Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sorrowofdaedalus    

Rank #57929 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8584 total,  12496 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 79% (79/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5637
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9102

latest user's comments

#954 - You said it, not me. Actually, it showed in thi…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags 0
User avatar #990 - Keoul (03/20/2013) [-]
That is why I said inconclusive. From the results we can understand that the, lets call them sexual tests, were ineffective and in fact lessened the man's affinity with that gender. The 14 years he was treated as a girl did nothing as well. We concluded from this that the 14 years of being treated as a girl meant nothing, though the tests did affect him, it proves that either the tests had a dramatic effect on his psyche, the 14 years living as a girl was useless, or that neither had an affect on his sexual identity.

Yes that's what the whole sex being a social construct is about, the theory that society can change a person's sex, I just said that aggressively trying to change ones sex is ineffective, what's your point?

So I was right, you refuse to even consider the opinion of others. "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!".
User avatar #994 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/20/2013) [-]
It proves that we don't know what truly had an effect on his mind that caused him to develop the way he did, and the more we learn about sexuality, the more counter-intuitive it seems to be, which actually makes its own twisted sort of sense.


It's a theory that societal gender roles can determine sexuality in the first place, not that people are changed from straight to gay or gay to straight. Of course, I could also see the argument that we're all born bisexual, and it's society that causes us to develop in to hetero or homosexuals.


So you were wrong, I read what you said, and decided that I disagreed with your opinion. If you present one that is backed by proper evidence and makes sense, I might just change my own opinion to follow suit. I never deny the possibility of correctness, because anything is technically possible.
#948 - Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's nonsensica… 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
#947 - I'm sorry that that is all you're capable of conceiving, but b…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags 0
User avatar #951 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
Listen mate don't take this discussion the wrong way, it's just a friendly debate, no need to go flinging out statements like "that is all you're capable of conceiving". It makes this debate less enjoyable and usual people only say that when they're losing the argument and refuse to acknowledge the other person. Don't get your knickers in a twist this is just a random comment debate.

Anywho, from a scientific standpoint it does prove something but it isn't conclusive. It showed that in this situation, under these circumstances, society cannot alter the individuals sex. I agree that it will have to be repeated multiple times to have definite results and answers but alas that isn't really possible these days due to human rights and all that jazz.

Also I have no idea what you're on about with the "A book is a book" analogy, please explain. Unless you're saying "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!" I don't get why it's there.
User avatar #954 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
You said it, not me.


Actually, it showed in this situation it proved nothing. It doesn't prove that because he may well have very much believed and been happy with being a girl before the non-consensual sexual treatment, or he may not have been. We don't know either way, therefore it is wrong to say that it proves society can or can't.


You said "That aggressively trying to convince someone that they are of another gender doesn't work? Isn't that what the whole sex being a social construct is about? "

My analogy is saying that no, that isn't what sex being a social construct of society is about. It's about being exactly what it says; That sex is a social construct of society. It had nothing to do with aggressively forcing change, that's just something you added on to make it sound bad.
User avatar #990 - Keoul (03/20/2013) [-]
That is why I said inconclusive. From the results we can understand that the, lets call them sexual tests, were ineffective and in fact lessened the man's affinity with that gender. The 14 years he was treated as a girl did nothing as well. We concluded from this that the 14 years of being treated as a girl meant nothing, though the tests did affect him, it proves that either the tests had a dramatic effect on his psyche, the 14 years living as a girl was useless, or that neither had an affect on his sexual identity.

Yes that's what the whole sex being a social construct is about, the theory that society can change a person's sex, I just said that aggressively trying to change ones sex is ineffective, what's your point?

So I was right, you refuse to even consider the opinion of others. "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!".
User avatar #994 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/20/2013) [-]
It proves that we don't know what truly had an effect on his mind that caused him to develop the way he did, and the more we learn about sexuality, the more counter-intuitive it seems to be, which actually makes its own twisted sort of sense.


