x
Click to expand

superflystickman

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:8/08/2010
Last Login:3/01/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4696
Comment Ranking:#11000
Highest Content Rank:#4610
Highest Comment Rank:#41
Content Thumbs: 1375 total,  1782 ,  407
Comment Thumbs: 11325 total,  13289 ,  1964
Content Level Progress: 77% (77/100)
Level 112 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 50.2% (251/500)
Level 310 Comments: Wizard → Level 311 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:2
Content Views:115491
Times Content Favorited:181 times
Total Comments Made:3454
FJ Points:13312
Favorite Tags: Pokemon (9) | The Game (8) | GIF (4) | facebook (2) | PIKACHU (2) | the other game (2)

Funny Text/Links

Funny Pictures

  • Views: 49686
    Thumbs Up 576 Thumbs Down 104 Total: +472
    Comments: 115
    Favorites: 105
    Uploaded: 03/16/13
    Fairy Tail Fairy Tail
  • Views: 17210
    Thumbs Up 260 Thumbs Down 39 Total: +221
    Comments: 21
    Favorites: 8
    Uploaded: 12/25/14
    The backpedalling is too real The backpedalling is too real
  • Views: 8584
    Thumbs Up 150 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +141
    Comments: 19
    Favorites: 10
    Uploaded: 05/28/14
    Disney Fanart Disney Fanart
  • Views: 6291
    Thumbs Up 119 Thumbs Down 12 Total: +107
    Comments: 5
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 10/30/12
    What What
  • Views: 7114
    Thumbs Up 129 Thumbs Down 29 Total: +100
    Comments: 10
    Favorites: 6
    Uploaded: 01/14/13
    KatawaKenji KatawaKenji
  • Views: 7380
    Thumbs Up 92 Thumbs Down 16 Total: +76
    Comments: 28
    Favorites: 24
    Uploaded: 09/16/10
    Vegeta breakdancing Vegeta breakdancing
1 2 3 4 5 > [ 29 Funny Pictures Total ]

latest user's comments

#14 - The only acceptable dress content 03/01/2015 on Mygosh +1
#107 - She didn't lose the will to live, she was clearly fighting to … 03/01/2015 on If only 0
#96 - It wasn't childbirth complications. How do you think Anakin su…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/01/2015 on If only +4
User avatar #105 - seancwatts (03/01/2015) [-]
She died because she lost the will to live. Didnt that happen because she saw the person she loved turn into such a monster? If he helped kill palpatine he would have been there for her and not choked her out. Prob resulting in her not dieing to childbirth. I dont know much about it though, but if what youre saying is true if he killed the senator he would have never had to undergo the operation in the first place.
User avatar #107 - superflystickman (03/01/2015) [-]
She didn't lose the will to live, she was clearly fighting to hold onto her life when she died. Plus Padme was way too badass to just give up, if she wasn't then she wouldn't have been able to unite the Gungans and Naboo proper. The droid said she lost the will to live because droids can't force. The choking was explicitly shown to be nonlethal as she spoke several times afterward, and her death had nothing to do with asphyxiation. And she didn't die from childbirth, they performed an emergency birth because she was dying. When you say killed the senator, you could be talking about two senators. If you mean Palpatine, then duh, things wouldn't have fallen to shit in the first place if he'd done that. If you mean Padme, then no, he still would've needed the operation. He needed the operation because he lost two limbs and then caught fire for a few minutes. Palpatine funneled Padme's connection to the force into him as a way to keep him alive during an operation that would kill basically anyone, much less a severely burned triple amputee
#425 - >Tons of anti gun arguments on the comments >On Funn…  [+] (6 new replies) 12/30/2014 on murica +3
User avatar #467 - roadrager (12/30/2014) [-]
Theres always been arguments against gun ownership on FJ were all from different cultures obviously we have different views. Personally I think that the US is insane and i dont understand your logic but as a Brit its not my right to tell you how you should run your country. What annoys me is all the eurofags trying to act superior this is an issue that America needs to sort out themselves.
#496 - parrotmaster (12/30/2014) [-]
Just because america needs to fix their own problems doesn't mean we're not superior.

