Upload
Login or register

stcronin

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:7/23/2012
Last Login:9/22/2016
Location:Califronia
Stats
Content Thumbs: 4078 total,  4451 ,  373
Comment Thumbs: 3376 total,  3994 ,  618
Content Level Progress: 32% (32/100)
Level 140 Content: Faptastic → Level 141 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 96% (96/100)
Level 232 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:135497
Times Content Favorited:285 times
Total Comments Made:2395
FJ Points:793
I am awesome

Text Posts

  • Views: 75441
    Thumbs Up 3499 Thumbs Down 166 Total: +3333
    Comments: 211
    Favorites: 253
    Uploaded: 11/12/12
    What winners look like What winners look like
  • Views: 16348
    Thumbs Up 375 Thumbs Down 93 Total: +282
    Comments: 43
    Favorites: 22
    Uploaded: 12/12/13
    I thought it was funny I thought it was funny
  • Views: 3208
    Thumbs Up 64 Thumbs Down 9 Total: +55
    Comments: 2
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/11/13
    Unicorns man Unicorns man
  • Views: 2962
    Thumbs Up 56 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +51
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 1
    Uploaded: 01/21/13
    MLK MLK
  • Views: 2701
    Thumbs Up 47 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +42
    Comments: 1
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/18/12
    In a Perfect World In a Perfect World
  • Views: 2426
    Thumbs Up 28 Thumbs Down 6 Total: +22
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 01/19/13
    Well shit Well shit
First2[ 9 ]
  • Views: 1283
    Thumbs Up 4 Thumbs Down 6 Total: -2
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 11/26/12
    Farting Preacher Farting Preacher
  • Views: 682
    Thumbs Up 0 Thumbs Down 5 Total: -5
    Comments: 0
    Favorites: 0
    Uploaded: 02/12/14
    How sweet How sweet
First2[ 9 ]
First2[ 9 ]

latest user's comments

#105 - But people label whole communities even if most individual are…  [+] (3 replies) 04/28/2014 on Le edgy /r/atheism faec +2
User avatar
#127 - kaitheguy (04/28/2014) [-]
think about how child molesters are labeled as rapists even though the vast majority just can't resist when sexy kids want the D
User avatar
#154 - envinite (04/28/2014) [-]
Is it really a child molester when the kids is priest molester?
User avatar
#223 - kaitheguy (04/28/2014) [-]
my point exactly
#103 - And you are an idiot for labeling everyone on both sides as id…  [+] (4 replies) 04/28/2014 on Le edgy /r/atheism faec +1
#220 - anon (04/28/2014) [-]
I'm not labeling everyone on both sides of the religions as idiots, I'm labeling the ones labeling everyone else. Only the guilty party. I respect your attempt but mock your fail.
User avatar
#229 - stcronin (04/30/2014) [-]
My fedora senses are tingling
#123 - soloman (04/28/2014) [-]
Woah woah woah.

You're an idiot for labeling an anonymous as an idiot just because they labeled people on both sides as idiots for labeling each other idiots, because the nature of anonymity means you are sorta labeling all anonymous as idiots, maybe? Or... Uh... Well at the very least you don't really know who this anonymous is.. so... You're an idiot. Or something.
User avatar
#124 - stcronin (04/28/2014) [-]
That's why we are all idiots because I am an idiot labeling an idiot as an idiot because not all labelists are idiots
#178 - I did respond with scientific responses but it seems like you …  [+] (1 reply) 03/03/2014 on Vegans final form 0
#179 - arthurfj (03/04/2014) [-]
"Did you actually read any of this? Or at least understand how biological mechanisms work? I really don't understand why you have a stick shoved so far up your ass"

No scientific reply there except insults.

"sorry I don't cater to your intelligence"
That's OK. I did try and simplify it for you, but it was hard given you distinct lack of and biological knowledge, or even common sense.

All I was saying is that you were wrong, and explaining why. As I was backed up by iidonteven 2 to 1, it seems I wasn't the only one that knew this.

