Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

slayzo

Rank #20357 on Comments
no avatar Level 173 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Offline
Send mail to slayzo Block slayzo Invite slayzo to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 113
Date Signed Up:8/17/2011
Last Login:12/28/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#20357
Highest Comment Rank:#8481
Comment Thumbs: 740 total,  1059 ,  319
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 173 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk → Level 174 Comments: Soldier Of Funnyjunk
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:555
FJ Points:939

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

latest user's comments

#241 - OK, I think it's time for me to apologize for being stupid, no…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #245 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
I've gone though this whole song and dance before with numerous people, and it really truly does agitate the shit out of me when I meet more people that are stupid enough to actually think there's any connection whatsoever between this idea of a beta neckbeard fedora basement shitlord whatever thing, and atheists.

Because there is none.

It's a stupid internet thing that apparently some people take seriously. And it really boils my blood that people mock the idea of doing NOTHING, because somehow not being part of any of the hundreds of magical fanclubs that have existed throughout history makes you a fat bearded slob for some reason.

Even that fucking quote "in this moment I am enlightened, not because of any phony religions but my own intelligence" or what the fuck ever, was ridiculed by r/atheism. Nobody ever endorsed that garbage, and yet somehow it has become the calling card for anyone insulting an atheist.

It's tiresome as hell, because so many religious debates are filled with intellectually dishonest bullshit, such as special pleading, scare tactics, ad hominem, non-sequitors out the ASS, false dichotomies, and general ignorance, that I have little to no patience for those that base their thoughts of atheists on a fictional idea crafted by religious internet dwellers.

Those kinds of religious people are the worst kind to actually know in real life because of how insufferably smug, self-righteous, bigoted, judgy, and ignorant those sorts of people are.

I'll apologize as well, because my reactions were based on how you HAD been responding, and my previous experience with the kind of people that respond like that. If you'd like to seriously discuss this further, then I'd be more than open to that possibility.
#239 - I stated that so that your first thought isn't "He only c…  [+] (1 new reply) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #240 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Why on earth would that be my first thought?
#238 - Are you trying to say that someone can actually think they're …  [+] (1 new reply) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #242 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
It's basically far more widespread than it should be.

Never said that. In general, surveyed atheists scored higher than any other group on quizzes concerning world religions. Never said by default.

That's because you're pulling it all out of your ass.

And you prove my point there.
#235 - Have you never met someone like that? At least a blind religio…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #236 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it. "

False false false false false false FALSE. Holy shit, have you never been to the South USA?

AND atheists in general have a greater knowledge of world religions than the religious. Nobody is a "blind atheist" because the de facto position of a newborn is atheist until they decide to become religious.

And your "loaded question" example is full of shit. That's a perfectly valid question that you're handwaving with special pleading (my god doesn't follow basic rules of logic because I said so).

I'll agree with your last line, because that's what you're doing now.
#241 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
OK, I think it's time for me to apologize for being stupid, now that I've calmed down a bit.

Don't consider anything I've said as the word of a real christian. I barely act like one.

Sorry for throwing out bullshit all along the way. I was just angry coming off another bitter gathering of family which ended with my parents reminding me of how shitty I am. Debate a real, intelligent christian sometime. Hopefully they'll be able to give you actual answers, instead of my stupidity.

I'm gonna stop replying now, because I think I've calmed down enough to stop being a raging autist.
User avatar #245 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
I've gone though this whole song and dance before with numerous people, and it really truly does agitate the shit out of me when I meet more people that are stupid enough to actually think there's any connection whatsoever between this idea of a beta neckbeard fedora basement shitlord whatever thing, and atheists.

Because there is none.

It's a stupid internet thing that apparently some people take seriously. And it really boils my blood that people mock the idea of doing NOTHING, because somehow not being part of any of the hundreds of magical fanclubs that have existed throughout history makes you a fat bearded slob for some reason.

Even that fucking quote "in this moment I am enlightened, not because of any phony religions but my own intelligence" or what the fuck ever, was ridiculed by r/atheism. Nobody ever endorsed that garbage, and yet somehow it has become the calling card for anyone insulting an atheist.

It's tiresome as hell, because so many religious debates are filled with intellectually dishonest bullshit, such as special pleading, scare tactics, ad hominem, non-sequitors out the ASS, false dichotomies, and general ignorance, that I have little to no patience for those that base their thoughts of atheists on a fictional idea crafted by religious internet dwellers.