It's america. Everything is superior to that.
#511 - meangirlz (12/30/2014) [-]
Try winning a war against us then. We're fucking insane and like it like that.
#519 - parrotmaster (12/30/2014) [-]
Yeah, easy to win a war when you're the only country willing to spend all that healthcare money outside of your borders.
#521 - meangirlz (12/30/2014) [-]
We're insane, I just admitted that. But we are superior war machines than where ever you're from. My point is proven.
User avatar #497 - roadrager (12/30/2014) [-]
well yeah most places are. all im saying is we dont have the right to talk shit about their gun control its their country let them sort it.
#21 - My bad. Hadn't seen the other post when I put this out. Found … 12/27/2014 on The backpedalling is too real 0
#8 - I take it you haven't kept up with gamergate and the **…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/25/2014 on The backpedalling is too real +3
User avatar #9 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
Either way I never really got why people cared about game journalism

All they ever really do is take what's happened at gaming events or in a interview
#14 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
Your troll, it failed here. You had a decent run...then you threw up the trollface.
#11 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
I think we just saw turtletroll slow roll a troll's role
#6 - Of course it doesn't outright say it. Every time an article is…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/25/2014 on The backpedalling is too real +3
User avatar #7 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
I'm not really being confrontational.

Just saying that they allow the journalists to have their own opinions. And every company is different.

They might be much more lax about everything and if they say "well done gamers you are the gamer of the year" or whatever that was then why wouldn't you consider that their stance?

They might take the stance of being totally neutral and letting their journalists say whatever they want as long as it's well written (which that article wasn't anyway but it's fucking gaming journalism so the standard isn't very high)
User avatar #8 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
I take it you haven't kept up with gamergate and the horseshit of gaming journalism at all, because you really seem to have no idea about what's been going on. Kotaku isn't lax, they have narratives to push. You can't push a narrative by being lax. They were working with all of the other major journalism sites to maintain a narrative across all of the websites. Before gamergate, they were all shilling out clickbait, SJW garbage and rants about cis white male scum. Gamers exposed the crap they were pulling, working with other sites included, and they all went for the throat, with Kotaku at the head. They tried to slander and shame gamergate out of existence. There was the initial "death of an identity" article, and then several afterwards about how gamergate didn't work, how gamergate was tired, and how they were all misogynists. Then they revealed that they've lost millions of dollars in ad revenue because they shit talked their original, core fanbase. Their shitty CEO, Nick Denton, even had to resign because of the losses. This isn't one journalists opinion, this is badly written pandering, asskissing and too-late damage control. They think that if they treat gamers like special snowflakes for a little while, they''ll all forget about the bullshit of the past several years.

This is Kotaku weakly waving the white flag because they got fucking destroyed.
User avatar #9 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
Either way I never really got why people cared about game journalism

All they ever really do is take what's happened at gaming events or in a interview
#14 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
Your troll, it failed here. You had a decent run...then you threw up the trollface.
#11 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
I think we just saw turtletroll slow roll a troll's role
#4 - Sure, but this isn't their opinion. This is "This is our …  [+] (8 new replies) 12/25/2014 on The backpedalling is too real +3
User avatar #5 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
kotaku.com/we-might-be-witnessing-the-death-of-an-identity-1628203079

Doesnt say anywhere "this is our company's standpoint"

Gamergate is almost as full of misinformation as the sjws
#13 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
You do realize these writers have come out saying they were threatened with termination if they didn't write exactly what they were told right? There is even large scale evidence of active and very illegal collusion and co-ordination.
Just because the writer can't say it's company standpoint(as they would be illegal, coercion) doesn't mean this is the mans opinion.

