Upload
Login or register

smittywrbmnjnsn

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:6/28/2012
Last Login:9/30/2016
Stats
Content Thumbs: 8995 total,  9786 ,  791
Comment Thumbs: 10030 total,  14278 ,  4248
Content Level Progress: 97% (97/100)
Level 189 Content: Anon Annihilator → Level 190 Content: Anon Annihilator
Comment Level Progress: 28% (28/100)
Level 296 Comments: Post Master → Level 297 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:4
Content Views:313309
Times Content Favorited:261 times
Total Comments Made:3903
FJ Points:18829
Favorite Tags: argument (6) | Debate (6) | Religion (6) | Good (5) | Fallout (3) | hard (3) | me (3) | sex (3) | are (2) | Arguments (2) | bad (2) | Battlefield (2) | die (2) | do (2) | i (2) | idiot (2) | logic (2) | my (2) | now (2) | Stupid (2)

  • Views: 56514
    Thumbs Up 2559 Thumbs Down 133 Total: +2426
    Comments: 271
    Favorites: 70
    Uploaded: 07/02/12
    Reasons I Die in Fallout Reasons I Die in Fallout
  • Views: 45564
    Thumbs Up 1792 Thumbs Down 73 Total: +1719
    Comments: 115
    Favorites: 46
    Uploaded: 12/29/12
    Graffiti Advice Graffiti Advice
  • Views: 30623
    Thumbs Up 1529 Thumbs Down 81 Total: +1448
    Comments: 70
    Favorites: 33
    Uploaded: 06/30/12
    Battlefield Battlefield
  • Views: 49075
    Thumbs Up 1521 Thumbs Down 118 Total: +1403
    Comments: 57
    Favorites: 22
    Uploaded: 07/02/12
    Fallout Logic Fallout Logic
  • Views: 15006
    Thumbs Up 554 Thumbs Down 46 Total: +508
    Comments: 9
    Favorites: 44
    Uploaded: 07/31/12
    Oh, megle Oh, megle
  • Views: 18041
    Thumbs Up 389 Thumbs Down 36 Total: +353
    Comments: 29
    Favorites: 2
    Uploaded: 02/18/13
    White People Volume White People Volume

latest user's comments

#32 - You buy games from Walmart? You trust the advice of Walmar…  [+] (1 reply) 04/29/2016 on Tactical as F*** +4
User avatar
#37 - pkashp (04/29/2016) [-]
No, I was window shopping. I rented it from Hastings and made the actual purchase during the Microsoft sale some weeks back.

Apparently not.
#202 - Drug abuse is just defined as the "habitual use of [drugs…  [+] (1 reply) 04/28/2016 on Worried anon gets medical... -1
#203 - Fgner (04/28/2016) [-]
Oh Jesus Christ, just stop replying. I thought you were genuinely concerned with people of unfortunate background and I tried to clear up your blatant misunderstanding, but now you're just being an annoying cunt.

Great, you grabbed the generic Google definition, here's the full definition that I was paraphrasing from two separate sources - 2/3 of the top fucking results on "Define Drug Abuse" via Google:

umm.edu/health/medical/ency/articles/drug-abuse
"Drug abuse is the recurrent use of illegal drugs, or the misuse of prescription or over-the-counter drugs with negative consequences. These consequences may involve
* Problems at work, school, home or in interpersonal relationships
* Problems with the law
* Physical risks that come with using drugs in dangerous situations"

www.businessdictionary.com/definition/drug-abuse.html
"Compulsive, excessive, and self-damaging use of habit forming drugs or substances, leading to addiction or dependence, serious physiological injury (such as damage to kidneys, liver, heart) and/or psychological harm (such as dysfunctional behavior patterns, hallucinations, memory loss), or death. Also called substance abuse."

