Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sorrowofdaedalus    

Rank #56918 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8582 total,  12494 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5588
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9102

latest user's comments

#367 - " I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know s…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/24/2013 on all natural 0
#374 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Entering a different state of consciousness is a completely different thing than escaping from reality, for one reason. The word escape implies that we need to run away from reality, like reality is bad or something. You're trying to make it seem like if you ever smoke weed, then after that your entire life revolves around it and you always need to be high. That's not true at all. I have no problem with reality. My girlfriend doesn't smoke weed, but i love going on dates with her because she makes me happy. That's part of my reality. Why would i need to escape from that? And no one uses weed for a "rush". Weed makes you calm, not in a rush. And using the "its illegal argument" is just plain stupid. The government is not always right. Remember how slavery used to be legal? The reason you keep calling me childish is because you're mad you can't come up with any good arguments. By the way; people who die from smoking weed every year: 0, average number of people who die from rock climing every year: 25. Dumb fuck. Do some research before you come at me with a retarded argument like that. And by the way, implying that i don't read? Insulting. I love reading. Fuck you. And even if everything you said was true (which its definately not) why do you have to yell at me? What did I, weed, or other weed smokers ever do to you to make you so mad?
User avatar #375 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, actually, it's not. The word escape implies exactly what it means, that you've left that state of consciousness. It doesn't mean or say that reality is bad, it says you're trying to leave it, and you do.

You're missing the point; when I say 'rush' I'm not claiming weed excites you, I'm claiming that these other activities are more fun.

By the way; People who die from smoking weed every year; Isn't 0. No one ODs on weed, but it is a proven carcinogen, meaning every pothead who has died of lung cancer, which is plenty, have all died from smoking weed. Indirectly you say? Yeah, about as indirectly as cigarettes, even if weed is less potent.

The 'illegal' argument isn't stupid, it's regarding basic moral fiber. Yeah, the government isn't always right, but flouting the law because you think it's wrong IS wrong. You don't break the rules set by society just because you don't like them, and if you do, you get your ass tossed in jail. That's what I'm saying, and that proves further that I'm not calling you a child because I can't make a good argument, I'm calling you a child because you're willing to break the law and risk years in jail for the sake of having a little fun.


By the way, I wasn't implying that you don't read, I was implying that reading is a more productive way to spend your time and have fun than smoking pot.

Not to mention, what the hell do you mean do some research? I didn't come at you with an argument about people dying from weed, I came at you with an argument about weed being a shitty way to have fun. Are you signing out so you can comment as an anonymous so it seems like more people are on your side?

Really though, if I didn't think I was making a good argument, why would I argue at all? My points are valid, none of them have you once disproven rather than angrily stated your opinion about, and you're calling them bad arguments without refuting any of them properly doesn't make them so.
#403 - nickmandemon (04/30/2013) [-]
Escape implies that you need to get away. I don't know how to explain that differently. And if you smoke pot you would understand that all this "leaving reality" stuff that you're talking about is a little ridiculous. Thats a better argument against something like lsd or something like that. And great for you if you think that those activities are more fun. Thats what you like to do and I'm not going to criticize you for it, unlike the way you're treating me for smoking "pot". And for you're information, weed has never killed anyone. That is one of the biggest arguments for its legalization. And regarding the legal issue; I don't know where you live, but I live in America, which was FOUNDED on the belief that if there is a law that the majority of the country doesn't agree with, then we have the right to change it. And if i enjoy smoking marijuana, I'm not gonna fucking wait for the government lollygagging and taking forever with legalization. And if flouting the law because you don't agree with it is wrong... are you calling people like Harriet Tubman bad people? Of course, I'm not comparing myself to her, I'm just asking you to defend what you said. And if you've admitted that you've never smoked weed, how do you know it's a shitty way to have fun? You sound like a person with a very narrow minded manner of thinking. And if I'm childish for having fun with risks, rather than spending my life surrounded by caution and metaphorical pillows, then so be it. Fun's best when it's spiked with danger. Maybe one day you will realize this, and i believe that day will be a great turning point in your life. I don't know why other people doing what they like to do bothers you so much, but maybe you should think about how it would feel if someone just started yelling at you and criticizing you about the way you live your life when they don't even know you as a person. And by the way, I've deftly refuted every argument you've presented. I literally address everything you say.
#364 - No one directly dies from anything. You don't die from a car a…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/24/2013 on all natural -1
#369 - anonymous (04/24/2013) [-]
"No one dies directly from anything"
So, deadly lung cancer isn't directly tied to smoking cigarettes? Literally overdosing on cocaine, or heroin, or meth or any other drug that is actually dangerous doesn't count as a direct death?
Yea, no shit there's people who have lung cancer and smoke pot, doesn't take a fuckin genius to figure that out. But if the weed didn't cause the cancer, why is there a problem? Why are cigarettes widely available and even subsidized by the government when they directly cause 100's of thousands of people to die each year? Yet weed, which (believe it or not) doesn't have a single death associated with it ever, is still illegal?
User avatar #370 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
Deadly lung cancer is directly tied to smoking cigarettes, but it's the AFFECTS of lung cancer that kills you, not the cancer itself, just like an overdose's AFFECTS kill you, the overdose doesn't.

