore if he had cooperated with the wildlings he would have had their aid and asking them to burn their leader alive is not a good deal. And burning people alive is torture what do you not understand about that? What do you not understand about the fact that if he was loyal he would not burn his retainers alive for not converting and use someone clearly using black magic. All you are doing is saying "yes he did bad things but he had good intentions so that's fine am I right?".
User avatar
#27 - youregaylol (09/18/2016) [-]
nah you didn't, your first line "burning retainers alive for not converting" proves it.

mance wouldn't have been burned if he accepted the fair deal.
User avatar
#30 - supername (09/18/2016) [-]
if you actually watched the show you'd know he burned plenty others for not converting and that is the reason he gives davos when he questions him. This is the last I have to say since you'd rather condescend instead of discuss.