Login or register


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:10/10/2011
Last Login:7/17/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 2 total,  19 ,  21
Comment Thumbs: 3303 total,  5513 ,  2210
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 68.99% (69/100)
Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Content Views:4112
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:950
FJ Points:3290

Text Posts

  • Views: 2089
    Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +2
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 05/03/14
    My Little Brony My Little Brony

latest user's comments

#33 - I hate this ****** site jesus christ  [+] (1 new reply) 07/16/2015 on Unfavorable Bird Meme 0
User avatar
#43 - thatoneiranianguy (07/16/2015) [-]
And yet you're still here.

Pretty typical...all bitch no logic.
#84 - Where's the controversy? That's extremely illegal, lol.  [+] (2 new replies) 07/16/2015 on 22 years is crazy! +7
#357 - anon (07/16/2015) [-]
People might see the age of consent or the punishment as unreasonable. I personally think the age of consent of 18 is fine but am not sure about what to think about 22 years. I think something like what she did should certainly be harshly punished but going into ranges of more than 10 years i think it hard to estimate how appropriate a punishment is. Maybe 15 or so would be enough? Btw i think the same way no matter the sex of the offender i just think being "out of the job buisness after loosing the possibility of having the job you had before again from 30-52 might make getting back into the job market hard. Now i don't want to sympathise with her and find her behaviour utterly inexcuseable but I think staying in prison for 15 years kinda gets a point across already and making things too hard for people who get out of prison again might reduce the chances of them becoming productive, non criminal citizens again. But well I am not really certain about my position on the topic here maybe in 10 years or so i will think about the issue differently. I think the justice system is not there to make the victims or their families comfortable by giving high sentences (though if they are satisfied with the sentences thats a nice thing of course) but rather discourage future criminals to make a crime not worth it and also to get dangerous people off the streets until they have (hopefully) turned into less dangerous citizens. Also the last sentence gives some people a huge boner
User avatar
#198 - anonymoose (07/16/2015) [-]
Most female pedophiles get a slap on the wrist and told "that's bad, don't do that again".
#14 - Too many people love their religious community membership to c… 07/16/2015 on Liberal America Logic +4
#109 - It just gets harder and harder to like or relate to the users … 07/15/2015 on Lets go to hell! +1
#34 - Satire. It's satire. 07/15/2015 on The problem with younger... 0
#56 - I wonder how successful the civil rights movement would've bee… 07/15/2015 on The world we live in 0
#175 - THAT OPINION SO UNPOPULAR 07/14/2015 on A popular unpopular opinion +2
#145 - If we want higher education to be as financially inaccessible …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/14/2015 on Minimum wage +1
User avatar
#154 - angelusprimus (07/14/2015) [-]
That's exactly what it should be. Providing you with your basic needs if you work full time. Nothing more. No luxury, no lobster dinners, no summer trips to the ocean or disneyworld every year.
Just your basic needs covered.
#22 - Believing in traditional marriage != denying service to people…  [+] (1 new reply) 07/12/2015 on LGBT the Oppressors +3
#58 - anon (07/12/2015) [-]
you been eatin' up that left narrative with a double-wide fork I see.
#19 - WOAH COOL  [+] (3 new replies) 07/11/2015 on Muh religion muh savior muh... +1
User avatar
#20 - jacklane (07/11/2015) [-]
What?Yeah! Cool. Let me say more then now that I have an audience

I hate blacks. I wasn't racist until I joined the Navy in 2009, where I was attacked by a black guy who tried to call ME a racist, and threaten to send me grinding because he thought his puny 2nd class rank made him a shot caller.... but we all know that decision comes from either the LCPO or DIVO, and MAYBE in some cases the LCPO. SO after that, I flattened the nigger's tires with an awl through the sidewalls and stayed below the radar as I watched and listened..... I found that ALL blacks were either always getting on restriction for dumb shit in-town and subsequently lazy and low ranking, or that they were high-ranking do-nothing, privileged asses that got to where they are simply for being fucking black.

Therefor I became racist at 21 years old. Also, to this day, blacks do nothing but try to scam on the corner, or deal drugs, murder, fuck it, I almost don't even care to post
User avatar
#31 - testaburger (07/11/2015) [-]
User avatar
#21 - jacklane (07/11/2015) [-]
Shit wait, not GRINDING, CRANKING. I've been out since 2013, forgetting shit.
[ 933 Total ]
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (9)
Anonymous comments allowed.
9 comments displayed.
#10 - nought ONLINE (03/30/2015) [-]
lol person below mad
#1 - Kestin (04/18/2013) [-]
Here's a link to the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (of Mental Disorders) 4's (summarized) definition of "antisocial personality disorder", since you clearly have no ******* clue what it is:

Here's a link to the dictionary, so you can learn the difference between words like "furry" and "beastiality":

"Furry", or any kink really, MIGHT be described by the paraphilia section (http://allpsych.com/disorders/paraphilias/index.html). Fetishism, while not technically correct, is the closest paraphilia "disorder" which describes the furry, but note this sentence: "To be considered diagnosable, the fantasies, urges, or behaviors must cause significant distress in the individual or be disruptive to his or her everyday functioning."