But you're the one who decided to be a technical asswipe about it and asked for one case of a person dying directly from smoking weed.


Weed has had deaths associated with it, as I said, it's been proven a carcinogen, and hence has ties to lung cancer. If a man who smokes pot gets lung cancer, he likely got lung cancer from smoking pot, even if that isn't what it says on the tin.

Cigarettes are widely available and subsidized by the government because they are a major cash crop, and in addition to that so many people are addicted to them now that if they were made illegal, we'd just see Prohibition all over again, crime and smuggling rates would sky-rocket, and they'd be back in two years anyhow. That's why.

The weed DID cause the cancer, in the same way that cigarettes cause cancer, in that they introduce carcinogens to the body. The only difference is the potency levels, but that doesn't mean that a man who smokes that dies from lung cancer died from cigarettes directly, it means he died from lung cancer caused by cigarettes, just how people die from lung cancer caused by weed.
User avatar #371 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
EFFECTS. ** My bad.
#362 - No, you fucking idiot, that isn't it at all. We…  [+] (5 new replies) 04/24/2013 on all natural -1
#365 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Okay. I never said that weed wasn't finding a different state of conciousness. It's the fact that you ASSUME ( <--- check it out it's that word we were talking about) that we need to. Like i said, it's for fun.
User avatar #367 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
" I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know smokes weed to escape from reality. "

This is a direct copy paste of you claiming that smoking weed isn't entering a different state of consciousness, i.e. escaping from reality.

It's for fun, but it also kills you; That isn't fun. There's a hell of a lot of things that are not only fun for you, they are good for you too, as well as legal, and bring on a hell of a lot more of a rush than weed ever will.

Ever try Fencing? Rock climbing? Writing a novel, reading one, or survivalist camping?

Now THAT is fun. This is my problem; There are plenty of ways to have fun that don't risk being caught by the authorities and don't cause damage to your body, yet, as we've established before, you're too childish to see passed that, because smoking pot is an easier way to enter a different state of consciousness.
#374 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Entering a different state of consciousness is a completely different thing than escaping from reality, for one reason. The word escape implies that we need to run away from reality, like reality is bad or something. You're trying to make it seem like if you ever smoke weed, then after that your entire life revolves around it and you always need to be high. That's not true at all. I have no problem with reality. My girlfriend doesn't smoke weed, but i love going on dates with her because she makes me happy. That's part of my reality. Why would i need to escape from that? And no one uses weed for a "rush". Weed makes you calm, not in a rush. And using the "its illegal argument" is just plain stupid. The government is not always right. Remember how slavery used to be legal? The reason you keep calling me childish is because you're mad you can't come up with any good arguments. By the way; people who die from smoking weed every year: 0, average number of people who die from rock climing every year: 25. Dumb fuck. Do some research before you come at me with a retarded argument like that. And by the way, implying that i don't read? Insulting. I love reading. Fuck you. And even if everything you said was true (which its definately not) why do you have to yell at me? What did I, weed, or other weed smokers ever do to you to make you so mad?
User avatar #375 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, actually, it's not. The word escape implies exactly what it means, that you've left that state of consciousness. It doesn't mean or say that reality is bad, it says you're trying to leave it, and you do.

