Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

sorrowofdaedalus    

Rank #55919 on Subscribers
sorrowofdaedalus Avatar Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Offline
Send mail to sorrowofdaedalus Block sorrowofdaedalus Invite sorrowofdaedalus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:6/15/2011
Last Login:9/09/2013
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 88 total,  144 ,  56
Comment Thumbs: 8581 total,  12493 ,  3912
Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 78% (78/100)
Level 285 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor → Level 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
Subscribers:1
Content Views:5547
Times Content Favorited:7 times
Total Comments Made:4151
FJ Points:9101

latest user's comments

#236 - I didn't need to know that information, but I'm glad I do. Tha…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2011 on School Uniforms +3
User avatar #241 - desuforeverlulz (10/27/2011) [-]
Roll up your sleeves by folding the cuffs over the shirt about 3-4 times. Look like a boss. Forget the suit jacket.
User avatar #246 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
That only works if your in a serious mood, otherwise you just look silly. Trust me, I've seen people attempt, only the people who are truly pissed off look like a boss doing that.
#68 - Animals don't stop to check holes, neither will you. 10/27/2011 on Food chain. +1
#61 - NO MORE "I"M NOT GOING TO DO THAT!!!"  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2011 on Food chain. +1
#67 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
Im no going to do that...
User avatar #68 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Animals don't stop to check holes, neither will you.
#58 - I kind of wish we could go back to the days of doing nothing b…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/27/2011 on Food chain. +4
User avatar #60 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
NO MORE CONDOMS!!
User avatar #61 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
NO MORE "I"M NOT GOING TO DO THAT!!!"
#67 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
Im no going to do that...
User avatar #68 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Animals don't stop to check holes, neither will you.
#54 - Kind of..We half-ass it.  [+] (6 new replies) 10/27/2011 on Food chain. +5
User avatar #57 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
agreed
User avatar #58 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I kind of wish we could go back to the days of doing nothing but hunting and fucking....
User avatar #60 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
NO MORE CONDOMS!!
User avatar #61 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
NO MORE "I"M NOT GOING TO DO THAT!!!"
#67 - jackshazam (10/27/2011) [-]
Im no going to do that...
User avatar #68 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Animals don't stop to check holes, neither will you.
#656 - Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening with… 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#53 - Picture 10/27/2011 on I guarantee you will LAUGH... +1
#635 - I don't say god because I need an answer to it; I say a god be…  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#646 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
we won't be able to prove it, so why make an answer? if we will never be able to prove it, why assume a deity is why, even though you will never know?

and it is best not to put a name to it, because admitting you don't know is better than convincing yourself you are right without proof. one day we will know for sure, but until then i can say it happened, i can't say a deity did it.
User avatar #656 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening without some divine, powerful being behind it. We see things differently, no amount of argument will change that, and it just boils down to if you are willing to believe in higher powers or if you can go ahead and live your life without that. I respect your decision, though I do not agree.
#48 - Because we love you.  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I guarantee you will LAUGH... +1
#49 - FightClub (10/27/2011) [-]
This image has expired
#53 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
#607 - Well, yes, but personally I think of the "gods and titans…  [+] (4 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#618 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
once we wondered what made an apple fall from a tree, that force was obviously Thor smashing his hammer, then we found it it's gravity, and we know it isn't a deity.
Once we wondered what an eclipse was, vikings once thought it was a wolf god eating the moon, and by shouting they could stop it, we now know it is a natural occurrence, not the act of a god.

religion survives because people can keep asking "then what makes THAT work?" and someone will say god, then when we find out, they will say then god makes that work.

you say god because you need an answer to it.
User avatar #635 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I don't say god because I need an answer to it; I say a god because no matter how hard we try, we will never be able to prove everything. Honestly, just as I'm quick to explain something as the force of a god, you were so quick to explain what science couldn't prove with "it just happened that way" you were doing the exact same thing, just without a name behind it.
#646 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
we won't be able to prove it, so why make an answer? if we will never be able to prove it, why assume a deity is why, even though you will never know?