It's a theory that societal gender roles can determine sexuality in the first place, not that people are changed from straight to gay or gay to straight. Of course, I could also see the argument that we're all born bisexual, and it's society that causes us to develop in to hetero or homosexuals.


So you were wrong, I read what you said, and decided that I disagreed with your opinion. If you present one that is backed by proper evidence and makes sense, I might just change my own opinion to follow suit. I never deny the possibility of correctness, because anything is technically possible.
#941 - Yeah, like I said, from a cultural and psychological perspecti…  [+] (2 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
User avatar #946 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
Gender and sexuality doesn't always make sense.
And are you accusing me of lying about this? I have nothing to gain from that. If I didn't have good reason to believe this, I sure as hell wouldn't be arguing for it.
And how does that prove you right? I was genuinely disgusted with transsexuals. Even now I don't like it unless it's done well, but I can at least appreciate the ones that do.
User avatar #948 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's nonsensical.

I'm saying I don't believe you just because you say it. Your reason would be because it's what you'd personally like to believe about pansexuals as opposed to bisexuals, and you're willing to lie to prove what you believe to others. It's nothing personal.

It proves that sexuality isn't inherent and that bisexuality an pansexuality are just two words for the same thing.
#927 - There's a flaw in your logic, seeing as they are sexually repu…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
User avatar #936 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
But many bisexuals are still not into the idea of people switching to the other.
Source: I'm bi, used to be turned off by trannies, got over it and now love traps and such.
User avatar #941 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, like I said, from a cultural and psychological perspective, that makes no sense.

Also, no one tells the truth on the internet.

Lastly, sounds to me like your experiences have proven me right.
User avatar #946 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
Gender and sexuality doesn't always make sense.
And are you accusing me of lying about this? I have nothing to gain from that. If I didn't have good reason to believe this, I sure as hell wouldn't be arguing for it.
And how does that prove you right? I was genuinely disgusted with transsexuals. Even now I don't like it unless it's done well, but I can at least appreciate the ones that do.
User avatar #948 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's nonsensical.

I'm saying I don't believe you just because you say it. Your reason would be because it's what you'd personally like to believe about pansexuals as opposed to bisexuals, and you're willing to lie to prove what you believe to others. It's nothing personal.

It proves that sexuality isn't inherent and that bisexuality an pansexuality are just two words for the same thing.
#924 - Are you just ignoring the fact that he'd been placed in to an …  [+] (6 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags +1
User avatar #942 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
I will acknowledge that the "therapeutic sessions" were indeed have a large affect. But alas this is from your 3rd person perspective, how would HE know about this? by all means he thought he was a girl not a man, why would being uncomfortable suddenly mean he should become a man as if that would solve all his problems?
At most all I can think of is some issues with doctors, not a gender crisis stemming from these visits.

But let's assume you're right and the visits did have an affect, what does that prove? that aggressively trying to convince someone that they are of another gender doesn't work? Isn't that what the whole sex being a social construct was about? sex being determined by social aspects? Yes the test may have worked the other way I agree with that but it just goes to show how a person cannot forced to identify with another sex.
User avatar #947 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
I'm sorry that that is all you're capable of conceiving, but believe it or not that is exactly the sort of thing that causes gender crisis. He found out that he was actually a male when he was fourteen from his parents, THEN he decided to become a male. This is according to the psychiatry textbook I've got that has a few paragraphs about him.

It proves nothing, as this hasn't been an experiment that has been repeated. From a scientific standpoint, unless this was done multiple times and all received the same results, we couldn't say it proves anything really. All it proves is that that doctor failed to do what he hoped to do. Sex being a social construct has nothing to do with aggressively trying to convince anyone of anything, it has to do with sex being a social construct and not a natural biological effect. A book is a book ,and not an apple, that's the point, it has nothing to do with trying to change people. It doesn't show anything definitively, it just shows that THAT person couldn't be forced to identify with the sex they wanted him to, but he was forced to identify with another sex because all people are.
User avatar #951 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
Listen mate don't take this discussion the wrong way, it's just a friendly debate, no need to go flinging out statements like "that is all you're capable of conceiving". It makes this debate less enjoyable and usual people only say that when they're losing the argument and refuse to acknowledge the other person. Don't get your knickers in a twist this is just a random comment debate.