You're missing the point; when I say 'rush' I'm not claiming weed excites you, I'm claiming that these other activities are more fun.

By the way; People who die from smoking weed every year; Isn't 0. No one ODs on weed, but it is a proven carcinogen, meaning every pothead who has died of lung cancer, which is plenty, have all died from smoking weed. Indirectly you say? Yeah, about as indirectly as cigarettes, even if weed is less potent.

The 'illegal' argument isn't stupid, it's regarding basic moral fiber. Yeah, the government isn't always right, but flouting the law because you think it's wrong IS wrong. You don't break the rules set by society just because you don't like them, and if you do, you get your ass tossed in jail. That's what I'm saying, and that proves further that I'm not calling you a child because I can't make a good argument, I'm calling you a child because you're willing to break the law and risk years in jail for the sake of having a little fun.


By the way, I wasn't implying that you don't read, I was implying that reading is a more productive way to spend your time and have fun than smoking pot.

Not to mention, what the hell do you mean do some research? I didn't come at you with an argument about people dying from weed, I came at you with an argument about weed being a shitty way to have fun. Are you signing out so you can comment as an anonymous so it seems like more people are on your side?

Really though, if I didn't think I was making a good argument, why would I argue at all? My points are valid, none of them have you once disproven rather than angrily stated your opinion about, and you're calling them bad arguments without refuting any of them properly doesn't make them so.
#403 - nickmandemon (04/30/2013) [-]
Escape implies that you need to get away. I don't know how to explain that differently. And if you smoke pot you would understand that all this "leaving reality" stuff that you're talking about is a little ridiculous. Thats a better argument against something like lsd or something like that. And great for you if you think that those activities are more fun. Thats what you like to do and I'm not going to criticize you for it, unlike the way you're treating me for smoking "pot". And for you're information, weed has never killed anyone. That is one of the biggest arguments for its legalization. And regarding the legal issue; I don't know where you live, but I live in America, which was FOUNDED on the belief that if there is a law that the majority of the country doesn't agree with, then we have the right to change it. And if i enjoy smoking marijuana, I'm not gonna fucking wait for the government lollygagging and taking forever with legalization. And if flouting the law because you don't agree with it is wrong... are you calling people like Harriet Tubman bad people? Of course, I'm not comparing myself to her, I'm just asking you to defend what you said. And if you've admitted that you've never smoked weed, how do you know it's a shitty way to have fun? You sound like a person with a very narrow minded manner of thinking. And if I'm childish for having fun with risks, rather than spending my life surrounded by caution and metaphorical pillows, then so be it. Fun's best when it's spiked with danger. Maybe one day you will realize this, and i believe that day will be a great turning point in your life. I don't know why other people doing what they like to do bothers you so much, but maybe you should think about how it would feel if someone just started yelling at you and criticizing you about the way you live your life when they don't even know you as a person. And by the way, I've deftly refuted every argument you've presented. I literally address everything you say.
#349 - You sound a hell of a lot like a butthurt offended stoner to m…  [+] (15 new replies) 04/24/2013 on all natural -1
#357 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
That sir. Is THE MOST ignorant assumption that people make about weed smokers. Congratulations, you won the prize. I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know smokes weed to escape from reality. It's just a fun thing people do with their friends. You're letting propaganda like Above The Influence get to you too much. And weed doesn't kill you by the way... even most anti weed people accept that as fact...
User avatar #363 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
Congratulations, you just won the award for being a pissed of little prick
#366 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
#368 - XzmanX (04/24/2013) [-]
User avatar #362 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, you fucking idiot, that isn't it at all.


Weed IS finding a different state of consciousness. Day-dreaming is a different state of consciousness. Spinning around in circles on the playground is a different state of consciousness. Seeking them out is a natural thing that all people do in some way or another.

It's the fact that you haven't grown up enough that you still so desperately NEED to find a more pleasurable state of consciousness than the one you are already in, like how children do in the playground or a person does when faced with an incredibly arduous task, not because you have work to do, but because you are still that much of a fucking kid, that I find it sad.


It isn't an assumption, it's a simple fact.
#365 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Okay. I never said that weed wasn't finding a different state of conciousness. It's the fact that you ASSUME ( <--- check it out it's that word we were talking about) that we need to. Like i said, it's for fun.
User avatar #367 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
" I can't speak for all weed smokers, but nobody i know smokes weed to escape from reality. "

This is a direct copy paste of you claiming that smoking weed isn't entering a different state of consciousness, i.e. escaping from reality.