and it is best not to put a name to it, because admitting you don't know is better than convincing yourself you are right without proof. one day we will know for sure, but until then i can say it happened, i can't say a deity did it.
User avatar #656 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening without some divine, powerful being behind it. We see things differently, no amount of argument will change that, and it just boils down to if you are willing to believe in higher powers or if you can go ahead and live your life without that. I respect your decision, though I do not agree.
#75 - Ever hear of an infinite loop? 10/27/2011 on Philosoraptor on: Lesbians 0
#586 - Actually once again you're wrong, there isn't a belief in many…  [+] (6 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#595 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
WHAT? WHAT? particles clumped together to make the titans, and then they gave birth to the gods, and you accept that?

once you believe one crazy thing, you will believe a million to defend it.
User avatar #607 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, yes, but personally I think of the "gods and titans" as more the invisible forces behind all of this. See, no matter how much we find in science, it always unravels down to some thing that we can't prove, some unknown force we can't explain at all; and that, that force that is so unexplained, is a deity. It isn't really just blind belief, it's more of a name for something that can't be explained.
#618 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
once we wondered what made an apple fall from a tree, that force was obviously Thor smashing his hammer, then we found it it's gravity, and we know it isn't a deity.
Once we wondered what an eclipse was, vikings once thought it was a wolf god eating the moon, and by shouting they could stop it, we now know it is a natural occurrence, not the act of a god.

religion survives because people can keep asking "then what makes THAT work?" and someone will say god, then when we find out, they will say then god makes that work.

you say god because you need an answer to it.
User avatar #635 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I don't say god because I need an answer to it; I say a god because no matter how hard we try, we will never be able to prove everything. Honestly, just as I'm quick to explain something as the force of a god, you were so quick to explain what science couldn't prove with "it just happened that way" you were doing the exact same thing, just without a name behind it.
#646 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
we won't be able to prove it, so why make an answer? if we will never be able to prove it, why assume a deity is why, even though you will never know?

and it is best not to put a name to it, because admitting you don't know is better than convincing yourself you are right without proof. one day we will know for sure, but until then i can say it happened, i can't say a deity did it.
User avatar #656 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening without some divine, powerful being behind it. We see things differently, no amount of argument will change that, and it just boils down to if you are willing to believe in higher powers or if you can go ahead and live your life without that. I respect your decision, though I do not agree.
#247 - .....Are you mentally impaired, or have you just not ACTUALLY … 10/27/2011 on Football 0
#543 - Your pretty much saying that we don't NEED to figure all of th… 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#529 - There are a lot of people that kind of do. And that one thing … 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#506 - No, you're kind of pidgeon holing me in to being christian, li…  [+] (10 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... -2
#578 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
better to invent something to make sense of it, then invent more things to make sense of our first invention!
also, the belief many bearded men in the sky made the universe is the same as one at the core of it.
and finally, our minds demand a starting force, but the universe doesn't require one, we need to see patterns and consistencies everywhere, but sometimes we search for one where we don't need one. it just happened, nothing started it, it just did,
User avatar #586 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Actually once again you're wrong, there isn't a belief in many bearded men creating the universe. The belief is that there was originally khaos, just empty bits of particles floating through reality, and as they converged and formed, the universe slowly began to form,as these forces compressed, the first life was created; the titans, and I'm sure you are at least somewhat familiar with the rest. And if you believe it just happened, nothing started reality, it JUST DID for no reason at all, then you CAN'T honestly say that you believe or follow science, because everything science teaches contradicts that idea.
#595 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
WHAT? WHAT? particles clumped together to make the titans, and then they gave birth to the gods, and you accept that?

once you believe one crazy thing, you will believe a million to defend it.
User avatar #607 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, yes, but personally I think of the "gods and titans" as more the invisible forces behind all of this. See, no matter how much we find in science, it always unravels down to some thing that we can't prove, some unknown force we can't explain at all; and that, that force that is so unexplained, is a deity. It isn't really just blind belief, it's more of a name for something that can't be explained.
#618 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
once we wondered what made an apple fall from a tree, that force was obviously Thor smashing his hammer, then we found it it's gravity, and we know it isn't a deity.
Once we wondered what an eclipse was, vikings once thought it was a wolf god eating the moon, and by shouting they could stop it, we now know it is a natural occurrence, not the act of a god.

religion survives because people can keep asking "then what makes THAT work?" and someone will say god, then when we find out, they will say then god makes that work.

