Login or register


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 19
Date Signed Up:4/14/2011
Last Login:6/30/2016
Location:South Carolina
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2327
Highest Content Rank:#123
Highest Comment Rank:#9
Content Thumbs: 59599 total,  66147 ,  6548
Comment Thumbs: 130562 total,  141610 ,  11048
Content Level Progress: 42% (420/1000)
Level 254 Content: Contaminated Win → Level 255 Content: Contaminated Win
Comment Level Progress: 15.3% (306/2000)
Level 409 Comments: Transcended → Level 410 Comments: Transcended
Content Views:1454884
Times Content Favorited:3808 times
Total Comments Made:89744
FJ Points:43892
Favorite Tags: is (11) | i (10) | the (9) | u (8) | y (7) | it (6) | like (6) | You (6) | are (5) | do (5) | in (5) | all (4) | and (4) | ASS (4) | dis (4) | Not (4) | of (4) | this (4) | tumblr (4) | comic (3)
My birthday is August 26th
I like new york style pizza and memes

HD Gifs / WebMs

latest user's comments

#2033616 - **** off the edge of my dick you cunt  [+] (1 new reply) 13 hours ago on FJ Backroom 0
User avatar
#2033617 - josuke (13 hours ago) [-]
#180 - Picture 13 hours ago on Applying logic to politics 0
#2033597 - THATS WHY I WENT TO LIVE WITH MOM, DAD  [+] (1 new reply) 13 hours ago on FJ Backroom 0
User avatar
#2033601 - pixxal (13 hours ago) [-]
#2033593 - Everyone's deeeeeeeaaaad. And it's such a crummy day out. Im b…  [+] (7 new replies) 13 hours ago on FJ Backroom 0
#2033619 - plataeiou (13 hours ago) [-]
Did someone say McDonald's?
User avatar
#2033602 - josuke (13 hours ago) [-]
Why go to mackies when you can go get a cheeky nandos with your friend Alex the bishop of banterville?
User avatar
#2033598 - spensy (13 hours ago) [-]
Because Wendy's is betterr
User avatar
#2033595 - guardianatreyu (13 hours ago) [-]
We'll go to Whataburger and you'll like it!
User avatar
#2033594 - pixxal (13 hours ago) [-]
I never took you to McDonald's in the first place
User avatar
#2033597 - seniorawesomesauce (13 hours ago) [-]
User avatar
#2033601 - pixxal (13 hours ago) [-]
#2033583 - oops le no context fac 14 hours ago on FJ Backroom 0
#2033582 - Picture 14 hours ago on FJ Backroom 0
#13 - I dont think El Salvador or Ethiopia is gonna look at these re…  [+] (11 new replies) 06/29/2016 on Feds ain't gettin this +7
#39 - anon (17 hours ago) [-]
how about russia and china teaming up to rape you?
User avatar
#34 - xtas (18 hours ago) [-]
another epic post
#18 - anon (21 hours ago) [-]
Actually we have about 1.3 million soldiers and about 4500 nukes. Now, assuming an average soldier weighs more or less 80kg (probably more, considering their equipment and all), it would take about 1.25 million soldiers to to reach 100 kilotons, which is a common yield for nukes, meaning that we effectively have about 4501 nukes for a total of 450100 kilotons of destructive power.

Now Ethiopia has a population of 94.1 million. Doing some simple mental arithmetic, this comes out to about 7528 kg of destructive power. Therefore, even if the entire population of Ethiopia re-specs into defensive power, they would be unable to thwart a total nuclear invasion by the US. In addition, since an invasion by Ethiopia would require calculation of the total destructive power of the entire population of the US, which is at least 3x that of the entire population of Ethiopia, a nuclear invasion by all of Ethiopia would be completely insufficient to take over.

In conclusion, you are correct. President Ethiopia would have to be a total fool to attempt to get a piece of the pie, especially if he knew how many nukes we have. President China, on the other hand, would totally be able to take our pie if he wasn't so averse to anything that might result in the Chinese people getting food.
#16 - anon (23 hours ago) [-]
More like, "Oh, Americans have a new Railgun\ Missile\ faglauncher that counters all our shit, looks like we need to copy all their tech and invade them with 12 million soldiers to their 1 million, we will win eventually." says the Chinese guy.
User avatar
#15 - thejusticar (06/29/2016) [-]
thanks for leaking that information idiot. Now Guatemala will take over.
#14 - anon (06/29/2016) [-]
But, china, russia, and many places in africa sure do... not those poor as fuck counties either, im talking about those well backed 1trillion dollar net worth drug dealing kind.

Dont get me started on the cartels in South America... might as well say fuck me in the ass
User avatar
#19 - steampoweredbot (20 hours ago) [-]
Any place in Africa, or any of the cartels, pose no threat to the US if they actually engaged in a real war against it.
The US holds all the technological superiority. We control the seas, we control the skies, and we control space.
Heck, even the September Eleventh attack, which was the largest attack since Pearl Harbor (I think the Towers actually resulted in more lives lost, but Pearl Harbor resulted in a larger loss in terms of military), killed less than 3000 people.

America, as it stands, cannot be successfully attacked through any military means. Her attacks on others can be defended against, since defense is always much easier, but that's about it.
User avatar
#38 - esioh (17 hours ago) [-]
are you retarded?
User avatar
#61 - steampoweredbot (13 hours ago) [-]
Great argument. When you don't have any reasonable counterpoint, just insult the person. It's the best strategy.
User avatar
#77 - esioh (4 hours ago) [-]
That rather pointed question was merely the hors d'oeuvre, to see if you were still interested in the argument, as it were. However it was unnecessarily partisan and for that I apologize. However, I fear you have missed Anon's points entirely. You claim that Africa, China, Russia etc wouldn't have a shadow of a hope against America because of their lack of technology and training, however Anon's argument was, if all of America's information, military and civilian was declassified, then these countries would be able to copy American tech, discover American weaknesses, and then launch devastating strikes. You merely appear to have missed that point.

jolly sorry for the retard jab old chap, just wanted a good bit of banter is all
User avatar
#30 - masanori (19 hours ago) [-]
And honestly the only reason defense against the US is manageable is the ridiculous ROE we have to abide by. If it came down to just levelling one another mercilessly it would be a slaughter.
#30 - you can be well mannered while still having a wealthy childhoo…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/29/2016 on Who you vote for is your... +6
User avatar
#65 - sagedivinity (12 hours ago) [-]
Trump, however, is not well mannered.
#66 - you're ******* autistic 06/29/2016 on Purge +2
#25 - >satoasami >putting even the tiniest bit of effort i… 06/29/2016 on Applying logic to politics -1