Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

sagedivinity    

Rank #12056 on Comments
sagedivinity Avatar Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to sagedivinity Block sagedivinity Invite sagedivinity to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:8/16/2012
Last Login:11/23/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#12056
Highest Content Rank:#13767
Highest Comment Rank:#2349
Content Thumbs: 4 total,  4 ,  8
Comment Thumbs: 3120 total,  3718 ,  598
Content Level Progress: 1.69% (1/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:837
Total Comments Made:2498
FJ Points:3079

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

latest user's comments

#86 - I'm not sure if you're joking or not but they weren't consider… 16 hours ago on Le-Tit 0
#63 - Don't, it's all so terrible and I thought the Boondocks in gen… 16 hours ago on The Vinyl Ass 0
#74 - Wow  [+] (1 new reply) 17 hours ago on Then stop being so killable +3
User avatar #80 - rokkarokkaali (16 hours ago) [-]
What are the odds?
10%
#7 - What? 18 hours ago on sagedivinity's profile 0
#154 - I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree… 20 hours ago on Love this guy 0
#152 - I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Li…  [+] (2 new replies) 21 hours ago on Love this guy 0
#153 - bluemagebrilly (21 hours ago) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (20 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#150 - Again, you don't know that for a fact? Nintendo had input, tha…  [+] (4 new replies) 23 hours ago on Love this guy 0
#151 - bluemagebrilly (23 hours ago) [-]
Uh.. I /do/ know that for a fact, actually? I've already pointed out how they did. They didn't put in a /lot/ of input, but they did do that.

Either way, my point wasn't that Nintendo made the game and now it's theirs, I'm saying they fully supported the creation of the game and put their label on it. The creators of the game practically work beside Nintendo now, as do the rest of the employees.

The original point is that despite the claims that Nintendo just wants to do the same thing over and over, they were willing to put Bayonetta, which is completely different from the rest of their games, onto their console and then smack their label and support on it. Again, I was never saying they made it themselves, but they helped its creation.
User avatar #152 - sagedivinity (21 hours ago) [-]
I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Life proves that Nintendo hates gay people because they released the game.
#153 - bluemagebrilly (21 hours ago) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (20 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#148 - Everyone else said no? That's a lie. You me to tell me that st…  [+] (6 new replies) 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0
#149 - bluemagebrilly (11/22/2014) [-]
Let me rephrase and say everyone they asked said no, then. Because they wanted their game on a console, it was made with a controller in mind. Nintendo wasn't the first to respond, however. They asked to be on Xbox and Playstation again, trying to get a 'partner' for the game so they could make it exactly as they wanted. They didn't just need a place to put it, they needed support to get it done and Nintendo was willing to do that.

I think we can definitely credit them for it because they put in some input and the game wouldn't exist without them, at least not for a long time.
User avatar #150 - sagedivinity (23 hours ago) [-]
Again, you don't know that for a fact? Nintendo had input, that's probably true but again baseless. I'm saying you have no way of knowing for sure. What we do know for sure is that Bayonetta isn't Nintendo's game. They didn't make it.
#151 - bluemagebrilly (23 hours ago) [-]
Uh.. I /do/ know that for a fact, actually? I've already pointed out how they did. They didn't put in a /lot/ of input, but they did do that.

Either way, my point wasn't that Nintendo made the game and now it's theirs, I'm saying they fully supported the creation of the game and put their label on it. The creators of the game practically work beside Nintendo now, as do the rest of the employees.

The original point is that despite the claims that Nintendo just wants to do the same thing over and over, they were willing to put Bayonetta, which is completely different from the rest of their games, onto their console and then smack their label and support on it. Again, I was never saying they made it themselves, but they helped its creation.
User avatar #152 - sagedivinity (21 hours ago) [-]
I still have to disagree. That's like saying that Tomodachi Life proves that Nintendo hates gay people because they released the game.
#153 - bluemagebrilly (21 hours ago) [-]
..? I have no idea what you're talking about now. I think you're getting an idea that I'm not saying. Plus, I don't even know if that game was supported by Nintendo. There's a difference between putting it on their console and putting their label on it.

I also have no idea what you mean by Tomodachi Life proving anything...

But we can agree to disagree, though I feel we're still on two different subjects. Something I am saying, or something you're skimming over, seems to make you think I'm saying Nintendo made the game, when I'm only saying they supported its creation fully and put their label on it.
User avatar #154 - sagedivinity (20 hours ago) [-]
I'm pretty sure I understand what your saying. I just disagree with you. You seem to think that Nintendo funding Bayonetta means they are willing to do something new, right? I disagree with that. So I drew a comparison to Tomodachi Life.

If Nintendo funding Bayonetta 2 means they are willing to break out of their mold and make new games then Nintendo supporting Tomodachi Life means they are opposed to homosexuality. I don't think either are true, though.

By the way, even if Bayonetta 2 somehow proved Nintendo capable of making something new that wouldn't entirely disprove the statement I made in the first comment. Of course, occasionally they release something that isn't a sequel, remake, HD remaster, or based off an established character or franchise, look at Splatoon. I'm saying they rely far too heavily on those things for their games to the point that if you took it all away they'd be a dead company,
#147 - I agree. 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0
#146 - And those are in the minority. I don't automatically hate any … 11/22/2014 on Love this guy 0

user's friends

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2350

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #5 - soundofwinter (06/22/2014) [-]
stickied by sagedivinity
**** you
User avatar #6 - garymotherfingoak ONLINE (18 hours ago) [-]
#6 get
User avatar #7 to #6 - sagedivinity (18 hours ago) [-]
What?
 Friends (0)