Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8585 total,  12497 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 80% (80/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Content Views:5804
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9103

latest user's comments

#27 - Well, you stop a wildfire by starting another fire to snuff it…  [+] (10 new replies) 05/29/2013 on rights for everyone +13
#50 - souleatingbunnies (05/29/2013) [-]
You're assuming the person that would go into a crowded area and shoot innocent people are thinking rationally. I'd guess that someone who would commit such a heinous act wouldn't worry about repercussions. Although if more people had guns the crime could be stopped quicker, so really both sides could be right. I just wish we knew the answer, I'm tired of seeing school shootings on the news
User avatar #239 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/29/2013) [-]
Yes, because despite what the media tells you, people with mental illnesses, sociopaths in particular, as a common trend are more intelligent than the average person.

They are probably able to logically deduce their fate better than you could in the same situation. What you mean to say is that I'm assuming a person that would go in to a crowded area and shoot innocent people is worried about his own life.

No, because the human mind prioritizes things in ridiculous order. What I believe is that a person that would go in to a crowded area and shoot innocent people wants to go in to a crowded area and shoot innocent people, not shoot one person and continue to get gunned down by a crowd of people around him. It won't be big enough for him, and the only one who he will be able to tell is scared is himself.

In other words, vast armament would psychologically deter the criminal from his shooting, because yes, believe it or not, Criminals have brains and we know how they work, at least in terms of basic Behaviorism.
User avatar #42 - PubLandlord (05/29/2013) [-]
You can't compare nuclear weapons to guns, that is completely out of context, the problem is guns make it very easy and efficient to kill someone and very impersonally.

When comparing you need to compare on a like for like basis, I could argue that having brick houses and not having wooden houses prevents fires therefore having no guns will be more beneficial
User avatar #98 - lskovfoged (05/29/2013) [-]
It's easy to compare those two things.
A gun is a weapon, and nuclear weapons are, without any shit, also weapons. I think that nuclear weapons makes it quite easy and efficient to kill someone as well, on a higher scale, which is probably also very impersonally.

But guns make it more personal though, since most of the time you see a face, maybe you know a name, or something like that, killing isn't easy. Now what is really easy is the old "Neck-shooting" facilities, they were impersonal.
#116 - anon (05/29/2013) [-]
No it isnt. The actors are not equivalent.

State actors =/= individual actors. IR 101.
User avatar #29 - thegamegestapo (05/29/2013) [-]
Because mutually assured destruction always calms things right down. Mexican stand-off at a national level. Couldn't possibly go wrong...
User avatar #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/29/2013) [-]
It's worked so far.
#142 - thenewneone (05/29/2013) [-]
At the cost of perhaps trillions of dollars?
User avatar #32 - thegamegestapo (05/29/2013) [-]
How many times has the word nearly ended with highly trained professionals calling the shots? Read up on the Cuban Missile Crisis, a brief history of the Cold War and the Samson Option. Seriously, WMDs are a seriously bad idea.

If it was such a good plan why does everyone freak out whenever N.Korea makes a big display of testing its own bombs?
User avatar #236 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/29/2013) [-]
Yes, I'm aware the Cuban Missile Crisis was a close call, but that had more to do with the fact that those missiles were going to be placed VERY close to America, and in the hands of a fascist leader no less.

It's what works, since the WMDs are in existence, and the reason we still use a plan of Mutually Assured Destruction is because they aren't going to just stop existing. Guns are the same way; There are too many, and getting them is too easy, to hope you could control them all. The worst of it is, even if you tried to get rid of them all, if there's even one left unchecked it could have CATASTROPHIC results.

The reason why is because people like being scared. It gives them something to rally together about, and even moreso, because of a glorification of war that continues even in to the modern day. While a portion of people may be largely anti-war, I think the fact of the matter is there's a latent desire in America, and perhaps other places, to see a third world war, not out of desire for war itself, but more out of anticipation. It's sort of like if a reputable source told you a Meteorite was coming to blow up the earth tomorrow, and meteorites start whizzing passed the earth, but none of them quite manage to hit.

You know they exist, you know this is a tangible, plausible cause for your destruction, and even though it didn't happen when they said it would, you constantly realize that it's going to eventually, because the chances of it not seem to be non-existent.

I don't think, even with the ridiculous regime that North Korea must follow, that there was ever truly a reason to fear Nuclear Crisis. I think even Kim Jung Un realizes that a Nuclear Blast will kill him just as well as it will anyone else, whether he WANTS to believe it or not.
#63 - You think this will bring back "The Robot" as a popu…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2013 on Conspiration +5
#76 - phantomi (05/29/2013) [-]
#11 - Apparently English class is the part you missed in between. 05/26/2013 on I always hated Jerry +5
#91 - You realize that if you don't go to school and study you proba… 05/25/2013 on saw the first page on front... 0
#67 - Yes, because it's not like Religion was just used as a front t… 05/23/2013 on someday we'll look up and... -2
#66 - Shut up. People are competitive, and others are mean. They hav…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/23/2013 on someday we'll look up and... -1
#101 - admiralamory has deleted their comment.
#44 - They are really good, yes.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/23/2013 on Terrorism! +1
User avatar #45 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
At some point i'm going to just download them of the internet
#42 - He is fighting Deadpool in a one on one duel to the death in t…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/23/2013 on Terrorism! +1
User avatar #43 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
I want to read deadpool comics, and other comics too, but i dont have the money to get them.
User avatar #44 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/23/2013) [-]
They are really good, yes.
User avatar #45 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
At some point i'm going to just download them of the internet
#38 - Bullseye is able to use anything. His deadliest attack, or so …  [+] (5 new replies) 05/23/2013 on Terrorism! +1
User avatar #39 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
But he has guns in the picture,
User avatar #42 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/23/2013) [-]
He is fighting Deadpool in a one on one duel to the death in the picture. He'd prepared the house to be filled with guns already. In fact, in that same comic, he shoots deadpool through the head at a cow butchering factory.
User avatar #43 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
I want to read deadpool comics, and other comics too, but i dont have the money to get them.
User avatar #44 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/23/2013) [-]
They are really good, yes.
User avatar #45 - albinomantis (05/23/2013) [-]
At some point i'm going to just download them of the internet
#52 - Well, humans also had endurance running for them. We did NOT …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/22/2013 on Haha Nerds +32
User avatar #64 - joefakes (05/22/2013) [-]
Best endurance for a predator. Camels and Gazels can go much further, much faster.
#58 - shutyourmustache has deleted their comment.
#139 - I'm going to cut your list in to two. Introversion- … 05/22/2013 on . 0
#137 - Your female raped a male dog?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/22/2013 on . 0
User avatar #146 - sabcy (05/22/2013) [-]
yes. I don't know why I didn't stop her.
#136 - You know, regardless of the true moral of the story.... …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/22/2013 on . +1
User avatar #145 - sabcy (05/22/2013) [-]
I'm not going to argue religion with you, because whether or you believe matters not, you will still be a brick wall to all my arguments. However, it pleases me to think that someone other than me likes to dispense justice in the most badass way possible.

