Login or register


Last status update:
Gender: male
Age: 24
Date Signed Up:1/23/2012
Last Login:12/03/2013
Location:The peninsular state below Georgia
Content Thumbs: 20220 total,  22075 ,  1855
Comment Thumbs: 3568 total,  4490 ,  922
Content Level Progress: 21.3% (213/1000)
Level 220 Content: Mind Blower → Level 221 Content: Mind Blower
Comment Level Progress: 65% (65/100)
Level 235 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Content Views:589680
Times Content Favorited:1072 times
Total Comments Made:1476
FJ Points:23877
Favorite Tags: my (7) | a (5) | the (4) | Big (3) | bitch (3) | is (3) | You (3) | cock (2) | dont (2) | for (2) | fucking (2) | i (2) | lulz (2) | Make (2) | pussy (2) | sword (2) | that (2) | this (2) | why (2)
Let me tell you a story about a glorious Oldfag.

latest user's comments

#49 - Define "a douchebag atheist" Please.  [+] (6 replies) 04/16/2013 on New measuring unit -2
#51 - anon (04/16/2013) [-]
An atheist that acts like a douchebag.
User avatar
#52 - shamefulhumor (04/16/2013) [-]
What makes an atheist seem douche baggy?
User avatar
#103 - felixjarl (04/16/2013) [-]
Someone who is just as annoying or more as than a fundamentalist Christian, they try to ''convert'' you to atheism no mater what.
User avatar
#104 - shamefulhumor (04/16/2013) [-]

In all my time arguing against religion I've never asked that someone "Convert" to anything, nor has any atheist I've talked to or seen on a forum, They simply call the religious on their bullshit, and the bullshit that is their religion.

Something ridiculous deserves ridicule.

Enjoy the handful of pander thumbs you got from the pompously pacifistic (I didn't know that complex could exist but the internet never ceases to amaze me) for using a useless distinction and verifiable false dichotomy.

Not thumbing you down or up. Just poking a few holes in this paper ship.

User avatar
#107 - felixjarl (04/16/2013) [-]
You are self righteous, extremely negative against religion and it seems like you consider it a only ''evil''. You show your abilities and consider yourself hurt even though the discussion was not about you.

Asseist indeed.
User avatar
#108 - shamefulhumor (04/16/2013) [-]
What a rough transition to the ad hominem.

Did i say it was "evil"?


Did I take this personally? Not exactly, The opening statement was not to garner sympathy for myself but rather point out the absurdity of that serious case of false equivalency your statement seems to be riddled with, (convert? I don't know how many spaghetti monster whiteness show up at your door but I'm still waiting for that soliciting attempt).

But it irritates me to no end when someone asserts something without thinking it through, gets called out, and then attempts reduces the conversation to some vague Freudian analysis of intent when their wicker tower of a point starts to crumble.

If you take anything from this, its to be a little less loose with the fightin' words.

Or not, Misguided liberalism and name-calling seem to do wonders for the thumb count, but, this time I wasn't letting it slide.

#259 - /b/, STHAP. 11/25/2012 on >dickfarts +5