It's for fun, but it also kills you; That isn't fun. There's a hell of a lot of things that are not only fun for you, they are good for you too, as well as legal, and bring on a hell of a lot more of a rush than weed ever will.

Ever try Fencing? Rock climbing? Writing a novel, reading one, or survivalist camping?

Now THAT is fun. This is my problem; There are plenty of ways to have fun that don't risk being caught by the authorities and don't cause damage to your body, yet, as we've established before, you're too childish to see passed that, because smoking pot is an easier way to enter a different state of consciousness.
#374 - nickmandemon (04/24/2013) [-]
Entering a different state of consciousness is a completely different thing than escaping from reality, for one reason. The word escape implies that we need to run away from reality, like reality is bad or something. You're trying to make it seem like if you ever smoke weed, then after that your entire life revolves around it and you always need to be high. That's not true at all. I have no problem with reality. My girlfriend doesn't smoke weed, but i love going on dates with her because she makes me happy. That's part of my reality. Why would i need to escape from that? And no one uses weed for a "rush". Weed makes you calm, not in a rush. And using the "its illegal argument" is just plain stupid. The government is not always right. Remember how slavery used to be legal? The reason you keep calling me childish is because you're mad you can't come up with any good arguments. By the way; people who die from smoking weed every year: 0, average number of people who die from rock climing every year: 25. Dumb fuck. Do some research before you come at me with a retarded argument like that. And by the way, implying that i don't read? Insulting. I love reading. Fuck you. And even if everything you said was true (which its definately not) why do you have to yell at me? What did I, weed, or other weed smokers ever do to you to make you so mad?
User avatar #375 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No, actually, it's not. The word escape implies exactly what it means, that you've left that state of consciousness. It doesn't mean or say that reality is bad, it says you're trying to leave it, and you do.

You're missing the point; when I say 'rush' I'm not claiming weed excites you, I'm claiming that these other activities are more fun.

By the way; People who die from smoking weed every year; Isn't 0. No one ODs on weed, but it is a proven carcinogen, meaning every pothead who has died of lung cancer, which is plenty, have all died from smoking weed. Indirectly you say? Yeah, about as indirectly as cigarettes, even if weed is less potent.

The 'illegal' argument isn't stupid, it's regarding basic moral fiber. Yeah, the government isn't always right, but flouting the law because you think it's wrong IS wrong. You don't break the rules set by society just because you don't like them, and if you do, you get your ass tossed in jail. That's what I'm saying, and that proves further that I'm not calling you a child because I can't make a good argument, I'm calling you a child because you're willing to break the law and risk years in jail for the sake of having a little fun.


By the way, I wasn't implying that you don't read, I was implying that reading is a more productive way to spend your time and have fun than smoking pot.

Not to mention, what the hell do you mean do some research? I didn't come at you with an argument about people dying from weed, I came at you with an argument about weed being a shitty way to have fun. Are you signing out so you can comment as an anonymous so it seems like more people are on your side?

Really though, if I didn't think I was making a good argument, why would I argue at all? My points are valid, none of them have you once disproven rather than angrily stated your opinion about, and you're calling them bad arguments without refuting any of them properly doesn't make them so.
#403 - nickmandemon (04/30/2013) [-]
Escape implies that you need to get away. I don't know how to explain that differently. And if you smoke pot you would understand that all this "leaving reality" stuff that you're talking about is a little ridiculous. Thats a better argument against something like lsd or something like that. And great for you if you think that those activities are more fun. Thats what you like to do and I'm not going to criticize you for it, unlike the way you're treating me for smoking "pot". And for you're information, weed has never killed anyone. That is one of the biggest arguments for its legalization. And regarding the legal issue; I don't know where you live, but I live in America, which was FOUNDED on the belief that if there is a law that the majority of the country doesn't agree with, then we have the right to change it. And if i enjoy smoking marijuana, I'm not gonna fucking wait for the government lollygagging and taking forever with legalization. And if flouting the law because you don't agree with it is wrong... are you calling people like Harriet Tubman bad people? Of course, I'm not comparing myself to her, I'm just asking you to defend what you said. And if you've admitted that you've never smoked weed, how do you know it's a shitty way to have fun? You sound like a person with a very narrow minded manner of thinking. And if I'm childish for having fun with risks, rather than spending my life surrounded by caution and metaphorical pillows, then so be it. Fun's best when it's spiked with danger. Maybe one day you will realize this, and i believe that day will be a great turning point in your life. I don't know why other people doing what they like to do bothers you so much, but maybe you should think about how it would feel if someone just started yelling at you and criticizing you about the way you live your life when they don't even know you as a person. And by the way, I've deftly refuted every argument you've presented. I literally address everything you say.
#361 - anonymous (04/24/2013) [-]
Show one case of a person dying directly from weed.
User avatar #364 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
No one directly dies from anything. You don't die from a car accident, you die from your lungs collapsing when your ribs get smashed IN the accident.