That is all.
#138 - Depends on who you ask. 05/22/2013 on Smart Guy 0
#19 - Last year a man was castrated by his crazy girlfriend and his …  [+] (1 new reply) 05/21/2013 on Like some people on FunnyJunk. +4
#20 - lethallizzie (05/21/2013) [-]
I find it funny that people say this is wrong.. mean while when I gave the information it was correct... (Just saying) btw thats fucking terrible and im sorry I didn't hear about it..
#81 - By who? The annoying kid in his AP Chemistry lab? Yeah right. … 05/21/2013 on Never mess with nerds +4
#156 - See? It's always better to let your feelings be known than try… 05/21/2013 on Just an uplifting post 0
#2 - I got this joke, not because I know anything about LoL or have…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/20/2013 on One of the most annoying... +23
User avatar #19 - bobmarles (05/20/2013) [-]
comic is called "League of Teemo" by Kimmundo
User avatar #13 - lolokoko (05/20/2013) [-]
Was it "When the servers are down", or the one where Mundo makes everyone gank Teemo?
User avatar #14 - lolokoko (05/20/2013) [-]
"When the servers are down" link.
#11 - europe (05/20/2013) [-]
What the fuck
#3 - erdinism (05/20/2013) [-]
Sauce? For science purposes , ofcourse...
#10 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
Yes, that let exactly to the specific comic that #2 was referring to. Thank you so much for posting that helpful comment. Why, with your deductive skills at finding the sauce, you deserve top comment.
#4 - tuckthisphit has deleted their comment.
#497 - You miss the point of the second amendment entirely. It has no… 05/20/2013 on Gun Control? +3
#32 - Yes. As I said, based upon how good Dragon Age 3 is …  [+] (2 new replies) 05/17/2013 on Online Pass 0
#33 - anon (05/17/2013) [-]
Fair enough..
#47 - anon (05/17/2013) [-]
I'm still waiting for someone to make baldur's gate: dark alliance 3. They have 3 more years until I lose hope.
#25 - I WILL JUDGE YOU BASED UPON HOW YOU MAKE UP FOR ******…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/17/2013 on Online Pass 0
User avatar #40 - Maroon (05/17/2013) [-]
Gonna be honest here, after Dragon Age 2 I pretty much lost interest in the franchise/story. The only way I'm gonna pay for a Dragon Age 3 is if they send a hot secretary to hand deliver it with a complimentary blowjob.
#31 - anon (05/17/2013) [-]
Are you sure you want them to release Dragon Age 3? I still have nightmares about Dragon Age 2 *Shivers*.
User avatar #32 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/17/2013) [-]

As I said, based upon how good Dragon Age 3 is will judge whether or not they TRULY ARE trying to become a better company. If it's shit, they will be condemned FOREVER in my eyes.
#33 - anon (05/17/2013) [-]
Fair enough..
#47 - anon (05/17/2013) [-]
I'm still waiting for someone to make baldur's gate: dark alliance 3. They have 3 more years until I lose hope.
#40 - They're okay I guess, but yeah. The best part of the…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/17/2013 on Look for the girl with a... +2
User avatar #41 - motherfuckingkenji (05/17/2013) [-]
I haven't seen the movie in years, and when I did I was 99% passed out.
I got nuthin'.
#38 - I wish the .gif showed the part where she eats his tongue out …  [+] (4 new replies) 05/17/2013 on Look for the girl with a... 0
#39 - motherfuckingkenji (05/17/2013) [-]
Well I don't know about that part, but do you like bananas B&W versions?
#93 - fodrizzler (05/17/2013) [-]
I like Bananas B&W versions.
User avatar #40 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/17/2013) [-]
They're okay I guess, but yeah.

The best part of the movie by far though is when the blonde shoves a bunch of billiards up her cunt and fires them out like a hydraulic cannon.
User avatar #41 - motherfuckingkenji (05/17/2013) [-]
I haven't seen the movie in years, and when I did I was 99% passed out.
I got nuthin'.
#53 - In other words, you should put Walter White on the cover of al… 05/17/2013 on Skewl! +6
#51 - Couldn't you technically do that with any picture of anything?  [+] (2 new replies) 05/17/2013 on Skewl! +2
#52 - adzo has deleted their comment.
User avatar #53 - sorrowofdaedalus (05/17/2013) [-]
In other words, you should put Walter White on the cover of all Chemistry Textbooks.

10/10 would cook with.
Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - anon (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - anon (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)