Those kinds of religious people are the worst kind to actually know in real life because of how insufferably smug, self-righteous, bigoted, judgy, and ignorant those sorts of people are.

I'll apologize as well, because my reactions were based on how you HAD been responding, and my previous experience with the kind of people that respond like that. If you'd like to seriously discuss this further, then I'd be more than open to that possibility.
#238 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Are you trying to say that someone can actually think they're christian without reading the bible? Because I have yet to meet someone that stupid, or even hear about someone that stupid, and it's basically impossible.

How do atheists know religion better than the religious by default, exactly? I don't see know someone who doesn't read the bible can know more than someone who does, over the bible. In fact, as I stated, plenty of non-religious throw out misquotes or misinterpretations. But hey, they know more by default, right?

The thing is, no matter what we say on the loaded question, they'll say "But that's bullshit, you just can't give me an answer" It doesn't matter what we say. Even if we say something like "He doesn't have a physical body unless he gives himself one, i.e. Jesus Christ, he's more like an essence", they'll just say we're pulling things out our ass and he's clearly not real. I say this from experience.

Good job showing off your fedora on the last line there.
User avatar #242 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
It's basically far more widespread than it should be.

Never said that. In general, surveyed atheists scored higher than any other group on quizzes concerning world religions. Never said by default.

That's because you're pulling it all out of your ass.

And you prove my point there.
#234 - I completely agree with you on the middle east topic though, t…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #237 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"not just the religious missionaries."

Well, yeah, I imagined it would be assumed that we value all human life, even if they're not a missionary.
#239 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
I stated that so that your first thought isn't "He only cares about the missionaries probably" because judging from your other comments, that's most likely your first generalization.
User avatar #240 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Why on earth would that be my first thought?
#232 - You're acting as if I actually hate athiests. There's no reaso…  [+] (7 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #233 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Anyone who thinks

"at least not as bad as kids being raised in households that are heavily against religion, because then we're stuck with fedora'd neckbeards"

and is being serious, is an idiot.
#235 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Have you never met someone like that? At least a blind religious person has some ounce of knowledge of what they're talking about. Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it.

Blind athiests, on the other hand, don't have to have any knowledge of religion. I've met plenty of people like that. Misquoting bible verses, throwing loaded questions ("If God created the universe, who created God?") and generally not doing there research.

Of course, there are plenty of intelligent athiests who would stomp me in a debate. I'm not intelligent enough to argue with the ones who have done plenty of research, I'd only do harm.
User avatar #236 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it. "

False false false false false false FALSE. Holy shit, have you never been to the South USA?

AND atheists in general have a greater knowledge of world religions than the religious. Nobody is a "blind atheist" because the de facto position of a newborn is atheist until they decide to become religious.

And your "loaded question" example is full of shit. That's a perfectly valid question that you're handwaving with special pleading (my god doesn't follow basic rules of logic because I said so).

I'll agree with your last line, because that's what you're doing now.
#241 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
OK, I think it's time for me to apologize for being stupid, now that I've calmed down a bit.

Don't consider anything I've said as the word of a real christian. I barely act like one.

Sorry for throwing out bullshit all along the way. I was just angry coming off another bitter gathering of family which ended with my parents reminding me of how shitty I am. Debate a real, intelligent christian sometime. Hopefully they'll be able to give you actual answers, instead of my stupidity.

I'm gonna stop replying now, because I think I've calmed down enough to stop being a raging autist.
User avatar #245 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
I've gone though this whole song and dance before with numerous people, and it really truly does agitate the shit out of me when I meet more people that are stupid enough to actually think there's any connection whatsoever between this idea of a beta neckbeard fedora basement shitlord whatever thing, and atheists.

Because there is none.

It's a stupid internet thing that apparently some people take seriously. And it really boils my blood that people mock the idea of doing NOTHING, because somehow not being part of any of the hundreds of magical fanclubs that have existed throughout history makes you a fat bearded slob for some reason.

Even that fucking quote "in this moment I am enlightened, not because of any phony religions but my own intelligence" or what the fuck ever, was ridiculed by r/atheism. Nobody ever endorsed that garbage, and yet somehow it has become the calling card for anyone insulting an atheist.

It's tiresome as hell, because so many religious debates are filled with intellectually dishonest bullshit, such as special pleading, scare tactics, ad hominem, non-sequitors out the ASS, false dichotomies, and general ignorance, that I have little to no patience for those that base their thoughts of atheists on a fictional idea crafted by religious internet dwellers.