Anywho, from a scientific standpoint it does prove something but it isn't conclusive. It showed that in this situation, under these circumstances, society cannot alter the individuals sex. I agree that it will have to be repeated multiple times to have definite results and answers but alas that isn't really possible these days due to human rights and all that jazz.

Also I have no idea what you're on about with the "A book is a book" analogy, please explain. Unless you're saying "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!" I don't get why it's there.
User avatar #954 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
You said it, not me.


Actually, it showed in this situation it proved nothing. It doesn't prove that because he may well have very much believed and been happy with being a girl before the non-consensual sexual treatment, or he may not have been. We don't know either way, therefore it is wrong to say that it proves society can or can't.


You said "That aggressively trying to convince someone that they are of another gender doesn't work? Isn't that what the whole sex being a social construct is about? "

My analogy is saying that no, that isn't what sex being a social construct of society is about. It's about being exactly what it says; That sex is a social construct of society. It had nothing to do with aggressively forcing change, that's just something you added on to make it sound bad.
User avatar #990 - Keoul (03/20/2013) [-]
That is why I said inconclusive. From the results we can understand that the, lets call them sexual tests, were ineffective and in fact lessened the man's affinity with that gender. The 14 years he was treated as a girl did nothing as well. We concluded from this that the 14 years of being treated as a girl meant nothing, though the tests did affect him, it proves that either the tests had a dramatic effect on his psyche, the 14 years living as a girl was useless, or that neither had an affect on his sexual identity.

Yes that's what the whole sex being a social construct is about, the theory that society can change a person's sex, I just said that aggressively trying to change ones sex is ineffective, what's your point?

So I was right, you refuse to even consider the opinion of others. "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!".
User avatar #994 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/20/2013) [-]
It proves that we don't know what truly had an effect on his mind that caused him to develop the way he did, and the more we learn about sexuality, the more counter-intuitive it seems to be, which actually makes its own twisted sort of sense.


It's a theory that societal gender roles can determine sexuality in the first place, not that people are changed from straight to gay or gay to straight. Of course, I could also see the argument that we're all born bisexual, and it's society that causes us to develop in to hetero or homosexuals.


So you were wrong, I read what you said, and decided that I disagreed with your opinion. If you present one that is backed by proper evidence and makes sense, I might just change my own opinion to follow suit. I never deny the possibility of correctness, because anything is technically possible.
#915 - Exactly, and if a Bisexual is attracted to both males and fema… 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
#902 - I'd call ******** on that. I doubt that…  [+] (8 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
User avatar #920 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
So are all straight guys into guys that became girls?
User avatar #927 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
There's a flaw in your logic, seeing as they are sexually repulsed by what they used to be. Bisexuals weren't.
User avatar #936 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
But many bisexuals are still not into the idea of people switching to the other.
Source: I'm bi, used to be turned off by trannies, got over it and now love traps and such.
User avatar #941 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, like I said, from a cultural and psychological perspective, that makes no sense.

Also, no one tells the truth on the internet.

Lastly, sounds to me like your experiences have proven me right.
User avatar #946 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
Gender and sexuality doesn't always make sense.
And are you accusing me of lying about this? I have nothing to gain from that. If I didn't have good reason to believe this, I sure as hell wouldn't be arguing for it.
And how does that prove you right? I was genuinely disgusted with transsexuals. Even now I don't like it unless it's done well, but I can at least appreciate the ones that do.
User avatar #948 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's nonsensical.

