Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sorrowofdaedalus

Rank #58506 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8585 total,  12497 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5694
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9103

latest user's comments

#17 - A story I forgot I'd mention; I was really big on RP, and at t… 05/10/2013 on Good guy GM 0
#16 - This is why I love Blizzard GMs. Such great customer service, …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/10/2013 on Good guy GM 0
User avatar #17 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/10/2013) [-]
A story I forgot I'd mention; I was really big on RP, and at the time, I only had a level 13 character. It was nearly four months old, because I pretty much just got on and RPed with the guild I was in all the time. Well, I contacted the GM one day when I seemed to be having trouble logging on to him, partially expecting them just to go "fuck it, he's only level 13, just roll a new one"


5 hours. 5 hours they worked to get my shitty level 13 RP-character back for me. Blizzard GMs are wonderful.
#4380751 - **sorrowofdaedalus rolled user theradiantdawn ** Yes. 05/09/2013 on autism autism autism autism 0
#163 - Well, that just depends on how many men named Rustle there are… 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -1
#161 - I don't know what they make, to be honest.  [+] (2 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -1
User avatar #162 - Nameloc (05/09/2013) [-]
How much money they make in a year?
I don't think it entirely matters, either way if she doesn't stick with him for the rest of her life, she's fucked.
User avatar #163 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Well, that just depends on how many men named Rustle there are out there.
#16 - Mario. 05/09/2013 on Games are drugs 0
#148 - Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come … 05/09/2013 on Communism +1
#143 - Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a cla…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#79 - Well, I guess you found one that can. 05/09/2013 on Wanna play a game? 0
#154 - Picture 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -1
#137 - Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to w…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#150 - I understand what you were pointing out, and I was pointing ou… 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -1
#126 - Perhaps so, but to eradicate greed entirely would be a hercule…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #131 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Communists do not aim to eradicate greed, rather class relations. Even then I think you'd be hard pressed to find a communist who thinks "full communism" is realistic at all.
User avatar #137 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to work, you'd need to eradicate greed. That said, could you explain to me how partial communism might work as opposed to full communism?
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#147 - Then you can't use it as an argument that she's got a duty to … 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -1
#121 - I wasn't really arguing against Communism. I support the idea;…  [+] (8 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #122 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Aye, but as proven by numerous experiments, altruism is the default state, not greed. Communists argue that it is better (not perfect, mind you) to have system which discourages greed and encourages altruism, than a system in the opposite.
User avatar #126 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to eradicate greed entirely would be a herculean task. If there is even a seed of it in the right person it can cause way for problems and corruption. That's where communism reaches a problematic point; the only way to rid greed entirely is complete control and suppression. However, complete control and suppression is no longer altruism, creating more of a problem in the attempt to remove it, not to mention that if successful things go down the route of 1984 and no one is ever capable of free thought.
User avatar #131 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Communists do not aim to eradicate greed, rather class relations. Even then I think you'd be hard pressed to find a communist who thinks "full communism" is realistic at all.
User avatar #137 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to work, you'd need to eradicate greed. That said, could you explain to me how partial communism might work as opposed to full communism?
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#144 - No no, what I mean is that I recognized that your comment was … 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -2
#116 - That's the exact opposite of what I'm saying though. …  [+] (10 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #119 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right, I misconstrued that then. But yes I would agree, though it is not an argument against communism.
User avatar #121 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
I wasn't really arguing against Communism. I support the idea; rather, I think the problem with Communism in practice is the essence of greed in mankind. People constantly need new stimulus, it's a survival tactic, and desiring more and more, even when they have enough to be perfectly happy, is an unfortunate side effect of that.
User avatar #122 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Aye, but as proven by numerous experiments, altruism is the default state, not greed. Communists argue that it is better (not perfect, mind you) to have system which discourages greed and encourages altruism, than a system in the opposite.
User avatar #126 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to eradicate greed entirely would be a herculean task. If there is even a seed of it in the right person it can cause way for problems and corruption. That's where communism reaches a problematic point; the only way to rid greed entirely is complete control and suppression. However, complete control and suppression is no longer altruism, creating more of a problem in the attempt to remove it, not to mention that if successful things go down the route of 1984 and no one is ever capable of free thought.
User avatar #131 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Communists do not aim to eradicate greed, rather class relations. Even then I think you'd be hard pressed to find a communist who thinks "full communism" is realistic at all.
User avatar #137 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to work, you'd need to eradicate greed. That said, could you explain to me how partial communism might work as opposed to full communism?
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#141 - I do, you don't seem to understand the fragility of that argum… 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -2
#111 - Isn't that what I said?  [+] (12 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #113 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
You said the complete opposite. I'm arguing that meals are inherently communal, which they are, and you're arguing they're completely selfish.

Also, you're wrong in saying all animals only care about themselves. This hasn't been an idea since the 1800's and is very obviously observable to be the contrary.
User avatar #116 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
That's the exact opposite of what I'm saying though.

I was arguing that in a tribe of people, immediate family shared with immediate family, and even if someone outside of that group was more "deserving" of food, the family communally cared about themselves. Also, when I say tribes I'm talking Neolithic Era. Cave People.