you say god because you need an answer to it.
User avatar #635 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I don't say god because I need an answer to it; I say a god because no matter how hard we try, we will never be able to prove everything. Honestly, just as I'm quick to explain something as the force of a god, you were so quick to explain what science couldn't prove with "it just happened that way" you were doing the exact same thing, just without a name behind it.
#646 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
we won't be able to prove it, so why make an answer? if we will never be able to prove it, why assume a deity is why, even though you will never know?

and it is best not to put a name to it, because admitting you don't know is better than convincing yourself you are right without proof. one day we will know for sure, but until then i can say it happened, i can't say a deity did it.
User avatar #656 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening without some divine, powerful being behind it. We see things differently, no amount of argument will change that, and it just boils down to if you are willing to believe in higher powers or if you can go ahead and live your life without that. I respect your decision, though I do not agree.
#515 - pedobearlivez (10/27/2011) [-]
Oh wow one thing we haven't figured out! Oh shit, good thing we all advertise ourselves as being allknowing about everything that ever happened!
User avatar #529 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
There are a lot of people that kind of do. And that one thing is the MOST IMPORTANT thing behind proving or disproving the existence of a deity of any kind. So yeah, THE BIGGEST FUCKING THING YOU CAN'T PROVE! THAT ONE BIG THING! When they find proof, solid, honest, proof, I don't think I COULD be a religious person any more. And there is a hell of a lot more than just the one, by the way. The list is damn near endless of things human beings don't know.
#490 - I honestly don't hate atheism. I was making a parody of what d… 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... +1
#482 - Well, that is awesome, that really is, but I'm talking bigger …  [+] (2 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#527 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
“In ridiculing a pathetic human fallacy, which seeks explanation where none need be sought and which multiplies unnecessary assumptions, one should not mimic primitive ontology in order to challenge it. Better to dispose of the needless assumption altogether. This holds true for everything from Noah's flood to the Holocaust.”
― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar #543 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Your pretty much saying that we don't NEED to figure all of this out. Which I understand, we really don't NEED to. Thing is, you are looking so hard to disprove something that you DO need to if you plan on doing it. We follow what we do because it provides answers that make sense to us; Also, I don't think that quote really applies here; I am saying that by the standards of science, the one we all follow, x needs to happen for y to take place; this is not an unnecessary presumption, it's a proven fact. I'm a hellenic polytheist, the society that created my religion devoted it's entirety to science. Explain to me how all of this can be created without a driving force, and I'll reconsider.
#467 - Yes, and the laws of physics state that everything can not pos…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/27/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... 0
#473 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
you don't know about quantum mechanics do you?
User avatar #470 - dragthelake (10/27/2011) [-]
Right. So magic man in the sky creates everything. Yea that makes sense. Did you not did see in the news that they caught on camera the creation of a planet?
User avatar #482 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, that is awesome, that really is, but I'm talking bigger than just planets. I mean everything that is. Before all that is, there was just nothing? that makes no sense. There had to be some source that no amount of science can explain, that started all that is. Like I said, my religion does not believe in any "magic man in the sky" that creates everything, it does have deities, but it makes sense and actually follows the idea of a big bang.
#527 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
“In ridiculing a pathetic human fallacy, which seeks explanation where none need be sought and which multiplies unnecessary assumptions, one should not mimic primitive ontology in order to challenge it. Better to dispose of the needless assumption altogether. This holds true for everything from Noah's flood to the Holocaust.”
― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar #543 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Your pretty much saying that we don't NEED to figure all of this out. Which I understand, we really don't NEED to. Thing is, you are looking so hard to disprove something that you DO need to if you plan on doing it. We follow what we do because it provides answers that make sense to us; Also, I don't think that quote really applies here; I am saying that by the standards of science, the one we all follow, x needs to happen for y to take place; this is not an unnecessary presumption, it's a proven fact. I'm a hellenic polytheist, the society that created my religion devoted it's entirety to science. Explain to me how all of this can be created without a driving force, and I'll reconsider.
#437 - Atheism is such ******* ******** . I …  [+] (22 new replies) 10/26/2011 on I'm going to hell for this... -2
#489 - pedobearlivez (10/27/2011) [-]
So instead you believe some magical guy created everything?
Come on dude. Open your eyes. We've been above the clouds. We've been to space. We seen other planets clearly. We have valid proof of evolution.
Religion was based on a time when there was no proof of any of that.
User avatar #506 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
No, you're kind of pidgeon holing me in to being christian, like I said, I'm a polytheist, what I believe makes a bit more sense than "magic man creates everything"
Come on dude. Open your eyes. We have seen so much, yet we still can't prove what the igniting force behind the start of all things is. Science is based on a time where we still can't prove what really happened.
#578 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
better to invent something to make sense of it, then invent more things to make sense of our first invention!
also, the belief many bearded men in the sky made the universe is the same as one at the core of it.
and finally, our minds demand a starting force, but the universe doesn't require one, we need to see patterns and consistencies everywhere, but sometimes we search for one where we don't need one. it just happened, nothing started it, it just did,
User avatar #586 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Actually once again you're wrong, there isn't a belief in many bearded men creating the universe. The belief is that there was originally khaos, just empty bits of particles floating through reality, and as they converged and formed, the universe slowly began to form,as these forces compressed, the first life was created; the titans, and I'm sure you are at least somewhat familiar with the rest. And if you believe it just happened, nothing started reality, it JUST DID for no reason at all, then you CAN'T honestly say that you believe or follow science, because everything science teaches contradicts that idea.
#595 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
WHAT? WHAT? particles clumped together to make the titans, and then they gave birth to the gods, and you accept that?