If the evidence of collusion and threats hadn't come out I'd agree, but you got this one wrong.
User avatar #6 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
Of course it doesn't outright say it. Every time an article is published by a journalism company, it has been allowed to make it that far by writers, editors, executives, and anyone else concerned with what their company is putting out. If an article makes it past all of these people and is published, then it is implied that the company is okay with this message and considers it a valid standpoint that represents their ideas on the issue. They don't say "This is what we think" because that makes their biases even more glaringly obvious and journalists like to at least attempt to maintain an illusion of objectivity, and furthermore, saying that the company's standpoint is whatever side of the issue they're writing in favor of is redundant, as they wouldn't be writing in favor of a point they didn't believe

TL;dr, don't call me misinformed when you're just being dense and confrontational.
User avatar #7 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
I'm not really being confrontational.

Just saying that they allow the journalists to have their own opinions. And every company is different.

They might be much more lax about everything and if they say "well done gamers you are the gamer of the year" or whatever that was then why wouldn't you consider that their stance?

They might take the stance of being totally neutral and letting their journalists say whatever they want as long as it's well written (which that article wasn't anyway but it's fucking gaming journalism so the standard isn't very high)
User avatar #8 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
I take it you haven't kept up with gamergate and the horseshit of gaming journalism at all, because you really seem to have no idea about what's been going on. Kotaku isn't lax, they have narratives to push. You can't push a narrative by being lax. They were working with all of the other major journalism sites to maintain a narrative across all of the websites. Before gamergate, they were all shilling out clickbait, SJW garbage and rants about cis white male scum. Gamers exposed the crap they were pulling, working with other sites included, and they all went for the throat, with Kotaku at the head. They tried to slander and shame gamergate out of existence. There was the initial "death of an identity" article, and then several afterwards about how gamergate didn't work, how gamergate was tired, and how they were all misogynists. Then they revealed that they've lost millions of dollars in ad revenue because they shit talked their original, core fanbase. Their shitty CEO, Nick Denton, even had to resign because of the losses. This isn't one journalists opinion, this is badly written pandering, asskissing and too-late damage control. They think that if they treat gamers like special snowflakes for a little while, they''ll all forget about the bullshit of the past several years.

This is Kotaku weakly waving the white flag because they got fucking destroyed.
User avatar #9 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
Either way I never really got why people cared about game journalism

All they ever really do is take what's happened at gaming events or in a interview
#14 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
Your troll, it failed here. You had a decent run...then you threw up the trollface.
#11 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
I think we just saw turtletroll slow roll a troll's role
#2 - Different journalists working for and representing the same we…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/25/2014 on The backpedalling is too real +58
User avatar #3 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
Okay but they still have some autonomy to have their own opinions.
User avatar #10 - cuntism (12/25/2014) [-]
In pretty much any other instance I'd side with you, but the death of gamers thing was a co-ordinated and collusionary act perpetrated by a host of websites working in tandem
User avatar #4 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
Sure, but this isn't their opinion. This is "This is our company's standpoint", and they're directly contradicting a previous statement from their company and acting like they never said things that they clearly did
User avatar #5 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
kotaku.com/we-might-be-witnessing-the-death-of-an-identity-1628203079

Doesnt say anywhere "this is our company's standpoint"

Gamergate is almost as full of misinformation as the sjws
#13 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
You do realize these writers have come out saying they were threatened with termination if they didn't write exactly what they were told right? There is even large scale evidence of active and very illegal collusion and co-ordination.
Just because the writer can't say it's company standpoint(as they would be illegal, coercion) doesn't mean this is the mans opinion.

If the evidence of collusion and threats hadn't come out I'd agree, but you got this one wrong.
User avatar #6 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
Of course it doesn't outright say it. Every time an article is published by a journalism company, it has been allowed to make it that far by writers, editors, executives, and anyone else concerned with what their company is putting out. If an article makes it past all of these people and is published, then it is implied that the company is okay with this message and considers it a valid standpoint that represents their ideas on the issue. They don't say "This is what we think" because that makes their biases even more glaringly obvious and journalists like to at least attempt to maintain an illusion of objectivity, and furthermore, saying that the company's standpoint is whatever side of the issue they're writing in favor of is redundant, as they wouldn't be writing in favor of a point they didn't believe

TL;dr, don't call me misinformed when you're just being dense and confrontational.
User avatar #7 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
I'm not really being confrontational.