I actually REMOVED things from it, summarizing those big words and lists into "habitual" and "negative consequences". So congratulations, you're being a pedantic asshole for no reason, I hope you feel good about yourself. What the fuck is even your prerogative at this point?
#187 - You say you have empathy, but then you continue to suggest tha…  [+] (3 replies) 04/27/2016 on Worried anon gets medical... -1
User avatar
#189 - Fgner (04/27/2016) [-]
What they hell are you talking about, man? I don't give a damn if you smoke weed once a month or once an hour as long as you aren't abusing it. AKA: As long as you aren't causing problems in your life or someone else's. Habitual usage isn't abuse on it's lonesome, it must be accompanied by consequence.

If you are a fortunate person that doesn't need to use drugs as a coping mechanism, using drugs to the point that you are causing negative consequences in your or someone else's life, that does make you an idiot. Especially someone else's life, because then you're a selfish idiot.

These actions could make them fall into the position of the unfortunate, in which case they would get my sympathy again, because there comes a point it's not their choice. But if a mentally-stable, rich, middle-aged guy wants to do blow off of a hooker every Friday behind his happy family's back and risk his nice job, then he's a fucking selfish idiot, no questions asked. Just like if I went to a bar every night, leaving my happy relationship at home and reducing the quality of my work, I would be an alcohol-abusing cunt. But I AM better than that, and I WONT do that.

How else would you define it? Should we not ever judge people for ruining lives for no reason? That's retarded.
User avatar
#202 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/28/2016) [-]
Drug abuse is just defined as the "habitual use of [drugs]."
We just argued the definition of drug abuse. Why would you suddenly think you could get away with adding to it?
I would, by definition, be abusing drugs in the act of smoking pot even once a week, and you said you were better than them. With this last comment you 'clarified' that you meant only a sub-category of home wreckers; up until now, you've clearly been saying you're better than even those who smoke weekly. "I'm not a fucking drug-abusing idiot, I'd like to keep myself sober, healthy..." When you say that, you're saying that drug-abusers are idiots (and that you're above them), and by definition that's just anyone who more than occasionally rewards oneself.

If you're really going to say that you didn't look at the definition when we were arguing the definition, fine. It's absurd, but whatever.
#203 - Fgner (04/28/2016) [-]
Oh Jesus Christ, just stop replying. I thought you were genuinely concerned with people of unfortunate background and I tried to clear up your blatant misunderstanding, but now you're just being an annoying cunt.

Great, you grabbed the generic Google definition, here's the full definition that I was paraphrasing from two separate sources - 2/3 of the top fucking results on "Define Drug Abuse" via Google:

umm.edu/health/medical/ency/articles/drug-abuse
"Drug abuse is the recurrent use of illegal drugs, or the misuse of prescription or over-the-counter drugs with negative consequences. These consequences may involve
* Problems at work, school, home or in interpersonal relationships
* Problems with the law
* Physical risks that come with using drugs in dangerous situations"

www.businessdictionary.com/definition/drug-abuse.html
"Compulsive, excessive, and self-damaging use of habit forming drugs or substances, leading to addiction or dependence, serious physiological injury (such as damage to kidneys, liver, heart) and/or psychological harm (such as dysfunctional behavior patterns, hallucinations, memory loss), or death. Also called substance abuse."

I actually REMOVED things from it, summarizing those big words and lists into "habitual" and "negative consequences". So congratulations, you're being a pedantic asshole for no reason, I hope you feel good about yourself. What the fuck is even your prerogative at this point?
#184 - If you went through all of that, you ought to be humbled enoug…  [+] (5 replies) 04/27/2016 on Worried anon gets medical... -1
User avatar
#185 - Fgner (04/27/2016) [-]
Read that comment over again, I specifically say:

"And I have nothing but empathy and love for them. In one of my lower comments I even addressed that it's a war not on drugs, but on the "impoverished, unfortunate, and easily-manipulated". For some of them, drugs are a coping mechanism they physically cannot escape and I can hardly call that abuse on their part. "

Special attention to "For some of them, drugs are a coping mechanism they physically cannot escape and I can hardly call that abuse on their part."
User avatar
#187 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/27/2016) [-]
You say you have empathy, but then you continue to suggest that anyone who regularly enjoys happiness through transaction is either poor or dumb. You still act as though you're better.
You don't need to be "impoverished, unfortunate, [or] easily-manipulated" to frequently enjoy marijuana.
User avatar
#189 - Fgner (04/27/2016) [-]
What they hell are you talking about, man? I don't give a damn if you smoke weed once a month or once an hour as long as you aren't abusing it. AKA: As long as you aren't causing problems in your life or someone else's. Habitual usage isn't abuse on it's lonesome, it must be accompanied by consequence.