once you believe one crazy thing, you will believe a million to defend it.
User avatar #607 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, yes, but personally I think of the "gods and titans" as more the invisible forces behind all of this. See, no matter how much we find in science, it always unravels down to some thing that we can't prove, some unknown force we can't explain at all; and that, that force that is so unexplained, is a deity. It isn't really just blind belief, it's more of a name for something that can't be explained.
#618 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
once we wondered what made an apple fall from a tree, that force was obviously Thor smashing his hammer, then we found it it's gravity, and we know it isn't a deity.
Once we wondered what an eclipse was, vikings once thought it was a wolf god eating the moon, and by shouting they could stop it, we now know it is a natural occurrence, not the act of a god.

religion survives because people can keep asking "then what makes THAT work?" and someone will say god, then when we find out, they will say then god makes that work.

you say god because you need an answer to it.
User avatar #635 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I don't say god because I need an answer to it; I say a god because no matter how hard we try, we will never be able to prove everything. Honestly, just as I'm quick to explain something as the force of a god, you were so quick to explain what science couldn't prove with "it just happened that way" you were doing the exact same thing, just without a name behind it.
#646 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
we won't be able to prove it, so why make an answer? if we will never be able to prove it, why assume a deity is why, even though you will never know?

and it is best not to put a name to it, because admitting you don't know is better than convincing yourself you are right without proof. one day we will know for sure, but until then i can say it happened, i can't say a deity did it.
User avatar #656 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, good for you, but I can't see all of this happening without some divine, powerful being behind it. We see things differently, no amount of argument will change that, and it just boils down to if you are willing to believe in higher powers or if you can go ahead and live your life without that. I respect your decision, though I do not agree.
#515 - pedobearlivez (10/27/2011) [-]
Oh wow one thing we haven't figured out! Oh shit, good thing we all advertise ourselves as being allknowing about everything that ever happened!
User avatar #529 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
There are a lot of people that kind of do. And that one thing is the MOST IMPORTANT thing behind proving or disproving the existence of a deity of any kind. So yeah, THE BIGGEST FUCKING THING YOU CAN'T PROVE! THAT ONE BIG THING! When they find proof, solid, honest, proof, I don't think I COULD be a religious person any more. And there is a hell of a lot more than just the one, by the way. The list is damn near endless of things human beings don't know.
#475 - thacuddlemonsta (10/27/2011) [-]
sorry for not wanting to believe in god.
User avatar #490 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
I honestly don't hate atheism. I was making a parody of what dragthelake said; I was trying to prove a point that all you need to do is change the name and reason and the same thing can be applied for his way of thinking.
User avatar #480 - dragthelake (10/27/2011) [-]
Don't you dare say sorry for that.
User avatar #452 - dragthelake (10/27/2011) [-]
Science actually makes sense.
User avatar #467 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Yes, and the laws of physics state that everything can not possibly start from nothing. There has to be an igniting force. I personally don't believe in one giant paradox of a being, I'm not saying my religion follows "science" any more so, but it does make more sense than that.
#473 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
you don't know about quantum mechanics do you?
User avatar #470 - dragthelake (10/27/2011) [-]
Right. So magic man in the sky creates everything. Yea that makes sense. Did you not did see in the news that they caught on camera the creation of a planet?
User avatar #482 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Well, that is awesome, that really is, but I'm talking bigger than just planets. I mean everything that is. Before all that is, there was just nothing? that makes no sense. There had to be some source that no amount of science can explain, that started all that is. Like I said, my religion does not believe in any "magic man in the sky" that creates everything, it does have deities, but it makes sense and actually follows the idea of a big bang.
#527 - pedobeahr (10/27/2011) [-]