Just saying that they allow the journalists to have their own opinions. And every company is different.

They might be much more lax about everything and if they say "well done gamers you are the gamer of the year" or whatever that was then why wouldn't you consider that their stance?

They might take the stance of being totally neutral and letting their journalists say whatever they want as long as it's well written (which that article wasn't anyway but it's fucking gaming journalism so the standard isn't very high)
User avatar #8 - superflystickman (12/25/2014) [-]
I take it you haven't kept up with gamergate and the horseshit of gaming journalism at all, because you really seem to have no idea about what's been going on. Kotaku isn't lax, they have narratives to push. You can't push a narrative by being lax. They were working with all of the other major journalism sites to maintain a narrative across all of the websites. Before gamergate, they were all shilling out clickbait, SJW garbage and rants about cis white male scum. Gamers exposed the crap they were pulling, working with other sites included, and they all went for the throat, with Kotaku at the head. They tried to slander and shame gamergate out of existence. There was the initial "death of an identity" article, and then several afterwards about how gamergate didn't work, how gamergate was tired, and how they were all misogynists. Then they revealed that they've lost millions of dollars in ad revenue because they shit talked their original, core fanbase. Their shitty CEO, Nick Denton, even had to resign because of the losses. This isn't one journalists opinion, this is badly written pandering, asskissing and too-late damage control. They think that if they treat gamers like special snowflakes for a little while, they''ll all forget about the bullshit of the past several years.

This is Kotaku weakly waving the white flag because they got fucking destroyed.
User avatar #9 - turtletroll (12/25/2014) [-]
Either way I never really got why people cared about game journalism

All they ever really do is take what's happened at gaming events or in a interview
#14 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
Your troll, it failed here. You had a decent run...then you threw up the trollface.
#11 - anonexplains (12/26/2014) [-]
I think we just saw turtletroll slow roll a troll's role
#180 - I mean I'm not interested in the game personally, but I am aga… 12/18/2014 on Gabes defeats the SJWs 0

user's channels

Join Subscribe 4chan
Join Subscribe animemanga
Join Subscribe fma-channel
Join Subscribe food-porn
Join Subscribe imadechannel
Join Subscribe katawashoujo
Join Subscribe pokemon
Join Subscribe wallpapers

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1100
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #99 - kanatana ONLINE (12/23/2014) [-]
Hey, was wondering if I could have your FJ points? Just curious.
User avatar #68 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
I wrote that Pokemon thing on the fly. Would you like to see what I can do when I put my mind to it?
User avatar #96 to #69 - pull (01/01/2013) [-]
I'm actually about twenty thousands words into writing a book right now. Imagine Harry Dresden plus Odd Thomas.
User avatar #97 to #96 - superflystickman (01/01/2013) [-]
That sounds like a fun trip.
User avatar #98 to #97 - pull (01/01/2013) [-]
It's been interesting, for sure.
User avatar #70 to #69 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
Good, good. If you're a fan of Naruto fanfiction, that would help.
User avatar #71 to #70 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
I love the series, but I'm afraid I haven't yet delved into the fanfiction, mainly out of fear fkr for the horrid **** that is doubtless there. I especially hated the last chapter, and especially love the current chapter.
User avatar #72 to #71 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
No... I am the 5% that is actually fairly decent. As the latest review of one of my stories says...