Those kinds of religious people are the worst kind to actually know in real life because of how insufferably smug, self-righteous, bigoted, judgy, and ignorant those sorts of people are.

I'll apologize as well, because my reactions were based on how you HAD been responding, and my previous experience with the kind of people that respond like that. If you'd like to seriously discuss this further, then I'd be more than open to that possibility.
#238 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Are you trying to say that someone can actually think they're christian without reading the bible? Because I have yet to meet someone that stupid, or even hear about someone that stupid, and it's basically impossible.

How do atheists know religion better than the religious by default, exactly? I don't see know someone who doesn't read the bible can know more than someone who does, over the bible. In fact, as I stated, plenty of non-religious throw out misquotes or misinterpretations. But hey, they know more by default, right?

The thing is, no matter what we say on the loaded question, they'll say "But that's bullshit, you just can't give me an answer" It doesn't matter what we say. Even if we say something like "He doesn't have a physical body unless he gives himself one, i.e. Jesus Christ, he's more like an essence", they'll just say we're pulling things out our ass and he's clearly not real. I say this from experience.

Good job showing off your fedora on the last line there.
User avatar #242 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
It's basically far more widespread than it should be.

Never said that. In general, surveyed atheists scored higher than any other group on quizzes concerning world religions. Never said by default.

That's because you're pulling it all out of your ass.

And you prove my point there.
#230 - Of course it was more than just religious people, but they wer…  [+] (5 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #231 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Mao Zedong is the popular one to quote.
Most people killed because of their religion was because it was by another religious group. Granted, there are those dictators out there who kill scores for political reasons and ban religious practices, but it still doesn't touch the thousands of years of bloodshed in the middle east alone.
#234 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
I completely agree with you on the middle east topic though, that place is a mess for religion in general. It's a shame so many people have died in general there, not just the religious missionaries.
User avatar #237 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"not just the religious missionaries."

Well, yeah, I imagined it would be assumed that we value all human life, even if they're not a missionary.
#239 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
I stated that so that your first thought isn't "He only cares about the missionaries probably" because judging from your other comments, that's most likely your first generalization.
User avatar #240 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Why on earth would that be my first thought?
#228 - Well there's plenty of over religious, and in general bad pare…  [+] (9 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer -1
User avatar #229 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
That's what we call bias.
And your opinion is grounded in stupid hatred.
#232 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
You're acting as if I actually hate athiests. There's no reason to, but the fact of the matter is, it's not like the only over-zealous households are religious ones. People of all shapes and sizes of stupidity can pop up anywhere, and it isn't only rooted in religious people, but rather the topic of religion itself, that spawns blind zealots.
User avatar #233 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Anyone who thinks

"at least not as bad as kids being raised in households that are heavily against religion, because then we're stuck with fedora'd neckbeards"

and is being serious, is an idiot.
#235 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Have you never met someone like that? At least a blind religious person has some ounce of knowledge of what they're talking about. Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it.

Blind athiests, on the other hand, don't have to have any knowledge of religion. I've met plenty of people like that. Misquoting bible verses, throwing loaded questions ("If God created the universe, who created God?") and generally not doing there research.

Of course, there are plenty of intelligent athiests who would stomp me in a debate. I'm not intelligent enough to argue with the ones who have done plenty of research, I'd only do harm.
User avatar #236 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it. "

False false false false false false FALSE. Holy shit, have you never been to the South USA?

AND atheists in general have a greater knowledge of world religions than the religious. Nobody is a "blind atheist" because the de facto position of a newborn is atheist until they decide to become religious.

And your "loaded question" example is full of shit. That's a perfectly valid question that you're handwaving with special pleading (my god doesn't follow basic rules of logic because I said so).

I'll agree with your last line, because that's what you're doing now.
#241 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
OK, I think it's time for me to apologize for being stupid, now that I've calmed down a bit.

Don't consider anything I've said as the word of a real christian. I barely act like one.

Sorry for throwing out bullshit all along the way. I was just angry coming off another bitter gathering of family which ended with my parents reminding me of how shitty I am. Debate a real, intelligent christian sometime. Hopefully they'll be able to give you actual answers, instead of my stupidity.