“In ridiculing a pathetic human fallacy, which seeks explanation where none need be sought and which multiplies unnecessary assumptions, one should not mimic primitive ontology in order to challenge it. Better to dispose of the needless assumption altogether. This holds true for everything from Noah's flood to the Holocaust.”
― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar #543 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/27/2011) [-]
Your pretty much saying that we don't NEED to figure all of this out. Which I understand, we really don't NEED to. Thing is, you are looking so hard to disprove something that you DO need to if you plan on doing it. We follow what we do because it provides answers that make sense to us; Also, I don't think that quote really applies here; I am saying that by the standards of science, the one we all follow, x needs to happen for y to take place; this is not an unnecessary presumption, it's a proven fact. I'm a hellenic polytheist, the society that created my religion devoted it's entirety to science. Explain to me how all of this can be created without a driving force, and I'll reconsider.
#278 - Yup; because being hot is just as good as being sorry. 10/26/2011 on Spiderbro 0
#276 - Yes, because you wouldn't have known if he didn't share the in… 10/26/2011 on Good Guy Josh -2
#4 - If you were a true fan of Poe you'd see the literary elements … 10/26/2011 on My Little Poeny +5
#58 - I didn't read a single thing about you; you told me yourself.  [+] (5 new replies) 10/26/2011 on FJ is still awesome. .... +1
User avatar #59 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
Haha I'm laughing my ass off right now.
#60 - anonymous (10/26/2011) [-]
Please don't respond in the manor you have been to everyone else, I'm just asking a question. But, is there a reason why you are taking the time to be a douche on the internet? Don't answer by taking the easy way out by saying "I'm just trolling cause it's fun and herp derp." I mean, what are you really going to accomplish by this besides self gratification and making people angry?
User avatar #61 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
No the hawks game ended and I don't wanna do homework. I'm having fun. I'm happy as fuck in my life and I could not have asked for a better one. I can actually be a really really nice person. I used to be a pretty big contributor on this site. Then I thought. Fuck it it's more fun to be a dick.
#62 - anonymous (10/26/2011) [-]
I think you would be a lot cooler and more enjoyable if you weren't a dick. Just saying. Also, if it were such a pleasurable act, why don't you do it to people who have done wrong to you. I have read the thread and the only one being unreasonable is you. If you're a dick to people who have done something wrong to you, then you have fun being a dick. People who haven't done anything can carry on with there day also. Win-win if you ask me.
User avatar #63 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
Cuz I do it in real life where it actually does something.
#56 - I do know you. I know a lot.  [+] (7 new replies) 10/26/2011 on FJ is still awesome. .... 0
User avatar #57 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
Right because everything you read on the internet is true.
User avatar #58 - sorrowofdaedalus (10/26/2011) [-]
I didn't read a single thing about you; you told me yourself.
User avatar #59 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
Haha I'm laughing my ass off right now.
#60 - anonymous (10/26/2011) [-]
Please don't respond in the manor you have been to everyone else, I'm just asking a question. But, is there a reason why you are taking the time to be a douche on the internet? Don't answer by taking the easy way out by saying "I'm just trolling cause it's fun and herp derp." I mean, what are you really going to accomplish by this besides self gratification and making people angry?
User avatar #61 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
No the hawks game ended and I don't wanna do homework. I'm having fun. I'm happy as fuck in my life and I could not have asked for a better one. I can actually be a really really nice person. I used to be a pretty big contributor on this site. Then I thought. Fuck it it's more fun to be a dick.
#62 - anonymous (10/26/2011) [-]
I think you would be a lot cooler and more enjoyable if you weren't a dick. Just saying. Also, if it were such a pleasurable act, why don't you do it to people who have done wrong to you. I have read the thread and the only one being unreasonable is you. If you're a dick to people who have done something wrong to you, then you have fun being a dick. People who haven't done anything can carry on with there day also. Win-win if you ask me.
User avatar #63 - dragthelake (10/26/2011) [-]
Cuz I do it in real life where it actually does something.
Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#33 - anonymous (08/03/2012) [-]