"I have to say wow... thats all i can say the kiss scene was fricken hilarious.
After reading it i took a break and walked downstairs giggling and laughing
for a few minutes. Although a little hard to read because of the massive
amount of content and the fact i'm getting a little sleepy this story is
amazing so far i just can't stop reading"

If you're interested, check this out. www.fanfiction.net/s/4054990/1/

I promise, it's a good read. If you like Soul Eater, I've got something interesting going on there, too.
User avatar #73 to #72 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
Interesting that you say that. I recently discovered SE, and I liked it but had to drop it because of extraneous circumstances.
User avatar #74 to #73 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
READ IT. WATCH IT. LIVE IT. BUY KEYCHAINS.
User avatar #75 to #74 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
I just have to wait until we get internet back, otherwise I'll tear through my data limit like a fire tears through dry brush.
User avatar #76 to #75 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
Snap, dude. Can you stream sites like Youtube?
User avatar #77 to #76 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
Yeah, I have a Galaxy S2, but I much prefer to read. How old is Naruto in chapter 1? It says he was born just over 12 years ago, but he didn't change from his orange jumpsuit to his mainly black jumpsuit until after Shippuden began, when he was roughly 15
User avatar #78 to #77 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
This is him at 12, but his personal history diverges when he's about 5. That's why he's in different clothes.
User avatar #79 to #78 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
I see. Does he hold true to his "embodiment of light" from the manga, or does that even come into play?
User avatar #80 to #79 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
My Naruto is... Dark. Violent. Conflicted, complicated, and not afraid to get dirty.

At the same time, he does have his standards, and he does lighten up along the way. Once he gets his true friends, he becomes more like the manga version... Kinda.

Listen, if I told you too much more, I would risk throwing out spoilers. Read it, and let me know what you think.
User avatar #81 to #80 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
So Naruto had he not had Iruka's personal attention. I suppose I'll have a little trouble with that, since one of my favorite qualities about Naruto is his Goku-esque optimism and good intent, but the reading does seem good.
User avatar #82 to #81 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
Trust me, buddy... if you can get through the first few chapters without wanting to kill me, you'll enjoy the ride.
User avatar #85 to #82 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
[big]WHAT. HE DOESN'T EAT AT ICHIRAKU??!?[big]
User avatar #86 to #85 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
JUST READ OKAY IT'S A LONG LONG LONG STORY

IF IT HELPS ANY, LATER IN THE STORY HE HELPS ICHIRAKU RUN THE STORE FOR AN AFTERNOON SO SHUT UP
User avatar #88 to #86 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
I mean I always wanted him to be clever but I came to terms with him not being clever and now it just doesn't feel like it fits but I've wanted it for so long and GAAAAHHHH INDECISION
User avatar #87 to #86 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
And and and and he's clever in conversation! I don't know if I like this. I was gonna go to bed but dammit I'm drawn in.
User avatar #89 to #87 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
This is a smarter Naruto... but he's still kinda stupid sometimes. I do hope you like it.
User avatar #90 to #89 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
Uh, I think so. I also like this relationship with the fox, because it opens up the opportunity for them to possibly become friends earlier.
User avatar #91 to #90 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
Yeah... They have a REALLY complicated relationship.
User avatar #83 to #82 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
I'll have to see tomorrow. I'm dead tired.
User avatar #84 to #83 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
G'night, mate. Sleep well.
User avatar #92 to #84 - superflystickman (12/31/2012) [-]
Alright, so I definitely like it, but did Naruto really have to buy a bunch of Goth clothes?
User avatar #93 to #92 - pull (12/31/2012) [-]
Hey, I was a stupid high school kid when I wrote that, give me a break. You have to admit, the quality is pretty good for an eighteen year old.
User avatar #94 to #93 - superflystickman (01/01/2013) [-]
Oh definitely, but being only a month shy of 19, I don't exactly appreciate that comment. I'll let it slide though. Have you ever tried writing on original content? Your style doesn't feel content, like it would flourish left to its owb devices.
#52 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#53 to #52 - superflystickman (10/16/2011) [-]
Workin' on it. Pic unrelated.
#54 to #53 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#56 to #55 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#58 to #57 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#59 to #58 - superflystickman (10/16/2011) [-]
Evidently we called Black Thread at some point.
#60 to #59 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#63 to #62 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#65 to #64 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #49 - Covenantkilla (03/13/2011) [-]
FUNNYJUNK
#34 - Covenantkilla (03/08/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 95**
User avatar #35 to #34 - superflystickman (03/09/2011) [-]
Close, but no.
#36 to #35 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 72**
#37 to #36 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 16**
User avatar #40 to #37 - superflystickman (03/09/2011) [-]
God hates you
#38 to #37 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 46**
#39 to #38 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 80**
#41 to #39 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 76**
#42 to #41 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 15** CHECK EM'
#44 to #43 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
**Covenantkilla rolls 44** ONE MORE
User avatar #46 to #44 - superflystickman (03/10/2011) [-]
Who the **** is that? It kinda looks like me.
User avatar #47 to #46 - Covenantkilla (03/10/2011) [-]
it is
User avatar #48 to #47 - superflystickman (03/11/2011) [-]
Yup. My face is the one that gets dubs. Also, that's creepy bro
#45 to #44 - Covenantkilla (03/09/2011) [-]
AAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWW YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!
User avatar #67 to #45 - superflystickman (12/08/2011) [-]
Oh, what twisted webs we weave.
#24 - Marv **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#20 - toothlessthedragon (01/25/2011) [-]
how did you find me?
#21 to #20 - superflystickman (01/25/2011) [-]
Comments. I noticed that you have a reaction with Toothless in it for EVERYTHING. And I was impressed. Also, I saw that you got most of your thumbs off of comments. Comment thumbs are so underrated, and as a fellow commenter, I offer you a brofist. And a friend request.
#22 to #21 - toothlessthedragon (01/25/2011) [-]
if you want to be my friend you have to pass my test
<--------enlarge for test
#23 to #22 - superflystickman (01/25/2011) [-]
Dude, I eat that for breakfast.   
  