Also, you should probably know that pedophiles, so long as they aren't acting on their urges, aren't "horrible, monstrous people." They're only bad people if they act on it, and, in ANY case they are a victim of either faulty wiring, a disturbed past, or some deep and likely unavoidable psychological damage. They're sad, abnormal individuals who deserve help. Those that can't "control themselves", of course, are not excusable, but I'm not here to argue that.

Source? I'm a goddamn psychology major.

If ANYONE in that conversation had "signs of antisocial personality disorder" it was YOU (take a look, you'll find stuff about "disregarding the rights of others", "lack of empathy", etc) but even THEN "showing signs" is not ANYWHERE near enough to diagnose a person. We ALL show signs of something.

Learn a bit about things before you open your ******* mouth. While I have no right to deny you your opinions, you can and absolutely SHOULD keep them to yourself if you have no knowledge of the subject at hand. Educate yourself, and THEN we can have this discussion. Until then, stop abusing people on the internet and enjoy the damn thing like everyone else is.
#3 to #1 - stickandmove (04/18/2013) [-]
I'm not diagnosing anyone over the internet. Simmer down.

Pedophiles who act on their impulses are evil, no doubt. But their attraction to children isn't indicative of a healthy mentality.

Don't flex your major. Everyone and their pet goldfish is either a criminal justice or psychology major. You're a dime a dozen.

I don't need to open my mouth to type. What's there to know about the subject? You pleasure yourself to likenesses of animals, or at least you defend the people that do. There's nothing more to it than that.

Have I addressed everything?
#4 to #3 - Kestin (04/19/2013) [-]
You actually did a pretty good job. More than I gave you credit for, in fact. I'd even be swayed to your point of view, if you weren't describing what is evidently a completely different situation. So here we go. I've even put on some Dobie Grey so I won't get so irrationally angry this time.

First of all, let's address your first remark. "Psychopathy leads to", " something very wrong with the lot of you", "doesn't mean you're not ****** in the head" all imply some sort of attempt to label or classify people. THIS ("characteristic of an antisocial personality") is an honest-to-whatever attempt to apply a clinical/psychological term to someone blanket group of people. I'd almost even be okay with that, but you did it entirely wrong. There is literally, and I do mean LITERALLY, no part of antisocial personality disorder (being a SOCIOPATH) that is displayed in furry culture (or even bestiality, pedophilia, etc) AT ALL. If you made a Venn Diagram, there'd be no overlap. None.

About pedophiles? Yeah, I don't like them. Hell, I know victims of them. But you said this: "Nevermind that they act on it, just the fact that it persists is abominable." It isn't. It's SAD. If we're going to throw around mental heath talk, it needs to be from a healthy point of view. I figured you should know.

And flexing my major? I'm not. I threw the "goddamn" in there because I was FURIOUS (and because it's a fun word), but I brought up my major simply to lend credibility to what I was saying. It would be unfair and wrong of me to school you on the finer points of psychology if I couldn't back it up with sources (which I did) and some sort of proof of knowledge (which I did). There are a TON of psych majors, true. It's just clear you aren't one of them.

Kudos, by the way, on your arguing of semantics. You're right, you don't need to open your mouth to type. The words just felt... the right kind of snarky. I meant it as a general expression along the lines of:
#5 to #4 - Kestin (04/19/2013) [-]
"Feel free to express your opinion, but if you're going to bring up clinical terms or argue your thoughts like fact, for the love of all that you hold dear make sure you understand what you're talking about before you communicate." In fact, I double checked EVERYTHING I said to you to make sure it was true before I sent it your way. I always do. Your opinions are (almost) always welcome. For example, I have a distaste for scat fetishes. I don't like gore porn. I'm perfectly fine with those, though, when everyone is consenting, but there isn't documentable evidence to support my opinions other than "I personally find this gross." I DO have a problem with snuff porn, because both conventional and post-conventional morality dictates that killing others for sexual satisfacting is wrong because it oversteps your rights in that you have (irreperably) harmed another living creature.