eat a dick douche
#35 to #33 - anonymous (03/05/2013) [-]
sorry im retarded i take that back
User avatar #32 - cryotaneko (06/16/2012) [-]
Happy one year anniversary of starting FJ. Congrats, dude.
User avatar #23 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
I am quite fond of you find sir, you make valid arguments and seem like a decent human being :OOOOO
User avatar #24 to #25 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Why thank you. I would be glad to have you as a friend, and I sincerely apologize of any of the trash that you met that give football players a bad name.
User avatar #25 to #26 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Haha, I don't personally pick on football players, there is always a douchebag in EVERY place in life. Like hell, I know a player football player, my player ex who was a skater, I know a redneck who beat his 14yr old pregnant girlfriend, I know a teacher who beat his wife. There are ******** everywhere, they arent just all packed in a football team haha
User avatar #26 to #27 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Yeah, ******** know no bounds. the stereotype is always about the football players picking on the drama geeks, but honestly, I think nowadays football players have to deal with more **** about being gay than thesbians do during high school.
User avatar #27 to #28 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Like most football players are chillin with the cheerleaders who are ironically also band geeks who also associate with drama kids who associate with goths who associate with punks who associate with emos who associate with rappers (poetry=rap) and rappers associate with blacks and blacks associate with rednecks soooo in the end, there arent any real stereotypes anymore, just ignorant people
User avatar #28 to #29 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
I guess so, I always preferred the punk girls myself. Hell, I'm now a 30 year old psychologist and my significant other shaves her head.
#29 to #30 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
<---- my hair as of 2 months ago but now picture it neon purple bc thats the new colour I have and a little bit shorter lol But I had to give my ex the shirt back D:
User avatar #30 to #31 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/27/2011) [-]
Hah, just remember, no matter how old you get, never outgrow the things that you love.
User avatar #31 to #32 - xjessicajynx (11/27/2011) [-]
Pretty much then, I will never outgrow talking, writing, cooking, playing my music (I play 13+ instruments) singing, belly dancing, and dance dance revolution lol
#4 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Gay love is beautiful and you are a dick for thinking otherwise.
User avatar #5 to #4 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Ooh, I'm a monster and a dick for thinking differently, that just screams "respect my opinions". Try reading my reply all the way through before posting ignorant ******** on my profile.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
I know it is your opinion, but it pisses me off when people think it is sick and wrong >_> There is nothing wrong with loving people.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and History suggest otherwise, Like I said in my reply though, just because it is unnatural, doesn't mean it isn't part of who you are. You need to accept that. I'm a sick and unnatural person, but I accept that, I practice it, and I'm happy because I do. There is no point in changing what can't be changed, and there is no point in trying to make something that is wrong seem right.
User avatar #8 to #7 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Anatomy and history aren't necessarily correct though, now are they? And you realize it is not just humans that are gay, they have seen a number of species of birds also practicing homosexual acts, among other species. And I'm not saying you have to change, but even if you keep think it is unnatural, doesn't mean it is. And are you saying that being gay is wrong and you can't make it right?
User avatar #9 to #8 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Well, the basics, yes, they are. And you realize new species are discovered every day, which means that being gay among the animals is still unnatural and different comparatively?
What I am saying is that it IS unnatural, but that doesn't mean you need to change it, and it is just ridiculous to try to say it is normal when it's not. I'm saying that being gay is something that you must accept, realize is different, and revel in that difference. I'm in to watersports and bondage, I realize it is sick and wrong, I accept that, I live out my ****** because it is part of me, and it makes me happy. Gays shouldn't try to force others to think something is right when it clearly isn't, they should simply accept the fact that they are gay, and that is different, and be happy the way they are.