Don't get angry at me for trying to help you, nor should you feel obliged to insult me because you're embarrassed at being wrong. It's what science is all about. Enquiring and finding truth.
#176 - Did you actually read any of this? Or at least understand how …  [+] (3 replies) 03/03/2014 on Vegans final form 0
#177 - arthurfj (03/03/2014) [-]
Yes, and yes. Both mine and iidonteven's comments were direct replies to your comment. And yes, I obviously must have an understanding of that to be able to correct you. And that's all we were doing, providing you with more information. I liked that you were curious but knew some things you didn't, so I explained them, that's all.

I'm not sure whether you're angry because you were wrong or because you were corrected, but FYI, if you want to get involved in scientific discussion, your reply should have a reply to a comment that is relevant, scientific and fact based.

The second you turn to insults you lose (not that this is really debate, but the point still stands)
User avatar
#178 - stcronin (03/03/2014) [-]
I did respond with scientific responses but it seems like you didn't read them correctly or understand what I was saying, so I got fed up, sorry I don't cater to your intelligence.
#179 - arthurfj (03/04/2014) [-]
"Did you actually read any of this? Or at least understand how biological mechanisms work? I really don't understand why you have a stick shoved so far up your ass"

No scientific reply there except insults.

"sorry I don't cater to your intelligence"
That's OK. I did try and simplify it for you, but it was hard given you distinct lack of and biological knowledge, or even common sense.

All I was saying is that you were wrong, and explaining why. As I was backed up by iidonteven 2 to 1, it seems I wasn't the only one that knew this.

Don't get angry at me for trying to help you, nor should you feel obliged to insult me because you're embarrassed at being wrong. It's what science is all about. Enquiring and finding truth.
#172 - I never said they would be completely photosynthetic, obviousl…  [+] (5 replies) 03/02/2014 on Vegans final form 0
#173 - arthurfj (03/02/2014) [-]
OK, thanks for repeating the same point that I just made, I guess.
Although fp for accepting you're wrong and not being argumentative.
User avatar
#176 - stcronin (03/03/2014) [-]
Did you actually read any of this? Or at least understand how biological mechanisms work? I really don't understand why you have a stick shoved so far up your ass
#177 - arthurfj (03/03/2014) [-]
Yes, and yes. Both mine and iidonteven's comments were direct replies to your comment. And yes, I obviously must have an understanding of that to be able to correct you. And that's all we were doing, providing you with more information. I liked that you were curious but knew some things you didn't, so I explained them, that's all.

I'm not sure whether you're angry because you were wrong or because you were corrected, but FYI, if you want to get involved in scientific discussion, your reply should have a reply to a comment that is relevant, scientific and fact based.

The second you turn to insults you lose (not that this is really debate, but the point still stands)
User avatar
#178 - stcronin (03/03/2014) [-]
I did respond with scientific responses but it seems like you didn't read them correctly or understand what I was saying, so I got fed up, sorry I don't cater to your intelligence.
#179 - arthurfj (03/04/2014) [-]
"Did you actually read any of this? Or at least understand how biological mechanisms work? I really don't understand why you have a stick shoved so far up your ass"

No scientific reply there except insults.

"sorry I don't cater to your intelligence"
That's OK. I did try and simplify it for you, but it was hard given you distinct lack of and biological knowledge, or even common sense.

All I was saying is that you were wrong, and explaining why. As I was backed up by iidonteven 2 to 1, it seems I wasn't the only one that knew this.

Don't get angry at me for trying to help you, nor should you feel obliged to insult me because you're embarrassed at being wrong. It's what science is all about. Enquiring and finding truth.
#171 - No the DNA of the cow would change, chloroplasts only posses 1…  [+] (1 reply) 03/02/2014 on Vegans final form 0
#174 - arthurfj (03/02/2014) [-]
Wow. "All the DNA for INSIDE". Like muscle. Ergo, it would taste the same. Which is the point.

Don't be stubborn, just accept you're wrong. No need to come up with wrong arguments to defend a wrong opinion.