Also, I'm not saying Animals only care about themselves personally, rather, they care about themselves and those they consider part of their family.
User avatar #119 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right, I misconstrued that then. But yes I would agree, though it is not an argument against communism.
User avatar #121 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
I wasn't really arguing against Communism. I support the idea; rather, I think the problem with Communism in practice is the essence of greed in mankind. People constantly need new stimulus, it's a survival tactic, and desiring more and more, even when they have enough to be perfectly happy, is an unfortunate side effect of that.
User avatar #122 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Aye, but as proven by numerous experiments, altruism is the default state, not greed. Communists argue that it is better (not perfect, mind you) to have system which discourages greed and encourages altruism, than a system in the opposite.
User avatar #126 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to eradicate greed entirely would be a herculean task. If there is even a seed of it in the right person it can cause way for problems and corruption. That's where communism reaches a problematic point; the only way to rid greed entirely is complete control and suppression. However, complete control and suppression is no longer altruism, creating more of a problem in the attempt to remove it, not to mention that if successful things go down the route of 1984 and no one is ever capable of free thought.
User avatar #131 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Communists do not aim to eradicate greed, rather class relations. Even then I think you'd be hard pressed to find a communist who thinks "full communism" is realistic at all.
User avatar #137 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to work, you'd need to eradicate greed. That said, could you explain to me how partial communism might work as opposed to full communism?
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#138 - Role model for who? Is she famous? Because I don't recognize h… 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -3
#133 - "if her boyfriend is in a high paying position" 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -3
#105 - Actually, did you know that the origin of the dinner table is …  [+] (14 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Communism 0
User avatar #109 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
That's ridiculous, all you have to do is look at every single tribe today and how they share their food. Look at the many cultures worldwide whose dinner table consists of meals everyone shares. Even the Western dinner table is a completely shared experience. Everyone eats from the same pots and pans, and the portions are equal.
User avatar #111 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Isn't that what I said?
User avatar #113 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
You said the complete opposite. I'm arguing that meals are inherently communal, which they are, and you're arguing they're completely selfish.

Also, you're wrong in saying all animals only care about themselves. This hasn't been an idea since the 1800's and is very obviously observable to be the contrary.
User avatar #116 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
That's the exact opposite of what I'm saying though.

I was arguing that in a tribe of people, immediate family shared with immediate family, and even if someone outside of that group was more "deserving" of food, the family communally cared about themselves. Also, when I say tribes I'm talking Neolithic Era. Cave People.

Also, I'm not saying Animals only care about themselves personally, rather, they care about themselves and those they consider part of their family.
User avatar #119 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right, I misconstrued that then. But yes I would agree, though it is not an argument against communism.
User avatar #121 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
I wasn't really arguing against Communism. I support the idea; rather, I think the problem with Communism in practice is the essence of greed in mankind. People constantly need new stimulus, it's a survival tactic, and desiring more and more, even when they have enough to be perfectly happy, is an unfortunate side effect of that.
User avatar #122 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Aye, but as proven by numerous experiments, altruism is the default state, not greed. Communists argue that it is better (not perfect, mind you) to have system which discourages greed and encourages altruism, than a system in the opposite.
User avatar #126 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, but to eradicate greed entirely would be a herculean task. If there is even a seed of it in the right person it can cause way for problems and corruption. That's where communism reaches a problematic point; the only way to rid greed entirely is complete control and suppression. However, complete control and suppression is no longer altruism, creating more of a problem in the attempt to remove it, not to mention that if successful things go down the route of 1984 and no one is ever capable of free thought.
User avatar #131 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Communists do not aim to eradicate greed, rather class relations. Even then I think you'd be hard pressed to find a communist who thinks "full communism" is realistic at all.
User avatar #137 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Right, but for, as you put it, "full communism" to work, you'd need to eradicate greed. That said, could you explain to me how partial communism might work as opposed to full communism?
User avatar #141 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
Partial communism, which communists just call communism, is basically exactly the same as "full communism". Except that "full communism" is the utopian version where there is complete absence of class and state structure. It's the same as saying that there is no such thing as ultimate totalitarianism, as there cannot possibly be one person in control of everything. There is always a degree of freedom no matter how small.
User avatar #143 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, alright. Still, I feel the sense of Greed would keep a class system for ever properly being abolished.
User avatar #147 - toastedspikes (05/09/2013) [-]
I see your point, and I agree. I'm pretty sure most communists would agree too, but that's not the whole point of communist theory. "Well at least it's better than capitalism".

I do see some charm in market socialism and mutualism though, doing some reading on those subjects atm.
User avatar #148 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Ah, right. Well, I'm no political mind myself. It's just come up quite frequently recently.
#131 - I like it. Seems kinky, and if her boyfriend is in a high payi…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Can it get worse? -5
User avatar #160 - Nameloc (05/09/2013) [-]
Her boyfriend is a tattoo artist.
Hence forth the reason she got the tattoo.
User avatar #161 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
I don't know what they make, to be honest.
User avatar #162 - Nameloc (05/09/2013) [-]
How much money they make in a year?
I don't think it entirely matters, either way if she doesn't stick with him for the rest of her life, she's fucked.
User avatar #163 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Well, that just depends on how many men named Rustle there are out there.
#66 - Because that's what Europeans do to water.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/09/2013 on Milkshake +3
#75 - anonymous (05/09/2013) [-]
I'm European and I can confirm this.
#63 - He might've just done a **** job because the whol…  [+] (2 new replies) 05/09/2013 on Wanna play a game? +1
User avatar #78 - fuush (05/09/2013) [-]
"Getting paid to do it properly" - rofl, an educated welder can hardly do such a bad work on purpose ;)
User avatar #79 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/09/2013) [-]
Well, I guess you found one that can.

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - anonymous (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - anonymous (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)