User avatar #10 to #9 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Does it matter if something is different? No, it doesn't, nor does it make it wrong.
And what is wrong with having those sort of ******** ? I don't think it is wrong if it makes you happy.
And gays aren't trying to force people that being gay is right, they are just trying to be accepted. So many gay people kill themselves because they are called unnatural and gross. So who is more sick, the guy that happens to like another guy, or the people driving them to kill themselves?
As long as there happy, people should just accept them as they are.
User avatar #11 to #10 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
Being a psychologist, I can hardly say that someone who has a belief that is negative is any more sick than a person who has an unnatural sexual preference.
Something that is unnatural is wrong, but there should not be unhappiness because you are wrong. There should be acceptance of it. Wrong and bad are two different things, and that is what I think is the mistake people make.
It is wrong to have the ******** I have because they aren't normal or natural, and aren't beneficial to reproduction, it is only out of happiness and pleasure that I do it, it is wrong, but I accept that, it isn't bad, just because it's wrong.
User avatar #12 to #11 - sarahsa (11/07/2011) [-]
Why is being gay even labled as 'unnatural'? What about it makes it that? Because it doesn't help with reproduction? Alright, you say your ****** is wrong because it doesn't help reproduction, but if you haven't noticed, we just hit 7o billion people. We don't need to keep reproducing.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/07/2011) [-]
We don't NEED to, but reproduction is the only natural reason for sex. It is labeled as unnatural because it IS. Like I said, science proves so. I'm not sure if you read my other comments at all, but I mentioned I am a hellenic polytheist. The ancient greeks were known for being openly gay, but the religion also shares a philosophy of accepting that just because something isn't unnatural, doesn't make bad, and true happiness can only be found through acceptance of what is unnatural, you need to accept what is wrong with you the same way you accept what is right about you.
User avatar #14 to #13 - sarahsa (11/09/2011) [-]
I understand that, but still, just because science proves something, doesn't make it correct. Anyway, that is actually pretty cool that you are a hellenic polytheist, and I get what you mean when you say just because something is unnatural, doesn't make it bad, and that you just have to accept something to be happy even if it is 'unnatural'.
Even though you don't support gays, you are clearly not overly against it, and you actually have some very interesting views, so I apologize for insulting you earlier :)
User avatar #15 to #14 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/09/2011) [-]
Thank you for your apology. Please understand that I don't support what isn't meant to be, but I will ALWAYS support love, even if it isn't "right". If I may ask, why is it that you so fervently support homosexuality?
User avatar #16 to #15 - sarahsa (11/10/2011) [-]
Well, I'm glad you support love always. I'm not sure, I just feel that no matter what the gender of the people, if they love each other, then it shouldn't matter, and it may also be because I think it is really cute.
User avatar #17 to #16 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/10/2011) [-]
That fair enough. But, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Believe it or not, even people that are homophobic or put up an angry first impression are willing to appeal to reason if you probe them with questions, reply in a generally calm manner, and make strong points. Isn't the point of the argument to get the other party to see your side?
User avatar #18 to #17 - sarahsa (11/12/2011) [-]
I see you point, but I have met plenty of people who won't listen to reason >_>
User avatar #19 to #18 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/13/2011) [-]
Reason tempered with zeal often strikes down understanding.
User avatar #20 to #19 - sarahsa (11/14/2011) [-]
Yeah, I suppose, I just wish some people could open there eye more.
User avatar #21 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (11/14/2011) [-]
People will listen, you just need to be patient. Being angry just makes people close their eyes more.
User avatar #22 to #22 - sarahsa (11/15/2011) [-]
People may eventually listen, but that doesn't mean it won't go through one ear and out the other.
User avatar #1 - barturia (08/05/2011) [-]
we reached the limit on the replys. too bad because i had alot more jokes.
User avatar #2 to #1 - sorrowofdaedalus (08/05/2011) [-]
Well ain't that a KICK in the head?
 Friends (0)