I'm saying I don't believe you just because you say it. Your reason would be because it's what you'd personally like to believe about pansexuals as opposed to bisexuals, and you're willing to lie to prove what you believe to others. It's nothing personal.

It proves that sexuality isn't inherent and that bisexuality an pansexuality are just two words for the same thing.
User avatar #906 - gonzoen (03/19/2013) [-]
Biologically, yes, it's a male or a female.
User avatar #915 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Exactly, and if a Bisexual is attracted to both males and females, even from a cultural perspective, there is no logical reasoning behind the idea that they would somehow how find a female that identifies as a male unattractive as opposed to a regular male, or vise versa.

I'd ask for a bisexual to tell me if this is really ever the case, but we all know there are plenty of jackasses willing to lie to push their own agendas and ideas.
#896 - Hi. Here to defend the helpless Anon who can't read your reply…  [+] (8 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags +1
User avatar #912 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
I did one better!
I WIKI'd him!

I knew about that as well, but are you just going to completely ignore the 14 years of his life that he was treated as a girl? That mean nothing to you?
Even now girls know that if they have sex they'll be penetrated, does that mean they run in fear and become men?
He was originally a man, who throughout his life was told and convinced to be a girl, 14 years and still he knew and wanted to be a man. How is that not proof that society didn't affect his gender?
User avatar #924 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Are you just ignoring the fact that he'd been placed in to an unwilling sexual situation, which would completely change the effects those 14 years of being treated like a girl would have on him? That mean nothing to you?
They are told to expect it, they aren't FORCED to do it in front of others, have pictures taken of them, their genitals inspected daily, and be told it's what is healthy whether they want it or not. I bet if you did that to a girl she WOULD run in fear and, depending on her susceptibility and the way her brain grew to adapt, she might actually want to become a man, yes.

It's not proof for the above arguments, and just repeating what you said doesn't make my arguments any less proof that there's many holes in your logic and explanations for your question.
User avatar #942 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
I will acknowledge that the "therapeutic sessions" were indeed have a large affect. But alas this is from your 3rd person perspective, how would HE know about this? by all means he thought he was a girl not a man, why would being uncomfortable suddenly mean he should become a man as if that would solve all his problems?
At most all I can think of is some issues with doctors, not a gender crisis stemming from these visits.

But let's assume you're right and the visits did have an affect, what does that prove? that aggressively trying to convince someone that they are of another gender doesn't work? Isn't that what the whole sex being a social construct was about? sex being determined by social aspects? Yes the test may have worked the other way I agree with that but it just goes to show how a person cannot forced to identify with another sex.
User avatar #947 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
I'm sorry that that is all you're capable of conceiving, but believe it or not that is exactly the sort of thing that causes gender crisis. He found out that he was actually a male when he was fourteen from his parents, THEN he decided to become a male. This is according to the psychiatry textbook I've got that has a few paragraphs about him.

It proves nothing, as this hasn't been an experiment that has been repeated. From a scientific standpoint, unless this was done multiple times and all received the same results, we couldn't say it proves anything really. All it proves is that that doctor failed to do what he hoped to do. Sex being a social construct has nothing to do with aggressively trying to convince anyone of anything, it has to do with sex being a social construct and not a natural biological effect. A book is a book ,and not an apple, that's the point, it has nothing to do with trying to change people. It doesn't show anything definitively, it just shows that THAT person couldn't be forced to identify with the sex they wanted him to, but he was forced to identify with another sex because all people are.
User avatar #951 - Keoul (03/19/2013) [-]
Listen mate don't take this discussion the wrong way, it's just a friendly debate, no need to go flinging out statements like "that is all you're capable of conceiving". It makes this debate less enjoyable and usual people only say that when they're losing the argument and refuse to acknowledge the other person. Don't get your knickers in a twist this is just a random comment debate.

Anywho, from a scientific standpoint it does prove something but it isn't conclusive. It showed that in this situation, under these circumstances, society cannot alter the individuals sex. I agree that it will have to be repeated multiple times to have definite results and answers but alas that isn't really possible these days due to human rights and all that jazz.