I'm gonna stop replying now, because I think I've calmed down enough to stop being a raging autist.
User avatar #245 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
I've gone though this whole song and dance before with numerous people, and it really truly does agitate the shit out of me when I meet more people that are stupid enough to actually think there's any connection whatsoever between this idea of a beta neckbeard fedora basement shitlord whatever thing, and atheists.

Because there is none.

It's a stupid internet thing that apparently some people take seriously. And it really boils my blood that people mock the idea of doing NOTHING, because somehow not being part of any of the hundreds of magical fanclubs that have existed throughout history makes you a fat bearded slob for some reason.

Even that fucking quote "in this moment I am enlightened, not because of any phony religions but my own intelligence" or what the fuck ever, was ridiculed by r/atheism. Nobody ever endorsed that garbage, and yet somehow it has become the calling card for anyone insulting an atheist.

It's tiresome as hell, because so many religious debates are filled with intellectually dishonest bullshit, such as special pleading, scare tactics, ad hominem, non-sequitors out the ASS, false dichotomies, and general ignorance, that I have little to no patience for those that base their thoughts of atheists on a fictional idea crafted by religious internet dwellers.

Those kinds of religious people are the worst kind to actually know in real life because of how insufferably smug, self-righteous, bigoted, judgy, and ignorant those sorts of people are.

I'll apologize as well, because my reactions were based on how you HAD been responding, and my previous experience with the kind of people that respond like that. If you'd like to seriously discuss this further, then I'd be more than open to that possibility.
#238 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Are you trying to say that someone can actually think they're christian without reading the bible? Because I have yet to meet someone that stupid, or even hear about someone that stupid, and it's basically impossible.

How do atheists know religion better than the religious by default, exactly? I don't see know someone who doesn't read the bible can know more than someone who does, over the bible. In fact, as I stated, plenty of non-religious throw out misquotes or misinterpretations. But hey, they know more by default, right?

The thing is, no matter what we say on the loaded question, they'll say "But that's bullshit, you just can't give me an answer" It doesn't matter what we say. Even if we say something like "He doesn't have a physical body unless he gives himself one, i.e. Jesus Christ, he's more like an essence", they'll just say we're pulling things out our ass and he's clearly not real. I say this from experience.

Good job showing off your fedora on the last line there.
User avatar #242 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
It's basically far more widespread than it should be.

Never said that. In general, surveyed atheists scored higher than any other group on quizzes concerning world religions. Never said by default.

That's because you're pulling it all out of your ass.

And you prove my point there.
#226 - I wasn't aware Stalin was religious.  [+] (7 new replies) 12/18/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #227 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Stalin killed all his people for a plethora of reasons.
You act like it was only religious people, rather than the religious, the political, the activist, the capitalist, etc
#230 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Of course it was more than just religious people, but they were still killed for their religion.

I was going to say china, but I don't feel like looking into the religious status of chinese government.
User avatar #231 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Mao Zedong is the popular one to quote.
Most people killed because of their religion was because it was by another religious group. Granted, there are those dictators out there who kill scores for political reasons and ban religious practices, but it still doesn't touch the thousands of years of bloodshed in the middle east alone.
#234 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
I completely agree with you on the middle east topic though, that place is a mess for religion in general. It's a shame so many people have died in general there, not just the religious missionaries.
User avatar #237 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"not just the religious missionaries."

Well, yeah, I imagined it would be assumed that we value all human life, even if they're not a missionary.
#239 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
I stated that so that your first thought isn't "He only cares about the missionaries probably" because judging from your other comments, that's most likely your first generalization.
User avatar #240 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Why on earth would that be my first thought?
#176 - I know as a baptist, we go by the idea of "If you don't t…  [+] (11 new replies) 12/17/2014 on archer 0
User avatar #179 - YllekNayr (12/17/2014) [-]
It's good that there are churches that take this approach.
But it's also oftentimes the parents who push for it, even moreso than the church.
#228 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Well there's plenty of over religious, and in general bad parents out there. At least if they get into religion, maybe they'll do their own homework eventually. It's only my opinion, but it's at least not as bad as kids being raised in households that are heavily against religion, because then we're stuck with fedora'd neckbeards who hate religion because their parents did.
User avatar #229 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
That's what we call bias.
And your opinion is grounded in stupid hatred.
#232 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
You're acting as if I actually hate athiests. There's no reason to, but the fact of the matter is, it's not like the only over-zealous households are religious ones. People of all shapes and sizes of stupidity can pop up anywhere, and it isn't only rooted in religious people, but rather the topic of religion itself, that spawns blind zealots.
User avatar #233 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
Anyone who thinks

"at least not as bad as kids being raised in households that are heavily against religion, because then we're stuck with fedora'd neckbeards"

and is being serious, is an idiot.
#235 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Have you never met someone like that? At least a blind religious person has some ounce of knowledge of what they're talking about. Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it.