What's there to know about the subject, though? Like any complicated subculture... a LOT. A TON. Someone more knowledgeable than I could do entire anthropolocial studies on the Furry subculture. They're fasciniating. You said "the likeness of animals." You also said "zoophilia fixation." As much as it's tempting to give it a glance and cry wolf (see the pun? ^_^), they aren't the same thing. Furry is actually more analogous to fantasy "fetishes" like... elves or dwarves. Or the aliens from Avatar. Or angels. Why ANTHROPOMORPHIC animal-people, though? I don't know. Since being a furry lets you recreate yourself in a subculture that is generally friendly and accepting, I'd have to say a lot of people probably are drawn to animals because the human race has not been kind to them but animals have never harmed them. Plus they're cute. Some people might like the look or feel of fur, which isn't really that much different than a "hairy fetish", just a bit less gross. Some people might find it exotic. Some people are just wired this way.

#6 to #5 - Kestin (04/19/2013) [-]
It's important to remember that it isn't different from most paraphilias. I am not a furry, but I have an odd fixation on BDSM. Can't help my self, honestly. I could trace back its roots, possibly, but there's no reason to. It is what it is. That, honestly, has more offensive and downright treading-on-thin-ice aspects than being a furry. Some people have a uniform fetish -- nurses, or schoolgirls. One could even say that liking schoolgirl uniforms is indicitive of pedophilia. (One would, of course, be wrong, though I could see pedophilies liking it. *shrug*) It's simply people who have a different view than you. What you've done is similar to attacking someone of a different religion, skin color, political party, sports team loyalty, or... hell, name a difference -- all while using the WRONG terms and doing it in a manner that crossed a lot of lines. Furries -- or people with almost any paraphilia -- do NOT need "desperate and immediate professional help" (providing the fixations or preferances aren't disrupting their lives or significantly disrupting the lives of others) no more than you are in need of professional help for any food preferences or musical tastes.

There are more points I'd likey love to dispute, but I do have to say I was so incredibly flabbergasted at your mis-informed and narrowminded attacking of an incredibly peaceful group of people that I had to stop reading. Like this, that I just noticed: "justice your fascination with nude man-dogs." Why should that need to be justified? Do ANY preferences, sexual or otherwise, that YOU hold need to be justified? In all honesty, though, it doesn't matter.

Really? I don't blame you for finding Furries weird. I don't even blame you for being uncomfortable with the subject. I don't even blame you for being unwilling to learn about them.
#7 to #6 - Kestin (04/19/2013) [-]
I will, however, say that your odd level of fear and hostility to paraphilia suggests either some traumatic experience, repressed desire, or mental issue that you may want to be see a counselor for, just to talk about it.

Either way, you need to understand that -- personal opinions aside -- what you've just done is not an okay or socially acceptable way to interact with another human being. The attacks you made were unfair and the terms you threw around were both incredibly negative and laughably inaccurate. You debased, berrated, and made less of someone else -- TO THEIR FACE -- simply because you had a problem accepting some semi-basic aspect of human sexuality. Have your opinions. Stick to them. But NEVER use them to harm someone minding their own business again.

(Yes, I wrote all that before-hand and broke it into pieces. If I was just offandedly offended by you, I suppose this would have been shorter. But 1) you did something horrible 2) you did it poorly 3) you are clearly a smart enough person to be reasoned with and explained to. You don't have to like furries, but what the hell is stopping you from throwing up your hands, saying "I don't understand and I don't wanna", and just walking away? Why attack people?)

P.S: I am aware I suck at spelling. You don't need to bring it up. ;)

P.P.S.: Honest question, no snark or attacks meant: what are you into? What are your kinks? There has to be something, right? Or are you defined by your lack of them? Because I actually quite enjoy the missionary position. That's cool. You have to have something that makes you different or unique somehow in life, though, right?
#8 to #7 - stickandmove (04/19/2013) [-]
As much as I appreciate you writing me the great american novel, I want to assure you wholeheartedly that I have no intention of reading any amount of it.

My concerns are what they are and, while I pride myself on keeping an open mind, I doubt that you can provide a sound enough argument in opposition.

If I've offended you then so be it. You'll need thick skin to enjoy the things you do, because this isn't the last time you'll receive unwelcome criticism for it.
#9 to #8 - Kestin (04/21/2013) [-]
*shrug* I don't really enjoy furry, and, as much as you'd think they would, no one really gives BDSM lovers ****.

Don't read what you don't want to read, that's fine. Left it there just in case you felt like having an intelligent discussion. It's not like I have anything better to do that late at night.

You can have your concerns. You probably shouldn't pride yourself on having an open mind (because you don't seem to), but who am I to judge? I don't know you. Maybe you were just having a bad day or whatever.

I think my you'll find my arguments very sound, though maybe not to your taste. Just know that if you ever get bored or curious, they'll be here. I do have to say, though, that I'm fine with "unwelcome criticism", but the way you expressed your crossed a line or two.

Regardless, I wish you a pleasant weekend and a good rest of your life.