Also I have no idea what you're on about with the "A book is a book" analogy, please explain. Unless you're saying "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!" I don't get why it's there.
User avatar #954 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
You said it, not me.


Actually, it showed in this situation it proved nothing. It doesn't prove that because he may well have very much believed and been happy with being a girl before the non-consensual sexual treatment, or he may not have been. We don't know either way, therefore it is wrong to say that it proves society can or can't.


You said "That aggressively trying to convince someone that they are of another gender doesn't work? Isn't that what the whole sex being a social construct is about? "

My analogy is saying that no, that isn't what sex being a social construct of society is about. It's about being exactly what it says; That sex is a social construct of society. It had nothing to do with aggressively forcing change, that's just something you added on to make it sound bad.
User avatar #990 - Keoul (03/20/2013) [-]
That is why I said inconclusive. From the results we can understand that the, lets call them sexual tests, were ineffective and in fact lessened the man's affinity with that gender. The 14 years he was treated as a girl did nothing as well. We concluded from this that the 14 years of being treated as a girl meant nothing, though the tests did affect him, it proves that either the tests had a dramatic effect on his psyche, the 14 years living as a girl was useless, or that neither had an affect on his sexual identity.

Yes that's what the whole sex being a social construct is about, the theory that society can change a person's sex, I just said that aggressively trying to change ones sex is ineffective, what's your point?

So I was right, you refuse to even consider the opinion of others. "Sex is a social construct, end of discussion!".
User avatar #994 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/20/2013) [-]
It proves that we don't know what truly had an effect on his mind that caused him to develop the way he did, and the more we learn about sexuality, the more counter-intuitive it seems to be, which actually makes its own twisted sort of sense.


It's a theory that societal gender roles can determine sexuality in the first place, not that people are changed from straight to gay or gay to straight. Of course, I could also see the argument that we're all born bisexual, and it's society that causes us to develop in to hetero or homosexuals.


So you were wrong, I read what you said, and decided that I disagreed with your opinion. If you present one that is backed by proper evidence and makes sense, I might just change my own opinion to follow suit. I never deny the possibility of correctness, because anything is technically possible.
#870 - Except Transgenders are still either male or female, and "…  [+] (10 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags -1
User avatar #879 - gonzoen (03/19/2013) [-]
Yes, transgender people identify as a different gender than their physical gender. But a "normal" bisexual wouldn't be turned on by a transgender person.
User avatar #902 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
I'd call bullshit on that.

I doubt that it matters to a normal bisexual, because it's still a male or female.
User avatar #920 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
So are all straight guys into guys that became girls?
User avatar #927 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
There's a flaw in your logic, seeing as they are sexually repulsed by what they used to be. Bisexuals weren't.
User avatar #936 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
But many bisexuals are still not into the idea of people switching to the other.
Source: I'm bi, used to be turned off by trannies, got over it and now love traps and such.
User avatar #941 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, like I said, from a cultural and psychological perspective, that makes no sense.

Also, no one tells the truth on the internet.

Lastly, sounds to me like your experiences have proven me right.
User avatar #946 - thatnerdyguy (03/19/2013) [-]
Gender and sexuality doesn't always make sense.
And are you accusing me of lying about this? I have nothing to gain from that. If I didn't have good reason to believe this, I sure as hell wouldn't be arguing for it.
And how does that prove you right? I was genuinely disgusted with transsexuals. Even now I don't like it unless it's done well, but I can at least appreciate the ones that do.
User avatar #948 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's nonsensical.

I'm saying I don't believe you just because you say it. Your reason would be because it's what you'd personally like to believe about pansexuals as opposed to bisexuals, and you're willing to lie to prove what you believe to others. It's nothing personal.