If you are a fortunate person that doesn't need to use drugs as a coping mechanism, using drugs to the point that you are causing negative consequences in your or someone else's life, that does make you an idiot. Especially someone else's life, because then you're a selfish idiot.

These actions could make them fall into the position of the unfortunate, in which case they would get my sympathy again, because there comes a point it's not their choice. But if a mentally-stable, rich, middle-aged guy wants to do blow off of a hooker every Friday behind his happy family's back and risk his nice job, then he's a fucking selfish idiot, no questions asked. Just like if I went to a bar every night, leaving my happy relationship at home and reducing the quality of my work, I would be an alcohol-abusing cunt. But I AM better than that, and I WONT do that.

How else would you define it? Should we not ever judge people for ruining lives for no reason? That's retarded.
User avatar
#202 - smittywrbmnjnsn (04/28/2016) [-]
Drug abuse is just defined as the "habitual use of [drugs]."
We just argued the definition of drug abuse. Why would you suddenly think you could get away with adding to it?
I would, by definition, be abusing drugs in the act of smoking pot even once a week, and you said you were better than them. With this last comment you 'clarified' that you meant only a sub-category of home wreckers; up until now, you've clearly been saying you're better than even those who smoke weekly. "I'm not a fucking drug-abusing idiot, I'd like to keep myself sober, healthy..." When you say that, you're saying that drug-abusers are idiots (and that you're above them), and by definition that's just anyone who more than occasionally rewards oneself.

If you're really going to say that you didn't look at the definition when we were arguing the definition, fine. It's absurd, but whatever.
#203 - Fgner (04/28/2016) [-]
Oh Jesus Christ, just stop replying. I thought you were genuinely concerned with people of unfortunate background and I tried to clear up your blatant misunderstanding, but now you're just being an annoying cunt.

Great, you grabbed the generic Google definition, here's the full definition that I was paraphrasing from two separate sources - 2/3 of the top fucking results on "Define Drug Abuse" via Google:

umm.edu/health/medical/ency/articles/drug-abuse
"Drug abuse is the recurrent use of illegal drugs, or the misuse of prescription or over-the-counter drugs with negative consequences. These consequences may involve
* Problems at work, school, home or in interpersonal relationships
* Problems with the law
* Physical risks that come with using drugs in dangerous situations"

www.businessdictionary.com/definition/drug-abuse.html
"Compulsive, excessive, and self-damaging use of habit forming drugs or substances, leading to addiction or dependence, serious physiological injury (such as damage to kidneys, liver, heart) and/or psychological harm (such as dysfunctional behavior patterns, hallucinations, memory loss), or death. Also called substance abuse."

I actually REMOVED things from it, summarizing those big words and lists into "habitual" and "negative consequences". So congratulations, you're being a pedantic asshole for no reason, I hope you feel good about yourself. What the fuck is even your prerogative at this point?
#160 - Not to mention, YOU ARE abusing drugs. Recreational use of…  [+] (1 reply) 04/26/2016 on Worried anon gets medical... -1
User avatar
#163 - Fgner (04/26/2016) [-]
tl;dr I'm with you on the 139 comment front - the world is a bad fucking place and I can't blame those in that position for what they suffer. I actually appreciate your concern for making that clear. But on 160 you're just kinda being a dick.
#183 - But then you have the whole family going "Grandpa didn't …  [+] (1 reply) 04/26/2016 on cletus the fetus +1
#200 - anon (04/26/2016) [-]
THIS.

I guarantee this sort of shit would happen and then the traditional and religious types would go bonkers. Whole thing would turn into a media circus.

channels owned

Subscribe arguments
Subscribe awesome-ideas
Subscribe silent-hill
Subscribe volkswagen-humor