You don't die from a bullet, you die from bleeding out or severe trauma CAUSED by the bullet.

Weed has been proven to have carcinogens in it. Go find a case of someone who has lung-cancer that also smokes pot. I'm sure there's plenty of them. All of them died, and it can be linked to weed. Is it the direct cause? Is it even the main cause? No, but it did directly make things worse.
#369 - anonymous (04/24/2013) [-]
"No one dies directly from anything"
So, deadly lung cancer isn't directly tied to smoking cigarettes? Literally overdosing on cocaine, or heroin, or meth or any other drug that is actually dangerous doesn't count as a direct death?
Yea, no shit there's people who have lung cancer and smoke pot, doesn't take a fuckin genius to figure that out. But if the weed didn't cause the cancer, why is there a problem? Why are cigarettes widely available and even subsidized by the government when they directly cause 100's of thousands of people to die each year? Yet weed, which (believe it or not) doesn't have a single death associated with it ever, is still illegal?
User avatar #370 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
Deadly lung cancer is directly tied to smoking cigarettes, but it's the AFFECTS of lung cancer that kills you, not the cancer itself, just like an overdose's AFFECTS kill you, the overdose doesn't.

But you're the one who decided to be a technical asswipe about it and asked for one case of a person dying directly from smoking weed.


Weed has had deaths associated with it, as I said, it's been proven a carcinogen, and hence has ties to lung cancer. If a man who smokes pot gets lung cancer, he likely got lung cancer from smoking pot, even if that isn't what it says on the tin.

Cigarettes are widely available and subsidized by the government because they are a major cash crop, and in addition to that so many people are addicted to them now that if they were made illegal, we'd just see Prohibition all over again, crime and smuggling rates would sky-rocket, and they'd be back in two years anyhow. That's why.

The weed DID cause the cancer, in the same way that cigarettes cause cancer, in that they introduce carcinogens to the body. The only difference is the potency levels, but that doesn't mean that a man who smokes that dies from lung cancer died from cigarettes directly, it means he died from lung cancer caused by cigarettes, just how people die from lung cancer caused by weed.
User avatar #371 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/24/2013) [-]
EFFECTS. ** My bad.
#345 - Nice logic, but you're telling me that ALL pot, EVER, is grown…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/24/2013 on all natural +1
#396 - anonymous (04/24/2013) [-]
If there are chemicals out there except the fertilizers you can buy at any plant store, I've never heard of them. Giving the plants maximum nutrition without choking them and maximum light (in the right cycles) without burning them really is what makes them crazy strong and high yield.

What greedy dealers do to make a better profit is to, for example, roll lower quality buds in ground glass to make it look high quality (making it dangerous to eat).
#313 - I'm implying that Atheists have no extrapersonal reasons for b… 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy 0
#135 - That being nice to one another allows for a pack mentality and… 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy 0
#132 - Sorry but you didn't see what I was doing there Toph.  [+] (1 new reply) 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy +1
#163 - couchtime (04/23/2013) [-]
How does this cleverness not have more thumbs
#122 - so I explained why. *** 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy 0
#121 - I never said an atheist SHOULD get special treatment. …  [+] (1 new reply) 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy 0
User avatar #122 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
so I explained why. ***
#112 - It's dumb how so many atheists believe that all christians lov…  [+] (3 new replies) 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy 0
#130 - kaoknight has deleted their comment.
User avatar #132 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
Sorry but you didn't see what I was doing there Toph.
#163 - couchtime (04/23/2013) [-]
How does this cleverness not have more thumbs
#110 - Christians are obligated by their Lord to be good people, Athe…  [+] (7 new replies) 04/23/2013 on Atheist Jimmy -2
#157 - jrondeau (04/23/2013) [-]
Christians are told by God to be good people.