It proves that sexuality isn't inherent and that bisexuality an pansexuality are just two words for the same thing.
User avatar #906 - gonzoen (03/19/2013) [-]
Biologically, yes, it's a male or a female.
User avatar #915 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Exactly, and if a Bisexual is attracted to both males and females, even from a cultural perspective, there is no logical reasoning behind the idea that they would somehow how find a female that identifies as a male unattractive as opposed to a regular male, or vise versa.

I'd ask for a bisexual to tell me if this is really ever the case, but we all know there are plenty of jackasses willing to lie to push their own agendas and ideas.
#7 - She was pumping while signing.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/19/2013 on (NSFW) Cumming 0
#8 - aulubear (03/19/2013) [-]
I suppose that makes sense.

But I wouldn't call that a stutter. Hands are generally uneffected by involuntary stuff like moaning and.. Other related things.
#4 - It doesn't happen for most people. Sorry to hear about your gi… 03/19/2013 on A True Friend 0
#57 - Then I guess I wasn't too far off. I don't watch TV.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/19/2013 on Joey Tribbiani 0
User avatar #58 - myrtille (03/19/2013) [-]
I don't really either, but a lot of my friends liked it.
#80 - This is adorable. 03/19/2013 on Hot 0
#55 - Yeah, I do. 03/19/2013 on That guy's got the right... 0
#52 - Picture 03/19/2013 on Good guy /b/ ?!?! +33
#53 - Well, the whole blood-transfusion thing would sort of suck. I …  [+] (3 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Joey Tribbiani 0
User avatar #56 - myrtille (03/19/2013) [-]
The show's called Friends, actually.
User avatar #57 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Then I guess I wasn't too far off.


I don't watch TV.
User avatar #58 - myrtille (03/19/2013) [-]
I don't really either, but a lot of my friends liked it.
#256 - This is such an annoying post, but it does prove a good point.… 03/19/2013 on Sexuality flags +2
#50 - Would it matter that much, in the grand scheme of things?  [+] (5 new replies) 03/19/2013 on Joey Tribbiani 0
User avatar #52 - amberleafwoohoo (03/19/2013) [-]
well perhaps in the future one of the parents and the kid both needed a blood tranfusion, but then they did tests and found out that they weren't related.. they'd be like heartbroken and stuff.
User avatar #53 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Well, the whole blood-transfusion thing would sort of suck. I don't know about what show that is, but it looks like those guys are friends, so I'll assume they could call other guy, explain situation, get blood from son, and then be done with it.

I'm not really sure heartbreak is the right reaction to having raised and nurtured a child towards adulthood, regardless of its origins.



Unless it's from Africa.
User avatar #56 - myrtille (03/19/2013) [-]
The show's called Friends, actually.
User avatar #57 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/19/2013) [-]
Then I guess I wasn't too far off.


I don't watch TV.
User avatar #58 - myrtille (03/19/2013) [-]
I don't really either, but a lot of my friends liked it.
#71 - Would've found it funnier if she'd had a fake or something, bu… 03/19/2013 on Super Sexy Stranger 0
#35 - It was a re-authorization, but either way, he was still the or… 03/18/2013 on Vampires +1
#17 - MFW the knock-off is the original.  [+] (2 new replies) 03/18/2013 on Vampires +7
User avatar #21 - asasqw (03/18/2013) [-]
Wrong, so very wrong. He was made just so that the people producing the movie didn't need to pay copyright fees.
User avatar #35 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/18/2013) [-]
It was a re-authorization, but either way, he was still the original movie vampire, and very much different from Dracula.
#498 - Kinda cool, I guess. I'd be known as "Sorr… 03/18/2013 on How fucked up are you 0
#10 - Thanks for the comment dude! I hope to get more of this stuff … 03/17/2013 on Hanako +1
#118 - Comment deleted 03/16/2013 on Roll your SPECIAL stat 0

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - xxxsonic fanxxx (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - xxxsonic fanxxx (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are assholes everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, assholes know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my fetish because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of fetishes? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the fetishes I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your fetish is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)