Blind athiests, on the other hand, don't have to have any knowledge of religion. I've met plenty of people like that. Misquoting bible verses, throwing loaded questions ("If God created the universe, who created God?") and generally not doing there research.

Of course, there are plenty of intelligent athiests who would stomp me in a debate. I'm not intelligent enough to argue with the ones who have done plenty of research, I'd only do harm.
User avatar #236 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
"Surely no one is stupid enough to think they're knowledgeble in their religion without reading into it. "

False false false false false false FALSE. Holy shit, have you never been to the South USA?

AND atheists in general have a greater knowledge of world religions than the religious. Nobody is a "blind atheist" because the de facto position of a newborn is atheist until they decide to become religious.

And your "loaded question" example is full of shit. That's a perfectly valid question that you're handwaving with special pleading (my god doesn't follow basic rules of logic because I said so).

I'll agree with your last line, because that's what you're doing now.
#241 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
OK, I think it's time for me to apologize for being stupid, now that I've calmed down a bit.

Don't consider anything I've said as the word of a real christian. I barely act like one.

Sorry for throwing out bullshit all along the way. I was just angry coming off another bitter gathering of family which ended with my parents reminding me of how shitty I am. Debate a real, intelligent christian sometime. Hopefully they'll be able to give you actual answers, instead of my stupidity.

I'm gonna stop replying now, because I think I've calmed down enough to stop being a raging autist.
User avatar #245 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
I've gone though this whole song and dance before with numerous people, and it really truly does agitate the shit out of me when I meet more people that are stupid enough to actually think there's any connection whatsoever between this idea of a beta neckbeard fedora basement shitlord whatever thing, and atheists.

Because there is none.

It's a stupid internet thing that apparently some people take seriously. And it really boils my blood that people mock the idea of doing NOTHING, because somehow not being part of any of the hundreds of magical fanclubs that have existed throughout history makes you a fat bearded slob for some reason.

Even that fucking quote "in this moment I am enlightened, not because of any phony religions but my own intelligence" or what the fuck ever, was ridiculed by r/atheism. Nobody ever endorsed that garbage, and yet somehow it has become the calling card for anyone insulting an atheist.

It's tiresome as hell, because so many religious debates are filled with intellectually dishonest bullshit, such as special pleading, scare tactics, ad hominem, non-sequitors out the ASS, false dichotomies, and general ignorance, that I have little to no patience for those that base their thoughts of atheists on a fictional idea crafted by religious internet dwellers.

Those kinds of religious people are the worst kind to actually know in real life because of how insufferably smug, self-righteous, bigoted, judgy, and ignorant those sorts of people are.

I'll apologize as well, because my reactions were based on how you HAD been responding, and my previous experience with the kind of people that respond like that. If you'd like to seriously discuss this further, then I'd be more than open to that possibility.
#238 - slayzo (12/18/2014) [-]
Are you trying to say that someone can actually think they're christian without reading the bible? Because I have yet to meet someone that stupid, or even hear about someone that stupid, and it's basically impossible.

How do atheists know religion better than the religious by default, exactly? I don't see know someone who doesn't read the bible can know more than someone who does, over the bible. In fact, as I stated, plenty of non-religious throw out misquotes or misinterpretations. But hey, they know more by default, right?

The thing is, no matter what we say on the loaded question, they'll say "But that's bullshit, you just can't give me an answer" It doesn't matter what we say. Even if we say something like "He doesn't have a physical body unless he gives himself one, i.e. Jesus Christ, he's more like an essence", they'll just say we're pulling things out our ass and he's clearly not real. I say this from experience.

Good job showing off your fedora on the last line there.
User avatar #242 - YllekNayr (12/18/2014) [-]
It's basically far more widespread than it should be.

Never said that. In general, surveyed atheists scored higher than any other group on quizzes concerning world religions. Never said by default.

That's because you're pulling it all out of your ass.

And you prove my point there.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1460 / Total items point value: 2180

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - sergejkarkarov (12/18/2011) [-]
Hey slayzo, I am your secret santa and this is my present to you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded &v=vVkDrIacHJM
 Friends (0)