Atheists are told by basic human reason to be good people.

It appears you're implying that atheists have no ethical motives to be good people....
User avatar #313 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
I'm implying that Atheists have no extrapersonal reasons for being a good person, while a Christian does.

Christians have the reason to do it because God told them to.

Atheists have the reason to do it because they told themselves to, i.e. basic human reason.
#131 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
The logical reason is actually explained by evolutionary biology.....
User avatar #135 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
That being nice to one another allows for a pack mentality and thus furthers the species' chances of survival?

I wouldn't regard that as a universal explanation, though how most people behave in groups? Sure , that's one way to consider it.
User avatar #117 - darksideofthebeast (04/23/2013) [-]
That's some bullshit
Just because an atheist is being nice he shouldn't get special treatment
It's human nature to be kind to others (Not really anymore)
But people don't deserve special treatment for being nice
Just be nice back.
And what he was doing wasn't necessarily good or bad.
He's just keeping his nose out of some shit it doesn't need to be in.
User avatar #121 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
I never said an atheist SHOULD get special treatment.

I said that they get it. You didn't seem to know, so explained why.

Keeping his nose out of some shit it doesn't be in is nice relative to what a lot of people do.
User avatar #122 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/23/2013) [-]
so I explained why. ***
#67 - Ancient Greek sort of Funeral. Drachtmas on the eyes and under… 04/23/2013 on Ashes +1
#91 - Comment deleted 04/22/2013 on Fucking feels. 0
#90 - Comment deleted 04/22/2013 on Fucking feels. 0
#129 - You clearly CAN say that, and she did. To be honest, I feel th… 04/22/2013 on filthy copper 0
#85 - I blame monday. 04/22/2013 on True Love 0
#82 - I think the better question is why you can't spell, but I digress.  [+] (2 new replies) 04/22/2013 on True Love 0
User avatar #84 - murrlogic (04/22/2013) [-]
My brain is going full on Potato

Maybe it's because it's 6 in the morning.
User avatar #85 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/22/2013) [-]
I blame monday.
#79 - He maned up, huh?  [+] (4 new replies) 04/22/2013 on True Love 0
User avatar #81 - murrlogic (04/22/2013) [-]
WHY CAN I NOT GRAMMER?!!!
User avatar #82 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/22/2013) [-]
I think the better question is why you can't spell, but I digress.
User avatar #84 - murrlogic (04/22/2013) [-]
My brain is going full on Potato

Maybe it's because it's 6 in the morning.
User avatar #85 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/22/2013) [-]
I blame monday.
#386 - Meh, I scroll down in comments until I see a comment I want to…  [+] (1 new reply) 04/22/2013 on casuals +1
User avatar #387 - strangesir (04/22/2013) [-]
You do have a point, it IS the most hated day of the week...
#164 - I'm pretty sure that implies MLP is better than precious metal… 04/22/2013 on Way to go -2
#377 - Actually, it's a human version of the character Tavros Nitram …  [+] (3 new replies) 04/22/2013 on casuals +4
User avatar #385 - strangesir (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, I saw in the comments, but I like to jokingly deny some things.
#386 - sorrowofdaedalus (04/22/2013) [-]
Meh, I scroll down in comments until I see a comment I want to reply to, then move on. I guess I should've figured, but I decided to reply anyway.

What can I say? It's a monday.
User avatar #387 - strangesir (04/22/2013) [-]
You do have a point, it IS the most hated day of the week...
#125 - You should consider that that is the brand new Injustice comic… 04/19/2013 on The Game +1
#20 - Because one has been domesticated since the earliest stages of… 04/19/2013 on Oh you silly Asian people... -1
#13 - You're....You're kidding, right? Maybe it's jus… 04/19/2013 on Cause im black +7

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - anonymous (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - anonymous (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more shit about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant bullshit on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)