No, really, I have a glandular problem
Dude, I eat that for breakfast.

No, really, I have a glandular problem
#25 to #23 - toothlessthedragon (01/25/2011) [-]
test completed
test completed
#26 to #25 - toothlessthedragon (01/25/2011) [-]
friendship
friendship
#27 to #26 - superflystickman (01/25/2011) [-]
Acheivement!:Befriend a dragon
#29 to #27 - superflystickman (01/25/2011) [-]
jklol I don't get acheivements

I get trophies

I'm a Sonyfag
User avatar #31 to #30 - superflystickman (01/25/2011) [-]
I'm not sure how to take a pic of my emblem, but mine is purple bacon with green wings
#32 to #31 - toothlessthedragon (01/25/2011) [-]
sounds yummy
sounds yummy
User avatar #19 - sugarbabykat (01/11/2011) [-]
I ******* love you. tag ur it!
User avatar #13 - igotsunshineinabag (12/28/2010) [-]
who are you?
User avatar #14 to #13 - superflystickman (12/28/2010) [-]
No one that you know, probably. I just saw your epic username(lyrics from Clint Eastwood by The Gorillaz) and I was gonna see if you would have an epic comment thread of the lyrics to that song on your profile.

Wow, that sounds a lot more creeper-ish when it's not just inside my head.
:/...
User avatar #15 to #14 - igotsunshineinabag (12/28/2010) [-]
indeed it does sir
User avatar #16 to #15 - superflystickman (12/28/2010) [-]
Well, sorry for bothering you
User avatar #17 to #16 - igotsunshineinabag (12/28/2010) [-]
theres just do many pedos
User avatar #18 to #17 - superflystickman (12/29/2010) [-]
Yeah, I understand. Mine says I'm like 20(just for **** access), but I'm really 16

And that sounds really plausible, considering how sketchy this whole convo has been
User avatar #12 - airguitar (12/22/2010) [-]
TOGETHER WE CAN PAVE THE WAY, IT WILL LAST FOREVER

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #2 to #1 - superflystickman (10/09/2010) [-]
And I was expecting something intellegent/funny
 Friends (0)